Provide a dmesg before you rant.
Thanks,
Brian
> On Jun 24, 2019, at 5:06 PM, 3 wrote:
>
> i know that wifi adapters never worked in obsd(excluding those
> adapters for which drivers were written by vendors), but i found one
> that shows signs of life in 11n(11ac 2t2r supported by chip). it
Using Ansible to reinstall the operating system is like trying to turn a four
door sedan into a monster truck with a hammer.
Wrong tool for the job.
> On Jun 22, 2019, at 6:46 PM, Frank Beuth wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 03:06:30AM +0100, Andrew Luke Nesbit wrote:
>>> On 21/06/2019
Mihai,
Do you want to protest companies by not buying their equipment? That is the
only feasible outcome from this conversation.
The other outcome would be you want advice on what models will work on OpenBSD.
-Brian
> On Jul 3, 2019, at 12:11 PM, Zack Lofgren wrote:
>
> Mihai,
>
> It
You’re always welcome to submit a patch for functionality you want. It might
not be accepted but your own use case would be covered.
Statements on the intentions of others, as the way you continue to do, is a
sign of a troll. Submit a patch and you’ll be a helpful troll, if such a thing
Use doas.conf to permit root with nopass option.
See doas.conf(5).
> On Jul 2, 2019, at 4:43 AM, cho...@jtan.com wrote:
>
> This isn't a bug per se, more of an incongruity in how security-centric tools
> work wrt root, specifically doas and chroot/su/other:
>
> joe@drogo$ doas -s
> drogo#
I’m fine with hardware implants snooping on me. But if I was a CISO for a huge
company, I might go the extra mile to care about said implants.
I’ll continue living carefree.
> On Jul 2, 2019, at 1:42 PM, Nathan Hartman wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 1:28 PM Brian Brombacher
Oh and if the implant is smart, it’ll detect you’re trying to find it and go
dormant.
Even more good luck!
> On Jul 2, 2019, at 1:24 PM, Brian Brombacher wrote:
>
> Hardware implants go beyond just sending packets out your network card. They
> have transceivers that let ag
Hardware implants go beyond just sending packets out your network card. They
have transceivers that let agents control or snoop the device from a distance
using RF.
You need to scan the hardware with RF equipment to be sure.
Good luck!
> On Jul 2, 2019, at 12:27 PM, Misc User wrote:
>
>>
You can also add a second line to /etc/mygate if you’re using that.
> On Aug 13, 2019, at 1:11 PM, Thomas Bohl wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>> My hostname.vio0 looks like this:
>> dhcp
>> inet6 alias > provider> 64
>>
>
> You most likely need to add a route. Add something like this to your hostname
I find cheap PCI-Express and PCI-X em(4) cards suffice for my needs. 990-992
Mbps with tcpbench.
> On Aug 2, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Claudio Jeker wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 12:28:58PM +0100, Andy Lemin wrote:
>> Ahhh, thank you!
>>
>> I didn’t realise this had changed and now the
See cd(4): https://man.openbsd.org/cd.4
It’s not a real block device. You’ll need to use something like the dvd+rw
tools package already mentioned in order to write data to it. The man page
talks about how cd devices are represented as block devices for consistency
with other tools like
Use the -n option to sysupgrade to not reboot after files are downloaded and
verified. Then delete the unwanted tarballs as mentioned from
/home/_sysupgrade/ and reboot.
See sysupgrade(8): https://man.openbsd.org/sysupgrade
> On Aug 1, 2019, at 7:31 AM, Antal Ispanovity wrote:
>
>
Boot into single user mode. At the boot loader prompt, type boot -s. This
will drop you to a root shell.
> On Nov 17, 2019, at 3:39 PM, Lev Lazinskiy wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I am new to openBSD, so forgive me if I am missing something obvious.
>
> I recently installed openBSD on a
The OP’s hostname.vlan* files never specify a vnetid. I get an error trying
to configure and bring up the second vlan interface the same way without vnetid
specified. Regardless of my error, the ifconfig(8) man page says without
vnetid specified, vlan tag 0 will be used. You need to specify
There might be something wrong with your setup. I routinely get 500+ MB/s disk
and full 1 GBit Ethernet.
