Re: vmmap: bad software everywhere

2011-06-06 Thread Andres Perera
i'm sure you could fathom the idea that some people care more about
streaming video on their browsers than address randomization, the same
way some people care more about speedier local lookups to  a
stationary sync db than making sure a package has  correct @want-lib
by trashing the ftp server on every query

some of these people may even call the alternative they're not using stupid

what does that do? nothing

On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
 On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 09:46:48AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
 On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
  On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 06:11:31PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
  On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
 
   How comes nobody in other OSes noticed ? Well, people probably did, and
   tweaked their allocators to work, by using preferably the low address 
   space,
   and having addresses that increase slowly, so that a lot of pointers 
   are below
   4GB, and a lot of pointer diffs are under 4GB.
 
  Or you could just be engaging in an ad hominem attack without actually
  looking at their implementations and assuming they're not doing it
  right because they're not you or your favorite platform. But hey, we
  don't know anyone who'd do *that* in the OpenBSD community. Right?
 
  Wrong.
 
  An ad hominem attack would require me asserting all this for a fact, which
  is not what I'm doing. Notice the probably ? it makes all the difference
  in the world.

 No, I'm afraid it really doesn't require asserting the truth. To
 quote from Wikipedia, An ad hominem (Latin: to the man), short for
 argumentum ad hominem, is an attempt to link the truth of a claim to a
 negative characteristic or belief of the person advocating it It's
 what I just did to you, in turn. How's it feel?

 An example or two would have lent powerful credence to your claim. The
 fix for mono, which Marc Espie notes in this thread, is a very
 powerful such indicator.

 I tend to publish findings early, when I don't have THAT many built
 examples yet. There's also some teamwork, specifically, I don't personally
 oversee everything in OpenBSD. Nobody does. But we do notice trends, and do
 some design work based on that.

 You can call that ad hominem if you wish, do any kind of rhethoric. For me,
 putting a probably in front of a working hypothesis is enough to go forward.
 I expect the facts to be disputed, I don't care much for the rhethoric part o
 it...

 I would even venture this is a fundamental activity for us to go forward.
 If you lose yourself in gruntwork, you don't see the bigger picture.
 Sometimes, we do have the luxury of saying this is complete shit, it 
 shouldn't
 work, and then we break bad software.

 On the other hand, secure by default, runs GENERIC is the other tenet of
 our culture - reproducible defaults, no need to tinker with configs to get
 things to work, and also, proceed cautiously, do not invent stupid APIS when
 we don't need to.



Re: Seems OpenBSD isn't absolutely alone in it's quest, atleast on embedded systems.

2011-06-06 Thread Thomas de Grivel
I don't want to engage in language wars, as i wrote before there is a gap in
programming culture and reinforcing trust in my favorite lang or OS won't
help.

We trust our languages to mean something but writing correct programs
strangely is still a struggle even to skilled programmers, and takes much
testing.

Again, i don't mean to hurt but C is really not KISS, at all. Its paradigm
is appropriate for system but its grammar is a huge mess. And we're all
happy to struggle with it ? Is it out of pride ? There is no easy fix but i
recognize this is the core source of many ugly bugs. They're just symptoms
of this. And noone cares at all.



Re: Seems OpenBSD isn't absolutely alone in it's quest, atleast on embedded systems.

2011-06-06 Thread Eric Furman
The answer is too write all OS code in Machine language for each
Architecture! YEA! We're waiting for your code!
I'm super duper excited! :-0 

On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 11:10 +0200, Thomas de Grivel billi...@gmail.com
wrote:
 I don't want to engage in language wars, as i wrote before there is a gap
 in
 programming culture and reinforcing trust in my favorite lang or OS won't
 help.
 
 We trust our languages to mean something but writing correct programs
 strangely is still a struggle even to skilled programmers, and takes much
 testing.
 
 Again, i don't mean to hurt but C is really not KISS, at all. Its
 paradigm
 is appropriate for system but its grammar is a huge mess. And we're all
 happy to struggle with it ? Is it out of pride ? There is no easy fix but
 i
 recognize this is the core source of many ugly bugs. They're just
 symptoms
 of this. And noone cares at all.



AT-2972LX10/LC

2011-06-06 Thread Marek Czubenko
Is it supported by broadcom driver? Has anybody any experience?
(the AT-2972LX10/LC would be good for me if it would be supported by any net 
OpenBSD driver,
there's no info on product's datasheet; I googled it, but didn't find positive 
results.)

Network controller is Broadcom BCM 5715S.

The proper manpage tells, that bge driver supports BCM57xx network controller.
Does it mean that xx may stand for exactly two characters (e.g. digits) or 
more too?

In other words: does it mean that BCM5715S is supported?


Marek Czubenko

Uczelniane Centrum  Information  Communication
Informatyczne   Technology Centre
Uniwersytet Miko3aja Kopernika  Nicolaus Copernicus University
Pl. Rapackiego 1,  87-100 Toruq Pl. Rapackiego 1,  87-100 Torun
tel: +48 56 611-27-38   phone: +48 56 611-27-38

  PGP: http://www.umk.pl/~mc10/pgp_public_key



Reverse-proxy PF ?

2011-06-06 Thread hvom .org
Hi all

I look the doc, ftp-proxy, no reverse-proxy PF ?.  Varnish, ultimate soluce
?

Cordialy



Re: Seems OpenBSD isn't absolutely alone in it's quest, atleast on embedded systems.

2011-06-06 Thread Thomas de Grivel

On 06/06/11 11:36, Eric Furman wrote:

I'm super duper excited! :-0 


do you need a towel ?

--
Thomas de Grivel
http://b.lowh.net/billitch

I must plunge into the water of doubt again and again.



Re: i386 current crashes on boot

2011-06-06 Thread Nigel Taylor
On 06/05/11 11:22, Nigel Taylor wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I rebuilt GENERIC.MP from cvs (current 4th June 2011). This crashed on
 boot. I reverted to old bsd.mp from April this booted. I downloaded
 bsd.mp from a mirror site this booted (date 14th May 2011). I downloaded
 a more recent bsd.mp from ftp.openbsd.org (4 June 2011 GENERIC.MP #57),
 this crashed on boot in the same place as built from cvs. Below I have
 typed from screen the panic.
 
 wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1:console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
 wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
 radeibdrm0 at vga1: apic 2 int 18
 drm0 at radeondrm0
 azalia0 at pci1 dev 5 function 1 ATI RS780 HD Audio rev 0x00: msi
 azalia0: no supported codecs
 panic: intr_disestablish: bogus irq 160
 Stopped at Debugger+0x4:  popl  %ebp
 Debugger(d08ebba2,d0bb4a34,d098c3b0,d0bb4a34,d0a5ddb8) at Debuuger+0x4
 panic(d098c3b0,a0,d0a3f4a0,3dc,3dc) at panic+0x5d
 isa_disestablish(0,d68f1480,5d,5,d9bb4a84) at isa_intr_disestabish+0ca
 azalia_pci_detach(d68bea00,0,2000,0,0,a0,d05d3990,d68bea00,d68bea1
 4,5,0,80012900,2000,0,0) at azalia_pci_detach+0x14a
 azalia_pci_attach(d68ae5080,d68bea00,d0bb4b54md03e77db,d05ab9f0) at
 azalia_pci_attach+0x1b9
 config_attach(d68ae580,d09c92a0,d0bb4b54,d05adb70,d0bb4b44) at
 config_attach+0x157
 pci_probe_deveice(d68ae580,80012900,0,0,8ae580) at pci_probe_device+0x420
 pci_enuimerate_bus(d68ae580,0,0,d03e77db,0) at pci_enumerate_bus+0x11c
 config_attach(d6923800,d09c9020,d0bb4c6c,d061e1e0,0) at config_attach+0x157
 ppbattach(d68ae780,d6923800,d0bb4d54,d03e77db,d05ab9f0) at ppbattach+0x2b8
 
 trace
 isa_intr_disestablish
 azailia_pci_detach
 azailia_pci_attach
 config_attach
 pci_probe_device
 pci_enumerate_bus
 config_attach
 ppbattach
 config_attach
 pci_probe_device
 pci_enumerate_bus
 config_attach
 mainbus_attach
 config_attach
 config_rootfound
 cpu_confgiure
 main
 
