[IMAGE]
Gracias a su preferencia y ixito obtenido Pms Capacitacisn Efectiva
de Mixico presenta:El programa mas importante del momento Manejo
Sptimo de la plataforma Compranet 5.0Exclusivas presentaciones:18 de
Julio en la Ciudad de Mixico.20 de Julio en Guadalajara, Jalisco.22
de Julio
Hello *,
If anyone is going to Slackathon 2011 and wants any particular openbsd
merchandise brought over please let us know ASAP (reply personally,
not on list). The items can be from Canada as the shipping order will
be made in about 24 hours.
Thanks
Hi,
I'm looking for a paper, or a man page about described groups in OpenBSD.
Is there a way to have more details on groups (/etc/group), for example :
what is the groups nobody, operator, nogroup, bin...)
For better understanding the system.
Thank you very much.
Wesley.
www.e-solutions.re
Was wondering what advantages OpenBSD has over a progressive Linux
distribution such as Ubuntu (Server edition). One thing I noticed is
that they're having a hell of a time transitioning away from the
traditional sysvinit-based system to the Upstart event-based init
daemon system.
--
/jm
Hi,
trying to compile current on amd64 just checked out from
anoncvs.eu.openbsd.org.
Produces following below. Is it me or src?
# cd /usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP/
# make clean make depend make
rm -f eddep *bsd *bsd.gdb tags *.[dio] [a-z]*.s [Ee]rrs linterrs assym.h
cat
On 2011 Jul 07 (Thu) at 15:06:40 +0200 (+0200), Maxim Bourmistrov wrote:
:Hi,
:
:trying to compile current on amd64 just checked out from
:anoncvs.eu.openbsd.org.
:
:Produces following below. Is it me or src?
:
:cc1: warnings being treated as errors
:ioconf.c:821: warning: excess elements in
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Calomel Org
infallibilismindefeasibil...@calomel.org wrote:
ALTQ using hfsc is limited to a maximum parent bandwidth of 4294Mb.
This value is 2^32 or 4,294,967,296 bits. If you set the bandwidth any
higher, altq will flip back to zero. This bug was found when
# cd /usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP/
# make clean make depend make
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html#20110414
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#BldBinary
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Juan Miscaro jmisc...@gmail.com wrote:
Was wondering what advantages OpenBSD has over a progressive Linux
distribution such as Ubuntu (Server edition). One thing I noticed is
that they're having a hell of a time transitioning away from the
traditional
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 03:42:28PM -0600, Jeff Ross wrote:
--- usr.bin/calendar/calendars/calendar.music Wed Jul 6 15:39:20 2011
+++ usr.bin/calendar/calendars/calendar.music.new Wed Jul 6
15:39:00 2011
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@
07/07 Gustav Mahler is born in Kalischt, Bohemia, 1860
Hello all,
For I, differences are simple :
OpenBSD : all products included are stable working fully from the install
sets packages.
OpenBSD : just install necessary things.
Ubuntu : All products are allowd to the dist, even unstable
Ubuntu : installs many many things as a workstation use even
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
nencohetar.jpg]
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
marquiartife.jpg]
Yet my upstream still prefers core2a as correct route to our network. I
noticed, that only core2a networks have announced flag, is that right?
Any other ideas what could be wrong?
If you look at the Loc-Rib aka 'bgpctl show rib 194.143.152.1 all' it will
show you that there are two networks
Hi Juan,
Juan Miscaro wrote on Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 09:02:08AM -0400:
Was wondering what advantages OpenBSD has over a progressive Linux
distribution such as Ubuntu (Server edition). One thing I noticed is
that they're having a hell of a time transitioning away from the
traditional
For starters, there is 100% consensus among developers that we'll never
use newfangled overengineered stuff like System V init.
You mean Upstart!
or wait
You mean systemd!
Hello misc,
I Have a ethernet RTL8169SC based chipset and it work very well with OpenBSD
4.8, the same card not work with 4.9
The motherboard of 4.9 is Intel DP43BF
in attach dmesg.boot of 4.9
Regards,
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had
a name of
Hi
The only mailing list that allows attachments is the _ports_ list,
they will be removed from messages on the other mailing lists.
http://www.openbsd.org/mail.html
you can upload your dmesg to pastebin and provide link in email.
On 14:53 Thu 07 Jul , R0me0 *** wrote:
Hello misc,
I Have a
Sorry,
The link of dmesg on pastebin : http://pastebin.com/fK9HSrfY
Regards,
2011/7/7 Sergey Bronnikov este...@gmail.com
Hi
The only mailing list that allows attachments is the _ports_ list,
they will be removed from messages on the other mailing lists.
http://www.openbsd.org/mail.html
On 07/07/2011 02:01 PM, Sergey Bronnikov wrote:
...
you can upload your dmesg to pastebin and provide link in email.