> On Jan 7, 2020, at 9:38 AM, Hamd wrote:
>
> It's 2020 and it's -still- sad to see OpenBSD -still- has the
> lowest/poorest (general/overall) performance ever:
>
Try setting sysctl kern.timecounter.hardware=tsc on the OpenBSD vmm guest and
run ntpd. I have not tried without ntpd but I know without using tsc, time
skews too much.
> On Apr 19, 2020, at 10:25 AM, Martin wrote:
>
> Thanks all of you guys for suggestions.
>
> Just one question to
Try something like this in pf.conf:
pass in on hvn1 proto tcp from to (hvn1) port 22 reply-to
10.0.0.1@hvn1
The reason you have to do this is because you have the same router address on
hvn0 and hvn1 (10.0.0.1). Another option is to use route tables.
Let me know if you have any questions.
>From your description, you want to pass IPv4 inside a tunnel that has an outer
>protocol of IPv6. Your resulting hostname.gif0 looks like the exact opposite
>of your description (IPv6 inside the tunnel with IPv4 outer).
Clarify what you need please. Provide your existing hostname.if files
> On Sep 3, 2020, at 11:02 AM, Ernest Stewart
> wrote:
>
> I forgot to say, in every computer I have /etc/sysctl.conf with
> "net.inet.ip.forwarding=1".
>
> And I insist, what shocks me the most is that tcpdump shows in both computers
> the right icmp packets but ping says 100% packets
> On Sep 3, 2020, at 12:38 PM, Brian Brombacher wrote:
>
>
>
>>>> On Sep 3, 2020, at 12:15 PM, Ernest Stewart
>>>> wrote:
>>> Theo de Raadt wrote:
>>> Oh my. Have you considered hiring a consultant?
>>>
>>> Of
>> On Sep 3, 2020, at 12:15 PM, Ernest Stewart
>> wrote:
> Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Oh my. Have you considered hiring a consultant?
>
> Of course. As you have already noticed, I have no idea about how to do what
> I'm trying to do. But a consultant is out of my budget.
>
> Are you guys
> On Sep 3, 2020, at 11:44 AM, Ernest Stewart
> wrote:
>
> On Sep 3, 2020, at 15:07 AM, Brian Brombacher wrote:
>
> "Your setup ... requires pf \rules and additional routing tables to make this
> work."
>
> And which pf rules and how to establish
> On Sep 10, 2020, at 11:16 AM, Demi M. Obenour wrote:
>
> How do I assign the same IP and MAC address to multiple interfaces?
> This is easy on Linux, but I cannot figure out how to do it on
> OpenBSD. The (virtual) machine is assigned a single IP address by
> the hypervisor, so changing
> On Sep 14, 2020, at 8:11 AM, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>
> Hi Brian,
>
> Brian Brombacher wrote on Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 07:55:11AM -0400:
>
>> Love the idea; however, the only drawback is if some Bad Person
>> is twiddling around and leaves a suid
> On Sep 14, 2020, at 7:43 AM, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>
> Hi Theo,
>
> Theo de Raadt wrote on Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 04:06:08AM -0600:
>> Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>
>>> are used for. Some such file systems may permit SUID and/or device
>>> files, so not checking them may be a dubious idea.
>
>>
> On Sep 4, 2020, at 10:51 AM, Tommy Nevtelen wrote:
>
> Hi there misc!
>
> Is there an external pfctl linter? we have bunch pf firwalls for which we
> generate rules but also write some manual ones that get merged. Would be nice
> if we could lint the rules before committed to vcs.. (yes
> On Sep 4, 2020, at 12:03 PM, Tommy Nevtelen wrote:
>
> On 04/09/2020 17.40, Brian Brombacher wrote:
>>>> On Sep 4, 2020, at 11:28 AM, Brian Brombacher wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Sep 4, 2020, at 10:51 AM, Tommy Nevtelen wrote:
>>>&
> On Sep 4, 2020, at 11:28 AM, Brian Brombacher wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Sep 4, 2020, at 10:51 AM, Tommy Nevtelen wrote:
>>
>> Hi there misc!
