> that doesn't make the slightest sense.
>
> "pure C" can be and often is perfectly portable.
those were not the right words, i meant to convey that because systemd
uses its own DBus binding (and not an already-ported lib like
GIO/GDbus) it would be difficult to port, as that binding is seemingly
On 6/28/14, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * ian kremlin [2014-06-29 01:05]:
>> due to its unportability (as it's written in pure C)
>
> that doesn't make the slightest sense.
>
> "pure C" can be and often is perfectly portable.
i took it as sarcasim.
--patrick
* ian kremlin [2014-06-29 01:05]:
> due to its unportability (as it's written in pure C)
that doesn't make the slightest sense.
"pure C" can be and often is perfectly portable.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services GmbH, http://bsws.de, Full-Service ISP
Secure Ho
Em 28-06-2014 20:39, Stuart Henderson escreveu:
> Even a significant number of Linux users I've talked to about it really
> don't like systemd.
Hate it. Made all my linux based systems slower.
>
> Just looking at the pid 1 part and ignoring the rest, there are way too
> many tentacles (library depe
Em 28-06-2014 20:25, Stuart Henderson escreveu:
> 1. maybe they did, in which case you don't want to make a stolen crypted
> password file any easier to use
Of course not. But if someone root any of my machines, I would assume
that password compromised. And never, ever, use that again.
>
> 2. "aver
On 28 Jun 2014, at 19:55, frank ernest wrote:
> wanted to know, before assuming that it is the case everywhere, do people
> really not like systemd and is it really hurting bsd? If so, I'd be
> interested in doing something about it. Thanks, David
A fact is that systemd slowly tears the open sou
On 2014-06-25, Jan Stary wrote:
> The "aucat audio server" is sndiod for some time.
> Fixing a typo while there.
>
> Jan
>
> PS: where should patches against web pages go, now that www@ is dead?
committed, thanks - please send ports-related changes to ports@,
otherwise here or tech dependin
On 2014-06-28, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
> On 28 June 2014 13:55, frank ernest wrote:
>> Hello, I'm ballsystemlord from the Opensuse forums and I've been reading
>> a lot about how systemd is unportable, even for use with some linux
>> programs and the systemd devs are not concerned about it. I,
On 2014-06-28, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> Em 27-06-2014 19:48, Stuart Henderson escreveu:
>> "yes, cracking a stolen hash is faster, but it's not what the average user
>> should worry about"
>>
>> I disagree, that is *exactly* what the average user should worry about.
>> And knowing that some p
> that bsd is being crowded out, a thought that had not crossed my mind.
> I wanted to know, before assuming that it is the case everywhere, do
> people really not like systemd and is it really hurting bsd? If so,
> I'd be interested in doing something about it. Thanks, David
yes, systemd has beco
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 11:39:20PM +0100, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> acpidump files attached, if anyone would like to see them
ah, totally forgot about rules of misc mailing list and demime
--
best regards
q#
acpidump files attached, if anyone would like to see them
--
best regards
q#
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/x-tar-gz]
Hi,
Just upgraded my Asus Eee PC 1000 to the latest snapshot:
OpenBSD 5.5-current (GENERIC.MP) #209: Fri Jun 27 12:23:05 MDT 2014
dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP
and it hungs around time when console changes to higher resolution.
Machine stays with blank sc
On 28 June 2014 13:55, frank ernest wrote:
> Hello, I'm ballsystemlord from the Opensuse forums and I've been reading
> a lot about how systemd is unportable, even for use with some linux
> programs and the systemd devs are not concerned about it. I, as a single
> person, can't possibly hope to ma
Hello, I'm ballsystemlord from the Opensuse forums and I've been reading
a lot about how systemd is unportable, even for use with some linux
programs and the systemd devs are not concerned about it. I, as a single
person, can't possibly hope to maintain the old sysVinit system and also
systemd is a
Em 28-06-2014 09:02, Sebastian Benoit escreveu:
> Giancarlo Razzolini(grazzol...@gmail.com) on 2014.06.28 00:10:31 -0300:
>> I never got a machine hacked, even when not using any mitigation techniques.
> Are you sure?
I'm never sure. And neither should be anyone these days. Let me
rephrase: I've ne
Giancarlo Razzolini(grazzol...@gmail.com) on 2014.06.28 00:10:31 -0300:
> I never got a machine hacked, even when not using any mitigation techniques.
Are you sure?
I noticed this:
revision 1.111
date: 2014/06/27 18:50:39; author: markus; state: Exp; lines: +5 -5;
commitid: 9HzmkMLFofU34iy0;
fix loading of private keys
Confirming this resolved the issue. Thank you, markus!
18 matches
Mail list logo