Just put it in-line.
Rule #1 of getting free help: don't make it annoying to the people
giving you the free help. I'm not going to third party sites for
something that
*Sorry about the direct response Nick. :0
These two lines make me think it's a configuration problem.
bge0 at pci7 dev 0 function 0 Broadcom BCM57788 rev 0x01, BCM57780
A1 (0x57780001): apic 0 int 17 (irq 10), address 00:22:4d:4c:40:ee
brgphy0 at bge0 phy 1: BCM57780 10/100/1000baseT PHY, rev. 1
Allright, I disabled bge0 on BIOS SETUP but the error continues:
pciide0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 Marvell 88SE6101 IDE rev 0xb2: DMA
(unsupported), channel 0 configured to native-PCI, channel 1
configured to native-PCI
2011/7/7 Zeb Packard zeb.pack...@gmail.com
*Sorry about the direct
I booted OBSD 4.8 on this motherboard and I have the same error:
can be this error related with BUG as described on man page of re driver ?
Regards,
2011/7/7 R0me0 *** knight@gmail.com
Allright, I disabled bge0 on BIOS SETUP but the error continues:
pciide0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0
On 07/07/11 13:25, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
Hi Juan,
Juan Miscaro wrote on Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 09:02:08AM -0400:
Was wondering what advantages OpenBSD has over a progressive Linux
distribution such as Ubuntu (Server edition). One thing I noticed is
that they're having a hell of a time
You mean systemd!
You'd need udev in the core system. And everybody knows daemontools/runit is
the past, present, and future of init systems.
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 09:02:08 -0400
Juan Miscaro jmisc...@gmail.com wrote:
Was wondering what advantages OpenBSD has over a progressive Linux
distribution such as Ubuntu (Server edition).
Are you kidding? Ubuntu? Where installed daemons are running by default,
where there is no command to
This machine does not have an re(4) chip in it. You need to use bge0
for your ethernet device.
On 2011 Jul 07 (Thu) at 11:39:20 -0700 (-0700), Zeb Packard wrote:
:*Sorry about the direct response Nick. :0
:
:These two lines make me think it's a configuration problem.
:
:bge0 at pci7 dev 0
The developers don't adopt new things just because they're new.
If something isn't reasonable, useful and secure it isn't used. This
is one reason why each new release of OpenBSD doesn't have the
currently released version of gcc, for example.
Wrong. It is because of GPL v3. Gcc in base
On 07/07/11 15:12, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
The developers don't adopt new things just because they're new.
If something isn't reasonable, useful and secure it isn't used. This
is one reason why each new release of OpenBSD doesn't have the
currently released version of gcc, for example.
Wrong. It
On 07/07/2011 02:39 PM, Zeb Packard wrote:
*Sorry about the direct response Nick. :0
These two lines make me think it's a configuration problem.
bge0 at pci7 dev 0 function 0 Broadcom BCM57788 rev 0x01, BCM57780
A1 (0x57780001): apic 0 int 17 (irq 10), address 00:22:4d:4c:40:ee
brgphy0 at bge0
the ethernet that I'm plugging work very well on old hardware and work very
well ( OBSD 4.8 )
the same ethernet accurs this error: ( re(4) chip )
pciide0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 Marvell 88SE6101 IDE rev 0xb2: DMA
:(unsupported), channel 0 configured to native-PCI, channel 1
:configured to
One thing I noticed is
that they're having a hell of a time transitioning away from the
traditional sysvinit-based system to the Upstart event-based init
daemon system.
That's syntactical stuff, who knows. That rabbit hole is as deep
as your project made it. Strategically, OBSD does less, but
dmesg.boot of old hardware: ( same ethernet )
OpenBSD 4.8 (GENERIC.MP) #359: Mon Aug 16 09:16:26 MDT 2010
dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP
cpu0: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 3.01 GHz
cpu0:
I'd like to see the output from ifconfig.
Ermal,
Thanks for the diff. When we tried it on FreeBSD 8.2-p2, ALTq would no
long start. We also looked into the source under
/usr/src/sys/contrib/altq/altq. Sadly, most of the changes we made
either broke altq completely or had no effect.
If you have any other ideas we would be happy to try
Hi all,
I'm in the process of migrating our company from a certain proprietary mail
system to a new OpenBSD mailserver (IMAP + Postfix).
I'd like to be able to migrate our users one at a time rather than do the whole
company in one fell swoop.
Does anyone know of a good/easy way to
dmesg.boot of old hardware: ( same ethernet )
[...]
bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 04/25/06, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xfad90,
SMBIOS rev. 2.3 @ 0xf0100 (34 entries)
bios0: vendor Award Software International, Inc. version F3e DB date
04/25/2006
bios0: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd.
