Hi Guys,
I hope I am posting on the right mailing list. I am sending you this email
because I have been experiencing a lot of BAD State in pf recently.
I don't know if this has been discussed previously.
More and and more people are now using Oses that can adapt the TCP Windows
Size. In pf, I
Richard Toohey wrote:
On 5/12/2007, at 7:09 PM, Richard Toohey wrote:
On 5/12/2007, at 4:24 PM, L wrote:
Question about buttons and knobs..
What exactly is a knob?
[cut]
it simpler. For example the CP command is just a knob for copy..
My understanding of knob is an option or a switch.
Hi,
afaik all access to oracle databases require oracle client software. only
exception I know of is JDBC ( java database connectivity, which has a thin
client requiring only tcp and the oracle jdbc client, which is pure java.
maybe that is an option.
if not you might connect your ms sql server
Hi,
this error seems to have been around a bit on the news groups but I
see no answers only questions (yeh I've got a bible on the shelf next
to the Koran so I could try that).
I've a DLT4000 tape drive connected to a scsi card in my sun blade
100 running openbsd 4.2
I'm getting this
working :)
many thanks
On 5 Dec 2007, at 10:52, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 10:23:46AM +, Khalid Schofield wrote:
Hi,
this error seems to have been around a bit on the news groups but
I see no
answers only questions (yeh I've got a bible on the shelf next to
the
Hi!
I just imported snmpd(8) and snmpctl(8), an initial attempt to
implement a new SNMP daemon for OpenBSD. SNMP is the Simple Network
Management Protocol and it is still very commonly used in corporate
networks, by network vendors, and in network management systems (NMS).
SNMP is very
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 10:23:46AM +, Khalid Schofield wrote:
Hi,
this error seems to have been around a bit on the news groups but I see no
answers only questions (yeh I've got a bible on the shelf next to the Koran
so I could try that).
I've a DLT4000 tape drive connected to a scsi
It's true, but this can't solve any problems.
In my case I have a /16 subnet and I need to nat every single IP to a
different IP, for a total amount of about 400 IPs.
Same subnet, same interface, redundant firewall with carp. Is there
another way to increase vhid limit?
On Aug 10, 2006 2:47 AM,
This is great news! Hopefully I'll find the time to help test.
John
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 11:52:12AM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote:
Hi!
I just imported snmpd(8) and snmpctl(8), an initial attempt to
implement a new SNMP daemon for OpenBSD. SNMP is the Simple Network
Management Protocol
Hi Folks,
I am running, or at least trying to run, OpenBSD 4.2 on a minipc using
AMD's GEODE LX-800.
(Its a
http://www.sdlsystem.se/shop/product_info.php?cPath=23_56products_id=65
6 )
At first I had almost given up, since trying to boot the system was
impossible
since I always got a kernel-panic
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 01:00:11PM +0100, SeDoFa wrote:
It's true, but this can't solve any problems. In my case I have a /16
subnet and I need to nat every single IP to a different IP, for a
total amount of about 400 IPs. Same subnet, same interface, redundant
firewall with carp. Is there
On 12/4/2007 at 6:53 PM Henning Brauer wrote:
|actually, if I were to implement these parts now I'd make it print
port
|numbers only and not names
=
That's what I plan to do when I change the code.I don't need the
command line option part because I have never needed the name
On 2007/12/05 13:02, Kleber Rocha wrote:
My rule is being ignored and the connection is being blocked by the
default block rule:
block in log all
But these rules work well in OpenBSD 4.0
See the 4.0 - 4.1 upgrade guide.