 ps
PID PPID PGRP UID SFLAGS WAit   COMMAND
 *0   -10   0 7  0x00200swapper
 
 
 dmesg from snapshot downloaded from mirror
 
 OpenBSD 4.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #112: Sat May 14 09:59:17 MDT 2011
 t...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP
 cpu0: AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 240e Processor (AuthenticAMD 686-class,
 1024KB L2 cache) 2.81 GHz
 cpu0:
 FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,HTT,SSE3,MWAIT,CX16,POPCNT
 real mem  = 3488739328 (3327MB)
 avail mem = 3421507584 (3263MB)
 mainbus0 at root
 bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 08/04/09, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xf0010,
 SMBIOS rev. 2.5 @ 0x9f400 (69 entries)
 bios0: vendor American Megatrends Inc. version 080014 date 08/04/2009
 bios0: FOXCONN A7GM-S 2.0
 acpi0 at bios0: rev 0
 acpi0: sleep states S0 S3 S4 S5
 acpi0: tables DSDT FACP APIC MCFG OEMB HPET SSDT
 acpi0: wakeup devices PCE3(S4) PCE4(S4) PCE5(S4) PCE6(S4) PCE7(S4)
 PCEB(S4) PCEC(S4) SBAZ(S4) PS2K(S3) PS2M(S3) P0PC(S4) UHC1(S4) UHC2(S4)
 UHC3(S4) USB4(S4) UHC5(S4) UHC6(S4) UHC7(S4) PCE2(S4) PCE9(S4) PCEA(S4)
 PWRB(S3)
 acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 32 bits
 acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat
 cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor)
 cpu0: apic clock running at 200MHz
 cpu1 at mainbus0: apid 1 (application processor)
 cpu1: AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 240e Processor (AuthenticAMD 686-class,
 1024KB L2 cache) 2.81 GHz
 cpu1:
 FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,HTT,SSE3,MWAIT,CX16,POPCNT
 ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 2 pa 0xfec0, version 21, 24 pins
 acpimcfg0 at acpi0 addr 0xe000, bus 0-255
 acpihpet0 at acpi0: 14318180 Hz
 acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0)
 acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus 1 (P0P1)
 acpiprt2 at acpi0: bus -1 (PCE3)
 acpiprt3 at acpi0: bus -1 (PCE4)
 acpiprt4 at acpi0: bus 3 (P0PC)
 acpiprt5 at acpi0: bus -1 (PCE2)
 acpiprt6 at acpi0: bus 2 (PCE9)
 acpiprt7 at acpi0: bus -1 (PCEA)
 acpicpu0 at acpi0: PSS
 acpicpu1 at acpi0: PSS
 acpitz0 at acpi0: critical temperature 60 degC
 acpibtn0 at acpi0: PWRB
 bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0xea00
 pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (bios)
 pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 AMD RS780 Host rev 0x00
 ppb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 AMD RS780 PCIE rev 0x00
 pci1 at ppb0 bus 1
 vga1 at pci1 dev 5 function 0 ATI Radeon HD 3200 rev 0x00
 wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
 wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
 radeondrm0 at vga1: apic 2 int 18
 drm0 at radeondrm0
 azalia0 at pci1 dev 5 function 1 ATI RS780 HD Audio rev 0x00: apic 2
 int 19
 azalia0: no supported codecs
 ppb1 at pci0 dev 9 function 0 AMD RS780 PCIE rev 0x00
 pci2 at ppb1 bus 2
 re0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 Realtek 8168 rev 0x03: RTL8168D/8111D
 (0x2800), apic 2 int 17, address 00:22:68:80:e9:f7
 rgephy0 at re0 phy 7: RTL8169S/8110S PHY, rev. 2
 ahci0 at pci0 dev 17 function 0 ATI SBx00 SATA rev 0x00: apic 2 int
 22, AHCI 1.1
 scsibus0 at ahci0: 32 targets
 ohci0 at pci0 dev 18 function 0 ATI SB700 USB rev 0x00: apic 2 int 16,
 version 1.0, 

Re: smtpd and no DH parameters found in

2011-06-06 Thread Mikolaj Kucharski
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 11:59:32PM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
 On Sun, 22 May 2011 23:12:21 +0100
 Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
 
  If I'm using 4096-bit RSA key, do I need to use 4096-bit size DH
  parameters file? 
 
 No
 
 Do they need to match?
 No
 
  Is it okay to have DH smaller or even bigger?
 
 Yes, some programs like dovecot manage it automatically so maybe?
 there's more info in the source code.

Do you mean more info in dovecot sources?


PS. I have delivery disabled for misc@, please keep me in CC.

-- 
best regards
q#



Re: i386 current crashes on boot

2011-06-06 Thread Mark Kettenis
 Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 11:13:12 +0100
 From: Nigel Taylor njtay...@asterisk.demon.co.uk
 
 On 06/05/11 11:22, Nigel Taylor wrote:
  Hi,
  
  I rebuilt GENERIC.MP from cvs (current 4th June 2011). This crashed on
  boot. I reverted to old bsd.mp from April this booted. I downloaded
  bsd.mp from a mirror site this booted (date 14th May 2011). I downloaded
  a more recent bsd.mp from ftp.openbsd.org (4 June 2011 GENERIC.MP #57),
  this crashed on boot in the same place as built from cvs. Below I have
  typed from screen the panic.
  
  wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1:console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
  wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
  radeibdrm0 at vga1: apic 2 int 18
  drm0 at radeondrm0
  azalia0 at pci1 dev 5 function 1 ATI RS780 HD Audio rev 0x00: msi
  azalia0: no supported codecs
  panic: intr_disestablish: bogus irq 160
  Stopped at Debugger+0x4:  popl  %ebp
  Debugger(d08ebba2,d0bb4a34,d098c3b0,d0bb4a34,d0a5ddb8) at Debuuger+0x4
  panic(d098c3b0,a0,d0a3f4a0,3dc,3dc) at panic+0x5d
  isa_disestablish(0,d68f1480,5d,5,d9bb4a84) at isa_intr_disestabish+0ca
  azalia_pci_detach(d68bea00,0,2000,0,0,a0,d05d3990,d68bea00,d68bea1
  4,5,0,80012900,2000,0,0) at azalia_pci_detach+0x14a
  azalia_pci_attach(d68ae5080,d68bea00,d0bb4b54md03e77db,d05ab9f0) at
  azalia_pci_attach+0x1b9
  config_attach(d68ae580,d09c92a0,d0bb4b54,d05adb70,d0bb4b44) at
  config_attach+0x157
  pci_probe_deveice(d68ae580,80012900,0,0,8ae580) at pci_probe_device+0x420
  pci_enuimerate_bus(d68ae580,0,0,d03e77db,0) at pci_enumerate_bus+0x11c
  config_attach(d6923800,d09c9020,d0bb4c6c,d061e1e0,0) at config_attach+0x157
  ppbattach(d68ae780,d6923800,d0bb4d54,d03e77db,d05ab9f0) at ppbattach+0x2b8
  
  trace
  isa_intr_disestablish
  azailia_pci_detach
  azailia_pci_attach
  config_attach
  pci_probe_device
  pci_enumerate_bus
  config_attach
  ppbattach
  config_attach
  pci_probe_device
  pci_enumerate_bus
  config_attach
  mainbus_attach
  config_attach
  config_rootfound
  cpu_confgiure
  main
  
