Issues with ntpd on openbsd 3.7-stable (not running ?)

2005-08-10 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
suitable for synchronization found I guess 2036 seems no response from the ntpd. Does anyone can help me please? Best regards, -- Alexis de BRUYN email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] web : http://www.de-bruyn.fr

Re: openbsd 3.7 in-kernel pppoe issues

2005-08-03 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
a permanent (static) gateway address, you could plug that value into /etc/hostname.pppoe0. i don't think it's your problem though. jmc -- Alexis de BRUYN email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] web : http://www.de-bruyn.fr -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de

Re: openbsd 3.7 in-kernel pppoe issues

2005-08-03 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
Try to remove your /etc/mygate if exists. Hi, I have the same problem here in Hungary, running 3.7- (almost)stable. My ISP is Axelero (T-Online Hungary now) and the userland ppp worked like a charm. I switched to kernel pppoe but it only works if I specify the remote peer (gateway) IP address by

Re: raidctl -vF component0 raid0

2009-03-31 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
# the fake device /dev/wd1b The above looks weird. The 'b' partition is typically swap. What do the following commands tell you? $ sudo disklabel -n wd1 $ sudo disklabel -n wd2 -- Alexis de BRUYN email : ale...@de-bruyn.fr

Re: raidctl -vF component0 raid0

2009-04-02 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
Message- From: Alexis de BRUYN [mailto:ale...@de-bruyn.fr] Sent: 02 April 2009 13:39 To: Chris Harries Cc: misc@openbsd.org Subject: Re: raidctl -vF component0 raid0 Hello Chris, Before setting up your mirror, I recommanded you to read RAID options for OpenBSD from the OpenBSD FAQ

Re: raidctl -vF component0 raid0

2009-04-02 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
man raidctl but it's now showing me anything more then I know already and what I am not doing correct to cause this reconstruction to just hang...? Any ideas Many Thanks Chris -Original Message- From: Alexis de BRUYN [mailto:ale...@de-bruyn.fr] Sent: 31 March 2009 12:33 To: Chris

Re: FW: raidctl -vF component0 raid0

2009-04-02 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
checked. Now correct...finally, Apologies Chris -Original Message- From: Chris Harries [mailto:ch...@sharescope.co.uk] Sent: 02 April 2009 14:07 To: 'Alexis de BRUYN' Subject: RE: raidctl -vF component0 raid0 Afternoon, Well on an i386 system with 2 x 1 TB Seagate hard

Re: raidctl -vF component0 raid0

2009-04-02 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
the same results weather I use AHCI or not just using sd0 sd1 or wd0 wd1. So, sorry, just a typo there! Chris -Original Message- From: Alexis de BRUYN [mailto:ale...@de-bruyn.fr] Sent: 02 April 2009 14:24 To: Chris Harries Cc: misc@openbsd.org Subject: Re: raidctl -vF component0

Re: FW: raidctl -vF component0 raid0

2009-04-02 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
2009 14:07 To: 'Alexis de BRUYN' Subject: RE: raidctl -vF component0 raid0 Afternoon, Well on an i386 system with 2 x 1 TB Seagate hard drives, I generally follow this method from what I know and have learnt: Install 4.4 i386 on to sd0 Reboot Patch source tree to 4.4 PATCH: cd /usr/src

Re: FW: raidctl -vF component0 raid0

2009-04-14 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
it? Well I did it after newfs and it displayed same output. And..ermmm yes :( missed that typo out, it should say i386 but you guessed that correctly :) Chris -Original Message- From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of Alexis de BRUYN Sent: 02

Re: Raid + OpenBSD Problem

2009-04-21 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
people, specifically Alexis de BRUYN who frequents this list often, but I never managed to get it working. Basically what happened was it would seam to work all the way up to copying the data and parity using these two commands; raidctl -vF component0 raid0 raidctl -vP raid0 When

DisplayLink CONV-USB2DVI : wsudl(0): We are not attached to the udl driver

2012-08-02 Thread Alexis de BRUYN [Mailinglists]
, but it is not resolved. Does anyone have this device (or other usb2dvi) working ? Thanks for your help. Alex. -- Alexis de BRUYN

Re: DisplayLink CONV-USB2DVI : wsudl(0): We are not attached to the udl driver

2012-08-02 Thread Alexis de BRUYN [Mailinglists]
Could this be related to the space preceding in the device declaration? Option device / dev/wsdisplay1 -- Option device /dev/wsdisplay1 Thanks for your reply, Вовочка, but this is a typo mistake I have made while I write my mail. -- Alexis de BRUYN