What is the benefit of doing so? What's the point? Is the website so likely
to be hacked into, that the developers need to sign all communication just
to ensure that it comes from them? There's absolutely no need to signing
errata or official communications. Name one justifiable use for them. If
On 12/5/07, Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 5, 2007 11:16 AM, new_guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've searched OpenBSD.org and google for source code signing practices in
OpenBSD, nothing obvious stands out. I've probably overlooked it. Just
curious about this... is the process
I have the following rule in pf.
pass in quick from 10.1.100.210 to any
Here the result of pfctl -sr
pass in quick inet from 10.1.100.210 to any flags S/SA keep state
But the connection is being blocked by pf, follows log of pflog0:
Dec 02 06:58:58.343862 rule 0/(match) [uid 0, pid 23271] block
On 12/5/07, Lars Noodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OpenBSD gets a short mention in a blog:
Q:
... why in the world canb t we design a computer that can
b cold bootb nearly instantaneously? I know about
hibernation, etc., but when I do have to reboot, I hate
Nick Guenther wrote:
Well, there's the MD5 files (e.g.
http://openbsd.arcticnetwork.ca/pub/OpenBSD/4.2/i386/MD5).
but yeah, for the most part OpenBSD doesn't need it.
-Nick
Could you explain in more detail? Why doesn't OpenBSD need to use pgp keys?
Really, I'm not trying to start
On Dec 5, 2007 11:46 AM, new_guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you dismiss PKI and the benefits that OpenPGP signatures provide to your
user community? Knowing that xyz binary is signed by OpenBSD for
distribution or abc email came from an official OpenBSD source is a good
thing. Trojaned
$ man pkg_info
On Dec 5, 2007 5:22 PM, badeguruji [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
On solaris, i can do:
grep name /var/sadm/install/contents
and see whether it is installed or not, also location
etc.
But, How can i do it on OB? where is the system map?
to see whether/where name is
On 12/5/07, badeguruji [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
On solaris, i can do:
grep name /var/sadm/install/contents
and see whether it is installed or not, also location
etc.
But, How can i do it on OB? where is the system map?
to see whether/where name is installed.
Thanks in advance
I have run an OBSD firewall for years and run nothing on it...the only
listening port is 22 on one of the internal interfaces. You don't need
identd or any of that crap on a firewall...it's forwarding or blocking
packets only.
--
~Allie D.
On Wed, December 5, 2007 10:58, Andreas Maus wrote:
On
Ah, my apologies. I was looking at the wrong thing. No further comment.
On Dec 5, 2007 6:18 PM, Brad Tilley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow, my surprise grows... I shall no longer add to this thread... Bye now.
http://www.kernel.org/signature.html
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/pgpkeyring.txt
*
For one thing, I think you're quite confused. Unless I'm missing something,
I'm not noticing the FreeBSD, NetBSD, Linux kernel developers signing
their code, or doing anything particularly differently from the OpenBSD
developers. Please explain.
You've also conveniently ignored bofh's question.
BOFH-5 wrote:
Would you consider Bruce Schneier to be knowledgeable about PKI? Have you
read:
http://www.schneier.com/paper-pki.html
Yes, I've read that. He's talking about CA's. He does not ridicule PGP keys
as you seem to. In fact, he has a few of his own:
Bruce Schneier [EMAIL
Hello,
When using OpenBSD only as a NAT router / Firewall with all of the
services in inetd.conf commented out is there any need to enable inetd?
I believe it's no longer necessary for ftp-proxy and want to make sure
I'm not missing anything.
Thank you.
--
Chris
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 11:59:31AM -0500, Nick Guenther wrote:
I'm surprised that OpenBSD (the most secure OS I know of)
does not use it, that's all I'm saying. I also thought there would be a real
reason for not doing so and there may in fact be and I may just be unaware
of it.
OpenBSD
Wow, my surprise grows... I shall no longer add to this thread... Bye now.
http://www.kernel.org/signature.html
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/pgpkeyring.txt
* One example of a signed Linux Kernel path... there are many others:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/patch-2.6.9.sign
* One
On 12/5/07, new_guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you dismiss PKI and the benefits that OpenPGP signatures provide to your
user community?
yes.
See the following link
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=pkg_infosektion=1manpath=OpenBSD+4.2
On Dec 5, 2007 10:52 PM, badeguruji [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
On solaris, i can do:
grep name /var/sadm/install/contents
and see whether it is installed or not, also location
Hi all,
I have a lot of VPN connections from all subsidiaries of my business (46
subsidiaries/46 tunnels exactly).