  ps
 PID PPID PGRP UID SFLAGS WAit   COMMAND
  *0   -10   0 7  0x00200swapper
  
  
  dmesg from snapshot downloaded from mirror
  
  OpenBSD 4.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #112: Sat May 14 09:59:17 MDT 2011
  t...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP
  cpu0: AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 240e Processor (AuthenticAMD 686-class,
  1024KB L2 cache) 2.81 GHz
  cpu0:
  FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,HTT,SSE3,MWAIT,CX16,POPCNT
  real mem  = 3488739328 (3327MB)
  avail mem = 3421507584 (3263MB)
  mainbus0 at root
  bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 08/04/09, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xf0010,
  SMBIOS rev. 2.5 @ 0x9f400 (69 entries)
  bios0: vendor American Megatrends Inc. version 080014 date 08/04/2009
  bios0: FOXCONN A7GM-S 2.0
  acpi0 at bios0: rev 0
  acpi0: sleep states S0 S3 S4 S5
  acpi0: tables DSDT FACP APIC MCFG OEMB HPET SSDT
  acpi0: wakeup devices PCE3(S4) PCE4(S4) PCE5(S4) PCE6(S4) PCE7(S4)
  PCEB(S4) PCEC(S4) SBAZ(S4) PS2K(S3) PS2M(S3) P0PC(S4) UHC1(S4) UHC2(S4)
  UHC3(S4) USB4(S4) UHC5(S4) UHC6(S4) UHC7(S4) PCE2(S4) PCE9(S4) PCEA(S4)
  PWRB(S3)
  acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 32 bits
  acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat
  cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor)
  cpu0: apic clock running at 200MHz
  cpu1 at mainbus0: apid 1 (application processor)
  cpu1: AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 240e Processor (AuthenticAMD 686-class,
  1024KB L2 cache) 2.81 GHz
  cpu1:
  FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,HTT,SSE3,MWAIT,CX16,POPCNT
  ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 2 pa 0xfec0, version 21, 24 pins
  acpimcfg0 at acpi0 addr 0xe000, bus 0-255
  acpihpet0 at acpi0: 14318180 Hz
  acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0)
  acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus 1 (P0P1)
  acpiprt2 at acpi0: bus -1 (PCE3)
  acpiprt3 at acpi0: bus -1 (PCE4)
  acpiprt4 at acpi0: bus 3 (P0PC)
  acpiprt5 at acpi0: bus -1 (PCE2)
  acpiprt6 at acpi0: bus 2 (PCE9)
  acpiprt7 at acpi0: bus -1 (PCEA)
  acpicpu0 at acpi0: PSS
  acpicpu1 at acpi0: PSS
  acpitz0 at acpi0: critical temperature 60 degC
  acpibtn0 at acpi0: PWRB
  bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0xea00
  pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (bios)
  pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 AMD RS780 Host rev 0x00
  ppb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 AMD RS780 PCIE rev 0x00
  pci1 at ppb0 bus 1
  vga1 at pci1 dev 5 function 0 ATI Radeon HD 3200 rev 0x00
  wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
  wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
  radeondrm0 at vga1: apic 2 int 18
  drm0 at radeondrm0
  azalia0 at pci1 dev 5 function 1 ATI RS780 HD Audio rev 0x00: apic 2
  int 19
  azalia0: no supported codecs
  ppb1 at pci0 dev 9 function 0 AMD RS780 PCIE rev 0x00
  pci2 at ppb1 bus 2
  re0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 Realtek 8168 rev 0x03: RTL8168D/8111D
  (0x2800), apic 2 int 17, address 00:22:68:80:e9:f7
  rgephy0 at re0 phy 7: RTL8169S/8110S 

serious security improvement in OpenBSD

2011-06-06 Thread Kapetanakis Giannis
I think the following diff will totally improve OpenBSD security (overall)

--- etc/master.passwd.old   Sat Jul 10 02:37:16 2010
+++ etc/master.passwd Mon Jun  6 15:04:15 2011
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-root::0:0:daemon:0:0:Charlie :/root:/bin/ksh
+root::0:0:daemon:0:0:Chuck Norris :/root:/bin/ksh
  daemon:*:1:1::0:0:The devil himself:/root:/sbin/nologin
  operator:*:2:5::0:0:System :/operator:/sbin/nologin
  bin:*:3:7::0:0:Binaries Commands and Source:/:/sbin/nologin

Who is this 'Charlie' guy anyway???

regards,

Giannis

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pkcs7-signature which 
had a name of smime.p7s]



Re: serious security improvement in OpenBSD

2011-06-06 Thread Gilles Chehade
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 03:06:54PM +0300, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
 I think the following diff will totally improve OpenBSD security (overall)
 
 --- etc/master.passwd.old   Sat Jul 10 02:37:16 2010
 +++ etc/master.passwd Mon Jun  6 15:04:15 2011
 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
 -root::0:0:daemon:0:0:Charlie :/root:/bin/ksh
 +root::0:0:daemon:0:0:Chuck Norris :/root:/bin/ksh
   daemon:*:1:1::0:0:The devil himself:/root:/sbin/nologin
   operator:*:2:5::0:0:System :/operator:/sbin/nologin
   bin:*:3:7::0:0:Binaries Commands and Source:/:/sbin/nologin
 
 Who is this 'Charlie' guy anyway???
 

Your diff is incorrect ...
Who is this Chuck Norris Root anyway ?

-- 
Gilles Chehade
http://www.poolp.org



Re: serious security improvement in OpenBSD

2011-06-06 Thread Kapetanakis Giannis
On 06/06/11 15:06, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
 I think the following diff will totally improve OpenBSD security (overall)

 --- etc/master.passwd.old   Sat Jul 10 02:37:16 2010
 +++ etc/master.passwd Mon Jun  6 15:04:15 2011
 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
 -root::0:0:daemon:0:0:Charlie:/root:/bin/ksh
 +root::0:0:daemon:0:0:Chuck Norris:/root:/bin/ksh
daemon:*:1:1::0:0:The devil himself:/root:/sbin/nologin
operator:*:2:5::0:0:System:/operator:/sbin/nologin
bin:*:3:7::0:0:Binaries Commands and Source:/:/sbin/nologin

 Who is this 'Charlie' guy anyway???

Chuck does not su - to exec
Root does su - chuck

Giannis

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pkcs7-signature which 
had a name of smime.p7s]



Re: serious security improvement in OpenBSD

2011-06-06 Thread Kapetanakis Giannis
On 06/06/11 15:11, Gilles Chehade wrote:
 On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 03:06:54PM +0300, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
 I think the following diff will totally improve OpenBSD security (overall)

 --- etc/master.passwd.old   Sat Jul 10 02:37:16 2010
 +++ etc/master.passwd Mon Jun  6 15:04:15 2011
 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
 -root::0:0:daemon:0:0:Charlie:/root:/bin/ksh
 +root::0:0:daemon:0:0:Chuck Norris:/root:/bin/ksh
daemon:*:1:1::0:0:The devil himself:/root:/sbin/nologin
operator:*:2:5::0:0:System:/operator:/sbin/nologin
bin:*:3:7::0:0:Binaries Commands and Source:/:/sbin/nologin

 Who is this 'Charlie' guy anyway???

 Your diff is incorrect ...
 Who is this Chuck Norris Root anyway ?


True. Here is version 2:

--- etc/master.passwd   Sat Jul 10 02:37:16 2010
+++ etc/master.passwd.chuck Mon Jun  6 15:22:57 2011
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
-root::0:0:daemon:0:0:Charlie :/root:/bin/ksh
+chuck::-1:-1:daemon:-1:-1:Norris :/root:/bin/ksh
+root::0:0:daemon:0:0:Chuck Norris :/root:/bin/ksh
  daemon:*:1:1::0:0:The devil himself:/root:/sbin/nologin
  operator:*:2:5::0:0:System :/operator:/sbin/nologin
  bin:*:3:7::0:0:Binaries Commands and Source:/:/sbin/nologin

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pkcs7-signature which 
had a name of smime.p7s]



Re: AT-2972LX10/LC

2011-06-06 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2011-06-06, Marek Czubenko marek.czube...@umk.pl wrote:
 Is it supported by broadcom driver? Has anybody any experience?
 (the AT-2972LX10/LC would be good for me if it would be supported by any net 
 OpenBSD driver,
 there's no info on product's datasheet; I googled it, but didn't find 
 positive results.)

 Network controller is Broadcom BCM 5715S.

It's very likely to work, /sys/dev/pci/if_bge.c matches the 5715S's
device ID. But I couldn't say for sure.

 The proper manpage tells, that bge driver supports BCM57xx network controller.
 Does it mean that xx may stand for exactly two characters (e.g. digits) or 
 more too?

no, it's just a shortcut. some new chip might come out with the
number starting BCM57 and not be supported.



i386 softraid crypto panic

2011-06-06 Thread Manuel GIRAUD
Hi,

I'm experiencing a panic after an upgrade from yesterday's snapshot
(SHA256 (bsd.rd) =
d56181843c4355c64d84f8583e0946289ba0b2055b1ba194ce38cb28f725b29b)

Everything but / is under a softraid cryto discipline so I did a
bioctl -c C -l /dev/wd0d softraid0 before running /upgrade. The
upgrade went ok but upon reboot, the bioctl command end up with the
following panic:

panic: kernel diagnostic assertion sc-sc_dis[sc-sd_target] == sd
failed: file ../../../../dev/softraid.c, line 3372
Stopped at   Debugger+0x4: popl %ebp

(I cannot include the 'trace' and 'ps' because the keyboard is not
working at this point)

dmesg before panic:

OpenBSD 4.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #62: Sun Jun  5 15:17:07 MDT 2011
dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP
RTC BIOS diagnostic error 11memory_size
cpu0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8600 @ 3.33GHz (GenuineIntel
686-class) 3.33 GHz
cpu0:
FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,SMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,SSE4.1,XSAVE
real mem  = 3487096832 (3325MB)
avail mem = 3419242496 (3260MB)
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 07/31/09, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xffea0,
SMBIOS rev. 2.5 @ 0xf0450 (82 entries)
bios0: vendor Dell Inc. version A05 date 07/31/2009
bios0: Dell Inc. OptiPlex 960
acpi0 at bios0: rev 2
acpi0: sleep states S0 S1 S3 S4 S5
acpi0: tables DSDT FACP SSDT APIC BOOT ASF! MCFG HPET  SLIC SSDT SSDT
SSDT
acpi0: wakeup devices VBTN(S4) PCI0(S5) PCI4(S5) PCI2(S5) PCI3(S5)
PCI1(S5) PCI5(S5) PCI6(S5) MOU_(S3) USB0(S3) USB1(S3) USB2(S3) USB3(S3)
USB4(S3) USB5(S3)
acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits
acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat
cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor)
cpu0: apic clock running at 332MHz
cpu1 at mainbus0: apid 1 (application processor)
cpu1: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8600 @ 3.33GHz (GenuineIntel
686-class) 3.33 GHz
cpu1:
FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,SMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,SSE4.1,XSAVE
ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 8 pa 0xfec0, version 20, 24 pins
ioapic0: misconfigured as apic 0, remapped to apid 8
acpimcfg0 at acpi0 addr 0xe000, bus 0-255
acpihpet0 at acpi0: 14318179 Hz
acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 4 (PCI4)
acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus 2 (PCI2)
acpiprt2 at acpi0: bus 3 (PCI3)
acpiprt3 at acpi0: bus 1 (PCI1)
acpiprt4 at acpi0: bus -1 (PCI5)
acpiprt5 at acpi0: bus -1 (PCI6)
acpiprt6 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0)
acpicpu0 at acpi0: C1, PSS
acpicpu1 at acpi0: C1, PSS
acpibtn0 at acpi0: VBTN
bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0x1 0xd/0x2000! 0xd2000/0x2000
cpu0: Enhanced SpeedStep 3326 MHz: speeds: , 3000, 2667, 2333, 2000 MHz
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (bios)
pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Intel Q45 Host rev 0x03
ppb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 Intel Q45 PCIE rev 0x03: msi
pci1 at ppb0 bus 1
vga1 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 ATI Radeon HD 3470 rev 0x00
wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
radeondrm0 at vga1: apic 8 int 16
drm0 at radeondrm0
Intel Q45 HECI rev 0x03 at pci0 dev 3 function 0 not configured
pciide0 at pci0 dev 3 function 2 Intel Q45 PT IDER rev 0x03: DMA
(unsupported), channel 0 wired to native-PCI, channel 1 wired to
native-PCI
pciide0: using apic 8 int 18 for native-PCI interrupt
pciide0: channel 0 ignored (not responding; disabled or no drives?)
pciide0: channel 1 ignored (not responding; disabled or no drives?)
Intel Q45 KT rev 0x03 at pci0 dev 3 function 3 not configured
em0 at pci0 dev 25 function 0 Intel ICH10 D BM LM rev 0x02: apic 8 int
21, address 00:24:e8:47:9f:46
uhci0 at pci0 dev 26 function 0 Intel 82801JD USB rev 0x02: apic 8 int 16
uhci1 at pci0 dev 26 function 1 Intel 82801JD USB rev 0x02: apic 8 int 17
uhci2 at pci0 dev 26 function 2 Intel 82801JD USB rev 0x02: apic 8 int 22
ehci0 at pci0 dev 26 function 7 Intel 82801JD USB rev 0x02: apic 8 int 22
usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0
uhub0 at usb0 Intel EHCI root hub rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1
azalia0 at pci0 dev 27 function 0 Intel 82801JD HD Audio rev 0x02: msi
azalia0: codecs: Analog Devices AD1984A
audio0 at azalia0
ppb1 at pci0 dev 28 function 0 Intel 82801JD PCIE rev 0x02: msi
pci2 at ppb1 bus 2
ppb2 at pci0 dev 28 function 1 Intel 82801JD PCIE rev 0x02: msi
pci3 at ppb2 bus 3
uhci3 at pci0 dev 29 function 0 Intel 82801JD USB rev 0x02: apic 8 int 23
uhci4 at pci0 dev 29 function 1 Intel 82801JD USB rev 0x02: apic 8 int 17
uhci5 at pci0 dev 29 function 2 Intel 82801JD USB rev 0x02: apic 8 int 18
ehci1 at pci0 dev 29 function 7 Intel 82801JD USB rev 0x02: apic 8 int 23
usb1 at ehci1: USB revision 2.0
uhub1 at usb1 Intel EHCI root hub rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1
ppb3 at pci0 dev 30 function 0 Intel 82801BA Hub-to-PCI rev 0xa2
pci4 at ppb3 bus 4
pcib0 at pci0 dev 31 function 0 Intel 82801JDO LPC rev 0x02
pciide1 at pci0 dev 31 function 2 

Re: bgpd exiting abnormally after ospf up/down

2011-06-06 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2011-06-03, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
 On 2011-06-03, Mindless Gr nomindles...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Today, after some link flaps, bgpd exited, i started it again and works, it 
 seams that bgpd cant handle such situations very well, i have included here 
 my 
 configuration and messages to help developers recongize the bug, or if it is 
 normal behaviour. if you need any extra informations, i will be happy to 
 share 
 them to you :)

 Jun  3 12:46:40 brdr0 bgpd[15610]: dispatch_rtmsg[change] mpath route not 
 found

 fwiw, that happens on -current as of May 3 too.

And I noticed similar with snmpd, though it stayed running - looks
like it probably coincides with an overflowing route socket.

10:20:16 ospfd[11628]: reloading interface list and routing table
10:20:18 ospfd[11628]: reloading interface list and routing table
10:22:19 bgpd[19059]: neighbor xx.10 (...): socket error: Operation timed out
10:29:34 bgpd[19059]: neighbor xx.6: received notification: Cease, 
administratively down
10:29:34 bgpd[19059]: neighbor xx.6: state change Established - Idle, reason: 
NOTIFICATION received
10:29:38 bgpd[1288]: nexthop aaa now valid: via xx.244 
10:29:39 bgpd[1288]: nexthop bbb now valid: via xx.244 
10:29:39 bgpd[1288]: nexthop ccc now valid: via xx.244 
10:29:39 bgpd[1288]: nexthop ddd now valid: via xx.244 
10:29:39 snmpd[30215]: dispatch_rtmsg[delete] mpath route not found
10:29:39 ospfd[11628]: reloading interface list and routing table
10:29:42 last message repeated 2 times
10:30:05 bgpd[19059]: neighbor xx.6: state change Idle - Connect, reason: Start
10:30:05 bgpd[19059]: neighbor xx.6: connect: No route to host
10:30:05 bgpd[19059]: neighbor xx.6: state change Connect - Active, reason: 
Connection open failed 
10:30:31 bgpd[1288]: nexthop aaa now valid: via xx.244 
10:30:31 bgpd[1288]: nexthop bbb now valid: via xx.244 
10:30:31 bgpd[1288]: nexthop ccc now valid: via xx.244 
10:30:31 bgpd[1288]: nexthop ddd now valid: via xx.244 
10:30:34 ospfd[11628]: reloading interface list and routing table



Re: Seems OpenBSD isn't absolutely alone in it's quest, atleast on embedded systems.

2011-06-06 Thread Amit Kulkarni
 I'm super duper excited! :-0 

 do you need a towel ?

do you need a keyboard or two? Now that you have decided to write your
own OS from scratch in s-expressions like language?

bwaaahh



Re: Seems OpenBSD isn't absolutely alone in it's quest, atleast on embedded systems.

2011-06-06 Thread Christiano F. Haesbaert
On 6 June 2011 06:10, Thomas de Grivel billi...@gmail.com wrote:
 I don't want to engage in language wars, as i wrote before there is a gap in
 programming culture and reinforcing trust in my favorite lang or OS won't
 help.

 We trust our languages to mean something but writing correct programs
 strangely is still a struggle even to skilled programmers, and takes much
 testing.

 Again, i don't mean to hurt but C is really not KISS, at all. Its paradigm
 is appropriate for system but its grammar is a huge mess. And we're all
 happy to struggle with it ? Is it out of pride ? There is no easy fix but i
 recognize this is the core source of many ugly bugs. They're just symptoms
 of this. And noone cares at all.



