Dear all
Very newbie question :
How to setup OBSD 4.0 become hotspot machine , any link to start over
beside google.
Thx
-sonjaya-
http://sicute.blogspot.com
Here's the command I used to make the patch as I'm not sure I used the
correct switches :
$ diff -u sudo.8.org sudo.8.new sudo.8.patch
--- sudo.8.org Thu Feb 22 09:58:00 2007
+++ sudo.8.new Thu Feb 22 09:58:43 2007
@@ -593,7 +593,7 @@
\ $ sudo cd /usr/local/protected
.Ve
.PP
-since when
Le Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:22:35 +0700
sonjaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] a pris sa plume:
more secure more better , i would happy if you want share to all .
if it is just for you and familly/friends
authpf and openvpn is the solution
if if for a very public hotspot you must take a look at captive portal
On 2/22/07, sonjaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
more secure more better , i would happy if you want share to all .
Thats the right attitude! ;)
O.K. I will dump my /dev/brain into a documentation and put it online
today or tomorrow.
Andreas.
--
Hobbes : Shouldn't we read the instructions?
ok i will be waiting good news from your.Thx before
On 2/22/07, Andreas Maus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/22/07, sonjaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
more secure more better , i would happy if you want share to all .
Thats the right attitude! ;)
O.K. I will dump my /dev/brain into a
Hi,
i am using nocatauth from nocat.net. you need to modify some initialize rules.
i am using two machine, you can run in one machine, however i still can fine
perl5 net:netmask something that needed.
brgds,
riwan
At 02:54 PM 02/22/2007 +0700, sonjaya wrote:
Dear all
Very newbie question :
Hi,
On Wed, 21.02.2007 at 14:14:57 -0800, lechuit pierre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem has been translated on FTP (creation of
FTP access to transfer presentation!)
that's what the regular users can be taught to use, and it works.
One policy used is to postpone big files to transfer
On 2/22/07, earx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:22:35 +0700
sonjaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] a pris sa plume:
more secure more better , i would happy if you want share to all .
if it is just for you and familly/friends
authpf and openvpn is the solution
Right.
My access point is
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:54:34 +0700
sonjaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear all
Very newbie question :
How to setup OBSD 4.0 become hotspot machine , any link to start over
beside google.
Thx
-sonjaya-
http://sicute.blogspot.com
Have a look at:
http://www.chillispot.org/
--
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Toni Mueller wrote:
I don't want to generally deny, or slow down, IE users of the site (I
can't), but only want to deny them range requests. I didn't find a knob
in Apache to do this. If anyone else does, I'm still interested.
May be I am thick here, I still don't
Has anyone else had a problem with cyrus-imap squatter
causing the enire computer to hang?
cyrus-imapd-2.2.13p0
OpenbBSD 4.0
I had /etc/cyrus.conf to do squatter at 06:00
and maybe after about five to seven days the computer
would hang, either with the display frozen or no display,
requiring
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, Paul Pruett wrote:
Has anyone else had a problem with cyrus-imap squatter
causing the enire computer to hang?
Not, squatter works fine (but beware, it can take a lot of
ressources).
Here's what I have in cyrus.conf:
squatter cmd=squatter -s -r user at=0540
Can you
The manual page of sendmail(8) contains the following link:
http://www.sendmail.org/tips/DontBlameSendmail.html
It seems sendmail replaced the link by the following:
http://www.sendmail.org/tips/DontBlameSendmail.php
Can someone please fix this?
On 2007/02/22 13:34, Paul Pruett wrote:
Has anyone else had a problem with cyrus-imap squatter
causing the enire computer to hang?
The hang might be related to the heavy i/o from the full-text
indexing. If it's an amd64 processor with an i386 kernel I'm
tempted to suggest trying a snapshot from
I'm in the middle of putting together a rather large order for servers, about
half of which will be running OpenBSD. I've gotten pretty good at finding
compatible hardware, but I was wondering, is there a vendor(s) who is known
for either a) good technical support for OpenBSD or b) support for
I am running OpenBSD 4.0 and have a bridge set up between two
interfaces: fxp0 and xl0. I would like a program that gives a fairly
basic report on the traffic flowing through this bridge. I am primarily
interested in knowing which IPs on the xl0 side of the bridge are
pulling the most bandwidth.
