Jaap Bosman said:
> In man mail(1) it is not clear to me that mail(1) is not for use outside
> a local network.
Strictly speaking mail(1) is not for use over network at all: it reads
local mailbox and sends mail via MTA. It does not do networking on its
own.
> Why do I want to use mail(1) as an
Thank you all so much for your answers.
In man mail(1) it is not clear to me that mail(1) is not for use outside
a local network.
In http://openbsd.das.ufsc.br/nl/mail.html
It says:
" Many subscribers and developers read their mail on text-based mailers
(mail(1), emacs, Mutt) "
I do understand
G'day Eric,
On 2016-02-26 Fri 14:52 PM |, Eric Furman wrote:
>
> What Nick was trying to say was, "If you do not understand internet
> e-mail from end-to-end please do not run an e-mail server."
Yes.
> There is a lot more to it than just installing some packages.
Yes, he'll need at least:
*)
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
But it's shit [pipes in mail(1)]. You cannot say "rawpipe" etc.
It is not flexible, not configurable, it is dumb and cannot really be
used for anything real,
It is very flexible. The inflated programs with cool features do not
allow you to use the
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
> But it's shit. You cannot say "rawpipe" etc. It is not flexible,
> not configurable, it is dumb and cannot really be used for
> anything real, except by outer intelligence (like signature mark
> lines which an
Fri, 26 Feb 2016 22:25:41 +0200 cho...@jtan.com
> Eric Furman writes:
> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016, at 09:22 AM, Артур Истомин wrote:
> > > With this approach, we will have only one email provider. His name is
> > > Google.
> > > Spam and other black sides of today email system is price we pay for
> >
Roderick wrote:
|On Fri, 26 Feb 2016, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|>|client I feel like. mail(1) was a bit too tedious and limited for
typical
|>|use.
|>
|> Unfortunately i (as the maintainer of the source) have to agree.
|> So it is. Especially regarding interactive use: no
I wrote:
What is not clear to me, is, if mail (1) for sending emails always
do smptp to localhost:25 (or :587?) , if one can change this. Perhaps
there is something to do.
It was a lapsus. I knew the solution.
mail (1) uses sendmail. And I did configure sendmail to use gmail smtp.
There is
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|client I feel like. mail(1) was a bit too tedious and limited for typical
|use.
Unfortunately i (as the maintainer of the source) have to agree.
So it is. Especially regarding interactive use: no way to access
message MIME parts directly, and no
Артур Истомин wrote:
|On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 07:54:20PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
|> On 02/25/16 17:01, Jaap Bosman wrote:
|>> Hallo, I would like to use mail(1) for email client.
Hallo!
|> No, really, you don't.
It may be that he is right, you know.
But if you
"trondd" wrote:
|On Fri, February 26, 2016 10:55 am, Joel wrote:
|> Unfortunately, it isn't in the ports tree, but there is a slightly
|> updated version of mail called heirloom-mail.
That is heirloom-mailx.
|s-nail is a fork and is in ports. I went through this
Eric Furman writes:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016, at 09:22 AM, Артур Истомин wrote:
> > With this approach, we will have only one email provider. His name is
> > Google.
> > Spam and other black sides of today email system is price we pay for
> > decentralized system. And it's worth it.
>
> What Nick
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016, at 09:22 AM, Артур Истомин wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 07:54:20PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
> > On 02/25/16 17:01, Jaap Bosman wrote:
> > > Hallo, I would like to use mail(1) for email client.
> >
> > No, really, you don't.
> >
> > > In man mail(1) I read nothing about
On Fri, February 26, 2016 10:55 am, Joel wrote:
> Unfortunately, it isn't in the ports tree, but there is a slightly
> updated version of mail called heirloom-mail.
s-nail is a fork and is in ports. I went through this same exercise and
quickly switched to IMAP so I can read my mail from
Unfortunately, it isn't in the ports tree, but there is a slightly
updated version of mail called heirloom-mail. It can do IMAP and also
authenticate for outgoing mail. I think it would compile on OpenBSD
without much effort.
--Joel
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:02:13PM +0100, Jaap Bosman wrote:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 07:54:20PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
> On 02/25/16 17:01, Jaap Bosman wrote:
> > Hallo, I would like to use mail(1) for email client.
>
> No, really, you don't.
>
> > In man mail(1) I read nothing about configure mail to send and receive
> > email from outside. I would
Jaap Bosman wrote:
>Hallo, I would like to use mail(1) for email client. [...]
>I guess email addresses have to be listed somewhere? where? How?
>ISP adresses and POP or whatever should be listed somewhere?
POP is obsolete. Instead you want to use IMAP to read emails from
your ISP and SMTP to
Hi Jaap,
On 2016-02-25 Thu 23:02 PM |, Jaap Bosman wrote:
> Hallo, I would like to use mail(1) for email client.
> In man mail(1) I read nothing about configure mail to send and receive
> email from outside.
It reads mail that is already on the machine it is on.
See the man page's -f flag and
On 02/25/16 17:01, Jaap Bosman wrote:
> Hallo, I would like to use mail(1) for email client.
No, really, you don't.
> In man mail(1) I read nothing about configure mail to send and receive
> email from outside. I would like to find how to configure mail(1).
Step 1: you need to read the first
http://www.openbsd.org/opensmtpd/faq/example1.html
Original Message
Subject: how to send email via Mail
Local Time: February 25, 2016 10:02 pm
UTC Time: February 25, 2016 10:02 PM
From: j...@xs4all.nl
To: misc@openbsd.org
Hallo, I would like to use mail(1) for email client
Hallo, I would like to use mail(1) for email client.
In man mail(1) I read nothing about configure mail to send and receive
email from outside. I would like to find how to configure mail(1).
I guess email addresses have to be listed somewhere? where? How?
ISP adresses and POP or whatever should be
21 matches
Mail list logo