Re: DisplayLink CONV-USB2DVI : wsudl(0): We are not attached to the udl driver

2012-08-02 Thread Alexis de BRUYN [Mailinglists]
-120 / DL-160 graphic chip. Regards, -- Alexis de BRUYN

Re: DisplayLink CONV-USB2DVI : wsudl(0): We are not attached to the udl driver

2012-08-03 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
the same error message. Regards, -- Alexis de BRUYN

Re: DisplayLink CONV-USB2DVI : wsudl(0): We are not attached to the udl driver

2012-08-04 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
[] = { 1920x1080px60, 1920x1080x60, 1280x1024x60, And rebuilt the kernel. But again same error. Thanks again for your help Mats. -- Alexis de BRUYN

OpenBSD USB display experience

2012-08-07 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
://www.mail-archive.com/misc@openbsd.org/msg114982.html. Does anybody have a working configuration with an USB Display ? Thanks for sharing your experience, -- Alexis de BRUYN

Re: DisplayLink CONV-USB2DVI : wsudl(0): We are not attached to the udl driver

2012-08-11 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
On 02.08.2012 22:31, Alexis de BRUYN wrote: On 02.08.2012 21:48, Matthieu Herrb wrote: This is the xorg.conf I use to test wsudl: Section Devicë Identifier Card0 Driver wsudl Option Devicë /dev/ttyD0 EndSection (Yes that's it. Modern X can figure out

Re: DisplayLink CONV-USB2DVI : wsudl(0): We are not attached to the udl driver

2012-08-11 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
help. -- Alexis de BRUYN

Re: DisplayLink CONV-USB2DVI : wsudl(0): We are not attached to the udl driver

2012-08-11 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
modes: 162000 wsdisplay2 at udl1 mux 1 wsdisplay2: screen 0 added (std, vt100 emulation) vscsi0 at root scsibus0 at vscsi0: 256 targets softraid0 at root scsibus1 at softraid0: 256 targets root on wd0a (388f307771acfa52.a) swap on wd0b dump on wd0b clock: unknown CMOS layout -- Alexis de BRUYN

Re: DisplayLink CONV-USB2DVI : wsudl(0): We are not attached to the udl driver

2012-08-12 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
On 11.08.2012 23:33, Alexis de BRUYN wrote: # wsconsctl -f /dev/ttyC0 display.type display.type=vga-pci # wsconsctl -f /dev/ttyD0 display.type display.type=displaylink # wsconsctl -f /dev/ttyE0 display.type display.type=displaylink I still have my previous issue, but I have another one

Re: DisplayLink CONV-USB2DVI : wsudl(0): We are not attached to the udl driver

2012-08-14 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
On 13.08.2012 23:34, Matthieu Herrb wrote: On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 10:04:17PM +0200, Alexis de BRUYN wrote: On 11.08.2012 23:33, Alexis de BRUYN wrote: I still have my previous issue, but I have another one : while the in-board display device is actived through my xorg.conf, the udl devices

Re: DisplayLink CONV-USB2DVI : wsudl(0): We are not attached to the udl driver

2012-08-14 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
On 14.08.2012 17:58, Matthieu Herrb wrote: On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 04:39:57PM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote: On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:31:24AM +0200, Alexis de BRUYN wrote: On 13.08.2012 23:34, Matthieu Herrb wrote: On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 10:04:17PM +0200, Alexis de BRUYN wrote: On 11.08.2012

Re: DisplayLink CONV-USB2DVI : wsudl(0): We are not attached to the udl driver

2012-08-20 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
On 14.08.2012 23:57, Matthieu Herrb wrote: On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:35:40PM +0200, Alexis de BRUYN wrote: On 14.08.2012 17:58, Matthieu Herrb wrote: On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 04:39:57PM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote: On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:31:24AM +0200, Alexis de BRUYN wrote: On 13.08.2012

Re: softraid to encrypt _AND_ raid?