On Thursday 22 February 2007 09:14, Darrin Chandler wrote:
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 08:49:41AM -0800, Jeff Simmons wrote:
I'm in the middle of putting together a rather large order for
servers, about half of which will be running OpenBSD. I've gotten
pretty good at finding compatible
On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 20:05 -0700, Darren Spruell wrote:
On 2/21/07, Ryan Corder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does anyone know why GSSAPI authentication has been disabled on the port
of msmtp in 4.0?
Might be a good question for ports@ and (if not ports@) the maintainer.
good point, thanks.
To start with, I based my anti-spam on the system described at
http://www.flakshack.com/anti-spam/wiki/index.php and it works very very
well.
I think someone already suggested limiting the size of files that are
scanned by the anti-virus, and I'd second that opinion. Chances are your
boss and
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 11:53:33AM -0500, Ross Davis wrote:
I am running OpenBSD 4.0 and have a bridge set up between two
interfaces: fxp0 and xl0. I would like a program that gives a fairly
basic report on the traffic flowing through this bridge. I am primarily
interested in knowing which IPs
On Thursday 22 February 2007 06:10, Tom Van Looy wrote:
The manual page of sendmail(8) contains the following link:
http://www.sendmail.org/tips/DontBlameSendmail.html
It seems sendmail replaced the link by the following:
http://www.sendmail.org/tips/DontBlameSendmail.php
Can someone
On Thursday 22 February 2007 06:10, Tom Van Looy wrote:
The manual page of sendmail(8) contains the following link:
http://www.sendmail.org/tips/DontBlameSendmail.html
It seems sendmail replaced the link by the following:
http://www.sendmail.org/tips/DontBlameSendmail.php
I forwarded this
http://openbsd.org/faq/upgrade40.html
Upgrade 3.9 to 4.0 (section 1.3) does not seem to mention changes to these
two files:
/var/www/htdocs/manual/mod/core.html
/var/www/htdocs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.html
Frank
Hello,
I'm trying the latest acpi changes.
When I try to use acpidump with or without the -o option I get the
following error:
acpidump: strange opcode 0x3
The file is huge, you can see the file with the error at the end, here:
http://www.wiroth.net/samples/acpidump.txt
Kind regards,
Didier
On 2/21/07, Alex Thurlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oops, forgot that part. At 325Mbps, we do about 60,000pps, so that puts
us at about 360,000pps needed for 2Gbps.
You'll have a hard time finding benches for that. To date, the best
reported is 150k pps which was on the intel E7520 chipset.
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 06:47:41PM -0800, Bray Mailloux wrote:
I ran an nmap -sS localhost which output
port state service
13/tcp open daytime
22/tcp open ssh
25/tcp open smtp
37/tcp open time
53/tcp open domain
113/tcp
Hi (again) Robert,
We've exchanged some mails in private by now. This one's for the lists.
bernd@ also has an entry in want.html but he did not
get help yet.
I must admit to not following the changes on want.html very closely.
Maybe I'll check every two or three months or whenever I get to
On 2007/02/22 22:36, Joachim Schipper wrote:
I must admit to not being aware of what would be running on 53/tcp.
netstat is your friend
$ fstat | grep tcp.*:53
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 04:54:25PM -0500, Cory Albrecht wrote:
Marc Balmer wrote:
Cory Albrecht wrote:
I'm trying to get my OpenBSD firewall to authenticate normal user
accounts off of an LDAP server running on a different machine.
On a side note, you are aware that you must create the
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 11:39:14AM -0500, stuartv wrote:
I have FINALLY been allowed to schedule time to replace the
aging mail server. Currently, it is running OpenBSD 3.7,
with sendmail, smtp-vilter, and clamav. This is our internal
mail server and it uses fetchmail to get our email off
http://www.sendmail.org/tips/DontBlameSendmail.html
The link has been recreated (it is redirected by the webserver
now; thanks to the fast reaction of the sendmail.org webmaster).
