It appears that you have two bus types -- PCI-E and PCI-X.
em0 - 5 are PCI-E. PCI-E is a spoke-hub (star) bus topology so each
em() is on its own bus pathway. One PCI-E device does NOT contend with
another.
em6 and em7 are PCI-X and, yes, they're on the same bus, and, yes, they
may contend wit
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 06:52:06PM -0500, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
> am considering acquiring some machines with SSD drives, e.g. thinkpad
> X300, and was interested to hear about any experiences with openbsd on
> an SSD drive.
>
I'me currenty on the road (train) with OpenBSD 4.3 on X300.
Hi Jonathan,
This has been discussed *extensively* on the list. You can no doubt read
the archives for more detail. I've run bge and em based cards for many,
many moons and both have served me quite well.
I'm sure others have done more testing than I have but if I had to pick
which was "bett
Hello all.
A few days ago finally I almost fell-in-love - got ThinkPad X60 Tablet.
WinXP partition resized to 15GB, OpenBSD installed... And here we begin:
- GENERIC and GENERIC.MP work OK (Opera still crashes on MP as usual...
well, my hopes belong to gnash today).
- All network works fine (b
I am using a Memtech AT2515-2048 (2GB) drive with a Soekris 4801, and have
been very happy. Boot is on-par with just about any ATA drive. I set it up
for limited writes out of longevity concerns which I imagine are not
well-founded in the case of SSD. It's a router..not a desktop, so my speed
o
Hi,
How are you doing today? My name is James Adamati I live in London and work in
a financial institution here in United Kingdom. There is a potential
transaction relating to a dormant account of one of our deceased customers,
which I would like us to handle the fund actualization together.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Jacob Yocom-Piatt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> am considering acquiring some machines with SSD drives, e.g. thinkpad X300,
> and was interested to hear about any experiences with openbsd on an SSD
> drive.
speaking (er, typing) with about zero research done, I'd sa
* Jacob Yocom-Piatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-14 18:52:06]:
> am considering acquiring some machines with SSD drives, e.g. thinkpad X300,
> and was interested to hear about any experiences with openbsd on an SSD
> drive.
>
> the reduction in latency and load times is attractive, but i'd like
On 4/14/08, Jernej Makovsek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now with this post I don`t want to start any wars. I know that nothing
> is bullet proof and so on but as a wannabe OBSD user I`m "just"
> interested in if this compromise was analysed and especially how the
> code has changed from then,
am considering acquiring some machines with SSD drives, e.g. thinkpad
X300, and was interested to hear about any experiences with openbsd on
an SSD drive.
the reduction in latency and load times is attractive, but i'd like to
hear some about some real world experiences before doling out seriou
Hello,
What doesn't make sense is giving the same IP to two different carp
interfaces in the same machine !
You are looking for interface bonding (trunk is the name openbsd uses I
think!).
Just trunk the two interfaces for each machine and then configure a carp for
the trunk interface. If one inte
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:09:29AM +0200, Jernej Makovsek wrote:
> ...Now with this post I don`t want to start any wars. I know that nothing
> is bullet proof and so on but as a wannabe OBSD user I`m "just"
> interested in if this compromise was analysed and especially how the
> code has changed fr
Hello,
I'd like to jump on what you said about separate buses because I
haven't looked at this before.
You made me curious to understand this dmesg output :
cpu0 at mainbus0
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (no bios)
pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 82Q965 Host" rev 0x02
agp0 at
/me eyeballs what brad is tailing while lhao
Wasn't April's Fools couple of weeks ago?
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Tom Geman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Problem is that carp2 never gets MASTER when I take down pcn2...
>
> I have never tried the setup you are proposing, but something doesn't seem
> right. Shouldn't both NICs belong to the same carp1? What happens if
Hi.
I`m considering switching from Linux to OpenBSD because of the
security of course. Now I wanted to be sure that I will finally be
able to protect my box with "smart" encryption etc. ("smart" because
anybody can write an encryption program, but few think about data that
remains in RAM (even aft
> What's the point behind this setup ? It doesn't make any sense!
>
> John
Well, it makes some sort of sense for me (but as I'm no expert, could
be a sweet dream :) ) so it's best I try to share what I'm looking for
:
There are 2 level of firewalls :
1st with fw1 & fw2 protects from internet an
I did find the following thread - users with the same problem:
http://www.globalaffairs.org/forum//showthread.php?t=51413
However, not really any resolution.
--
Chris
On 14/04/2008, Tom Geman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > pcn2 : 10.1.1.11
> > pcn3 : 10.1.1.12
> > # cat /etc/hostname.carp1
> > inet 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 10.1.1.255 vhid 2 carpdev pcn2 advskew 0
> > # cat /etc/hostname.carp2
> > inet 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 10.1.1.255 vhid 2 carpdev pcn3 advskew
We've found the best gateway box -- pf, sshd for "ssh -w" vpn and ipsec
clients, spamd, etc. -- is non-MP, as follows.
