Re: snapshot packages

On 2022-07-23, not jacinda ardern wrote: > Is there a way to see the build status of the different architectures > for snapshot packages, eg via a continuous integration pipeline or > somesuch No > I noticed that the current snapshots seem to have moved to libz-7.0 in > th

Re: Potential mirror sync issue with snapshot packages

Ricky Cintron wrote: > Before upgrading my -current system Saturday evening (Jan. 22), I noticed that > the snapshot packages for amd64 were partially synced. The first half are from > the 21st, while the second half are from the 20th. I checked the Fastly cdn, > the >

Re: french amd64 snapshot packages mirrors not synced

Antoine Jacoutot @ 17-02-2019 10:11 CET: Thanks, syncing should resume soon. This was due to a stuck job that filled the disk. Thank you very much. Cheers. -fredg

Re: french amd64 snapshot packages mirrors not synced

On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 07:52:12AM +0100, Fred. GALUSIK wrote: > Hi, > > In case nobody noticed, french mirrors are stucked on January, the 31. > > http://ftp.fr.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/amd64/ > http://ftp2.fr.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/amd64/ > > While many

french amd64 snapshot packages mirrors not synced

Hi, In case nobody noticed, french mirrors are stucked on January, the 31. http://ftp.fr.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/amd64/ http://ftp2.fr.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/amd64/ While many have synced a couple of times since. Last one is on February, the 15 :

Re: pointing installurl to current snapshot packages path does not work

Dear Sir, seriously sorry for any noise I may have caused today. It has been a complete oversight on my part. I did search actually the wrong locations in this case. Searching the forums and also the mailing list. In stead i have should have not only looked at the man page of installurl but as

Re: pointing installurl to current snapshot packages path does not work

Completely intentional. Snapshots convert into released mode, but not all the parts are released yet. Release happens when enough parts are built. When you encountered this problem, did you read the manual pages to look for a solution? Why not? > I installed today via usb the latest snapshot

Re: pointing installurl to current snapshot packages path does not work

One point of information, I'm pretty sure I'm wrong in what I said here: > Keep installurl set to the snapshots directory of the mirror. Not only does that not make sense, but if you installed via http that shouldn't need to be changed while using the snapshot. The -Dsnap flag should be all you

Re: pointing installurl to current snapshot packages path does not work

thank you for your kind support. I notice that i should have better read the man pages and also see that in recent other thread these options have been raised too. Again, my humble thanks to this awsome community. eelco On 10/7/17, Dave Voutila wrote: > > Make sure you’re

Re: pointing installurl to current snapshot packages path does not work

eelco van der vlugt wrote: > https://ftp.eu.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/6.2/amd64/ is not found It's not found because it doesn't exist. 6.2 will apparently be released in a week, for now you can play with PKG_PATH environment variable as described in pkg_add(1). -- caóc

Re: pointing installurl to current snapshot packages path does not work

Make sure you’re using the -Dsnap flag on pkg_add and pkg_info. Keep installurl set to the snapshots directory of the mirror. > On Oct 7, 2017, at 9:10 AM, eelco van der vlugt wrote: > > Hello, > > I installed today via usb the latest snapshot > 2017-Oct-04 03:45 from >

pointing installurl to current snapshot packages path does not work

Hello, I installed today via usb the latest snapshot > 2017-Oct-04 03:45 from leaseweb. When setting up I chose disk as install medium, so have no installurl set up at the beginning. Now i am trying to set up installurl so i can get latest packages. I have tried following in installurl > 1

Re: Crash in gnome-control-center on latest amd64 snapshot / packages

Mike, Thanks for letting me know it got stripped out. I was worried about that given the size. Here's a link to the corefile: https://www.sendspace.com/file/cb1hpt The application is working well on my Thinkpad x220 and this is the first time I've ever been able to get things going this far

Re: Crash in gnome-control-center on latest amd64 snapshot / packages

Bryan C. Everly wrote: > Hi, > > I've managed to get Gnome running on a Macbook Pro Retina 13 (Macbook 11,1) > and all seems well with some exceptions. The primary among them is a crash > of gnome-control-center on startup. > > When I run it from the terminal, I get a "Floating point exception"

Crash in gnome-control-center on latest amd64 snapshot / packages

Hi, I've managed to get Gnome running on a Macbook Pro Retina 13 (Macbook 11,1) and all seems well with some exceptions. The primary among them is a crash of gnome-control-center on startup. When I run it from the terminal, I get a "Floating point exception" and gdb shows: Program received

Re: Crash in gnome-control-center on latest amd64 snapshot / packages

On 2015-11-29, Bryan C. Everly wrote: > Mike, > > Thanks for letting me know it got stripped out. I was worried about that > given the size. Here's a link to the corefile: > > https://www.sendspace.com/file/cb1hpt core files by themselves aren't all that useful, run

Re: Crash in gnome-control-center on latest amd64 snapshot / packages

Mike, Interestingly enough, when I tried building control-center from source with debug on, it crashed part of the way through running /usr/bin/awk (how's that for weird). Same story - floating point exception. The specific command being ran was: awk -f "./xsldoc.awk"

Re: Chromium in the latest snapshot packages

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 04:19:42PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: | It's typical for a few ports to fail during a snapshot build. | Usually because of changes in the ports tree, sometimes because of | changes in base, sometimes just because a particular port doesn't | build reliably. | |

Re: Chromium in the latest snapshot packages

On 2015-06-22, Christian Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de wrote: The chromium build is very brittle and fails frequently in quasi-random ways. During the latest amd64 snapshot build, chromium errored out twice, in slightly different ways. I've uploaded new amd64 packages (Jun 25) that include

