Hi misc,
I'm trying to setup a new openbsd 3.9 install on i386. It worked before on
that computer when I installed quickly to test for compatibility, but I
needed to finish up some hardware stuff on it and then I wanted to install
for real but it does not work anymore.
It hangs at the disk:
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 07:59:23PM +0200, Ronnie Garcia wrote:
Hello,
I have an OSPF enabled backbone and want to insert two firewalls.
Each firewall will be connected to one different core router.
My idea is to setup OSPFd on the interfaces plugged to the core, and
CARP on the
* Chris Cappuccio [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-10 20:56]:
Ronnie Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will pfsync just handle the split sessions happily ? Will it handle the
load for, say, 10k pps ?
with a soekris net4501? no
with a 500mhz celeron or higher? yes
uh, careful. pfsync is
Or is sniffing with kismet and then trying to crack the key with
bsd-airtools (wich doesn`t implement the latest algorithms to speed this
up) the only way on oBSD?
Kind regards,
Sebastian
p.s.
If somebody has a aircrack-ng port wich may compiles fine or even just
supports the stuff it
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 19:59, Ronnie Garcia wrote:
I have an OSPF enabled backbone and want to insert two firewalls.
Each firewall will be connected to one different core router.
...
With this design, a SYN packet can enter thru FW2 and the
corresponding ACK packet go back thru FW1.
Will
On 10/10/06 9:29 PM, ropers wrote:
http://www.thejemreport.com/mambo/content/view/286/
from the above link:
Technically end-users are not Marvell's customers because it neither
makes nor sells the actual hardware that people use. Instead, it makes
chips that OEMs in turn buy and integrate
On 11/10/06, Jan Stary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.theonion.com/content/node/53928
Oh, this is SUCH torture!
My common sense very resolutely tells me that these strings are pure
gibberish, but I just can't help myself, trying to treat this as
ciphertext. Is it base64? Apparently not,
Taisto Qvist wrote:
Hi Folks,
I am having the extremely annoying, and probably simple problem of not
being able to list the rules in my authpf anchors, and its close to
keeping me up all night.
I had this issue when I configured this the first time, but I just cant
remember what kind of simple
On 11/10/06, Patrick Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi misc,
I'm trying to setup a new openbsd 3.9 install on i386. It worked before on
that computer when I installed quickly to test for compatibility, but I
needed to finish up some hardware stuff on it and then I wanted to install
for real
On Monday 09 October 2006 22:44, you wrote:
I see 4.0 is coming out, and yet, no hardware raid support, no fixes for
raidframe,
and still no SMP support, for sparc64 on Ultrasparc II machines.
yadda
Just to give you an idea how lazy the OpenBSD developers are, I got up this
morning and went
Vic wrote:
There is already open bug report about this: 5105, and I read some
about it on misc@ I believe. Anyway, ral card drops me to ddb when
swotching it from 11g mode to 11b, I had that happen to me yesterday
on a two weeks old snapshot. Would it be of any use providing the
trace and ps
On 10/11/06, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just had another thought:
Why do the IP phones have to have public IPs?
Is this because giving them NATted, private range IPs previously
didn't work so well?
The VoIP phones Patrick is using are probably (my guess) using the
Session
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Damien Bergamini wrote:
| Here are the appropriate dmesg lines:
| ral0 at pci1 dev 9 function 0 Ralink RT2561S rev 0x00: irq 12, address
| 00:16:b6:98:85:1f
| ral0: MAC/BBP RT2661B, RF RT2527
Another appropriate dmesg line would have been the OS version and
the
Would one of the developers please rebuild X for -current i386? The
10/10 snapshot seems to have cranked the libc revision, but the 10/7 X
seems to still uses the old libc. (At least, on a fresh install using
the 10/10 sets and the 10/7 X, it complains that it can't find
libc.so.39 and .40
On 11/10/06, Martin Gignac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/11/06, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just had another thought:
Why do the IP phones have to have public IPs?
Is this because giving them NATted, private range IPs previously
didn't work so well?
The VoIP phones Patrick is
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 09:32:07AM -0400, Martin Gignac wrote:
On 10/11/06, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just had another thought:
Why do the IP phones have to have public IPs?