At the matriz i have an CISCO ASA 5520 VPN concentrator.
Over subsidiaries, i have a openbsd 4.1.
my ipsec.conf is:
--
Hello,
On solaris, i can do:
grep name /var/sadm/install/contents
and see whether it is installed or not, also location
etc.
But, How can i do it on OB? where is the system map?
to see whether/where name is installed.
Thanks in advance for your guidance.
-BG
Can you dismiss PKI and the benefits that OpenPGP signatures provide to your
user community? Knowing that xyz binary is signed by OpenBSD for
distribution or abc email came from an official OpenBSD source is a good
thing. Trojaned binaries and forged emails happen. PKI can help mitigate
this.
On Dec 5, 2007 12:41 PM, new_guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BOFH-5 wrote:
Would you consider Bruce Schneier to be knowledgeable about PKI? Have you
read:
http://www.schneier.com/paper-pki.html
Yes, I've read that. He's talking about CA's. He does not ridicule PGP keys
as you seem to.
On 12/5/07, new_guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Harpalus a Como wrote:
What is the benefit of doing so? What's the point? Is the website so
likely
to be hacked into, that the developers need to sign all communication just
to ensure that it comes from them? There's absolutely no need to
Harpalus a Como wrote:
What is the benefit of doing so? What's the point? Is the website so
likely
to be hacked into, that the developers need to sign all communication just
to ensure that it comes from them? There's absolutely no need to signing
errata or official communications. Name one
Hi!
I just imported snmpd(8) and snmpctl(8), an initial attempt to
implement a new SNMP daemon for OpenBSD. SNMP is the Simple Network
Management Protocol and it is still very commonly used in corporate
networks, by network vendors, and in network management systems (NMS).
SNMP is very
I have inetd disabled on almost all of my systems (including all my
firewalls). If you have commented out every service in inetd.conf,
there is no need to run inetd, it has nothing to do and just sits
there.
s
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
fabioFVZ wrote:
...
See you next year!
Between now and then is there a chance of listening to the talks online?
If so, what is the URL for the audio?
Regards
-Lars
Hi all,
I have a lot of VPN connections from all subsidiaries of my business (46
subsidiaries/46 tunnels exactly).
At the matriz i have an CISCO ASA 5520 VPN concentrator.
Over subsidiaries, i have a openbsd 4.1.
my ipsec.conf is:
--
On 12/5/07, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Come on... twice a year and get the benefit of not being excluded from
company policies which require digital signature of software downloaded
through the internet.
sign it yourself, then download it. problem solved.
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 19:58:59 +0100, Andreas Maus wrote:
The only service that should (or could,depends on your point of view)
be allowed from the internet is IMHO the identd service.
Blocking this service may cause some delay because some mailers and
irc servers are checking for this service.
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 08:46:16 -0800 (PST), new_guy wrote:
Can you dismiss PKI and the benefits that OpenPGP signatures provide to your
user community? Knowing that xyz binary is signed by OpenBSD for
distribution or abc email came from an official OpenBSD source is a good
thing. Trojaned binaries
Yes, that's what I gathered was meant. Going into PKI and code signing,
however, I assumed he meant signing and verifying the underlying source
code, and navigating the trees, I haven't noticed that.
Evidently he meant signing binary packages. In that case, I can kind of
understand the
On Dec 5, 2007, at 7:46 PM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
I don't see what is the problem with blessing a fingerprint of the
binaries with a PKI signature, which would mean that *these* are the
binaries the devs intended to release.
Who would sign the binaries?
Would each package maintainer
If you want a secure binary. buy an official CD.. This is
what most people do. PKI requires infrastructure that would cost OpenBSD
money and developer time. Official CD's keep OpenBSD alive.
Oh wait, we should devote resources to people who care about
security, just not enough
See you next year!
Thank you it was a great event with perfect presentations.