A) Use a box with the fastest memory bandwidth (and latency) your budget
-- cash or time spent scrounging -- can afford/acquire. (e.g. on a
P-III 1 GHz machine, we saw meaningfu
> pcn2 : 10.1.1.11
> pcn3 : 10.1.1.12
> # cat /etc/hostname.carp1
> inet 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 10.1.1.255 vhid 2 carpdev pcn2 advskew 0
> # cat /etc/hostname.carp2
> inet 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 10.1.1.255 vhid 2 carpdev pcn3 advskew 10
> When I start the network, carp1 gets MASTER role but carp2
Hello,
I have a webserver that obtains its external static IP via dhclient from my
ISP.
I actually have two webservers, one is a master and one a slave. Using carp
on the internal network side I am able to have two definable and detectable
states for each webserver, master and slave which is dep
Monah Baki schrieb:
rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from 192.168.2.0/24 to any port 80 -> \
127.0.0.1 port 5000
You changed the 'to'-part from 'to $ext_if' to 'to any', yes, but you
also modified the 'rdr on' device to $ext_if. Why not leave it $int_if
as before? Should work here?
Hello,
I'm working on testing this network topology :
http://kgt.free.fr/objectif-net2.png
I'm focusing on the inside side of fw1, which is linked (red cables)
to ifw1 and ifw2 for high availability.
These 2 nics are pcn2 and pcn3. I've configured them this way :
pcn2 : 10.1.1.11
pcn3 : 10.1.1.1
I received mine this past Saturday, April 12th! I'm in Madison,
Wisconsin, US. Perfect timing, too, as I've nearly finished Peter's pf
book.
My thanks to the whole OpenBSD team. OpenBSD rocks!
Josh Grosse wrote:
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:57:55 -0700, Dag Richards wrote
Then I performed a boot dump, I have
drwxrwx--- 2 root wheel 512 Apr 14 07:53 ./
drwxr-xr-x 25 root wheel 512 Aug 28 2007 ../
-rw--- 1 root wheel 2 Apr 14 07:51 bounds
-rw---
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Tom Geman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been purchasing OpenBSD since version 2.7 was released. I usually buy
> two each time and leave one unopened. I also started to purchase versions
> prior to 2.7 to complete my collection. Unfortunately I
4.3 package arrived this morning in Grass Valley, California.
Thanks to all!!!
--
Bren Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
One more 4.3 CDs package spotted: mine reached my mailbox in Bergen,
Norway today.
- P
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic"
del
The 4.3 CD set arrived today near Boston, Mass.
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:57:55 -0700, Dag Richards wrote
> Then I performed a boot dump, I have
> drwxrwx--- 2 root wheel 512 Apr 14 07:53 ./
> drwxr-xr-x 25 root wheel 512 Aug 28 2007 ../
> -rw--- 1 root wheel 2 Apr 14 07:51 bounds
> -rw--- 1 root w
On Monday 14 April 2008, Chris Smith wrote:
> I took a tcpdump and they are all TCP RST packets.
>
> Further investigation shows that the destination ports match state
> entries of gmail pop3s connections. I do use fetchmail on my server
> to fetch my Google hosted email via pop3s. But why would TC
If I configure all carp interfaces via command line (removed the hostname.if
carps) after machine is rebooted this "problem" doesn't happen ! :O
This is crazy and I'm out of ideas for now. I was playing with carpdemote
and state transition from master to backup and vice-versa works fine.
It's somet
I hate to add to this thread, but I'm running a similar system and
experiencing similar "hangs", albeit on 4.2 release. Realing kind of
annoying because all I want from this system is to be a SQUID server,
and when the box crashes, the hard disk light will stay on like it's
throttling the hard driv
Understand that I am not (quite) reporting a panic without a ps and trace.
I had kernel panic this weekend on my standby vpn firewall, this is the
third time this has happened in the last 300 days or so, always with the
same panic.
I run with ddb.log=1
I ran ps and trace expecting the output
On 2008-04-14, Joe Warren-Meeks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If the box was only doing pf stuff, then that would be correct. If you
> were to put a bunch of ftp-proxys on there too, then MP would help, no?
very little, the bulk data handling is done in kernel by nat/rdr
rules added to the anchor
On 2008-04-14, sonjaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I try install cacti 0.8.7b in my obsd 4.2 , i using rrdtool 1.0.49
> and get error in cacti like this bellow:
> RRDTool Version
> ERROR: Installed RRDTool version does not match configured version.
> Please visit the Configuration Settings
On Thursday 10 April 2008, Lord Sporkton wrote:
> It is possible that its not really ment for you, but perhaps your
> modem, something along the lines of a modem checkin?
I took a tcpdump and they are all TCP RST packets.
Further investigation shows that the destination ports match state
entries
If the box was only doing pf stuff, then that would be correct. If you
were to put a bunch of ftp-proxys on there too, then MP would help, no?
I understand the same as you: in that specific case the MP could be useful.
