Hi all,
I looked in man 4 ath, man 8 ifconfig and man 8 wicontrol but did find
out the answer to my question:
Is there any tool like wicontrol for ath cards ?
Typically, how can I scan for access points ?
Yours,
Alexandre Stefani
Hello! I'm have problem :( My server is HP DL380 G3.
#uname -a
OpenBSD .econmos.com 3.8 GENERIC#202 i386
#dmesg
OpenBSD 3.8-current (GENERIC) #202: Wed Oct 19 17:52:24 MDT 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.06GHz (GenuineIntel
Hi all,
Is ike over tcp supported under isakmpd on obsd 3.7?? where I can
find docs about this configuration ??
Thanks.
--
CL Martinez
carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com
Hi Alexandre,
I don't know of a control tool for ath(4) because all can be done over
ifconfig(8). To scan for access points do simply:
ifconfig -M ath0
I also did a wmdockapp which does a bit monitoring of your wireless card,
which works pretty good with ath(4). That's the port for the latest
From: Alexandre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
I looked in man 4 ath, man 8 ifconfig and man 8 wicontrol but did find out
the answer to my question:
Is there any tool like wicontrol for ath cards ?
Typically, how can I scan for access points ?
I think this was added post 3.7, but you might be
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 10:24:25AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Is ike over tcp supported under isakmpd on obsd 3.7?? where I can
no
My problem (!!!) - bge1 at pci4 dev 2 function 0 Broadcom BCM5703X rev 0x02:
couldn't establish interrupt at irq 15.
Howto ? RTFM ? Help me!
Try to set it to a different IRQ in the BIOS.
The whole matter is strange on irq15, which is usually for secondary IDE.
Uwe
Thx! IRQ = 7 all work OK!
- Original Message -
From: Uwe Dippel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: HP DL 380 G3 + OpenBSD 3.8
My problem (!!!) - bge1 at pci4 dev 2 function 0 Broadcom BCM5703X rev
0x02:
couldn't establish
Hi,
I just wrote this article about migrating to a new HD after the
old one got too flakey.
I maintain the original over here:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/documents/hd-migration
HD MIGRATION:
It started with my HD failing to sync when I was rebooting. And
some odd errormessages I saw. So I
Hello!
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 12:42:04PM +0200, Han Boetes wrote:
I just wrote this article about migrating to a new HD after the
old one got too flakey.
[...]
I like a dump | restore combo, because dump is quite fast.
I.e. partition the new disk similar to the old one (sizes may vary as
long
On 10/26/05, Chris Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Running 3.8, 2 nics, 1 statically assigned, and the other using dhcp.
Problem is that resolv.conf is always overwritten. Using
resolv.conf.tail doesn't help as the information is just tacked on at
the end of the dhcp supplied
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 12:42:04PM +0200, Han Boetes wrote:
Hi,
I just wrote this article about migrating to a new HD after the
old one got too flakey.
I maintain the original over here:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/documents/hd-migration
HD MIGRATION:
It started with my HD
Hannah Schroeter wrote:
I like a dump | restore combo, because dump is quite fast.
Sounds interesting, I'll look into it.
I.e. partition the new disk similar to the old one (sizes may
vary as long as stuff will fit on the new disk). dump|restore
for every filesystem (partition) you have,
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 20:57:15 -0500
James Harless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I'm looking for is a way to whitelist them based on user
input.. before their initial email has been sent. In this somewhat typical
scenario, the user has contacted me and said I don't want mail from
[EMAIL
Hi,
I tried installing nmap and got some dependency problems. I am running
snapshots.
pkg_add
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/i386/nmap-3.93.tgz
Can't install
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/i386/nmap-3.93.tgz:
lib not found pcap.3.1
Even by
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Rico
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 8:55 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Problem installing nmap from packages
Hi,
I tried installing nmap and got some dependency problems. I am running
Rico [Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 02:55:02PM +0200] wrote:
I tried installing nmap and got some dependency problems. I am running
snapshots.
pkg_add
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/i386/nmap-3.93.tgz
Can't install
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 02:55:02PM +0200, Rico wrote:
Hi,
I tried installing nmap and got some dependency problems. I am running
snapshots.
pkg_add
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/i386/nmap-3.93.tgz
Can't install
Chad,
I appreciate the insight. I do realize it's a difficult problem but,
I think that there's a solution (albeit possibly from someone smarter
than I).