2012-11-30 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
/sd0d softraid0 sd1 is your raid+crypto device. -- Alexis de BRUYN

Xorg + wsudl(4) DL-165 consumes a lot of cpu

2013-03-02 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
properly sd1 at scsibus1 targ 2 lun 0: OPENBSD, SR CRYPTO, 005 SCSI2 0/direct fixed sd1: 475901MB, 512 bytes/sector, 974646960 sectors -- Alexis de BRUYN

Re: Xorg + wsudl(4) DL-165 consumes a lot of cpu

2013-03-02 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
] (**) /dev/wsmouse: (accel) acceleration factor: 2.000 [ 156.886] (**) /dev/wsmouse: (accel) acceleration threshold: 4 [ 3767.061] damage command failed, giving up! -- Alexis de BRUYN

Re: Xorg + wsudl(4) DL-165 consumes a lot of cpu

2013-03-02 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
, afaict. It's all purely done on the CPU. Actually I find it kind of amazing that it works at all... Yes it is ! It is sufficient for me in many cases. -- Alexis de BRUYN

nxsshd dies when client connecting

2013-03-09 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
. Regards, -- Alexis de BRUYN

nwflag hidenwid : SIOCS80211FLAGS: Invalid argument

2013-07-01 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
DS11 media DS11 mediaopt hostap media DS11 mediaopt monitor -- Alexis de BRUYN

radeondrm(4): only 1 screen displaying over 3

2013-08-28 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
Hi misc@, On an ATI Radeon HD 7870 display card with 6 mini-display-ports, only 1 screen over 3 connected is displaying correctly : [ 4026.582] (II) RADEON(0): Output DisplayPort-0 connected [ 4026.582] (II) RADEON(0): Output DisplayPort-1 connected [ 4026.582] (II) RADEON(0): Output

Re: radeondrm(4): only 1 screen displaying over 3

2013-09-01 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
Thanks to jsg@, problem solved: CVSROOT:/cvs Module name:src Changes by: j...@cvs.openbsd.org2013/09/01 04:39:39 Modified files: sys/dev/pci/drm/radeon: si.c sid.h Log message: drm/radeon: update line buffer allocation for dce6 [...] On 28.08.2013 09:51, Alexis de

Re: [Cannot allocate memory][Qemu][x86 i386] limits ? login.conf ?

2014-07-17 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
with +256M RAM. Be sure that the user which launches qemu has your class (vipw(8)). Regards, -- Alexis de BRUYN

Xenocara/radeonsi_dri.so build failed on -current

2015-06-13 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
in . (bsd.subdir.mk:48 'realbuild') *** Error 2 in /usr/xenocara (Makefile:36 'build') Thanks for your help, -- Alexis de BRUYN

Re: usbhidctl(1) and usbhidaction(1)

2015-06-11 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
) and a Cherry KW 3000 (wireless), everything is working fine. Let me know if you need more information. Regards, -- Alexis de BRUYN

Re: Octeon snapshots

2015-12-09 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
t the bsd.rd file you think the system did? That's why I put these details steps in here. I hope it help you some anyway. Daniel -- Alexis de BRUYN

Re: Octeon snapshots

2015-12-09 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
/octeon/usr/mips64-unknown-openbsd5.8/bin/objcopy Thank you Paul. bsd.rd is now booting. -- Alexis de BRUYN

Pictures are "blurred" in certain cases after snapshot upgrade (radeonrdrm related?)

2015-12-11 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
Hi Everybody, After upgraded from snapshots/amd64 12/09/2015 (previous was 12/04/2015), Puffy is blurred on xdm login screen (like [1]). Puffy (/etc/X11/xdm/pixmaps/OpenBSD_15bpp.xpm) displayed in feh is fine [2], while in eog is blurred [1]. Pictures/thumbnails displayed and all icon

Re: Pictures are "blurred" in certain cases after snapshot upgrade (radeonrdrm related?)

2015-12-12 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
Problem solved [1]. Thanks jsd@ [1]: https://www.marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech=144984739021388=2 On 12/11/15 16:19, Alexis de BRUYN wrote: Hi Everybody, After upgraded from snapshots/amd64 12/09/2015 (previous was 12/04/2015), Puffy is blurred on xdm login screen (like [1]). Puffy (/etc/X11/xdm

error: [drm:pid10679:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... render ring idle