# uname -smr
OpenBSD 4.8 i386
# ifconfig
re0
re0: flags=8b43UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,ALLMULTI,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu
1500
lladdr 00:08:54:69:13:54
priority: 0
media: Ethernet 100baseTX full-duplex
status: active
inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 0xff00
That dmesg is about a year old, I'm leaning towards ESD damage.
Yes, the machine are different, I'm doing upgrade of hardware, I buy
tp-link model n. TG-3269 and have the same chipset and work very well on
this machine that have OBSD 4.8, but I tested the SAME ethernet that I'm
running on 4.8 in new hardware with 4.9
2011/7/7 Miod Vallat m...@online.fr
Other thing, I have others servers, that are running OBSD 4.8 with the same
ethernet model, and it work very well.
The ethernet is ENLGA-1320 ( encore electronics ) ( YES, is a generic
network card )
2011/7/7 R0me0 *** knight@gmail.com
Yes, the machine are different, I'm doing upgrade of
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 13:42:00 -0400
IT Guy it...@barrett.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm in the process of migrating our company from a certain
proprietary mail system to a new OpenBSD mailserver (IMAP + Postfix).
I'd like to be able to migrate our users one at a time rather than do
the whole
On Jul 7, 2011, at 1:42 PM, IT Guy wrote:
Hi all,
I'm in the process of migrating our company from a certain proprietary mail
system to a new OpenBSD mailserver (IMAP + Postfix).
I'd like to be able to migrate our users one at a time rather than do the
whole company in one fell swoop.
Does
Ubuntu is linux, OpenBSD is OpenBSD.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Juan Miscaro jmisc...@gmail.com wrote:
Was wondering what advantages OpenBSD has over a progressive Linux
distribution such as Ubuntu (Server edition). One thing I noticed is
that they're having a hell of a time
On 7/7/2011 12:42 PM, IT Guy wrote:
Hi all,
I'm in the process of migrating our company from a certain proprietary mail
system to a new OpenBSD mailserver (IMAP + Postfix).
I'd like to be able to migrate our users one at a time rather than do the whole
company in one fell swoop.
Does anyone
So, i've setup a file server with softraid rather than the older
raidframe, however on the new system I tried setting my sd*b
partitions to a raid 0 configuration so the swap space runs a
little faster. After getting the swap space setup, though dmesg
prints [ root on sd0a swap on sd0b ..]. After
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011, Zeb Packard wrote:
So, i've setup a file server with softraid rather than the older
raidframe, however on the new system I tried setting my sd*b
partitions to a raid 0 configuration so the swap space runs a
little faster. After getting the swap space setup, though dmesg
hmmkay, so both disklabels have an sd0b, softraid is pointed to
sd3b for swap, but dmesg still prints 'swap on sd0b dump on sd0b'
I'm assuming this is because sd0b is striped?
I figure it's worth a shot on my test system, if it's quicker, I'm not
opposed to the little bit of configuration up
All Linux-based distributions are hacked together like a Frankenstein
monster, coming from disparate sources stitched together to build a new
whole, hoping it won't fall apart anytime soon, while OpenBSD is like a
finely tuned thoroughbred, it may not go first place in speed, but will
deliver with
On 07/07/11 18:02, Zeb Packard wrote:
hmmkay, so both disklabels have an sd0b, softraid is pointed to
sd3b for swap, but dmesg still prints 'swap on sd0b dump on sd0b'
I'm assuming this is because sd0b is striped?
no, it is because sd0b is swap BY DEFINITION.
Do not use the 'a' partition of
On 07/07/11 15:59, R0me0 *** wrote:
[...snip a whole lot of incomplete, fragmentary and wrong stuff...]
here's the scoop.
Realtek cards work. re(4) driver works. Got at least a couple, it's
not something I usually brag about, but here's one from 4.9:
re0 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 Realtek 8169
Hi All,
I've been battling this issue for a couple of days now and I'm hoping someone
might have a possible fix for it. Any help is greatly appreciated.
I have a workstation which is on a network routed through VPN client device
The clients are on VLAN 304 with an address range of 192.168.18.0
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:53 PM, R0me0 *** knight@gmail.com wrote:
# uname -smr
OpenBSD 4.8 i386
# ifconfig
re0
re0: flags=8b43UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,ALLMULTI,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST
mtu
1500
lladdr 00:08:54:69:13:54
priority: 0
media: Ethernet 100baseTX
186135
[IMAGE]
Gracias a su preferencia y ixito obtenido Pms Capacitacisn Efectiva de
Mixico presenta:
El programa mas importante del momento
Manejo Sptimo de la plataforma Compranet 5.0
Exclusivas presentaciones:
18 de Julio en la Ciudad de Mixico.
20 de Julio en Guadalajara, Jalisco.
22
53 matches
Mail list logo