>>
>> Is there an external pfctl linter? we have bunch pf firwalls for which we
>> generate rules
> On Oct 7, 2020, at 2:35 PM, ben wrote:
>
> Hello, Misc;
>
> I'm attempting to write an rc script to start a tmux session:
>
>#!/bin/sh
>
>daemon="/usr/bin/tmux"
>daemon_flags=" new -d -s MAINTMUX -n SHELL"
>
>. /etc/rc.d/rc.subr
>
>rc_reload=NO
>
>rc_stop() {
> On Oct 19, 2020, at 10:29 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> On 2020-10-19, Rachel Roch wrote:
>> One of the CDNs would seem the obvious answer to your problem. Or have you
>> already tried them ?
>
> They fetch files from origin sources on the fly, mostly from Canada
> (for
>> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 02:35:46PM -0400, Brian Brombacher wrote:
>> What do you do with table in other rules? If you’re doing nothing,
>> you need to do something like block additional connections, or adjust the
>> pass rule to include from !
>
> You're r
What do you do with table in other rules? If you’re doing nothing, you
need to do something like block additional connections, or adjust the pass rule
to include from !
Run: pfctl -t smtp -T show
Does it show the offending IP? If so, the rule worked as you defined it.
> On May 27, 2020,
Do it in hostname.if. You’ll win the race.
> On May 26, 2020, at 2:14 PM, Demi M. Obenour wrote:
>
> On 2020-05-26 09:34, Kanto Andria wrote:
>> Hello,
>> man ndp is probably another solution
>>
>>On Tuesday, May 26, 2020, 9:17:25 a.m. EDT, Tommy Nevtelen
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On
> On Oct 27, 2020, at 5:33 PM, Pierre Emeriaud
> wrote:
>
> Howdy misc@,
>
> I have a fairly complicated setup with lots of interfaces, a couple of
> rdomains etc.
>
> I'd like wireguard to listen only on an IP address, not all. But if my
> understanding of ifconfig(8) is correct, this
> On Aug 3, 2020, at 11:51 AM, sven falempin wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 11:38 AM Brian Brombacher
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> > On Aug 3, 2020, at 9:54 AM, sven falempin wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello
>>
> On Aug 3, 2020, at 12:22 PM, sven falempin wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 12:00 PM Brian Brombacher
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Aug 3, 2020, at 11:51 AM, sven falempin
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 3,
> On Aug 4, 2020, at 4:33 PM, Sonic wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 4:24 PM wrote:
>> Update the installed packages first pkg_add -Uu
>
> It's a fresh install based on -current just downloaded. First attempt
> at installing packages, so no packages to upgrade.
>
Just wait for new
>> On Aug 8, 2020, at 4:36 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2020-08-07, Edward Carver wrote:
>> Hi Misc,
>>
>> Does OpenBSD support Carrier Grade Nat (cg-nat)?
>> Thanks for helping..
>
> What do you mean by 'support'?
>
> Running as a client behind one? Yes, that's transparent anyway
> On Jun 11, 2020, at 4:28 PM, Toyam Cox wrote:
>
> Hello Misc,
>
> Full config at end of email.
>
> I've discussed the below in #openbsd on freenode, and was told to come
> here. At present, I have a setup where I need multiple unrelated
> servers under a single IP address. I used relayd
> On Jul 3, 2020, at 7:17 PM, Henry Bonath wrote:
>
> Daniel,
>
> Thanks for taking the time to test this out.
> I just reloaded a test machine from scratch with -current and
> installed the HAProxy 2.0.15-4f39279 package.
> I loaded a very basic config file, and am also seeing the same
>> On Jul 1, 2020, at 1:14 PM, gwes wrote:
>>
>> On 7/1/20 8:05 AM, Luke Small wrote:
>> I spoke to my favorite university computer science professor who said
>> ++n is faster than n++ because the function needs to store the initial
>> value, increment, then return the stored value in the
> On Jul 3, 2020, at 3:34 AM, Kapetanakis Giannis
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> My setup in relayd is like this:
>
> redirect radius {
> listen on $radius_addr udp port radius interface $ext_if
> pftag RELAYD_radius
> sticky-address
> forward to mode least-states check icmp demote carp
> }
>
Use these directives also in unbound (see the pattern and choose what you
need, like 24.172.IN-ADDR.ARPA, to cover your 172.24.* reverse.
local-zone: "168.192.IN-ADDR.ARPA" nodefault
local-zone: "16.172.IN-ADDR.ARPA" nodefault
local-zone: "17.172.IN-ADDR.ARPA" nodefault
local-zone:
no wrote:
>>>> It isn’t. rdr-to, and by extension redirects, are not natting the source
>>>> address.