Rouven
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 11:49:07AM -0500, Chris Smith wrote:
Hello,
When using OpenBSD only as a NAT router / Firewall with all of the
services in inetd.conf commented out is there any need to enable inetd?
Hi Chris.
The only service that should (or could,depends on your point of view)
be
On Dec 5, 2007 2:23 PM, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/5/07, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Come on... twice a year and get the benefit of not being excluded from
company policies which require digital signature of software downloaded
through the internet.
blah blah blah
have you ever wondered why openbsd doesn't do binary updates?
maybe you are now going to be able to figure out why we don't need
complex signing mechanisms.
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 06:46:01PM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 11:59:31AM -0500, Nick
On 12/5/07, bofh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why, I tell you, if you can just make openbsd more like windows,
you'll get a lot more users Don't you care about
market share? (Cue Theo's story about the VC who tried to dotcom-ize
openbsd :-))
Oh? What story is that? I can't
Are you allowing the carp traffic in and out?
This is the more common fuckup I make when configuring them that has
this result. make sure the carp and pfsync traffic makes it in and
out.
That's irrelevant (the impersonating bit).
What you have to understand is this - this is not a commercial
venture, nor is openbsd looking to grow marketshare or ease of use or
anything. This is a project by developers for themselves.
Yes, they do sell CDs and so on to help support the project,
I am working with hoststated and trying to figure out if it will work
for what I want to do. I have some questions that I hope people can
answer for me.
kern.version=OpenBSD 4.2-stable (GENERIC) #0: Sun Dec 2 13:43:16 GMT
2007
[EMAIL
Dag Richards wrote:
Your understanding of preempt seems correct
I had a similar issue on a pair of 4.1 FW's.
A careful examination revealed that one of the carp ifaces on one system
had ip addrs that were missing on the other.
Carefully compare ifconfig -aA on each machine to each other.
I
Hello, A quick question.
I have a pair of 4.1 boxes acting as firewalls using carp/pfsync etc.
The primary has advskew 0, the backup has advskew 100. I have
net.inet.carp.preempt=1 on both.
So anyway, I was downloading some 4.2 install binaries onto the backup
fw, and I noticed that the
Bob Beck-2 wrote:
If you want a secure binary. buy an official CD.. This is
what most people do. PKI requires infrastructure that would cost OpenBSD
money and developer time. Official CD's keep OpenBSD alive.
Oh wait, we should devote resources to people who care about
On 2007/12/06 10:06, Josh wrote:
So anyway, I was downloading some 4.2 install binaries onto the backup fw,
and I noticed that the backup/primary carp interfaces kept on switching
between master/backup fairly rapidly ( around every 5 - 10 seconds or so )
despite both hosts being up just
Lars Hansson-5 wrote:
No. OpenBSD doesn't sign code.
---
Lars Hansson
Oh that surprises me, are OpenPGP signatures used for anything? Errata,
official communication, etc... maybe this is a stupid question, by it seems
everyone does it these days... even small software projects. Not being
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 02:30:28PM -0800, Bryan Irvine wrote:
What would be the rationale for 640? ;)
Well according to cvs log:
it can be easily changed if you like it another way. millert,
So I guess one rationale might be as simple as because ;)
Does anything get posted to the log
OpenCON 2007 is over.
This year due to problems at work I had to leave OpenCON 2007
organization in the hands of Marc Balmer and Vera Hardmeier.
I'd like to thank them for their perfect work (as for the usual OpenBSD way of
doing things).
Without their support OpenCON shouldn't happened.
Hello,
Will the product at the following link work under OpenBSD?
http://www.synchrotech.com/products/card-rw_06_p111_p222_elan_pcmcia_pc-card_reader_slot.html
It's costing US$75, paying that kind of money and not have it work
would be quite heart breaking.
Thanks,
~Mayuresh
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/12/06 11:48, Josh wrote:
I will investigate what Stuart Henderson mentioned.
If it's that, tcpdump on the parent iface will show proto 112 IPv6
packets every few seconds, and ifconfig carpXX destroy sh /etc/netstart
carpXX should clear things out.