Is this because giving them NATted, private range IPs previously
didn't work so well?
The VoIP phones
Hello,
I can't boot the latest snapshot if the card is plugged. The boot process
stops just after (sometimes before) the starting of the network.
If I boot from bsd.rd or bsd.mp it works fine : the card is detected and
works.
If I boot without the network card : bsd boots.
Here is the dmesg
Exciting stuff; totally missed the log sysctl.
The netstat(8) reveals some interesting info about a persistent failover
condition:
$ netstat -sp carp
carp:
7731906 packets received (IPv4)
0 packets received (IPv6)
0 packets discarded for bad interface
According to Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://www.rtos.com/news/detail/?prid=104
Product Category ThreadX Deployments Representative Customers
Wireless Networking 200,000,000 Broadcom, Intel, Marvell
Even more curious is this at the bottom of that same
On Oct 10, 2006, at 5:38 PM, Shane J Pearson wrote:
By interesting, you mean one is well meaning, but a little kooky
and not always in touch with reality and the other is focused and
committed to maintaining some sanity in the world of computing?
No, I didn't mean that. I meant that both
On 10/11/06, Girish Venkatachalam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If my memory serves me right, SIP actually has ALG built into the standard
itself and www.opensip.org might already give you what you want.
Hmm, wasn't aware of that. Do you have any specific RFC or 3GPP spec
number that I could
Jack J. Woehr wrote:
On Oct 10, 2006, at 5:38 PM, Shane J Pearson wrote:
By interesting, you mean one is well meaning, but a little kooky
and not always in touch with reality and the other is focused and
committed to maintaining some sanity in the world of computing?
No, I didn't
On Oct 11, 2006, at 10:58 AM, Breen Ouellette wrote:
PS - Jack, some friendly advice, you are only encouraging them each
time you reply. They obviously don't care about why you find
interest in this subject. They only want to find a way to link you
to RMS and then trash you.
Thanks,
Yes, I've tried siproxd, but my lack of knowledge has caused me to fail
to get this working properly.
I'm VERY excited with all the responses you folks gave me. Now I have
to take the time to read all them over. I'll respond to the other posts
very soon.
Thank you once again for all the
Yes, I've tried siproxd, but my lack of knowledge has caused me to fail
to get this working properly.
Then using your available public IPs should be the ticket.
-Martin
--
Suburbia is where the developer bulldozes out the trees, then names
the streets after them.
Martin Gignac wrote:
On 10/11/06, Girish Venkatachalam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If my memory serves me right, SIP actually has ALG built into the
standard itself and www.opensip.org might already give you what you want.
Hmm, wasn't aware of that. Do you have any specific RFC or 3GPP
On 10/11/06, Jon Radel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If my memory serves me right, SIP actually has ALG built into the
standard itself and www.opensip.org might already give you what you want.
Hmm, wasn't aware of that. Do you have any specific RFC or 3GPP spec
number that I could check out
Girish Venkatachalam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Threads a big PITA. Best avoided. Creates more problems than solves.
OpenBSD is about neatness, cleanliness and stability.
Threads don't have any of them. :-)
First of all, threads are a good choice for some tasks. Just because
openbsd's
On 10/9/06, Patrick - South Valley Internet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have a box I installed OpenBSD 3.9 on. I'm trying to get this box to
function as our office firewall. Here's the catch - we have VOIP phones
that contact an external VOIP server outside of our firewall. I've been
On 11/10/06, Martin Gignac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I've tried siproxd, but my lack of knowledge has caused me to fail
to get this working properly.
Then using your available public IPs should be the ticket.
-Martin
Yah, it's becoming clearer. Use whatever is cleaner and easier to
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 02:42:12PM -0700, Joe wrote:
By the way, if anyone has any pointers (no pun intended) for a
CS newbie, any help and recommendations are always appeciated.
I like the OpenBSD development community and hope to contribute
some code and patches in the future.
Advanced
For those of you that are knowledgeable, and have the time to respond
does anyone see any troubles with this hardware selection?
I am mostly concerned with the raid Controller selection I am
expecting it to have raid 5 across 16 drives with 1 spare
the intent is to run a PostgreSQL 8.2 Server
Hey Jens,
On 10/11/06, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OTOH, if you do have enough public IPs to play with, I'd still
consider bridging and using only public IPs (then you don't need to do
VLANs or NAT).