>>>> Clients connecting through relayd and to the backend will have source
>>>> addresses
>>>> not that of the relayd machine but of the or
Hmm...
/bin/ls, a utility that has existed since 1960’s.
This is not a bug.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ls
> On Jul 4, 2020, at 3:02 PM, Richard Ipsum wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Output of ls -R between OpenBSD and GNU coreutils seems to differ,
> OpenBSD ls -R will apparently list "hidden"
> On Jul 4, 2020, at 3:38 PM, Ottavio Caruso
> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 4 Jul 2020 at 19:59, Richard Ipsum wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Output of ls -R between OpenBSD and GNU coreutils seems to differ,
>> OpenBSD ls -R will apparently list "hidden" directories like .git,
>> whereas GNU coreutils
I’ll be explicit.
Did the OP run ls(1) as superuser? See -A flag in man ls
We have no idea.
> On Jul 4, 2020, at 3:44 PM, Brian Brombacher wrote:
>
>
>
>>> On Jul 4, 2020, at 3:38 PM, Ottavio Caruso
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, 4 Jul
> On Jul 4, 2020, at 3:10 PM, Brian Brombacher wrote:
>
> Hmm...
>
> /bin/ls, a utility that has existed since 1960’s.
>
> This is not a bug.
>
> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ls
>
Please disregard this poor advice. Obviously this isn’t the 1960
> On Jun 11, 2020, at 4:28 PM, Toyam Cox wrote:
>
> Hello Misc,
>
> Full config at end of email.
>
> I've discussed the below in #openbsd on freenode, and was told to come
> here. At present, I have a setup where I need multiple unrelated
> servers under a single IP address. I used relayd
> On Jul 3, 2020, at 9:46 PM, Daniel Jakots wrote:
>
> On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 20:25:12 -0400, Brian Brombacher
> wrote:
>
>> My subjective net gain is simplicity, security, performance, and
>> flexibility.
>
> I don't think adding ipsec (or a mesh vpn) int
> On Jul 10, 2020, at 9:15 PM, Gabri Tofano wrote:
>
> Here:
>
> LAB1-LB1$ relayctl sh sum
> Id TypeName Avlblty Status
> 1 redirecthttp active
> 1 table web_servers:80 active (1 hosts)
> 1
> On Jul 10, 2020, at 7:31 PM, Alfred Morgan wrote:
>
>
>>
>> You claimed sysupgrade does this.
>> sysupgrade does nothing like that. It placed a /bsd.upgrade file, and
> that is the end of the story.
>> You told boot (via commands in boot.conf) to do something, so it did,
> before
> On Jul 10, 2020, at 11:42 PM, Gabri Tofano wrote:
>
>
>> Does http work with redirects? It wasn’t clear if it did or not in
>> your first post.
>
> It doesn't work with http and that is the redirect that I was testing.
>
>> Indications from your pf anchor rules and the down
>> status
>> On Jul 11, 2020, at 11:20 AM, Gabri Tofano wrote:
> On 2020-07-11 06:33, Brian Brombacher wrote:
>>>>>>> On Jul 10, 2020, at 11:42 PM, Gabri Tofano wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Does http work with redirects? It wasn’t clear if
No reason to expire ssh brute force. They will never stop.
Manual flush if someone accidentally locked themselves out.
Just my two cents :)
> On Jun 4, 2020, at 12:48 AM, Anatoli wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Even then it seems that some of them turn up again pretty much
>> instantly after expiry.
>
> On Jul 13, 2020, at 6:58 AM, Alfred Morgan wrote:
>
>
> Brian wrote:
> > (echo boot /bsd.upgrade; echo boot) > /etc/boot.conf
>
> Brian, that doesn't work. I tried that already before. It seems to stop at
> the error not finding bsd.upgrade and won't continue.
>
> -alfred
Thanks for
Are you using: kern.timercounter.hardware=tsc ?
I’m on 6.7 release and no issue with collectd.