Re: Chromium in the latest snapshot packages

Thanks so much for letting me know. I appreciate it. I'll try a from source build and see how far I get. From talking to my friends on the openJDK project it sounds challenging but what the heck - never hurts to try. Thanks, Bryan On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Christian Weisgerber

Re: Chromium in the latest snapshot packages

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 02:58:37PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: On 2015-06-22, Bryan C. Everly br...@bceassociates.com wrote: I wiped and re-loaded my laptop over the weekend with the latest snapshots and noticed that Chromium isn't in the amd64 snapshot package directory on any of

Re: Chromium in the latest snapshot packages

On 2015-06-22, Bryan C. Everly br...@bceassociates.com wrote: I wiped and re-loaded my laptop over the weekend with the latest snapshots and noticed that Chromium isn't in the amd64 snapshot package directory on any of the mirrors I checked. Is there currently a problem with the build on

Re: Chromium in the latest snapshot packages

Anything I can do to help diagnose the problem? Thanks, Bryan On Jun 22, 2015, at 3:24 PM, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote: On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 02:58:37PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: On 2015-06-22, Bryan C. Everly br...@bceassociates.com wrote: I wiped and re-loaded my laptop

Re: Chromium in the latest snapshot packages

It's possible that it's due to the recent controversy over the hello google blob --- “Lanie, I’m going to print more printers. Lots more printers. One for everyone. That’s worth going to jail for. That’s worth anything.” - Printcrime by Cory Doctrow Please avoid sending me Word or

Chromium in the latest snapshot packages

Hello all, I wiped and re-loaded my laptop over the weekend with the latest snapshots and noticed that Chromium isn't in the amd64 snapshot package directory on any of the mirrors I checked. Is there currently a problem with the build on that or should I bit the bullet and build from source?

Re: Collision with dbus-daemon-launch-helper and latest snapshot/packages

On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 09:59:08AM -0400, Jason Crawford wrote: Hello all, I updated to the latest snapshot (dmesg below) and when trying to update my packages to the lastest from ftp.eu.openbsd.org, I get: quirks-2.61 signed on 2015-04-05T21:43:07Z Collision in

Re: Collision with dbus-daemon-launch-helper and latest snapshot/packages

On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 04:29:29PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote: On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 09:59:08AM -0400, Jason Crawford wrote: Hello all, I updated to the latest snapshot (dmesg below) and when trying to update my packages to the lastest from ftp.eu.openbsd.org, I get: quirks-2.61

Collision with dbus-daemon-launch-helper and latest snapshot/packages

Hello all, I updated to the latest snapshot (dmesg below) and when trying to update my packages to the lastest from ftp.eu.openbsd.org, I get: quirks-2.61 signed on 2015-04-05T21:43:07Z Collision in dbus-daemon-launch-helper-1.8.16: the following files already exist

Re: Collision with dbus-daemon-launch-helper and latest snapshot/packages

Thanks for the quick response. Glad to know my system isn't randomly busted. On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote: On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 09:59:08AM -0400, Jason Crawford wrote: Hello all, I updated to the latest snapshot (dmesg below) and when trying to update

Re: Collision with dbus-daemon-launch-helper and latest snapshot/packages

Collision in dbus-daemon-launch-helper-1.8.16: the following files already exist /usr/local/libexec/dbus-daemon-launch-helper (dbus-1.8.16v0 and dbus-daemon-launch-helper-1.8.16) I've deleted this file, updated again and all went well. On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Jason Crawford

Re: Collision with dbus-daemon-launch-helper and latest snapshot/packages

Giving feedback, here's the original file that I've moved to ~ and new file that was created after the pkg_add -u original -rwsr-x--- 1 root _dbus 295096 Mar 20 00:56 /root/dbus-daemon-launch-helper new -rwsr-x--- 1 root _dbus 295096 Apr 4 12:59

m88k architecture has no snapshot packages

not sure what the correct course of rectifying this is; whether the INSTALL.$arch file should say m68k (I'm not familiar with these architectures) or whether there is simply no snapshot packages for m88k (there are release packages). However I felt it best to bring it to the attention of the group

Re: m88k architecture has no snapshot packages

the correct course of rectifying this is; whether the INSTALL.$arch file should say m68k (I'm not familiar with these architectures) or whether there is simply no snapshot packages for m88k (there are release packages). However I felt it best to bring it to the attention of the group

Re: Latest snapshot packages: Interloper?

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 01:34:47PM +1000, Rod Whitworth wrote: On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 18:28:10 -0400, STeve Andre' wrote: On 06/19/11 18:19, Rod Whitworth wrote: This popped up as the first file (in name order) when I went to see if there was a new bunch of pkgs to go with the install iso I'm

Latest snapshot packages: Interloper?

This popped up as the first file (in name order) when I went to see if there was a new bunch of pkgs to go with the install iso I'm downloading: ftp://ftp.ca.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/i386/.marathonin finity-0.0.20090509p0.tgz.RrgZXP WTF? Enquiring minds and all that ***

Re: Latest snapshot packages: Interloper?

On 06/19/11 18:19, Rod Whitworth wrote: This popped up as the first file (in name order) when I went to see if there was a new bunch of pkgs to go with the install iso I'm downloading: ftp://ftp.ca.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/i386/.marathonin finity-0.0.20090509p0.tgz.RrgZXP

Re: Latest snapshot packages: Interloper?

On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 18:28:10 -0400, STeve Andre' wrote: On 06/19/11 18:19, Rod Whitworth wrote: This popped up as the first file (in name order) when I went to see if there was a new bunch of pkgs to go with the install iso I'm downloading:

Re: snapshot packages?

On Oct 14 15:18:49, frantisek holop wrote: hmm, on Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 03:02:42PM +0200, Jan Stary said that Snapshots and snapshot packages move forward all the time, unlike your installed system. If you have a system that provides libcurses.so.10.0, and (a new version