2016-10-01 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
class: X.Org XInput Driver [22.633] ABI class: X.Org XInput driver, version 22.1 [22.633] (II) Using input driver 'ws' for '/dev/wsmouse' [22.633] (**) /dev/wsmouse: always reports core events [22.633] (II) ws: /dev/wsmouse: debuglevel 0 [22.633] (**) Option "Device" "/dev/wsmouse" [22.633] (**) ws: /dev/wsmouse: ZAxisMapping: buttons 4 and 5 [22.633] (**) ws: /dev/wsmouse: WAxisMapping: buttons 6 and 7 [22.633] (**) ws: /dev/wsmouse: associated screen: 0 [22.634] (II) ws: /dev/wsmouse: minimum x position: 0 [22.634] (II) ws: /dev/wsmouse: maximum x position: 3839 [22.634] (II) ws: /dev/wsmouse: minimum y position: 0 [22.634] (II) ws: /dev/wsmouse: maximum y position: 1079 [22.634] (==) ws: /dev/wsmouse: Buttons: 7 [22.634] (**) ws: /dev/wsmouse: YAxisMapping: buttons 4 and 5 [22.634] (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device "/dev/wsmouse" (type: MOUSE, id 7) [22.634] (**) /dev/wsmouse: (accel) keeping acceleration scheme 1 [22.634] (**) /dev/wsmouse: (accel) acceleration profile 0 [22.634] (**) Option "AccelerationNumerator" "5" [22.634] (**) Option "AccelerationDenominator" "2" [22.634] (**) Option "AccelerationThreshold" "0" [22.634] (**) /dev/wsmouse: (accel) acceleration factor: 2.500 [22.634] (**) /dev/wsmouse: (accel) acceleration threshold: 0 -- Alexis de BRUYN

Re: error: [drm:pid10679:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... render ring idle

2016-10-10 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
driver Thanks Mark, this is now working fine. there. Otherwise, just delete the file. Cheers, Mark -- Alexis de BRUYN

iwn0: no link after 6.1 upgrade

2017-08-19 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
"Intel Rate Matching Hub" rev 2.00/0.00 addr 2 vscsi0 at root scsibus2 at vscsi0: 256 targets softraid0 at root scsibus3 at softraid0: 256 targets sd1 at scsibus3 targ 1 lun 0: <OPENBSD, SR CRYPTO, 006> SCSI2 0/direct fixed sd1: 114470MB, 512 bytes/sector, 234435953 sectors root on sd1a (d70c277ea78ccc07.a) swap on sd1b dump on sd1b -- Alexis de BRUYN

Re: iwn0: no link after 6.1 upgrade

2017-08-19 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
On 08/19/17 15:02, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 02:54:05PM +0200, Alexis de BRUYN wrote: On 08/19/17 11:35, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 11:12:04AM +0200, Alexis de BRUYN wrote: After an 6.1 upgrade (from 6.0-release to 6.1-release) on my Lenovo X230 laptop

Re: iwn0: no link after 6.1 upgrade

2017-08-19 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
On 08/19/17 16:16, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 03:51:32PM +0200, Alexis de BRUYN wrote: Yes, I have double-checked, this is what is shown in the Web GUI. "Authentication PassPhrase Settings" : "WPA-Personal" "WPA Mode" : "WPA2 Only" &q

Re: iwn0: no link after 6.1 upgrade

2017-08-19 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
On 08/19/17 11:35, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 11:12:04AM +0200, Alexis de BRUYN wrote: After an 6.1 upgrade (from 6.0-release to 6.1-release) on my Lenovo X230 laptop, I can't get my wireless connection working anywore on different kind of access points or ISP boxes. Same

Re: /bsd: thread: table is full

2022-02-16 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
On 14/02/2022 17:19, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2022-02-14, Alexis de BRUYN wrote: Hello Everybody, Since I have updated my -current deskop this morning (sysupgrade & pkg_add), the whole box seems slower, I have a lot of application crashes and I see this message a lot in /var/log/mess

/bsd: thread: table is full

2022-02-14 Thread Alexis de BRUYN
=0 vscsi0 at root scsibus2 at vscsi0: 256 targets softraid0 at root scsibus3 at softraid0: 256 targets sd1 at scsibus3 targ 1 lun 0: sd1: 424961MB, 512 bytes/sector, 870320783 sectors root on sd1a (3f0d06aece990c6b.a) swap on sd1b dump on sd1b radeondrm0: PITCAIRN radeondrm0: 1920x1080, 32bpp wsdisplay0 at radeondrm0 mux 1: console (std, vt100 emulation), using wskbd0 wskbd1: connecting to wsdisplay0 wskbd2: connecting to wsdisplay0 wskbd3: connecting to wsdisplay0 wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (std, vt100 emulation) thread: table is full thread: table is full thread: table is full thread: table is full -- Alexis de BRUYN