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 12:00:51PM -0600, Chris Black wrote:
I am trying to set up failover default routes. The situation is three
OpenBSD machines, client, rtr0 and rtr1. Client has two interfaces, one
with a crossover link to rtr0 and one to rtr1. I would like the default
route for client to
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 08:52:37AM +0500, Shohrukh Shoyokubov wrote:
I just wanted to ask this question to [EMAIL PROTECTED] My situation is
100Mbps/100Mbps that is needed to be managed. I need bandwidth
management and I want to ask if someone has such experience. I plan to
implement it on
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 05:17:22PM -0600, Alex Thurlow wrote:
So anywhere I look for router performance on OpenBSD, all the benchmarks
are on small lines or old machines. I also see mentions of people using
it in large scale installations, which is what I'm looking to do. I
thought I'd
Hello everybody,
I`m asking this for a friend who wanna set up a company and needs a
dedicated Webserver (wich does run OpenBSD of course..).
It`s kinda hard to find companies wich do provide such services OR do
even just reply (or reply in a accaptable amount of time (wich is NOT
14days and
I've just been looking at setting up ipsec with multiple endpoints
(zyxel 661h, fwiw: the basic connectivity is ok, though I am growing
to loathe their web gui and lack of plaintext config).
It would be convenient not to wire the remote peers down to static
IP addresses, but if I do something
On 2007/02/22 19:38, jared r r spiegel wrote:
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 12:09:27AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
obviously having the same names, the first is overwritten by the second.
Would I be totally going down the wrong route if I were to change
the hardcoded -default and default-
Hi,
Is anyone working on adding w-axis support to ums/wsmouse/xorg? the
latter two seem fairly easy to add (i am working on them), but the third i
haven't looked at yet, but i will if noone else is working on it at the
moment.
this is mostly required for any mice/trackpads that have both
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 03:14:54PM +1100, Sunnz wrote:
Sorry for the n00bish question, but I noticed that the swap partition
created during the installation wasn't defined in /etc/fstab.
Now, am I supposed to add it myself or is it necessarily at all? (wd0b)
It's not needed. If you add
Running fine on -current 21/02. Loads faster than the version I run on
the same kit on Linux!
On 22/02/07, Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running 2.2 on -current (19 Feb) with no issues. Will let you know if
I come up against any issues
On 2/21/07, Robert Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 14:30, Robert Nagy wrote:
Hi
I would like to ask everyone who uses OpenOffice.Org to test the new 2.2m8
packages. Version 2.2 is going to be released on the 27th of February and I
.
.
Please send all the test reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(even if you do not have
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 14:30, Robert Nagy wrote:
Please send all the test reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(even if you do not have see problem).
Sorry, did not include the dmesg in my earlier email. I will try this on
another machine with the latest snapshot and OpenOffice 2.0.p4 and send
Hi everyone.
We (bernd@ and robert@) are in a need of two laptop
batteries for the IBM ThinkPad X31 modes because both
of ours are kinda useless now.
bernd@ also has an entry in want.html but he did not
get help yet. A battery would enable us to hack on trains
and other on other types of public
On 2/22/07, Sunnz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for the n00bish question, but I noticed that the swap partition
created during the installation wasn't defined in /etc/fstab.
Now, am I supposed to add it myself or is it necessarily at all? (wd0b)
Nope. Have a gander at swapctl(8), second
Ohh ok I see the the kernel knows about partition B.
Thanks very much for your answers.
2007/2/23, Darren Spruell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 2/22/07, Sunnz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for the n00bish question, but I noticed that the swap partition
created during the installation wasn't defined
Sunnz wrote on Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 03:14:54PM +1100:
Sorry for the n00bish question, but I noticed that the swap partition
created during the installation wasn't defined in /etc/fstab.
Now, am I supposed to add it myself or is it necessarily at all? (wd0b)
See swapctl(8):
Note: The
46 matches
Mail list logo