Joe Gibbens wrote:
Thanks for the reply Janne.
So my only way to run a process over 1GB in size is a custom kernel? Is
Yes, as of now, on i386.
there an easier way to run a large cache with a process size over 1GB?
You can do other things aswell, like bumping cachepct to ~12 with
Hi,
Reading Through
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amd64#FreeBSD
under OpenBSD it says
2004. Complete in-tree support for the platform was achieved prior to
the hardware's initial release due to AMD's loaning of several
machines for the project's hackathon that year. OpenBSD developers
have
Hi!
I'm running OpenBSD 3.9 GENERIC as a NAT router.
If I add the reassemble tcp option to my scrub rule in pf.conf,
I have trouble connecting to some sites, particulary ebay (ebay.de,
ebay.at and ebay.com as well as e.g. kaufen.ebay.de) and
some other few sites, from a machine behind the NAT
Walter Haidinger([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 2006.07.19 12:28:52 +:
Hi!
I'm running OpenBSD 3.9 GENERIC as a NAT router.
If I add the reassemble tcp option to my scrub rule in pf.conf,
I have trouble connecting to some sites, particulary ebay (ebay.de,
ebay.at and ebay.com as well as e.g.
Karel Kulhavy wrote:
The icecast.xml.dist in Icecast is containing nonexisting directories - maybe
it's intended for the user to fill in, maybe it's just forgotten.
The way it is right now is intended, see
/usr/local/share/doc/icecast/README.OpenBSD
Yeah ... I'll fix the grammar in the
Which web mail package is easiest to install and use on
OpenBSD? Are there any gaping security holes?
Eric Johnson
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
This sounds like a MTU problem. Either those sites are blocking
Unlikely. I have cable, not a PPTP/PPPoE link. Therefore, no packet
encapsulation. I'm aware of the MTU issue with ADSL.
ICMP-frag-needed messages or you are.
I think I am. _Only_
I understand what you are saying about this not being an OpenBSD or a
raidframe problem. I will try that tool you pointed me to and see what it
says. Will it permanently mark the blocks as bad? If the worst happens I'm
going to have to rebuild the system, but I don't want it to use those
Siju George wrote:
...
so does this mean that W^X support was available on EM64T
processorseven before XD bit was added if you use OpenBSD?
Sure it was...IF you ran OpenBSD/i386 on it.
If you ran OpenBSD/amd64, no.
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2004-02/2145.html
Hi list,
Not terribly important, but I have a problem with the netload panel
plugin for Xfce4. It shows the in/out rates for my interfaces (vr
re) on my amd64 machine, but on my i386 Vaio laptop with an fxp
interface it always shows no traffic. It is able to figure out the IP
number for the
http://www.squirrelmail.org/
May be not easiest to install, because of specific PHP requirements,
but manageable. Haven't heard about security problems much, and also
don't really know of any good alternative.
Thanks,
Pawel.
Eric Johnson wrote:
Which web mail package is easiest to install
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 03:40:50PM +0100, Andreas Kahari wrote:
Hi list,
Not terribly important, but I have a problem with the netload panel
plugin for Xfce4. It shows the in/out rates for my interfaces (vr
re) on my amd64 machine, but on my i386 Vaio laptop with an fxp
interface it
I regularly use nload on Linux to get a quick and dirty view of how much
bandwidth something is using.
It doesn't seem to be in stock 3.9, and I can't find it in ports either.
Fair enough, it's not there.
But a quick google reveals that back in November 2002 it was being
worked on as a port
On 7/19/06, Richard Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I regularly use nload on Linux to get a quick and dirty view of how much
bandwidth something is using.
It doesn't seem to be in stock 3.9, and I can't find it in ports either.
Fair enough, it's not there.
But a quick google reveals that back
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 07:22:13AM -0500, Eric Johnson wrote:
Which web mail package is easiest to install and use on
OpenBSD? Are there any gaping security holes?
Eric Johnson
http://www.squirrelmail.org/
// gsoares
Eric Johnson wrote:
Which web mail package is easiest to install and use on
OpenBSD? Are there any gaping security holes?
Eric Johnson
I've been using the sendmail (configured for Internet use) that was part
of the OBSD 3.7 install on my two servers for the past 6 months, with
zero
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 04:34:49PM +0100, Richard Wilson wrote:
Did it ever make it in? Might it at some point? Possibly a better
question, is there something similar/better already there?