--
Thanks,
Jordi Espasa Clofent
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 05:38:21PM +0200, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
Hey there,
> According several messages I've read from Henning or Daniel in present
> and @pf list, there are not any benefits in run PF with MP kernels (and
> multi-processor boxes, of course). Even you can get a poor perfo
Hey guys,
I have a pair of firewalls running fully patched OpenBSD 4.2. These are
DL140s and i have the optional quad gigabit ethernet card in them.
Now, whenever I use the GENERIC kernel, all is well. However, if I
switch to the GENERIC.MP kernel I lose connectivity and get em0:
watchdog timeou
Hey guys,
I have a pair of firewalls running fully patched OpenBSD 4.2. These are
DL140s and i have the optional quad gigabit ethernet card in them.
Now, whenever I use the GENERIC kernel, all is well. However, if I
switch to the GENERIC.MP kernel I lose connectivity and get em0:
watchdog timeout
* openbsd firewall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-14 16:12]:
> All switches are CISCO 2900 and 3500. Is there any recommend configuration
> for these switches ?
yes. involves a nice pack of explosives and a lighter.
that said, i have used these shitty things in a dark time long long
ago, and they
I'd like to use GENERIC.MP on a couple of boxes that share bge1 with a
built-in service processor for remote management, but when the kernel boots,
it locks up the SP). I understand this is normal.
Using config -e, I have disabled bge* and added a custom bge0 that attaches
fine. The problem is t
On 2008-04-14, openbsd firewall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some news about this... If I change vhid on the backup node this problem
> doesn't occurs since the ARP for the master node is still in cache and
> backup node now has a different mac address for the carp interfaces. Of
> course changing
Dear all
I try install cacti 0.8.7b in my obsd 4.2 , i using rrdtool 1.0.49
and get error in cacti like this bellow:
RRDTool Version
ERROR: Installed RRDTool version does not match configured version.
Please visit the Configuration Settings and select the correct RRDTool
Utility Version.
o;?
Dear Misc,
Shipment Reports of Actual Buyers Suppliers and prices of any product
from Export & Import of US Customs, UK Customs, China Customs and
India Customs are available for subscription.
Please contact us for Free demo report on your Products.
Thanking you and looking forward to hear
Hello,
Some news about this... If I change vhid on the backup node this problem
doesn't occurs since the ARP for the master node is still in cache and
backup node now has a different mac address for the carp interfaces. Of
course changing vhid and IP doesn't give any trouble at all.
It seems the b
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-04-14, Almir Karic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Barry Commander
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hi
> >> In order to allow wireless clients both IPv4 and IPv6 access to m
On 2008-04-14, seanm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Catalyst 3750s for distribution/access (yes, I know...). I could use the
> Intel
> SX NIC closest to our current copper NICs, but now's a good time to consider
> alternative cards if they offer better stability/robustness/performance (and
> espe
On 2008-04-14, Almir Karic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Barry Commander
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi
>> In order to allow wireless clients both IPv4 and IPv6 access to my wireless
>> access point (protected with authpf)
>> do I need to have them login as aut
i have finally taken the time to quickly write up what you need to do
on your switches when using carp and/or STP. comments welcome.
http://bulabula.org/carp-and-stp-meet-switch-security.html
Good info Henning. Currently I've a two PF-based bridges (OpenBSD 4.2)
and I get redundacy with RSTP
Hi misc@,
I'd be grateful for any recent recommendations or warnings
wrt currently available GigE NICs for core vlanning/routing/filtering.
(Archives contain various previous related threads, but most recent
posts are from a few years ago, so I thought it'd be worthwhile asking
for more
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:55:17PM +0200, Almir Karic wrote:
| On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Barry Commander
| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > Hi
| > In order to allow wireless clients both IPv4 and IPv6 access to my
wireless
| > access point (protected with authpf)
| > do I need to have them
Le Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:29:26 +0200,
Paul de Weerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a icrit :
> Hi all,
>
> The new 4.3 CD set has just arrived here in Zurich, Switzerland ! I've
> put up a pic on http://www.weirdnet.nl/images/openbsd43set.jpg ..
> looking very cool yet again ;)
>
> Thanks to all the developers
I would like to thank all those who replied to my enquiry. The openbsd
mailing list is an excellent mailing list, and its members are a great help to
all those searching for answers to their questions about openbsd. I want to
add want I can, so I am writing the answer to my question in order to s
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Barry Commander
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
> In order to allow wireless clients both IPv4 and IPv6 access to my wireless
> access point (protected with authpf)
> do I need to have them login as authpf twice? Once with IPv4 and again with
> IPv6?
no. just a
Hello, Everybody.
see dmesg in attachment
it was rebuilt from sources i got from cvs last week.
Hangs after some time of inactivity, when something heavy (like
thunderbird) starts up, or just waking up from being swapped after
quite a period of inactivity.
Let me know, if you need some more
> Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 14:41:48 -0700
> From: Don Fanning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Did exactly as described (altering for my settings which were 21 for
> sbus and 22 for pci). Here is what I currently get:
>
> luphy3 at hme2 phy 1: LU6612 10/100 PHY, rev. 1
> "Sun PCIO EBus2" rev 0x01 at pci1
59 matches
Mail list logo