Matthew Szudzik wrote
I have two computers I'm considering going amd64 on:
1. My Thinkpad X61s (1GB RAM)
It appears that the wireless driver your Thinkpad requires
wpi0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG rev 0x02: apic 2
is not supported in OpenBSD/amd64. See
Currently using ocrad from ports, fast, small footprint, thumbs up.
Though I still need a higher accuracy, and was wondering,
if anybody has made Tesseract compile/use on OpenBSD successfully?
Uwe
It appears that the wireless driver your Thinkpad requires
wpi0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG
is not supported in OpenBSD/amd64. See
http://www.openbsd.org/amd64.html
That is not true. Both wpi(4) and iwn(4) are in amd64 GENERIC.
The web page needs an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It appears that the wireless driver your Thinkpad requires
wpi0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG
is not supported in OpenBSD/amd64. See
http://www.openbsd.org/amd64.html
That is not true. Both wpi(4) and iwn(4) are in amd64 GENERIC.
The web
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:23:56AM +0100, Alexander Hall wrote:
Matthew Szudzik wrote
I have two computers I'm considering going amd64 on:
1. My Thinkpad X61s (1GB RAM)
It appears that the wireless driver your Thinkpad requires
wpi0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG rev
F}rsat Antalya - Manavgat'ta Denize S}f}r Washington Resort'tan
HTML versiyon igin t}klay}n}z
http://www.email2clients.com/washington/emails/24032008wasghington.htm
.
http://www.washington-resort.com
http://www.washington-resort.com
http://www.washington-resort.com
Washington Resort
Sure, I wasn't really thinking of bktr, which as I understand is a
video capture card and as such has onboard electronics for image
processing. Evidently, this in combo with a normal cam is the best in
terms of resolution/low cpu load.
I was aiming more for the post comparing 40$ usb webcam/100$
Hello all! I'm having some trouble with getting an OpenBSD box to properly
tag packets via 802.1Q.
I'm setting up an OpenBSD4.2 router pulling data off a trunk port on a Cisco
2960 switch. I can see the packets traverse the stack upwards but they are
not being encapsulated with a vlan tag on the
Hi,
I've just come across some strange behaviour on pfstatd on openbsd 4.2.
If I run nmap against pfstatd, pfstatd stops. Is this expected behaviour
or a known bug? It seems a bit weak to me for software that should be
running on a firewall. To reproduce it try a straight nmap scan of the
Thanks Brian! I was really hoping to keep the number of ip addresses used
to a minimum though. I'm using a /29 and am really tight on ips.
Using carp0 straight onto (carpdev) nfe0 would not require nfe0 to have an
ip address, any way I can get away with the same when the carpdev is vlan20?
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 09:32 -0400, G 0kita wrote:
Hello all! I'm having some trouble with getting an OpenBSD box to properly
tag packets via 802.1Q.
I'm setting up an OpenBSD4.2 router pulling data off a trunk port on a Cisco
2960 switch. I can see the packets traverse the stack upwards but
mcb, inc. wrote:
You did not use '-l' correctly then. You have not specified
a library to link against hence the unresolved reference.
Get the -l correct and you will be on your way.
Exactly.
Well, I just figured out, that I have to use -lpqxx instead of -llibpqxx.a
Duh...
Thank you anyway
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 10:01 -0400, G 0kita wrote:
---
Nah, a /29 is the smallest WAN space you can use for a CARP - CARP (or
HSRP/VRRP) Ethernet WAN transport.
If you have that budget and business need, then you can afford the
hardware and IP space.
Remember, you can always use _RFC1918 private
Owain Ainsworth wrote:
I have an x61s, it dual boots i386 and amd64. Both works fine. So in
that case don't worry about device support. :)
Yeah I realized that (and installed amd64 on an usb stick just to test). :-)
Thanks,
/Alexander
2008-03-26, clifford bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just come across some strange behaviour on pfstatd on openbsd 4.2.
If I run nmap against pfstatd, pfstatd stops. Is this expected behaviour
or a known bug? It seems a bit weak to me for software that should be
running on a firewall.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Fridiric Pli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have an openbsd router with two ebgp peers.
I have serveral prefixes to announce but I would like to know how I could
influence outcoming traffic from each of my prefix.
I did not understand how to use weight,
Hi Alexey,
Anything is possible but... no I just checked the md5s of my package
against a mirror and it's definitely pfstatd2.2 from the 4.2 i386
packages collection, running on openbsd 4.2. Pretty standard stuff I think.
Thanks,
Cliff.