Oh great, you pointed out something that *could* be better.
Yeah, C has its problems, so how are *YOU* going to start fixing it ?
Now, again, I lost the part where you say what you are doing to make it better.

You made no questions and no statements that could result in any
productive work what-so-ever.

Honestly, what are you trying to achieve ?



Re: Seems OpenBSD isn't absolutely alone in it's quest, atleast on embedded systems.

2011-06-06 Thread Chris Bennett
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 05:36:03AM -0400, Eric Furman wrote:
 The answer is too write all OS code in Machine language for each
 Architecture! YEA! We're waiting for your code!
 I'm super duper excited! :-0 

Perhaps he should go work on this project:
BareMetal OS
BareMetal is a 64-bit OS for x86-64 based computers. The OS is written entirely 
in Assembly, whil
e applications can be written in Assembly or C/C++.

Clearly someone is trying to get rid of ugly languages!



Re: serious security improvement in OpenBSD

2011-06-06 Thread Patrick Lamaiziere
Le Mon, 06 Jun 2011 15:06:54 +0300,
Kapetanakis Giannis bil...@edu.physics.uoc.gr a icrit :

 Who is this 'Charlie' guy anyway???

That is a good question. I've searched in the past looking old system
passwd to find who decided this name for the root account but with no
luck.

Looks like Charlie  is a tribute to Charlie Root (a famous baseball
player):http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Root

Does someone remember who, when and why?

Regards.



Re: Seems OpenBSD isn't absolutely alone in it's quest, atleast on embedded systems.

2011-06-06 Thread Francois Pussault
brainfuck OS sould be a  good idea too...
:D

of course this is a joke, forth language should be more usefull

 
 From: Chris Bennett ch...@bennettconstruction.biz
 Sent: Mon Jun 06 18:49:16 CEST 2011
 To: misc@openbsd.org
 Subject: Re: Seems OpenBSD isn't absolutely alone in it's quest, atleast on
embedded systems.


 On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 05:36:03AM -0400, Eric Furman wrote:
  The answer is too write all OS code in Machine language for each
  Architecture! YEA! We're waiting for your code!
  I'm super duper excited! :-0 

 Perhaps he should go work on this project:
 BareMetal OS
 BareMetal is a 64-bit OS for x86-64 based computers. The OS is written
entirely in Assembly, whil
 e applications can be written in Assembly or C/C++.

 Clearly someone is trying to get rid of ugly languages!



Cordialement
Francois Pussault
3701 - 8 rue Marcel Pagnol
31100 ToulouseB 
FranceB 
+33 6 17 230 820 B  +33 5 34 365 269
fpussa...@contactoffice.fr



Re: Seems OpenBSD isn't absolutely alone in it's quest, atleast on embedded systems.

2011-06-06 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 11:49:16 -0500
Chris Bennett wrote:

 BareMetal is a 64-bit OS for x86-64 based computers. The OS is written 
 entirely in Assembly,

I believe some/all newer models? of the Sonicwall range were rewritten
in assembly, to increase performance. My cousin loves em.



Re: Seems OpenBSD isn't absolutely alone in it's quest, atleast on embedded systems.

2011-06-06 Thread Josh Rickmar
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 11:49:16AM -0500, Chris Bennett wrote:
 On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 05:36:03AM -0400, Eric Furman wrote:
  The answer is too write all OS code in Machine language for each
  Architecture! YEA! We're waiting for your code!
  I'm super duper excited! :-0 
 
 Perhaps he should go work on this project:
 BareMetal OS
 BareMetal is a 64-bit OS for x86-64 based computers. The OS is written 
 entirely in Assembly, whil
 e applications can be written in Assembly or C/C++.
 
 Clearly someone is trying to get rid of ugly languages!
 

http://www.menuetos.net/ ?



Re: Reverse-proxy PF ?

2011-06-06 Thread Rosen Iliev

You should try nginx.

R

hvom .org wrote, On 6/6/2011 3:54 AM:

Hi all

I look the doc, ftp-proxy, no reverse-proxy PF ?.  Varnish, ultimate soluce
?

Cordialy




OpenBSD crash (tomcat + subsonic possibly)

2011-06-06 Thread Michael Sioutis
Hello,

I am running Subsonic 4.4 over SSL, java 7 (jdk-1.7.0.00beta122), and
tomcat 6.0.20 to stream music
through a nice interface.

There are times (not always) when I am uploading GBs (5-10) of music
data (remotely with scp), and the system crashes:
user  ttyp1XXX.XXX.XX.XXX   Mon Jun  6 16:21 - crash  (00:26)

I am pretty positive it is caused by subsonic trying to read and index
all the extra files, but I would like to ask:
1)Has anyone experienced issues by using the above combination?
2)What system log files should I look into? (I currently know, and
have checked dmesg, lastlog, daemon, authlog,
daily.out, messages, but couldn't find anything relevant about the
cause, except the crash in lastlog.)

Mike



Re: i386 softraid crypto panic

2011-06-06 Thread Ted Unangst
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Manuel GIRAUD
manuel.gir...@univ-nantes.fr wrote:
 I'm experiencing a panic after an upgrade from yesterday's snapshot
 (SHA256 (bsd.rd) =
 d56181843c4355c64d84f8583e0946289ba0b2055b1ba194ce38cb28f725b29b)

 Everything but / is under a softraid cryto discipline so I did a
 bioctl -c C -l /dev/wd0d softraid0 before running /upgrade. The
 upgrade went ok but upon reboot, the bioctl command end up with the
 following panic:

 panic: kernel diagnostic assertion sc-sc_dis[sc-sd_target] == sd
 failed: file ../../../../dev/softraid.c, line 3372
 Stopped at   Debugger+0x4: popl %ebp

There is no such line in the source, so apparently there was a patch,
but it looks like it's been removed now.



Re: i386 softraid crypto panic

2011-06-06 Thread Matthew Dempsky
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 02:47:45PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
 On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Manuel GIRAUD
 manuel.gir...@univ-nantes.fr wrote:
  I'm experiencing a panic after an upgrade from yesterday's snapshot
  (SHA256 (bsd.rd) =
  d56181843c4355c64d84f8583e0946289ba0b2055b1ba194ce38cb28f725b29b)
 
  Everything but / is under a softraid cryto discipline so I did a
  bioctl -c C -l /dev/wd0d softraid0 before running /upgrade. The
  upgrade went ok but upon reboot, the bioctl command end up with the
  following panic:
 
  panic: kernel diagnostic assertion sc-sc_dis[sc-sd_target] == sd
  failed: file ../../../../dev/softraid.c, line 3372
  Stopped at   Debugger+0x4: popl %ebp
 
 There is no such line in the source, so apparently there was a patch,
 but it looks like it's been removed now.

That line is from my softraid scsibus diff, which was included in the
Jun 5 snapshots.  There was a bug where it didn't properly unwind a
failed BIOCCREATERAID attempt.

The diff below fixes this issue, and I haven't been able to reproduce
any other panics in my testing with RAID 0, RAID 1, and crypto
softraid configurations.


Index: softraid.c
===
RCS file: /home/mdempsky/anoncvs/cvs/src/sys/dev/softraid.c,v
retrieving revision 1.230
diff -u -p -r1.230 softraid.c
--- softraid.c  3 May 2011 17:08:51 -   1.230
+++ softraid.c  6 Jun 2011 17:25:43 -
@@ -87,7 +87,8 @@ struct cfdriver softraid_cd = {
 
 /* scsi  discipline */
 void   sr_scsi_cmd(struct scsi_xfer *);
-void   sr_minphys(struct buf *bp, struct scsi_link *sl);
+void   sr_minphys(struct buf *, struct scsi_link *);
+intsr_scsi_probe(struct scsi_link *);
 void   sr_copy_internal_data(struct scsi_xfer *,
void *, size_t);
 intsr_scsi_ioctl(struct scsi_link *, u_long,
@@ -167,7 +168,7 @@ extern void (*softraid_disk_attach)(str
 
 /* scsi glue */
 struct scsi_adapter sr_switch = {
-   sr_scsi_cmd, sr_minphys, NULL, NULL, sr_scsi_ioctl
+   sr_scsi_cmd, sr_minphys, sr_scsi_probe, NULL, sr_scsi_ioctl
 };
 
 /* native metadata format */
@@ -1632,6 +1633,7 @@ void
 sr_attach(struct device *parent, struct device *self, void *aux)
 {
struct sr_softc *sc = (void *)self;
+   struct scsibus_attach_args saa;
 
DNPRINTF(SR_D_MISC, \n%s: sr_attach, DEVNAME(sc));
 