It does not
Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
Will the product at the following link work under OpenBSD?
http://www.synchrotech.com/products/card-rw_06_p111_p222_elan_pcmcia_pc-card_reader_slot.html
I haven't actually tried it, but their web site says it uses the TI
PCI-1420 PCI-Cardbus bridge, and OpenBSD appears
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007, STeve Andre' wrote:
Yes, one can dismiss the benefits. Think about what an MD5 (or any
other cyptographic) checksum means. If the OpenBSD site publishes
that list, how does something more complicated help?
Answer: it doesn't.
Wrong.
If someone cracks a website, then
On Wednesday, 05.12.2007 at 17:59 +, Kevin Stam wrote:
For one thing, I think you're quite confused. Unless I'm missing
something, I'm not noticing the FreeBSD, NetBSD, Linux kernel
developers signing their code, or doing anything particularly
differently from the OpenBSD developers.
On 05/12/2007, fabioFVZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OpenCON 2007 is over.
This year due to problems at work I had to leave OpenCON 2007
organization in the hands of Marc Balmer and Vera Hardmeier.
Thankyou. I had a great time!
--
Best Regards
Edd
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 11:23:28AM -0800, Ted Unangst wrote:
On 12/5/07, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Come on... twice a year and get the benefit of not being excluded from
company policies which require digital signature of software downloaded
through the internet.
And naturally I attached the wrong files, apart from the mistyping of
install42.iso.
Here's the dmesg from the working kernel.
TQ
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Taisto Qvist XX
Sent: den 5 december 2007 13:14
To: misc@openbsd.org
Claus Assmann wrote:
Wrong.
If someone cracks a website, then he can put up a modified binary
and a modified MD5 checksum.
This is silly. You mean that you get the checksums and the
associated binaries from the *SAME* website?
On Dec 5, 2007 7:15 PM, Tony Abernethy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Claus Assmann wrote:
Wrong.
If someone cracks a website, then he can put up a modified binary
and a modified MD5 checksum.
This is silly. You mean that you get the checksums and the
associated binaries from the *SAME*
Josh wrote:
Hello, A quick question.
I have a pair of 4.1 boxes acting as firewalls using carp/pfsync etc.
The primary has advskew 0, the backup has advskew 100. I have
net.inet.carp.preempt=1 on both.
So anyway, I was downloading some 4.2 install binaries onto the backup
fw, and I noticed
On 2007/12/06 11:48, Josh wrote:
I will investigate what Stuart Henderson mentioned.
If it's that, tcpdump on the parent iface will show proto 112 IPv6
packets every few seconds, and ifconfig carpXX destroy sh /etc/netstart
carpXX should clear things out.
It does not happen all the time, just
On 05/12/2007, Jeremy Huiskamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That thing on the door is a handle. A knob would let you adjust how
far the door opens, how much it resists being opened, whether or not
it shuts itself (and how quickly) and how far you have to turn the
handle to get it to start
OpenBSD gets a short mention in a blog:
Q:
... why in the world canbt we design a computer that can
b cold bootb nearly instantaneously? I know about
hibernation, etc., but when I do have to reboot, I hate
waiting those three or four minutes.
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 01:13:31PM +0100, Taisto Qvist XX wrote:
Hi Folks,
I am running, or at least trying to run, OpenBSD 4.2 on a minipc using
AMD's GEODE LX-800.
(Its a
http://www.sdlsystem.se/shop/product_info.php?cPath=23_56products_id=65
6 )
At first I had almost given up, since
On 2007/12/05 18:22, Steve Shockley wrote:
Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
Will the product at the following link work under OpenBSD?
http://www.synchrotech.com/products/card-rw_06_p111_p222_elan_pcmcia_pc-card_reader_slot.html
I haven't actually tried it, but their web site says it uses the
TI
Hi,
I was trying to use the gmfsk digital radio communication program with
azalia but ran into some snags.