$ cd /usr/ports make search key='bandwidth.*monitor'
Port: bwm-ng-0.5p0
Path:
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, Eric Johnson wrote:
Which web mail package is easiest to install and use on
OpenBSD? Are there any gaping security holes?
Ilohamail works for me and in my opinion it's better
than Squirrelmail. There is a demo version on the
site. If you have a working (IMAP/POP3) server
Thanks for the off list replies I got. I suspect this was a driver issue as
it's working on 3.9 after spending all day reinstalling the firewalls.
Ashley
--
If you do it the stupid way, you will have to do it again
- Gregory Chudnovsky
2006/7/18, Bryan Irvine [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I would like recommendations on solutions like Plesk for OpenBSD.
AFAIK plesk runs on OpenBSD. If you are looking for something free, I
think there is only webmin.
--Bryan
Try VHCS for something free and i know cpanel with WHM run on FreeBSD,
http://www.roundcube.net/
It is pretty new still, but I replaced SquirrelMail with it because
SquirrelMail is terrible. People seemed to like the change. Very simple to
configure, and it's pretty.
-Kian
On 7/19/06, Bachman Kharazmi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/ pkg_info
Hi,
is any 'good' web based ftp client around which can run in chrooted Apache?
Thanks for your help
George
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, Andreas Kahari wrote:
Not terribly important, but I have a problem with the netload panel
plugin for Xfce4. It shows the in/out rates for my interfaces (vr
re) on my amd64 machine, but on my i386 Vaio laptop with an fxp
interface it always shows no traffic. It is able to
one problem though, it doesn't support the maildir format :-(
George
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 06:59:06PM +0200, Bachman Kharazmi wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/ pkg_info
ftp://ftp.stacken.kth.se/pub/OpenBSD/3.9/packages/i386/openwebmail-2.51.tgz
Information for
2006/7/19, Bachman Kharazmi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/ pkg_info
ftp://ftp.stacken.kth.se/pub/OpenBSD/3.9/packages/i386/openwebmail-2.51.tgz
Information for
ftp://ftp.stacken.kth.se/pub/OpenBSD/3.9/packages/i386/openwebmail-2.51.tgz
Comment:
highly configurable webmail client
not that I know of, but it would take about 20 minutes to write in PHP[1].
[1] or the language of your choice.
--Bryan
On 7/19/06, FTP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
is any 'good' web based ftp client around which can run in chrooted Apache?
Thanks for your help
George
On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 00:05:25 +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote...
You should a) use grep -C and b) check out 3.9 or -current ;)
Yea I'm on 3.7-RELEASE still. ugh.
[1]: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-cvsm=112930507105045w=2
Aw damn, that's nice! Thanks todd@
- Eric
On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 19:22:00 +0200, FTP wrote...
is any 'good' web based ftp client around which can run in chrooted Apache?
Runs in chroot'ed apachehrmm...methinks you are new to all of this,
right? Maybe you should contact your local sysadmin and ask him the explain
how things work
Hi I'm looking for clue. Does anyone have any?
-p
--
Here my ticker tape .signature My name is Peter Philipp lynx -dump
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pufferfisholdid=20768394; | sed -n
131,136p There is no such thing as a certified security specialist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jul 19, 2006, at 8:48 AM, Scott Francis wrote:
On 7/18/06, R. Tyler Ballance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy,
I'm working on debugging a quirky bug (aren't they all) when using an
OpenBSD NFS client with a FreeBSD NFS server, I'm certain it's
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 12:43:39PM -0500, Eric Pancer wrote:
On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 19:22:00 +0200, FTP wrote...
is any 'good' web based ftp client around which can run in chrooted Apache?
Runs in chroot'ed apachehrmm...methinks you are new to all of this,
right? Maybe you should
On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 20:21:01 +0200, Peter Philipp wrote...
Hi I'm looking for clue. Does anyone have any?
Hey, aren't you the idiot that kept renegotiating your DHCP lease?
There's no clue here for you to find; we don't speak Martian.
- Eric
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 08:21:01PM +0200, Peter Philipp wrote:
Hi I'm looking for clue. Does anyone have any?
Given your recent questions, I would suggest further reading on Threat
Modeling and specifically Attack Trees.
--
Darrin Chandler| Phoenix BSD Users Group
[EMAIL
On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 20:27:52 +0200, FTP wrote...
the browser itself is only for anonymous ftp :-( I actually wanted FTP
over HTTP
Browser can do authenticated FTP. Please consult your documentation, this is
not an OpenBSD problem.