I do have variables that are known (the sender email address and the
recipient email address). The problem is tying them to the IP Address
Hi,
slightly OT, I created Frappr! openbsd map
(http://www.frappr.com/openbsd). Join it and well, we could see who
and where does use OpenBSD.
Regards
Petr R.
--
Security is decided by quality -- Theo de Raadt
On Wed 2005.10.26 at 14:55 +0200, Rico wrote:
Hi,
I tried installing nmap and got some dependency problems. I am running
snapshots.
pkg_add
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/i386/nmap-3.93.tgz
Can't install
On 10/26/05, lEBEDEW aNDREJ gERMANOWI^ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My problem (!!!) - bge1 at pci4 dev 2 function 0 Broadcom BCM5703X rev 0x02:
couldn't establish interrupt at irq 15.
Howto ? RTFM ? Help me!
In the Compaq BIOS, make sure nothing is configured for IRQ 15. It's
an annoying issue
--On 26 October 2005 08:21 -0500, James Harless wrote:
I do have variables that are known (the sender email address and the
recipient email address). The problem is tying them to the IP Address
of the MTA when it's seen @ spamd. It may be that there isn't a
solution without direct
Thanks all! The problem is solved by recustomizing IRQ in BIOS.
# dmesg | grep bge1
bge1 at pci4 dev 2 function 0 Broadcom BCM5703X rev 0x02, BCM5703 A2
(0x1002): irq 7 address 00:0e:7f:ad:0e:e3
brgphy1 at bge1 phy 1: BCM5703 10/100/1000baseT PHY, rev. 2
bge1:
I'm looking at buying a ECS A900 or A901 laptop and i'm curious if
anyone has any experience running OpenBSD on such a machine?
Tech specs, for those interested:
http://www.ecsusa.com/products/a900_spec.html
http://www.ecsusa.com/products/a901_spec.html
---
Lars Hansson
Message from: Lars
At 09:57 PM 10/25/05, James Harless wrote:
I appreciate the suggestions, but, not quite what I'm looking for yet.
Either of these would allow me to whitelist someone AFTER they had been
greylisting. What I'm looking for is a way to whitelist them based on user
input.. before their initial email
On Wednesday 26 October 2005 07:38 am, Siju George wrote:
Now My /etc/dhclient.conf looks like this
These two lines worked fine here:
---
request subnet-mask, broadcast-address, routers;
supersede domain-name-servers 192.168.107.2;
On 10/26/05, Frank Bax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 09:57 PM 10/25/05, James Harless wrote:
I appreciate the suggestions, but, not quite what I'm looking for yet.
Either of these would allow me to whitelist someone AFTER they had been
greylisting. What I'm looking for is a way to whitelist
If you are using spamlogd correctly, so that it is whitelisting the
destination addresses of target mailservers, I find the actual need
for this to be near zero, since most people send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and as soon as they do the server is whitelisted for
the reply - this is not
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 09:06:11 -0600, Bob Beck proclaimed...
Basically, the correct answer is suck it up princess, in
pathological cases someone's email might be delayed by a short while
getting to you in normal cases it won't. Usually users ask for this
when you tell them what you are
My experience is that greylisting requires at least 2 failed attempts.
Maybe my pf.conf isn't setup properly. But, there's always 1 'extra' failure
that seems to me should pass through.
James is right, it's a design flaw of spamd that two failed attempts
are required. This is what happens:
On 10/26/05, James Harless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chad,
I appreciate the insight. I do realize it's a difficult problem but,
I think that there's a solution (albeit possibly from someone smarter
than I).
Nope there's just not.
I do have variables that are known (the sender email address
I wanted to set up a system which has two ether cards (it's part of
a transparent bridge so it'll be inline with someone's connection)
such that it'll pick up a DHCP address on *both* cards ... the trick
comes from not knowing in advance whether the DHCP server will be
on the inside connection or
Hi
I'm running a 3.7 (all patches applied, everthing else default) on an
old box (dmesg at the end). It fetches mail for me with the following
script:
---8---
#! /bin/sh
LOCK=$HOME/.getmail.lock
if ! [ -f $LOCK ]
then
touch $LOCK
getmail 21 /dev/null
rm $LOCK
fi
On Oct 26, 2005, at 11:54 AM, Graham Toal wrote:
My experience is that greylisting requires at least 2 failed
attempts.