@@ -1656,6 +1658,18 @@ sr_attach(struct device *parent, struct 
 
printf(\n);
 
+   sc-sc_link.adapter_softc = sc;
+   sc-sc_link.adapter = sr_switch;
+   sc-sc_link.adapter_target = SR_MAX_LD;
+   sc-sc_link.adapter_buswidth = SR_MAX_LD;
+   sc-sc_link.luns = 1;
+
+   bzero(saa, sizeof(saa));
+   saa.saa_sc_link = sc-sc_link;
+
+   sc-sc_scsibus = (struct scsibus_softc *)config_found(sc-sc_dev,
+   saa, scsiprint);
+
softraid_disk_attach = sr_disk_attach;
 
sr_boot_assembly(sc);
@@ -1910,19 +1924,10 @@ sr_scsi_cmd(struct scsi_xfer *xs)
DNPRINTF(SR_D_CMD, %s: sr_scsi_cmd: scsibus%d xs: %p 
flags: %#x\n, DEVNAME(sc), link-scsibus, xs, xs-flags);
 
-   sd = sc-sc_dis[link-scsibus];
+   sd = sc-sc_dis[link-target];
if (sd == NULL) {
-   s = splhigh();
-   sd = sc-sc_attach_dis;
-   splx(s);
-
-   DNPRINTF(SR_D_CMD, %s: sr_scsi_cmd: attaching %p\n,
-   DEVNAME(sc), sd);
-   if (sd == NULL) {
-   printf(%s: sr_scsi_cmd NULL discipline\n,
-   DEVNAME(sc));
-   goto stuffup;
-   }
+   printf(%s: sr_scsi_cmd NULL discipline\n, DEVNAME(sc));
+   goto stuffup;
}
 
if (sd-sd_deleted) {
@@ -1948,19 +1953,6 @@ sr_scsi_cmd(struct scsi_xfer *xs)
wu-swu_dis = sd;
wu-swu_xs = xs;
 
-   /* the midlayer will query LUNs so report sense to stop scanning */
-   if (link-target != 0 || link-lun != 0) {
-   DNPRINTF(SR_D_CMD, %s: bad target:lun %d:%d\n,
-   DEVNAME(sc), link-target, link-lun);
-   sd-sd_scsi_sense.error_code = SSD_ERRCODE_CURRENT |
-   SSD_ERRCODE_VALID;
-   sd-sd_scsi_sense.flags = SKEY_ILLEGAL_REQUEST;
-   sd-sd_scsi_sense.add_sense_code = 0x25;
-   sd-sd_scsi_sense.add_sense_code_qual = 0x00;
-   sd-sd_scsi_sense.extra_len = 4;
-   goto stuffup;
-   }
-
switch (xs-cmd-opcode) {
case READ_COMMAND:
case READ_BIG:
@@ -2036,6 +2028,28 @@ stuffup:
 complete:
sr_scsi_done(sd, xs);
 }
+
+int
+sr_scsi_probe(struct scsi_link *link)
+{
+   struct sr_softc *sc = link-adapter_softc;
+   struct sr_discipline*sd;
+
+   KASSERT(link-target  SR_MAX_LD  link-lun == 0);
+
+   sd = sc-sc_dis[link-target];

Known softraid(4) issue in Jun 5 snapshot

2011-06-06 Thread Matthew Dempsky
As a heads up to all softraid(4) users, there's a known issue with a
softraid patch included in the Jun 5 snapshot kernels.  In particular,
unsuccessful attempts to create a softraid logical disk using
bioctl(8) (i.e., bioctl -c) can result in a kernel panic.

I encourage softraid(4) users to skip this snapshot release.  The next
snapshot release will include a fix for this issue.

Sorry for the inconvenience! :(



Re: OpenBSD crash (tomcat + subsonic possibly)

2011-06-06 Thread Matthew Dempsky
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Michael Sioutis papito@gmail.com wrote:
 I am running Subsonic 4.4 over SSL, java 7 (jdk-1.7.0.00beta122), and
 tomcat 6.0.20 to stream music
 through a nice interface.

It would help if you also included what version of OpenBSD you're
using, preferably by including the output of dmesg.  That's sort of a
vital detail.



Re: OpenBSD crash (tomcat + subsonic possibly)

2011-06-06 Thread Michael Sioutis
OpenBSD 4.9!

Mike

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Matthew Dempsky matt...@dempsky.org wrote:
 On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Michael Sioutis papito@gmail.com
wrote:
 I am running Subsonic 4.4 over SSL, java 7 (jdk-1.7.0.00beta122), and
 tomcat 6.0.20 to stream music
 through a nice interface.

 It would help if you also included what version of OpenBSD you're
 using, preferably by including the output of dmesg.  That's sort of a
 vital detail.

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type text/x-log which had a name of 
dmesg.log]



Re: OpenBSD crash (tomcat + subsonic possibly)

2011-06-06 Thread LeviaComm Networks
 On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Michael Sioutispapito@gmail.com 
 wrote:

I am running Subsonic 4.4 over SSL, java 7 (jdk-1.7.0.00beta122), and
tomcat 6.0.20 to stream music
through a nice interface.


Its easier and faster to send more information than needed and having
it ignored, than it is to go back and forth asking for what is needed
Please reply the dmesg, output of pkg_info andget the crash dump ready 
to be sent out if someone asks for it.  Fell free to include anything 
else that you think is pertinent to this problem.




Re: Seems OpenBSD isn't absolutely alone in it's quest, atleast on embedded systems.

2011-06-06 Thread gilbert . fernandes
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:31:29AM -0500, Amit Kulkarni wrote:

 do you need a keyboard or two? Now that you have decided to write your
 own OS from scratch in s-expressions like language?

We should send this guy bullshit to the Linux kernel
mailing-list so they can have some fun too. Hey.
Those guys are doing open source, we can share the
fun even if they're stuck stuffing penguins at home
while we get red-leather chicks on our side...

-- 
Threepwood



Re: Seems OpenBSD isn't absolutely alone in it's quest, atleast on embedded systems.

2011-06-06 Thread gilbert . fernandes
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 01:33:31PM -0300, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:

 Honestly, what are you trying to achieve ?

I bet 10 canadian dollars on his 15 minute fame,
and eternal storage in Google newsgroup servers
of YARGTKBTOD*

(*) Yet Another Random Guy That Knows Better Than
OpenBSD Developers

-- 
Bill Gates



Re: Interesting panic during boot

2011-06-06 Thread Dave Anderson
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Dave Anderson wrote:

On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:

On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 01:09:47PM -0400, Dave Anderson wrote:
 While gathering notebook dmesgs I encountered this panic during boot (at
 a Best Buy, on a demo system labelled Toshiba r835-p50x, booting from
 a USB stick loaded with an i386 snapshot dated 5/24).  The root device
 DUID shown is correct.

 panic: root device (e0166bb8f33fc15d) not found
 stopped at Debugger_0x4: popl %ebp

 [trace]
 Debugger(d08e2194.d0ba9d54.d08bf2f0.d0ba9d54.15c6a) at Debugger+0x4
 panic(d08bf2f0.e0.16.6b.b8) at panic+0x5d
 setroot(d3a99800.0.4000.d0ba9e94.0) at setroot+0xa05
 diskconf(d08b73d7.0.d08bd109.0,0) at diskconf+0x12e
 main(d02004ba.d02004c2.0.0.0) at main+0x570

 [ps]
   PID  PPID  PGRP  UID  S FLAGS   WAIT  COMMAND
9 0 00   3   0x100200  bored crypto
8 0 00   3   0x100200  pftm  pfpurge
7 0 00   3   0x100200  usbtskusbtask
6 0 00   3   0x100200  usbatsk   usbatsk
5 0 00   3   0x100200  acpi0 acpi0
4 0 00   3   0x100200  bored syswq
3 0 00   3 0x40100200idle0
2 0 00   3   0x100200  kmalloc   kmthread
1 0 00   3  0  initexec  swapper
  * 0-1 00   70x80200swapper

 [All of the above was hand-copied from the screen, so there may be
 typos.]

 I hope that this is enough information to enable someone to track down
 the problem.  If more is needed, let me know what it is and I'll try to
 get it.

 Dave

 --
 Dave Anderson
 d...@daveanderson.com

The dmesg is needed. This looks like the disk/usb stick is not being
found by the OS.

I was afraid of that.

Dealing with the first apparent problem, that most of the dmesg scrolls
off the screen, looks to be easy; a quick look at the source reveals
that ddb has an apparently undocumented 'dmesg' command.