- Eric
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 11:33:16AM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote:
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 08:21:01PM +0200, Peter Philipp wrote:
Hi I'm looking for clue. Does anyone have any?
Given your recent questions, I would suggest further reading on Threat
Modeling and specifically Attack Trees.
On 7/19/06, Peter Philipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi I'm looking for clue. Does anyone have any?
-p
too funny!
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, Eric Pancer wrote:
On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 20:27:52 +0200, FTP wrote...
the browser itself is only for anonymous ftp :-( I actually wanted FTP
over HTTP
Browser can do authenticated FTP. Please consult your documentation, this is
not an OpenBSD problem.
Browsers make
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 08:21:01PM +0200, Peter Philipp wrote:
Hi I'm looking for clue. Does anyone have any?
Google provide some:
http://www.hasbro.com/clue/
Make sure you fit the minimum requirements however:
http://www.hasbro.com/clue/pl/page.browse/dn/default.cfm
May be CLUE JR.
I second roundcube nomination.
The SquirrelMail 1.5.x CVS tree is .. correct that.. ahem .. was
wy better than 1.4.x, but 1.5 has been beyond hope for some time
now. RoundCube is where it's at. Requires MySQL, and still missing a
search feature, but it pretty much works right out of the box.
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 07:26:01PM +0200, FTP wrote:
one problem though, it doesn't support the maildir format :-(
there is a unofficial/suckz patch/openwebmail to make maildir support at
http://www.agneau.org/openwebmail/
*the squirrelmail is a better choice*
// gsoares
It is pretty new still, but I replaced SquirrelMail with it because
SquirrelMail is terrible. People seemed to like the change. Very simple to
configure, and it's pretty.
but it's pretty good too :)
--
Hi, I'm a .signature virus! Copy me to your .signature file and help
me propagate, thanks!
On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 20:27 +0200, FTP wrote:
the browser itself is only for anonymous ftp :-( I actually wanted FTP over
HTTP
what about http://user:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
altogether a bad idea though...however no more insecure that
using plain-old-FTP in the first place. Might or might not
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 07:22:13 -0500, Eric Johnson wrote
Which web mail package is easiest to install and use on
OpenBSD? Are there any gaping security holes?
Eric Johnson
Someone posted a question about a week or two ago for a chrooted web-based
email system. Nick Holland (I think) wrote
Hello all,
I'm finally desperate enough to post this to a list...
I have been trying for two days to set up a basic VPN between my OpenBSD
box at home and my OpenBSD box at work.
The box at home is running 3.7 and the box here at work is running 3.9.
I know this is going to look like a lot
Steve Glaus wrote:
Hello all,
I'm finally desperate enough to post this to a list...
I have been trying for two days to set up a basic VPN between my OpenBSD
box at home and my OpenBSD box at work.
The box at home is running 3.7 and the box here at work is running 3.9.
May be worth to have
Eric Johnson wrote:
Which web mail package is easiest to install and use on
OpenBSD? Are there any gaping security holes?
I've used Horde/IMP for several years now and like it. I wouldn't
exactly call it easy to install, though - look around online for
walkthroughs, as certain parts of it
Unfortunately I cannot determine why only some sites have troubles
and that's why I seeking advice here on howto further diagnose
the problem.
Any hints are appreciated!
It's a stab in the dark but I would start with the assumption that some
sites are using server load balancing and that
We apologize for multiple receipts.
Eighth Real-Time Linux Workshop
October 12-15, 2006
Lanzhou University - SISE
Hi Walter,
I've seen this behavior also. When I 'set debug loud' I got more
information recorded via syslog.
Some stuff about RFC1323 and bad-timestamp errors.
Below is a section of a pf.conf file. It would be interesting to know if
you get similar results with
set debug loud when trying to
On Thursday 20 July 2006 03:32, Whyzzi wrote:
Requires MySQL
And the rational reason for a webmail system to require a RDBMS backend is?
---
Lars Hansson
More info - I ran a test scenario.
Here is a sample of the messages I get via syslog with set debug loud
and scrub with reassemble tcp trying to run OS X's Software Update.
Jul 19 19:42:37 obsd38 /bsd: pf_normalize_tcp_stateful: Did not receive
expected RFC1323 timestamp
Jul 19 19:42:37
51 matches
Mail list logo
