> http://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/6.5/packages-stable/amd64/
> updated binary packages (with security fixes) for stable, as described here
> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-announce=156577865917831=2
Uu Ooh - I am sorry :-(
I managed to break my .muttrc and so I've overseen the announce of
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 05:51:23PM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2019-09-01, Felix Hanley wrote:
> > I had assumed I would be able to use the existing pf.conf (which has
> > worked for years) even after the introduction of the vlan2 interface
> > as the pppoe0 parent. To get anything to
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 10:55:18AM -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> It's hard trying to help you as.
>
> Vlan syntax changed from the upgrade or 6.1 to 6.2 and the pf queuing
> changed from 6.3 to 6.4.
>
> So looks like you skip a few version and no where did you provide any
> details on your
I hope it is OK to share here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jI3YE3Jlgw8
Jan
Stuart Henderson(s...@spacehopper.org) on 2019.09.02 17:58:55 -:
> On 2019-09-02, Marcus MERIGHI wrote:
> > Hello Joerg,
> >
> > just passing on my user experience...:
> >
> > streckf...@dfn-cert.de (Joerg Streckfuss), 2019.09.02 (Mon) 10:15 (CEST):
> >> Furthermore I'm not sure which
What motivates me to stay on OpenBSD is that I want the free desktop concept to
work. This system + Arcan + GNOME-like interface seems, to me, like an
compelling way to get there. I hope I can shoehorn this project into my life
and then reality in some fashion.
--
Patrick Harper
This will only work if you stop upgrading snapshots long before 6.6 is
announced.
Otherwise you will be on 6.6-current by November 1st and -r will wait for 6.7.
On September 2, 2019 1:15:26 PM GMT+02:00, Ian Darwin
wrote:
>> The sysupgrade tool is a nice way to install the newest snapshot,
In this thread I didn't understand what you update.
You said you run STABLE? So you update ports? ...or using m:tier?? ...?
Can somebody please tell me what are those "-stable updates for
packages"?
http://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/6.5/packages-stable/amd64/
updated binary packages (with
On 2019-09-01, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> i would like to confgiure my obsd server as a web server.
>
> I would like to configure my web server to handle multiple domains
> without having to set each domain one by one.
>
> I mean:
> Every request for www.x.com is mapped into the root directory
>
On 2019-09-02, Marcus MERIGHI wrote:
> Hello Joerg,
>
> just passing on my user experience...:
>
> streckf...@dfn-cert.de (Joerg Streckfuss), 2019.09.02 (Mon) 10:15 (CEST):
>> Furthermore I'm not sure which snapshot should I run. Almost every day
>> there will be a fresh one.
>
> you seem to be
On 2019-09-01, Felix Hanley wrote:
> I had assumed I would be able to use the existing pf.conf (which has worked
> for years) even after the introduction of the
> vlan2 interface as the pppoe0 parent. To get anything to work I had to remove
> all queueing references.
>
> BTW, I am running 6.5:
0
C Turkey
P Ankara
T Yenimahalle
Z 06930
O Consultant
I
A Elvis Brul
M elvisbr...@gmail.com
U
B +90-532-633-17-92
X
N More than 5 years, OpenBSD setup installation remote administration.
Network engineering, software development.
On 9/2/19 6:48 AM, Marcus MERIGHI wrote:
> Hello Joerg,
>
> just passing on my user experience...:
>
> streckf...@dfn-cert.de (Joerg Streckfuss), 2019.09.02 (Mon) 10:15 (CEST):
>> Furthermore I'm not sure which snapshot should I run. Almost every day
>> there will be a fresh one.
>
> you seem
On 9/1/19 5:49 PM, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> i would like to confgiure my obsd server as a web server.
>
> I would like to configure my web server to handle multiple domains
> without having to set each domain one by one.
>
> I mean:
> Every request for www.x.com is mapped into
hi everyone
http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/2017-August/313577.html
states that the "urpf-failed" block rule causes the IPv6 traffic (ping)
significant packet loss,
while IPv4 remains fine
is this correct ?
https://lipidity.com/openbsd/router/ states
The antispoof rules should be
Thanks for the detailed explanation.
Really appreciated.
All the best
Regards,
Kihaguru.
