Re: How make "pkg_add" auto-choose some package version for me when same package is available in more versions?

On 2016-07-05 04:21, Nick Holland wrote: ( On 07/04/16 22:11, Tinker wrote: .. The *oldest* version would be fine too! Write a little script to fetch the directory of the package repository, apply /whatever logic you want/, then pkg_add that exact package. Done. The contention that "99%"

Re: How make "pkg_add" auto-choose some package version for me when same package is available in more versions?

On 07/04/16 22:11, Tinker wrote: > On 2016-07-05 10:09, Tinker wrote: > .. >> What made me ask this problem was Squid on 5.8, where there were two >> versions. I realize that two versions of a very similar package is >> very rare otherwise though, so maybe in the bigger picture the >> question

Re: How make "pkg_add" auto-choose some package version for me when same package is available in more versions?

On 2016-07-05 10:09, Tinker wrote: .. What made me ask this problem was Squid on 5.8, where there were two versions. I realize that two versions of a very similar package is very rare otherwise though, so maybe in the bigger picture the question didn't really make sense. Wait, can "%" be used

Re: How make "pkg_add" auto-choose some package version for me when same package is available in more versions?

-> Noise My original intention when I asked this question was for tools where I never ever will care about version number. For Squid I don't. I guess some compression tool, for instance, would count too - likely its behavior is exactly the same, and if it's not I would be fine with realizing

Re: build error

On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 7:19 AM, Edgar Pettijohn wrote: > On 16-07-03 22:12:34, Philip Guenther wrote: ... >> Heh. Part of me wants to admonish you again for turning a knob you >> didn't have a reason to turn, but part of me wants to thank you for >> demonstrating that

Re: How make "pkg_add" auto-choose some package version for me when same package is available in more versions?

On Mon, 04 Jul 2016, Chris Bennett wrote: > Don't want to rebuild your production web/business servers? > Look up Mtier in the mailing list. Nice helpful infrastructure. Yes, I use their services both at work and at home. > Not to sound like I'm kissing ass,

Re: image view and manipulation

On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Ryan Freeman wrote: > You might be interested in the ImageMagick (or GraphicsMagick) packages. > The latter is a fork of the former, but they both supply the same > commands. display, convert, mogrify are some of the commands available, > and

Re: image view and manipulation

On Sun, Jul 03, 2016 at 07:34:41PM -0500, jsg wrote: >Hi folks > Can some of you recommend what packages or package >you use to manipulate, view, resive .png or .img (other) imaeges >for website content. > > >thanks in advance > If you are going to be using this program

Re: How make "pkg_add" auto-choose some package version for me when same package is available in more versions?

On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 06:48:32PM +0200, Kamil Cholewiński wrote: > > I think we're confusing two different concepts here... Latest stable > release (with most recent security patches) vs following bleeding edge. > > Former is almost always what you want in production. There might be only > one

Re: How make "pkg_add" auto-choose some package version for me when same package is available in more versions?

On Mon, 04 Jul 2016, Marc Espie wrote: > YES, they're all wrong. There's a BIG difference between running new > shitz in a test setup vs running "bleeding edge" in production. I think we're confusing two different concepts here... Latest stable release (with most recent security

Re: image view and manipulation

On Sun, Jul 03, 2016 at 07:34:41PM -0500, jsg wrote: >Hi folks > Can some of you recommend what packages or package >you use to manipulate, view, resive .png or .img (other) imaeges >for website content. > > >thanks in advance > You might be interested in the ImageMagick

Re: How make "pkg_add" auto-choose some package version for me when same package is available in more versions?

On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 04:35:10PM +0200, Kamil Cholewi??ski wrote: > > But choosing and running the latest version automatically ? that's the > > computer equivalent of running blindfolded into traffic on a speedway. > > Many people run CURRENT, trunk, HEAD, 0.999-dev, sid, Arch, however you >

Re: How make "pkg_add" auto-choose some package version for me when same package is available in more versions?

On Sun, 03 Jul 2016, Raul Miller wrote: > And then there's the use case of untangling the mess when this did the > wrong thing. Well, I think nobody here argues that a program, if facing a hard decision, should throw an error rather than corrupt the system. I'm well

Re: build error

On 16-07-03 22:12:34, Philip Guenther wrote: > On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Edgar Pettijohn > wrote: > > On 16-07-03 20:38:48, Philip Guenther wrote: > >> On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Edgar Pettijohn > >> wrote: > >> > I'm trying to build

Re: How make "pkg_add" auto-choose some package version for me when same package is available in more versions?

On Sun, Jul 03, 2016 at 09:41:34PM +0200, Kamil Cholewi??ski wrote: > On Sun, 03 Jul 2016, Chris Bennett > wrote: > > This can't be done and should NOT be done. if you are asked to choose > > between two+ different versions, often that choice is based on the

Re: Silly library path debug question. Also, is /usr/local/lib/ in the default search path for library files?

On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 12:44 AM, Janne Johansson wrote: > OpenBSD will not make B load C just by A loading B, so the program A needs > to ask for both B and C while being linked in order to work. It depends on what "depends" means. :-) > 2016-07-03 16:49 GMT+02:00 Tinker

Re: image view and manipulation

Hi, jsg wrote: Can some of you recommend what packages or package you use to manipulate, view, resive .png or .img (other) imaeges for website content. command-line or GUI? For GUI, I use LaternaMagica and PRICE. I use LaternaMagica for mssive exports and resizing. A limitation

Re: Silly library path debug question. Also, is /usr/local/lib/ in the default search path for library files?

OpenBSD will not make B load C just by A loading B, so the program A needs to ask for both B and C while being linked in order to work. 2016-07-03 16:49 GMT+02:00 Tinker : > Am debugging something and am not quite clear about details. > > > My executable A loads library B