Maybe my pf.conf isn't setup properly. But, there's always 1
'extra' failure
that seems to me should pass through.
James is right, it's a design flaw of spamd that two
How would you find an unknown ip of an unknown machine? About the
only *chance* you have is doing MX lookup's and hoping that email
comes from that same server. If their organization uses various
relays and proxies to send, you are out of luck. There's no way to
get that information
Graham Toal wrote:
The only fix for this is a *major* redesign of spamd (or equivalently
incorporating spamd's greylisting code into a spamfilter which *does*
relay connections at the IP level to an MTA - which is actually what I'm
working on at the moment)
Why start from scratch ? There are
I didn't see any specifics in the archives or from Google. As this
type of software tuner can be had for cheap (locally here I've found
the Asus TV FM tuner PCI card for under $40cdn), I was wondering if
OpenBSD had support for it?
Many thanks in advance!
--
I know too much and yet not enough
FYI, Hakan tells me this isn't possible now, but might be someday.
Sean Knox wrote:
[I didn't get much response on the openbsd-ipsec list, so I'm reposting
here]
I'm having problems allowing roadwarrior connections from aggressive and
main mode clients to connect isakmpd at the same
--On 26 October 2005 09:12 -0400, Frank Bax wrote:
Have you tried whitelisting these servers:
http://greylisting.org/whitelisting.shtml
That list by policy only includes 'shared queue' servers on blocks
larger than /24 (the greylisting software written by the list compiler
usually
On 10/26/05, Graham Toal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wanted to set up a system which has two ether cards (it's part of
a transparent bridge so it'll be inline with someone's connection)
such that it'll pick up a DHCP address on *both* cards ... the trick
comes from not knowing in advance
I have been reading through the archives but have not found a reliable answer
yet. I have recently been converting vpns from manual to isakmpd, with one
of the other endpoints being a Cisco box. I can bring up a single subnet/IP
no problem but if I try to add another phase2 connection it fails.
At 11:05 AM 10/26/05, James Harless wrote:
On 10/26/05, Frank Bax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
spamd only delays the *first* message between the two parties. After that
there is no delay - as long as sender continues to use the same SMTP
server.
My experience is that greylisting requires at
Stuart Henderson wrote:
--On 26 October 2005 08:21 -0500, James Harless wrote:
I do have variables that are known (the sender email address and the
recipient email address). The problem is tying them to the IP Address
of the MTA when it's seen @ spamd. It may be that there isn't a
solution
Graham,
I use a bridge and assign the IP to one NIC, albeit statically assigned,
on several production OpenBSD 3.5 systems. If I ever switched the IP to
the Other NIC, I would lose connectivity until the ARP tables on the
various LAN hosts updated with the new MAC address. Maybe about 10
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
Hi
I'm running a 3.7 (all patches applied, everthing else default) on an
old box (dmesg at the end). It fetches mail for me with the following
script:
---8---
#! /bin/sh
LOCK=$HOME/.getmail.lock
if ! [ -f $LOCK ]
then
touch $LOCK
I use a bridge and assign the IP to one NIC, albeit statically assigned,
on several production OpenBSD 3.5 systems. If I ever switched the IP to
the Other NIC, I would lose connectivity until the ARP tables on the
various LAN hosts updated with the new MAC address. Maybe about 10 minutes
Maybe I'm not understanding the problem, but for a tranparent bridge, you
wouldn't want it to be assigned an IP address on either network card. hence
the transparent part.
You would think so, but you would be wrong. As I was when I started
this project. In OpenBSD a bridge must either have
The only fix for this is a *major* redesign of spamd (or equivalently
incorporating spamd's greylisting code into a spamfilter which *does*
relay connections at the IP level to an MTA - which is actually what I'm
working on at the moment)
Why start from scratch ? There are enough seasoned,
On 10/26/05, James Harless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chad,
I appreciate the insight. I do realize it's a difficult problem but,
I think that there's a solution (albeit possibly from someone smarter
than I).
Nope there's just not.
There is, but not with spamd as currently implemented.
On 10/26/05, Otto Moerbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
GNU gdb 6.3
[...]