> On Jul 30, 2020, at 4:53 PM, Martin wrote:
>
> I can test it on 6.7-current only, and I haven't tested collectd on 6.6 -
> 6.7 -stable. TSC looks synchronized, ntpd corrects small amount of time
> On Oct 28, 2020, at 6:21 PM, Brian Brombacher wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Oct 28, 2020, at 5:07 PM, Pierre Emeriaud
>> wrote:
>>
>> Le mar. 27 oct. 2020 à 23:46, j...@snoopy.net.nz a
>> écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
> On Oct 30, 2020, at 11:44 AM, Brian Brombacher wrote:
>
>
>
>>> On Oct 29, 2020, at 11:56 PM, David Diggles wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 05:15:00PM +, Peter M??ller wrote:
>>> Hello Lucas,
>>>
>>> as fa
> On Oct 29, 2020, at 11:56 PM, David Diggles wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 05:15:00PM +, Peter M??ller wrote:
>> Hello Lucas,
>>
>> as far as I understood, setting MTU on encN interfaces is not supported
>> since it is not mentioned by enc(4) and setting it manually fails:
>>
>>>
> On Oct 30, 2020, at 6:32 PM, Lars Bonnesen wrote:
>
> I have been using a combination of Apache, mod_proxy and letsencrypt to set
> up different loadbalancing/https offload solution like this:
>
> https://URL1[Apache http_1]
> ---|
>
> On Oct 29, 2020, at 11:21 AM, Pierre Emeriaud
> wrote:
>
> Le jeu. 29 oct. 2020 à 00:09, Brian Brombacher a
> écrit :
>>
>> Scratch that, use the ifconfig wgrtable option to specify separate routing
>> domains for the port 53. This lets you initiate
> On Oct 28, 2020, at 5:07 PM, Pierre Emeriaud
> wrote:
>
> Le mar. 27 oct. 2020 à 23:46, j...@snoopy.net.nz a
> écrit :
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Pierre,
>>
>> The error may indicate that port 53 on 127.0.0.1 is already used by another
>> service. This appears to be confirmed by your netstat
> On Oct 29, 2020, at 6:09 PM, Pierre Emeriaud
> wrote:
>
> Le jeu. 29 oct. 2020 à 21:03, Stuart Henderson a
> écrit :
>> Which DNS server do you have bound on 53?
>
> unwind
>
>
>>> Is there a reason why wg needs such a large bind?
>> Unless/until it gets an option to bind to a
> On Jul 8, 2021, at 8:05 AM, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 11:57:50PM +0300, Ville Valkonen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> not sure if related but my Linux box (also in Hetzner) also started to have
>> flaky connection lately.
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Ville
>
> I opened a
> On Aug 8, 2021, at 9:15 PM, Steven Shockley
> wrote:
>
> Does anyone know if OpenBSD still works in Azure? I found the docs on
> uploading a VM, but they cover OpenBSD 6.1. I also found
> https://github.com/Azure/WALinuxAgent/issues/1360, where someone was trying
> to use 6.3 and
> On Sep 24, 2021, at 6:16 PM, Don Tek wrote:
>
> Would there be any ‘problem’ with configuring a 2-machine CARP setup and
> then just keeping one machine powered-off until needed?
>
> I realize this defeats live failover, but this is not a requirement for my
> customer.
>
> I just want
> On Oct 15, 2021, at 7:09 PM, Antonino Sidoti wrote:
>
> HI,
>
> I am getting this error since upgrading to v7.0;
>
> pf enabled
> net.inet.ip.forwarding: 0 -> 1
> net.inet6.ip6.forwarding: 0 -> 1
> starting network
>
> ifconfig: SIOCSETPFLOW: Can't assign requested address
> ifconfig:
sing “dhcp” in there.
>
>>> On 16 Oct 2021, at 10:39 am, Brian Brombacher wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Oct 15, 2021, at 7:09 PM, Antonino Sidoti wrote:
>>>
>>> HI,
>>>
>>> I am getting this error since upgra
Hi David,
Thank you for the write-up, this was an awesome read. I was on the edge of a
cliff waiting to hear what device or app you replaced next.
Bravo, excellent job done!
-Brian
> On Dec 27, 2021, at 1:03 AM, David Rinehart wrote:
>
> A long read, but may be interesting...
>
> I
You have a fundamental misunderstanding of what a shell is, how a program
executes, and how arguments to that program are passed.