To satisfy my own curiosity, what are the advantages in your view that
bridging offers
the cvs info manual says:
But in case you want to know, the rule is that the RCS file
is stored in the attic if and only if the head revision on
the trunk has state `dead'.
counterexamples:
/cvs/src/sbin/swapon/Attic/swapon.8,v
Hola
Somebody has running OpenBSD in this machine, controller SATA works, run fine
??
Gracias
Diego Fernando Nieto Moreno
---
www.compumundohypermegared.org
Comunidad de Usuarios OpenBSD Colombia
On 10/11/06, Sam Fourman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For those of you that are knowledgeable, and have the time to respond
does anyone see any troubles with this hardware selection?
I am mostly concerned with the raid Controller selection I am
expecting it to have raid 5 across 16 drives with
So far, every reply has been, It's yours if you pay
to ship it.
Count me in; I will help pay shipping as well.
Count me in too, I have slightly limited funds but will help as much as I can.
Please contact me off list if I can be of any use.
Patsy
Hi misc
I am looking at http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/dev/pci/if_em.c
and can see the following...
--snip--
revert revision 1.131, the code in question was later found to not ensure
the proper alignment requirement for the VLAN layer on strict alignment
architectures. This would
Sam Fourman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For those of you that are knowledgeable, and have the time to respond
does anyone see any troubles with this hardware selection?
I am mostly concerned with the raid Controller selection I am
expecting it to have raid 5 across 16 drives with 1 spare
I wanted to test ipsec.conf before loading it and I noticed this odd behavior.
pgurumur-vm-openbsd (OpenBSD): [~/working/networking/docs]
10.200.0.46: [570]$ cat ipsec.conf
remote_gw = 192.168.0.1
remote_net = { 10.0.100.0/22, 10.0.2/24 }
local_net = { 172.16.18.0/26 }
ike esp from $local_net
Sometimes ports have helpful messages that tell you the proper way to
start it from rc.local or some other set of instructions that shoudl
be your next step etc...
Sometimes these get installed as a dependency of another app though
and so the screen just keeps right on trucking and you don't
Bryan Irvine wrote:
Sometimes these get installed as a dependency of another app though
and so the screen just keeps right on trucking and you don't have time
to read it. Is there some command or somewhere you can go to see what
the message was?
$ man pkg_info
The argument you're looking
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 03:28:08PM -0700, Bryan Irvine wrote:
Sometimes these get installed as a dependency of another app
though and so the screen just keeps right on trucking and you
don't have time to read it. Is there some command or somewhere
you can go to see what the message was?
On 10/11/06, Matthew Weigel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bryan Irvine wrote:
Sometimes these get installed as a dependency of another app though
and so the screen just keeps right on trucking and you don't have time
to read it. Is there some command or somewhere you can go to see what
the
On 11/10/06, Martin Gignac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Jens,
On 10/11/06, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OTOH, if you do have enough public IPs to play with, I'd still
consider bridging and using only public IPs (then you don't need to do
VLANs or NAT).
To satisfy my own curiosity, what
Breen,
Quoting Breen Ouellette [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
PS - Jack, some friendly advice, you are only encouraging them each time
you reply. They obviously don't care about why you find interest in this
subject. They only want to find a way to link you to RMS and then trash you.
I wasn't trying to
PKG_INFO(1)OpenBSD Reference Manual
NAME
pkg_info - a utility for displaying information on software packages
[...]
-D Show the install-message file (if any) for each package
(depre-
cated option).
-M Show the install-message file (if
On 2006/10/12 01:15, ropers wrote:
Or maybe I have gotten a small chunk off of that big fat 123.0.0.0/8
network to play with. So let's say I have been allocated
123.123.123.0/24.
Normally, you get a separate address _as_well_. Let's say 123.4.5.6/30.