This GDB was configured as i386-unknown-openbsd3.7...
Core was generated by `sh'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0 0x1c027ed6 in
It *ought* to be possible to configure both hostname.xl0 and hostname.fxp1
as dhcp, and whichever one comes up first, will then bridge through the
DHCP server for the other. Unfortunately it just happens by luck of
alphabetical order, that the one which comes up first is *not* looking
at a
A while back, I had problems installing OpenBSD on Proliants. I'd get all the
way through the installation process and reboot the computer, and the BIOS
wouldn't boot OpenBSD from the first the RAID1 hard disk. Playing with
disklabel and using other commands to copy the MBR didn't work. If I
Assuming that the problem turns out to be that the dhcp request for
fxp1 is always routed out of fxp1 (makes sense, right?) what can I do
to have it routed out the other interface via bridging? (Remembering
that the solution has to work symmetrically, if in some other deployment
it is the
Why not start the system with one interface down (so you know which way
to route to) then up it at the end of the boot sequence and start the
dhclient?
Graham Toal wrote:
Assuming that the problem turns out to be that the dhcp request for
fxp1 is always routed out of fxp1 (makes sense,
2005/8/30, Alexander von Gernler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
just resumed my work on i386-laptop.html after vacation, and I noticed
we don't have any reports on the IBM/Lenovo Thinkpad X41.
Does anyone out there have this machine running under OpenBSD?
Please report.
Hi all,
It's not an X41, but I
Jonas Carlsson wrote:
In what ways will I suffer if I simply re-enable null mounts to bring
some discspace from /home into my apache chroot on a much smaller /var
partition? I've used this solution without problems for a few versions.
Maybe you won't suffer at all, maybe you get corrupted
Han Boetes wrote:
It started with my HD failing to sync when I was rebooting. And
some odd errormessages I saw. So I was holding my breath hoping
for it to be something else or just an incident.
DejC!-vC9. You are describing my laptop with its crappy Hitachi hard drive.
But it only got
Graham Toal wrote:
I could force the traffic from one interface to the other with pf
and a route-to option, but only if I know which interface the dhcp
server is connected to. Since I cannot make that assumption (it
depends on where in the network the bridge is inserted) I can't see
a solution.
anyone have any luck getting apps running under linux emulation that
don't check whether they can play at a certain sampling rates to play
properly on hardware like auich(4) stuck on 48kHz?
I've tried running the redhat esound libs against the native daemon with
no luck (sound doesn't play).
Making, drinking tea and reading an opus magnum from James Wright:
[Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
anyone have any luck getting apps running under linux emulation that
don't check whether they can play at a certain sampling rates to play
properly on hardware like
Robert,
If I remember correctly, bridging only works in hostap mode.
Rgds,
Anwar Puthu
___
Sent with SnapperMail
www.snappermail.com
.. Original Message ...
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 12:36:04 +0200 Robert Stepanek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi list,
When setting up a wireless bridge to
If I remember correctly, bridging only works in hostap mode.
Bingo, someone remembered -- and that is correct.
In the other modes, MAC addresses of course do not get exposed
correctly, and your access point cannot impersonate the other
hosts it is required to.
It is fairly obvious if you think
...a while back, i wrote a tutorial for RAIFRame RAID1 as a root FS on
NetBSD. I used the bootstrap method. Sometime not soon after, NetBSD
added RAIDFrame to the INSTALL* kernels and presumably menus to sysinst,
mitigating the need for this approach.
the boostrap process is:
*) do a basic
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:42:43 -0500, Graham Toal wrote:
What I expected was that the first would sleep for a
short time then ask again, and get it OK. I haven't seen that happen -
about 30 minutes later and the interface still has no IP.
[This goes vastly OT, I know:]
I am blank astonished
Oct 26 2005 c. 20:42 Graham Toal wrote:
I wanted to set up a system which has two ether cards (it's part of
a transparent bridge so it'll be inline with someone's connection)
such that it'll pick up a DHCP address on *both* cards ... the
trick comes from not knowing in advance whether the DHCP
What I expected was that the first would sleep for a
short time then ask again, and get it OK. I haven't seen that happen -
about 30 minutes later and the interface still has no IP.
[This goes vastly OT, I know:]
I am blank astonished that it seems to be impossible to get two
67 matches
Mail list logo
