On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 10:10:16AM -0700, Diana Eichert wrote:
Chuckle, try to troubleshoot a network issue when it is in a
virtual network. Lots of fun, not.
diana
Better yet, get told by management NOT to troubleshoot but let the
outsourcers do it. While your whole hospital is down for 7
2010/1/13 Ciprian Dorin, Craciun ciprian.crac...@gmail.com:
3.) Many of the benefits you gain by running a stable and secure
operating system like OpenBSD are lost when you run it as a guest on
top of some other insecure host operating system.
This is only true if either:
* there is a
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 2:08 AM, Eric Furman ericfur...@fastmail.net wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 08:31 +0200, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
ciprian.crac...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, but you guys from OpenBSD have proved that you can trust
the skills of **some** developers to write an __supposed__
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 08:31:14AM +0200, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun wrote:
Sorry, but you guys from OpenBSD have proved that you can trust
the skills of **some** developers
viz., precisely those developers that are telling you to not trust
the virtualization hype/crap. So, why not trust those
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 08:55:33AM +0200, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Bret S. Lambert bret.lamb...@gmail.com
wrote:
How did lazy internet denizen gets told he's lazy turn into
anything worth spending this much time on?
I would like to personally
Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us writes:
I have seen people virtualize a file server and domain controller on a
single machine. Which is awesome because now you get free 30% loss of
IO performance. You know it keeps bandwidth use lower and latency
higher. Exactly what lusers like.
Oh,
Of course it didn't! What they should have done was put the backup
server on the same VM!!! Problem solved!
On 1/13/10, Peter N. M. Hansteen pe...@bsdly.net wrote:
Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us writes:
I have seen people virtualize a file server and domain controller on a
single
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:41:15AM +0200, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun wrote:
* any other options??? (anyone???)
If you are looking at OpenBSD in a production environment as
a firewall, ssl accelerator, or for protection from OS privilege
escalation when someone else finds and uses an exploit in
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 07:54:46AM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
Virtualization is a toy sold as an enterprise solution. The argument
goes like this: you need a domain controller and sequel server so you
need 2 machines. So instead of paying for 2 machines you virtualize
them!
Chuckle, try to troubleshoot a network issue when it is in a
virtual network. Lots of fun, not.
diana
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 1:31 AM, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
ciprian.crac...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, but you guys from OpenBSD have proved that you can trust
the skills of **some** developers to write an __supposed__ perfectly
secure operating system, so why not trust other developers to write
a
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Vadkan Jozsef jozsi.avad...@gmail.com wrote:
Can I run obsd as a xen guest?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Can+I+run+obsd+as+a+xen+guest
The internet: you're doing it wrong.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Bret Lambert bret.lamb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Vadkan Jozsef jozsi.avad...@gmail.com
wrote:
Can I run obsd as a xen guest?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Can+I+run+obsd+as+a+xen+guest
The internet: you're doing it wrong.
Hello
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
ciprian.crac...@gmail.com wrote:
[snipz0rz]
So I bet that the initial poster expected an (authoritative) answer
that should have came in the form of an advice based on experience or
at least something useful... (Not lmgtfy, which I'm
On 08:59, Tue 12 Jan 10, Vadkan Jozsef wrote:
Can I run obsd as a xen guest?
under 'full' virtualisation, yes.
under para-virtualisation, no.
--
Michiel van Baak
mich...@vanbaak.eu
http://michiel.vanbaak.eu
GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x71C946BD
Why is it drug
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 10:41:15 +0200 Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
ciprian.crac...@gmail.com wrote:
So I bet that the initial poster expected an (authoritative) answer
that should have came in the form of an advice based on experience or
at least something useful... (Not lmgtfy, which I'm sure he
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:43 AM, J.C. Roberts list-...@designtools.org
wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 10:41:15 +0200 Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
ciprian.crac...@gmail.com wrote:
B B So I bet that the initial poster expected an (authoritative) answer
that should have came in the form of an advice
How did lazy internet denizen gets told he's lazy turn into
anything worth spending this much time on?
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Bret S. Lambert bret.lamb...@gmail.com wrote:
How did lazy internet denizen gets told he's lazy turn into
anything worth spending this much time on?
I would like to personally apologize for criticizing you, Bret, of
lmgtfy the other guy (which I didn't knew
* Ciprian Dorin, Craciun ciprian.crac...@gmail.com [2010-01-13 07:37]:
This is only true if either:
* there is a security bug in the virtualization software (highly
improbable, and maybe easibly fixed);
i owuld pee my pants (or maybe bob's instead) laughing if it wasn't so
sad. it is
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 08:31 +0200, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
ciprian.crac...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:43 AM, J.C. Roberts list-...@designtools.org
wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 10:41:15 +0200 Ciprian Dorin, Craciun
ciprian.crac...@gmail.com wrote:
B B So I bet that the initial
21 matches
Mail list logo