Output of my pfstatd +CONTENTS file if it helps:
SchC6berle DC!niel wrote:
Just a couple of nitpicks:
- I don't think you gain anything with noatime and async on a mfs (useless)
Thanks. That was an artifact of porting from the old HD-based mount.
- /etc/rc mounts / rw, it's not enough to specify ro in /etc/fstab. You have
to either: a)
On 2008-03-26, G 0kita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all! I'm having some trouble with getting an OpenBSD box to properly
tag packets via 802.1Q.
dmesg, ifconfig -A, config files please... diagrams, while helpful for
visualizing what you intend to do, don't actually show what you have done.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:05:51AM -, ?lfar M. E. Johnson sez:
I installed tcl-8.4 and tk-8.4 which are required when installing git. My
question is how to get the mann directory to display in man. I have tried
organising tcltk in
On 2008 Mar 25 (Tue) at 19:48:02 + (+), Matthew Szudzik wrote:
: I have two computers I'm considering going amd64 on:
:
: 1. My Thinkpad X61s (1GB RAM)
:
:It appears that the wireless driver your Thinkpad requires
:
: wpi0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG rev 0x02: apic
When the process tries to write to the socket after the connection has
been closed, it gets a SIGPIPE signal. Without custom signal handling,
the default action is to terminate the process, see signal(3).
signal(3).
Basic socket programming issue, the author sucks. Try the patch below ;)
Daniel
On 2008 Mar 26 (Wed) at 10:23:56 +0100 (+0100), Alexander Hall wrote:
Matthew Szudzik wrote
I have two computers I'm considering going amd64 on:
1. My Thinkpad X61s (1GB RAM)
It appears that the wireless driver your Thinkpad requires
wpi0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG
I am interested in the Specialized mountain bikes, the Stumpjumper and also
the Epic. What sizes do you have? Is the Stumpjumper full suspension? Thanks
Cinder Cycling Shop wrote:
Hi there,
We are liquidating our 2007 stock and we give big discounts on all our
bicycles.
We sell
There's probably a better way to do it, but I don't know how. At least
this works.
Here's mine. This is covered in man.conf(5).. :)
--- man.conf.orig Wed Mar 26 15:52:28 2008
+++ man.confWed Mar 26 16:21:48 2008
@@ -7,9 +7,11 @@
_whatdb/usr/share/man/whatis.db
I have this rule in my PF
and its not working
everything just gets thrown into the high queue and nothing touches
the low queue
(this is from the output of pfctl -s rules)
pass in on em0 inet proto tcp from any to 208.70.72.13 port = ssh
flags S/SA modulate state (source-track rule,
I believe your low queue is for ssh interactive traffic only. The high
queue is for bulk traffic like scp or sftp transfers.
If you watch your queues in pftop (page 8) you should see ssh traffic like
typed commands in the low queue and the rest goes to the high queue.
Hope this helps
PF
I was watching my queus via pfctl -vvs queues
Per the man page
when a second one is specified it will instead be used for packets
which have a TOS of lowdelay and for TCP ACKs with no data payload
so i believe bulk would go to low as its the first queue listed, and
interactive would go to high
Hi, like subject, i would to know why OpenBSD do not partecipate to
Google Summer of Code. Exist a reasonable reason?
I already search on FAQ but no answer about this :)
[raven]
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008, raven wrote:
Hi, like subject, i would to know why OpenBSD do not partecipate to Google
Summer of Code. Exist a reasonable reason?
I wanted to get some candidate projects proposed for OpenSSH but I wasn't
organised in time.
-d
Google is the ultimate arbitrator of mentoring organizations. You may
find the following sections of the GSoC faq useful
http://code.google.com/opensource/gsoc/2008/faqs.html#0.1_mentoring_orgs
http://code.google.com/opensource/gsoc/2008/faqs.html#0.1_org_eligible
Fuar Dan}~man}n}zdan Size Vzel Teklifler
Bu iletiyi d|zg|n gvremiyorsan}z t1klay1n1z
http://www.fairs2go.com/emails/13032008.htm
http://www.fairs2go.com
http://fairs2go.com/newsite/?p=42
http://www.fairs2go.com
http://fairs2go.com/newsite/?p=42
http://fairs2go.com/newsite/?p=42
[snip]
(The 2/3-term BSD license meant to do basically the same, but it used
more words to do the same. The old 4-term BSD license included some
terms to make University of California benefit from advertising, if
there was going to be any.)
I have been generating midi, ogg, pdf, and mp3 files
33 matches
Mail list logo