On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 6:17 PM Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 05:32:53PM +0300, Kihaguru Gathura wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Unable to boot with the following message
> >
> > open
Thank you,
Works well
Regards,
Kihaguru
On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 6:07 PM Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 05:32:53PM +0300, Kihaguru Gathura wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Unable to boot with the following message
> >
> > open /pci@83,4000/FJSV,ulsa@2,1/disk@0,0:a/etc/random.seed:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 05:32:53PM +0300, Kihaguru Gathura wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Unable to boot with the following message
>
> open /pci@83,4000/FJSV,ulsa@2,1/disk@0,0:a/etc/random.seed: Invalid argument
> open /pci@83,4000/FJSV,ulsa@2,1/disk@0,0:a/bsd: Invalid argument
> Boot device:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 05:32:53PM +0300, Kihaguru Gathura wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Unable to boot with the following message
>
> open /pci@83,4000/FJSV,ulsa@2,1/disk@0,0:a/etc/random.seed: Invalid argument
> open /pci@83,4000/FJSV,ulsa@2,1/disk@0,0:a/bsd: Invalid argument
>
> Not sure the issue with
It's hard trying to help you as.
Vlan syntax changed from the upgrade or 6.1 to 6.2 and the pf queuing
changed from 6.3 to 6.4.
So looks like you skip a few version and no where did you provide any
details on your configuration.
So I would suggest to go and read either the man page or look at
Hi,
Unable to boot with the following message
open /pci@83,4000/FJSV,ulsa@2,1/disk@0,0:a/etc/random.seed: Invalid argument
open /pci@83,4000/FJSV,ulsa@2,1/disk@0,0:a/bsd: Invalid argument
Not sure the issue with softraid setup detailed below. Any assistance
highly appreciated.
Thanks and
Please go away.
If somebody needs half a dozen tries before they manage to send an
email, that person is not qualified to help others with computers.
Rakort Information Technologies wrote on Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 04:31:19PM +0300:
> 0
> C Turkey
> P Ankara
> T Cankaya
> Z 06510
> O Rakort
0
C Turkey
P Ankara
T Cankaya
Z 06510
O Rakort Information Technologies
I Rakort Information Technologies
A 2139. Street 2/11
M rakorti...@gmail.com
U http://www.rakort.com
B +90-850-460-10-58
X
N More than 5 years, OpenBSD setup/installation/remote administration.
Network engineering, software
Hello Joerg,
just passing on my user experience...:
streckf...@dfn-cert.de (Joerg Streckfuss), 2019.09.02 (Mon) 10:15 (CEST):
> Furthermore I'm not sure which snapshot should I run. Almost every day
> there will be a fresh one.
you seem to be watching closely, therefore you will notice a time
> The sysupgrade tool is a nice way to install the newest snapshot, never
> had a problem. But what is the correct way to install a stable release
> on snapshot? Using the standard bsd.rd upgrade way?
>From man sysupgrade:
-r Upgrade to the next release. The default is to find out if
accept
0
C Turkey
P Ankara
T Cankaya
Z 06520
O Consultant
I Ibrahim TOPBASI
A
M ibrahimtopb...@linuxmail.org
U
B +90 532 633 17 92
X
N OpenBSD Consulting, Training, Installation, Maintenance and Support for
mid-size business. Over 5 years of experience with OpenBSD and PF firewall.We
have more then 5
0
C Turkey
P Ankara
T Cankaya
Z 06510
O Rakort Information Technologies
I ibrahim Topbasi
A 2139. Street 2/11
M open...@rakort.com
U http://www.rakort.com
B +90-850-460-10-58
X
N More than 5 years, OpenBSD setup/installation/remote administration. Network
engineering, software development. Also
Hello Ingo,� First of all, thanks for quick reply.� The website is also
presented as English now. You can visit the website to see what we do and
our experience about openbsd.� We would like to give openbsd support as
Rakort in Turkey. Therefore, Would you add openbsd.org commercial support
list
Hi gustavo,
my own expirience with this list is that you will receive very good
answers and tips from experienced people.
...but only if you try to ask good questions ;-)
With "good questions" I mean for example writing about what you want to
do, what you have done by now, what is not working,
In this thread I didn't understand what you update.
You said you run STABLE? So you update ports? ...or using m:tier?? ...?
Can somebody please tell me what are those "-stable updates for
packages"?
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 07:59:59PM -0400, Steven Shockley wrote:
> So, many thanks to
Hi Misc,
we have to run 6.6 snapshot on one of our firewall clusters to get in
touch with the new aggr(4) driver. This driver seems to work great
whith 6.6 snapshot on a dell pe 470 with intel X710 based quadport
sfp+ nics doing LACP.
We had serious problems with the trunk(4) driver on OpenBSD
32 matches
Mail list logo