You pass arguments to a program through a SINGLE ARRAY.
This is true in every operating system.
Stop advocating for things you don’t understand.
> On Nov 19, 2021,
> On Oct 26, 2021, at 9:31 AM, Matt Dainty wrote:
>
> I'm currently using OpenBSD with an Andrews & Arnold vDSL connection so I
> have
> a pppoe(4) interface, etc. and this works for IPv4 & IPv6.
>
> The problem is because of the rubbish rural Openreach infrastructure here in
> the UK I
> On Oct 26, 2021, at 9:22 AM, Sven F. wrote:
>
> }{ello,
>
> I updated a device and use php fpm on openbsd 7.0
> everything works fine after putting a resolv file in the chroot
> but i can't send email from the chroot
>
> I hope I didn't see something obvious.
>
> to troubleshoot i drop
> On Dec 11, 2021, at 11:12 AM, u...@mailo.com wrote:
>
> The article:
> https://eklitzke.org/the-cult-of-dd
>
> The content of the article:
>
> The Cult of DD
> Mar 17, 2017
> You'll often see instructions for creating and using disk images on Unix
> systems making use of the dd command.
> On Dec 11, 2021, at 11:22 AM, Brian Brombacher wrote:
>
>
>> On Dec 11, 2021, at 11:12 AM, u...@mailo.com wrote:
>>
>> The article:
>> https://eklitzke.org/the-cult-of-dd
>>
>> The content of the article:
>>
>> The Cu
> On Mar 7, 2022, at 12:10 PM, Brian Brombacher wrote:
>
> Hi Mihai,
>
> Not exactly related to disk speed, but have you cranked up the following
> sysctl to see if it helps?
>
> sysctl kern.bufcachepercentage=9
>
> I put an entry in /etc/sysctl.conf for per
Correction:
kern.bufcachepercentage=90
> On Mar 7, 2022, at 12:07 PM, Brian Brombacher wrote:
>
> Hi Mihai,
>
> Not exactly related to disk speed, but have you cranked up the following
> sysctl to see if it helps?
>
> sysctl kern.bufcachepercentage=9
>
Hi Mihai,
Not exactly related to disk speed, but have you cranked up the following sysctl
to see if it helps?
sysctl kern.bufcachepercentage=9
I put an entry in /etc/sysctl.conf for persistence.
This will cause up to 90% of system memory to be used as a unified buffer cache
for disk access.
> On Mar 6, 2022, at 7:41 AM, Mihai Popescu wrote:
>
> Since this thread is moving slowly in another direction, let me
> reiterate my situation again: I am running a browser (mostly chromium)
> and the computer slows down on downloads. Since I've checked the
> downloads rates, I observed
> On Jan 28, 2022, at 9:46 AM, dansk puffer wrote:
>
> Are there any major security differences between libressl and openssl
> nowadays? From what I read the situation for openssl improved and some Linux
> distros switched back to openssl again with mostly? OpenBSD remaining to use
>
> On Feb 6, 2022, at 4:51 PM, Brian Brombacher wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Feb 6, 2022, at 4:32 PM, Mike Fischer wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> Am 06.02.2022 um 21:13 schrieb Brian Brombacher :
>>>
>>>>> You can work around it by putting b
> On Feb 6, 2022, at 12:07 PM, Mike Fischer wrote:
>
> Hi Łukasz,
>
>>> Am 06.02.2022 um 12:08 schrieb Łukasz Moskała :
>>>
>>> W dniu 6.02.2022 o 05:28, Mike Fischer pisze:
>>> OpenBSD 7.0 stable amf64
>>> My host has two ethernet interfaces, em0 and em1.
>>> Note: The host is a VM with
> On Feb 6, 2022, at 4:32 PM, Mike Fischer wrote:
>
>
>> Am 06.02.2022 um 21:13 schrieb Brian Brombacher :
>>
>>>> You can work around it by putting both interfaces in diffrent rdomains,
>>>> then running two httpd instances, one in r
> On Jan 28, 2022, at 11:53 AM, Laura Smith
> wrote:
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>
>> On Friday, January 28th, 2022 at 14:43, dansk puffer
>> wrote:
>>
>> Are there any major security differences between libressl and openssl
>> nowadays? From what I read the situation for
84 matches
Mail list logo