Actually capturing the dmesg looks to be harder; given that this is a
store demo system to which I have very limited access I'm not sure I've
got any better way than hand-writing it all.  I've got a couple of ideas
for easier ways to try, but it will take a few days.  Are there any
parts of the dmesg that are known to be unnecessary for this purpose, so
I can avoid the work of copying them if I have to fall back to writing
everything down and retyping it?

Now that I've had time to think about this a bit, I'd guess that the
problem is some new USB controller that OpenBSD doesn't yet understand.
If so, am I correct that all that's really needed is the vendor ID and
device ID of the controller?  I'll check for this first, now that I know
how to view the whole dmesg after the panic.

FWIW this stick boots just fine on lots of other systems, both before
and after this problem system.

I got a chance to poke at this system again today, and found a USB port
from which I could boot.  The offending device appears to be 'NEC
PCIE-XHCI rev 0x04 at pci4 dev 0 function 0 not configured'.  I also
found another system (labelled Dell Inspiron 17r-6457dbk) which exhibits
a similar problem but again was able to find a working USB port; this
appears to use the same new device: 'NEC PCIE-XHCI rev 0x04 at pci2
dev 0 function 0 not configured'.

I'm sending both dmesgs to dm...@openbsd.org and also including them
here in case that's useful.

Dave

OpenBSD 4.9-current (GENERIC) #3: Mon May 23 21:40:58 MDT 2011
dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-2310M CPU @ 2.10GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 2.10 
GHz
cpu0: 
FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,PCLMUL,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,x2APIC,POPCNT,XSAVE,AVX
real mem  = 2853560320 (2721MB)
avail mem = 2796097536 (2666MB)
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 03/04/11, SMBIOS rev. 2.5 @ 0xaaefe000 
(43 entries)
bios0: vendor TOSHIBA version Version 2.10 date 03/04/2011
bios0: TOSHIBA PORTEGE R835
acpi0 at bios0: rev 0
acpi0: sleep states S0 S3 S4 S5
acpi0: tables DSDT FACP HPET APIC MCFG ASF! BOOT SLIC SSDT SSDT SSDT SSDT
acpi0: wakeup devices LANC(S4) HDEF(S3) RP02(S4) PXSX(S4) RP04(S4) PXSX(S4) 
USBB(S4) USBC(S4) EHC1(S4) EHC2(S4) PWRB(S4) LID_(S4)
acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits
acpihpet0 at acpi0: 14318179 Hz
acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat
cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor)
cpu0: apic clock running at 99MHz
cpu at mainbus0: not configured
cpu at mainbus0: not configured
cpu at mainbus0: not configured
ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 2 pa 0xfec0, version 20, 24 pins
acpimcfg0 at acpi0 addr 0xf800, bus 0-63
acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0)
acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus -1 (PEGP)
acpiprt2 at acpi0: bus 1 (RP01)
acpiprt3 at acpi0: bus 2 (RP02)
acpiprt4 at acpi0: bus 4 (RP03)
acpiprt5 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP04)
acpiprt6 

Sun Blade 1500 (non-Silver) OBP

2011-06-06 Thread Bjorn
Hi,


I recently got a Sun Blade 1500 Red at an eBay auction.
I have a Sun Type 7 keyboard which won't work on this old OBP (4.9.5),
and have read that it should work with later versions.

Problem is, it has a very old OBP. AFAIK, the old Sunsolve FTPs used
to have the firmwares available for download but these no longer
exists.

Does anyone have version 4.30.4.a (Patch ID: 140686-02) (or at least a
version = 4.17) and be willing to share this with me?


Thank you,
Bjorn



Re: OpenBSD crash (tomcat + subsonic possibly)

2011-06-06 Thread Michael Sioutis
PKG_INFO log available as attached!

I only have a minfree file in /var/crash..

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:13 PM, LeviaComm Networks n...@leviacomm.net
wrote:
  On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Michael Sioutispapito@gmail.com
  wrote:

 I am running Subsonic 4.4 over SSL, java 7 (jdk-1.7.0.00beta122), and
 tomcat 6.0.20 to stream music
 through a nice interface.

 Its easier and faster to send more information than needed and having
 it ignored, than it is to go back and forth asking for what is needed
 Please reply the dmesg, output of pkg_info andget the crash dump ready to
be
 sent out if someone asks for it.  Fell free to include anything else that
 you think is pertinent to this problem.

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type text/x-log which had a name of 
pkg_info.log]



IPF is not and never was a cash cow

2011-06-06 Thread Darren Reed

And anyone that tries to represent it as such is lieing.

In fact I've never made money off of it and never I've never tried to 
make money off it.


Now if you all make money off of pf, well and good for you.

My goal for ipf was never to make money off of it.

Please correct your presentation.

Darren



Re: serious security improvement in OpenBSD

2011-06-06 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Patrick,

Patrick Lamaiziere wrote on Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 06:59:48PM +0200:
 Le Mon, 06 Jun 2011 15:06:54 +0300,
 Kapetanakis Giannis bil...@edu.physics.uoc.gr a icrit :

 Who is this 'Charlie' guy anyway???

 That is a good question. I've searched in the past looking old system
 passwd to find who decided this name for the root account but with no
 luck.

http://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=4BSD/etc/passwd

  has root::0:10:Ernie Co-vax,508JE,0204:/:/bin/csh on Nov 16, 1980

http://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=4.1cBSD/etc/passwd

  has root::0:10:Charlie,458E,7750:/:/bin/csh on Feb 27, 1983

http://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=4.2BSD/etc/passwd

  has root::0:10:Charlie :/:/bin/csh on Sep 25, 1983

 Looks like Charlie  is a tribute to Charlie Root (a famous baseball
 player):http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Root

No idea.

 Does someone remember who, when and why?

It looks like it happened in 1981 or 1982 at the CSRG in Berkeley,
and Charlie was a person or machine or joke located in office 458,
next door to Bill Joy.

That's partial information and guesswork, but no wonder, i wasn't
there.  Bill Joy will probably know; and maybe Eric Allman and Kirk
McKusick, who are listed in the 4.1cBSD passwd file as well.

The following CD set seems likely to contain more information:

http://www.mckusick.com/csrg/

Yours,
  Ingo



Re: Seems OpenBSD isn't absolutely alone in it's quest, atleast on embedded systems.

2011-06-06 Thread Marc Espie
How about he proves to us he can write good lisp code first, by maintaining
ecl and maxima and sbcl for a while ?



COMPRANET 5.0 Manejo Óptimo del Sistema (EL CURSO MÁS IMPORTANTE DEL MOMENTO)

2011-06-06 Thread Adriana Hernandez
172871

[IMAGE]

Pms Capacitacisn Efectiva de Mixico presenta:

El programa mas importante del momento

Manejo Sptimo del Sistema Compranet 5.0

Exclusivas presentaciones:

27 de Junio en la Ciudad de Mixico.

29 de Junio en Guadalajara, Jalisco.

01 de Julio en Monterrey, Nuevo Lesn.

Expositor: Mtro. Alberto Ledesma Gonzalez

10 horas de entrenamiento

Empresa Registrada ante la STPS Reg. COLG640205CP30005

Smguenos en Twitter@pmscapacitacion o bien en Facebook PMS de Mixico

Mayores informes responda este correo electrsnico con los siguientes
datos.
Empresa:
Nombre:
Telifono:
Email:
Nzmero de Interesados:
Y en breve le haremos llegar la informacisn completa del evento. 
O bien comunmquense a nuestros telifonos  un ejecutivo con gusto le
atendera
Tels. (33) 8851-2365, (33)8851-2741.

Copyright (C) 2010, PMS Capacitacisn Efectiva de Mixico  S.C. Derechos
Reservados. PMS de Mixico, El logo de PMS de Mixico son marcas
registradas. ADVERTENCIA PMS de Mixico no cuenta con alianzas
estratigicas de ningzn tipo dentro de la Republica Mexicana. NO SE DEJE
ENGAQAR - DIGA NO A LA PIRATERIA. Todos los logotipos, marcas comerciales
e imagenes son propiedad de sus respectivas corporaciones y se utilizan
con fines informativos solamente.

Este Mensaje ha sido enviado a misc@openbsd.org como usuario de Pms de
Mixico o bien un usuario le refiris para recibir este boletmn.
Como usuario de Pms de Mixico, en este acto autoriza de manera expresa
que Pms de Mixico le puede contactar vma correo electrsnico u otros
medios.
Si usted ha recibido este mensaje por error, haga caso omiso de el y
reporte su cuenta respondiendo este correo con el subject BAJACOMPRANET

Unsubscribe to this mailing list, reply a blank message with the subject
UNSUBSCRIBE BAJACOMPRANET
Tenga en cuenta que la gestisn de nuestras bases de datos es de suma
importancia y no es intencisn de la empresa la inconformidad del
receptor.