It is giving the sound card commands it can't recognize:
sound_open_for_read: sndopen: setinfo failed: m and
sound_open_for_write: sndopen: setinfo failed: m
Gmfsk uses /dev/audio.
On Wednesday 05 December 2007 11:46:16 new_guy wrote:
Harpalus a Como wrote:
What is the benefit of doing so? What's the point? Is the website so
likely
to be hacked into, that the developers need to sign all communication
just to ensure that it comes from them? There's absolutely no need
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 08:46:16AM -0800, new_guy wrote:
Can you dismiss PKI
Seems they do.
The problem of signing code does not remove the problem
of checking the signature.
When you sign code and when you ask developers to do so,
they need to own some private key which will let you check
on
On Wednesday 05 December 2007 18:22:19 Claus Assmann wrote:
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007, STeve Andre' wrote:
Yes, one can dismiss the benefits. Think about what an MD5 (or any
other cyptographic) checksum means. If the OpenBSD site publishes
that list, how does something more complicated help?
A good night's sleep did the trick. Probably this is common knowledge but no
amount of searching for the error messages when I did pecl install fileinfo
gave me useful results. Anyways, if there is anyone who has had problems
installing horde on OpenBSD as a result of fileinfo not being
bofh wrote:
On Dec 5, 2007 7:15 PM, Tony Abernethy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Claus Assmann wrote:
Wrong.
If someone cracks a website, then he can put up a modified binary
and a modified MD5 checksum.
This is silly. You mean that you get the checksums and the
associated
But, my god, you're asking people to do actual work? Goddamn it, you
aren't doing your bit to improve the ease of use of people using
openbsd. Where's the one click gui to install everything that I want
(but only what I want and nothing more!)? It is positively
embarassing that I have to use a
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 02:35:38 +0100, Gilbert Fernandes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Signing the hashes could help but you do know very few
people are really going to check those.
Or you pull the MD5s from another source than your packages,
not bloody likely that the two different sites you've
Rob Lytle writes:
It is giving the sound card commands it can't recognize:
sound_open_for_read: sndopen: setinfo failed: m and
sound_open_for_write: sndopen: setinfo failed: m
Is that really the error message? What a horrible error
message.
The program is probably trying to use an
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 04:03:48AM +0100, Linus Sw?las wrote:
Or you pull the MD5s from another source than your packages,
not bloody likely that the two different sites you've selected
for download has both been hacked.
This does not protect against the master site being owned though,
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007, STeve Andre' wrote:
On Wednesday 05 December 2007 18:22:19 Claus Assmann wrote:
Someone actually did the former with sendmail.org (to distribute a
version of sendmail with a backdoor). The problem was only noted
because users checked the (digital) signature.
You
On Dec 6, 2007 2:46 AM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Come on... twice a year and get the benefit of not being excluded from
company policies which require digital signature of software downloaded
through the internet.
It's not really OpenBSD's problem that some companies
On Dec 6, 2007 4:52 AM, Steve Shockley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
Will the product at the following link work under OpenBSD?
http://www.synchrotech.com/products/card-rw_06_p111_p222_elan_pcmcia_pc-card_reader_slot.html
I haven't actually tried it, but their web site says
... hibernation modes are readily available.
Lars, you misspelled this, `available` = sucks!
Ioan
Lars NoodC)n [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/12/2007 11:40
OpenBSD gets a short mention in a blog:
Q:
... why in the world canbt we design a computer that can
bcold bootb nearly
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 07:02:03PM -0800, Claus Assmann wrote:
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007, STeve Andre' wrote:
On Wednesday 05 December 2007 18:22:19 Claus Assmann wrote:
Someone actually did the former with sendmail.org (to distribute a
version of sendmail with a backdoor). The problem was
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 05:27:31PM -0800, Rob Lytle wrote:
Hi,
I was trying to use the gmfsk digital radio communication program with
azalia but ran into some snags.
It is giving the sound card commands it can't recognize:
sound_open_for_read: sndopen: setinfo failed: m and
93 matches
Mail list logo