Say you don't run a dynamic routing
I've been thinking about the legal blurbs in the source files, the
most permissive being the one in, for example, src/bin/chio/parse.y
I feel it's a bit silly to bother with them, since they have no
technical significance. But perhaps it's worthwhile, every once
in a while, to ponder the real
I've been thinking about the legal blurbs in the source files, the
most permissive being the one in, for example, src/bin/chio/parse.y
I feel it's a bit silly to bother with them, since they have no
technical significance. But perhaps it's worthwhile, every once
in a while, to ponder the
Due to the recent flair over the use of the Firefox logo, the GNU camp
has decided to fork the entire project, into IceWeasel. The idea here
is that they can't use the FF logo freely, so of course they must fork
it. I just want to know how this is going to affect the OpenBSD camp,
if at all.
Hi again Jens,
On 10/11/06, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2006/10/12 01:15, ropers wrote:
Or maybe I have gotten a small chunk off of that big fat 123.0.0.0/8
network to play with. So let's say I have been allocated
123.123.123.0/24.
Normally, you get a separate address
is there any open source software that allows for use of OTS computers as PLCs
for manufacturing equipment?
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
is there any open source software that allows for use of OTS computers as PLCs
for manufacturing equipment?
6,010,000 hits on Google, .. or did you have a different question?
Lee
Leland
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 12:22:06PM -0400, Martin Gignac wrote:
On 10/11/06, Girish Venkatachalam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If my memory serves me right, SIP actually has ALG built into the standard
itself and www.opensip.org might already give you what you want.
Hmm, wasn't aware of that.
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, Paul Stoeber wrote:
I wonder if the following language would provide the same level of
protection or better:
We, the authors of this work, are giving it away to you, dear
reader (and to everyone else), as an opportunity, not as a
service. Do with it
AFAIK, no, but I was hoping to glean that information from the list...
On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 23:31 -0500, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
is someone planning on making a OpenBSD port for IceWeasel?
Sam Fourman Jr.
On 10/11/06, David Sampson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Due to the recent flair over
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 09:26:21AM +0530, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 12:22:06PM -0400, Martin Gignac wrote:
On 10/11/06, Girish Venkatachalam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If my memory serves me right, SIP actually has ALG built into the standard
itself and
On 10/12/06, Girish Venkatachalam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very Sorry Martin. I was not in a good mood this morning and I also got angry
since I didn't know enough to help you out.
Have a nice day! Hope you don't take it to heart.
No sweat. :-)
--
Suburbia is where the developer
On 10/12/06, David Sampson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Due to the recent flair over the use of the Firefox logo, the GNU camp
has decided to fork the entire project, into IceWeasel. The idea here
is that they can't use the FF logo freely, so of course they must fork
it. I just want to know how
On 10/11/06, Girish Venkatachalam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 12:22:06PM -0400, Martin Gignac wrote:
On 10/11/06, Girish Venkatachalam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If my memory serves me right, SIP actually has ALG built into the standard
itself and www.opensip.org might
Hrrmpf. It seems like this goes against OpenBSD philosophy, but there
are many who know far more than I on this subject Maybe TDR hasn't
decided/thought about it, I don't know. I would like to continue to use
firefox under that name, and use the logo too, but it probably isn't as
simple as
Dear list.
My pf.conf not working.
I have pf in bridge machine with xl2 to internet
firewall and xl1 to
internal switch. Bridging is ok.
This my simple pf.conf
me=172.16.0.228
altq on xl1 bandwidth 100% cbq queue {me,dflt}
queue mebandwidth 8Kb
queue dflt bandwidth 16Kb cbq
On 10/11/06, David Sampson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AFAIK, no, but I was hoping to glean that information from the list...
On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 23:31 -0500, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
is someone planning on making a OpenBSD port for IceWeasel?
and the point would be? what makes iceweasel a
Breen,
I am replying to this in full because I want my intentions known.
I'll leave it at this.
On 12/10/2006, at 2:58 AM, Breen Ouellette wrote:
Jack J. Woehr wrote:
On Oct 10, 2006, at 5:38 PM, Shane J Pearson wrote:
By interesting, you mean one is well meaning, but a little
kooky
On 10/12/06, Martin Gignac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I'm familiar with 3261. However the SIP proxy that 3261 talks
about has a completely different function than what an ALG/SBC does.
Maybe I shouldn't have used the term SIP proxy in my previous
e-mails. My bad.
I don't know if it'll
66 matches
Mail list logo