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of 
compranet.jpg]



Re: Seems OpenBSD isn't absolutely alone in it's quest, atleast on embedded systems.

2011-06-06 Thread goodb0fh
X86 machine language sucks big rocks.  Everyone should write in microcode for
full speed!

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 6, 2011, at 12:49 PM, Chris Bennett ch...@bennettconstruction.biz
wrote:

 On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 05:36:03AM -0400, Eric Furman wrote:
 The answer is too write all OS code in Machine language for each
 Architecture! YEA! We're waiting for your code!
 I'm super duper excited! :-0 

 Perhaps he should go work on this project:
 BareMetal OS
 BareMetal is a 64-bit OS for x86-64 based computers. The OS is written
entirely in Assembly, whil
 e applications can be written in Assembly or C/C++.

 Clearly someone is trying to get rid of ugly languages!



Re: Seems OpenBSD isn't absolutely alone in it's quest, atleast on embedded systems.

2011-06-06 Thread goodb0fh
I see your brainfuck and raise you APL

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 6, 2011, at 1:11 PM, Francois Pussault fpussa...@contactoffice.fr
wrote:

 brainfuck OS sould be a  good idea too...
 :D

 of course this is a joke, forth language should be more usefull

 
 From: Chris Bennett ch...@bennettconstruction.biz
 Sent: Mon Jun 06 18:49:16 CEST 2011
 To: misc@openbsd.org
 Subject: Re: Seems OpenBSD isn't absolutely alone in it's quest, atleast
on
 embedded systems.


 On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 05:36:03AM -0400, Eric Furman wrote:
 The answer is too write all OS code in Machine language for each
 Architecture! YEA! We're waiting for your code!
 I'm super duper excited! :-0 

 Perhaps he should go work on this project:
 BareMetal OS
 BareMetal is a 64-bit OS for x86-64 based computers. The OS is written
 entirely in Assembly, whil
 e applications can be written in Assembly or C/C++.

 Clearly someone is trying to get rid of ugly languages!



 Cordialement
 Francois Pussault
 3701 - 8 rue Marcel Pagnol
 31100 ToulouseB
 FranceB
 +33 6 17 230 820 B  +33 5 34 365 269
 fpussa...@contactoffice.fr



PowerMath - Your Virtual Mathematics Assistant

2011-06-06 Thread PowerMath
PowerMath - Your Virtual Mathematics Assistant

  Mathematics Made Easy
Summer   2011





Computer   Animation   Lesson-Shows :
Courses in Arithmetic, Algebra, Geometry, Trigonometry, Pre-Calculus,
Calculus, Probability and Statistics
covering Middle-School, High-School and University level Mathematics, for
Students and Instructors.









PowerMath   has   been   featured   on

among   others . . .




Exclusion:
If you no longer wish to receive email from PowerClassroom Software invoke 
deletePlease do NOT reply to this e-mail if you wish to unsubscribe,
instead use the instructions above.   Any/all information collected from our
customers will not be sold, shared, or rented.



Re: OpenBSD crash (tomcat + subsonic possibly)

2011-06-06 Thread Corey

On 06/06/2011 04:03 PM, Michael Sioutis wrote:

PKG_INFO log available as attached!

I only have a minfree file in /var/crash..

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:13 PM, LeviaComm Networksn...@leviacomm.net
wrote:

  On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Michael Sioutispapito@gmail.com
  wrote:

I am running Subsonic 4.4 over SSL, java 7 (jdk-1.7.0.00beta122), and
tomcat 6.0.20 to stream music
through a nice interface.

Its easier and faster to send more information than needed and having
it ignored, than it is to go back and forth asking for what is needed
Please reply the dmesg, output of pkg_info andget the crash dump ready to

be

sent out if someone asks for it.  Fell free to include anything else that
you think is pertinent to this problem.

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type text/x-log which had a name of 
pkg_info.log]



Attachments are stripped by the list manager software.  Please include 
your dmesg and other info inline with your message text.




Re: Interesting panic during boot

2011-06-06 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 04:24:13PM -0400, Dave Anderson wrote:
 On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Dave Anderson wrote:
 
 On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
 
 On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 01:09:47PM -0400, Dave Anderson wrote:
  While gathering notebook dmesgs I encountered this panic during boot (at
  a Best Buy, on a demo system labelled Toshiba r835-p50x, booting from
  a USB stick loaded with an i386 snapshot dated 5/24).  The root device
  DUID shown is correct.
 
  panic: root device (e0166bb8f33fc15d) not found
  stopped at Debugger_0x4: popl %ebp
 
  [trace]
  Debugger(d08e2194.d0ba9d54.d08bf2f0.d0ba9d54.15c6a) at Debugger+0x4
  panic(d08bf2f0.e0.16.6b.b8) at panic+0x5d
  setroot(d3a99800.0.4000.d0ba9e94.0) at setroot+0xa05
  diskconf(d08b73d7.0.d08bd109.0,0) at diskconf+0x12e
  main(d02004ba.d02004c2.0.0.0) at main+0x570
 
  [ps]
PID  PPID  PGRP  UID  S FLAGS   WAIT  COMMAND
 9 0 00   3   0x100200  bored crypto
 8 0 00   3   0x100200  pftm  pfpurge
 7 0 00   3   0x100200  usbtskusbtask
 6 0 00   3   0x100200  usbatsk   usbatsk
 5 0 00   3   0x100200  acpi0 acpi0
 4 0 00   3   0x100200  bored syswq
 3 0 00   3 0x40100200idle0
 2 0 00   3   0x100200  kmalloc   kmthread
 1 0 00   3  0  initexec  swapper
   * 0-1 00   70x80200swapper
 
  [All of the above was hand-copied from the screen, so there may be
  typos.]
 
  I hope that this is enough information to enable someone to track down
  the problem.  If more is needed, let me know what it is and I'll try to
  get it.
 
Dave
 
  --
  Dave Anderson
  d...@daveanderson.com
 
 The dmesg is needed. This looks like the disk/usb stick is not being
 found by the OS.
 
 I was afraid of that.
 
 Dealing with the first apparent problem, that most of the dmesg scrolls
 off the screen, looks to be easy; a quick look at the source reveals
 that ddb has an apparently undocumented 'dmesg' command.
 
 Actually capturing the dmesg looks to be harder; given that this is a
 store demo system to which I have very limited access I'm not sure I've
 got any better way than hand-writing it all.  I've got a couple of ideas
 for easier ways to try, but it will take a few days.  Are there any
 parts of the dmesg that are known to be unnecessary for this purpose, so
 I can avoid the work of copying them if I have to fall back to writing
 everything down and retyping it?
 
 Now that I've had time to think about this a bit, I'd guess that the
 problem is some new USB controller that OpenBSD doesn't yet understand.
 If so, am I correct that all that's really needed is the vendor ID and
 device ID of the controller?  I'll check for this first, now that I know
 how to view the whole dmesg after the panic.
 
 FWIW this stick boots just fine on lots of other systems, both before
 and after this problem system.
 
 I got a chance to poke at this system again today, and found a USB port
 from which I could boot.  The offending device appears to be 'NEC
 PCIE-XHCI rev 0x04 at pci4 dev 0 function 0 not configured'.  I also
 found another system (labelled Dell Inspiron 17r-6457dbk) which exhibits
 a similar problem but again was able to find a working USB port; this
 appears to use the same new device: 'NEC PCIE-XHCI rev 0x04 at pci2
 dev 0 function 0 not configured'.
 
 I'm sending both dmesgs to dm...@openbsd.org and also including them
 here in case that's useful.

Excellent! Thanks for the investigation. XHCI sounds like usb3, and I
don't believe we support that yet.

 Ken



Re: Seems OpenBSD isn't absolutely alone in it's quest, atleast on embedded systems.

2011-06-06 Thread gilbert . fernandes
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 08:17:11PM -0400, goodb...@gmail.com wrote:

 X86 machine language sucks big rocks.

x86 is not executed on x86 processors since the
Pentium 4. Intel (and AMD) are using RISC cores
at the heart of their processors.

x86 instructions are translated into RISC code
and this code is the one that gets executed.

The x86 CISC is just a shell around an RISC
heart.

-- 
Overflow