Hi misc,
(this is on 4.6-stable, -current has the same issue)
I played around with our shiny new /32 and noticed that this is not
working:
$ sudo /sbin/route add -inet6 -prefixlen 48 2a00:15a8:6:: 2a00:15a8::3
$ route -n show -inet6 | fgrep 2a00:15a8::3
[...]
2a00:15a8:6::/64 2a00:15a8::3 UGS
Hi,
I'm trying to secure my wlan access point with ipsec.
Apparently I cannot match ipv6 esp traffic. This is on 4.4
I build a simplified setup with qemu, ipsec-gw and ipsec-client:
- ipsec-gw
[r...@ipsec-gw:~]# cat /etc/ipsec.conf
ike passive esp from 10.12.32.235 to 10.12.32.236
On 06/04/12 21:52, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
What's considered the current 'best practice' for following OpenBSD
src with git? I'm interested in trying out git for managing my
growing list of pending/WIP patches for the src tree, but there seem
to be a bunch of options and I don't know if
Hi,
so we were used for a dns amplification attack. Some jackass thought
it would be a good idea to send us ~50k qps with the DO flag set and
type ANY. This would have resulted in ~750mbit/s outbound traffic.
For all you masochists out there, this is the iptables rule I came up with:
iptables
On 08/23/12 20:05, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 13:12, Ryan Kirk wrote:
One thing I've never understood is that if you're MITM'd, what good is
a cert revocation going to do? The proxying individual can easily
block access to the revocation lists, and your browser be none the
On 02/04/2013 03:59 PM, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
Hello,
I am facing a strange behavior,
I have the following scenario
eBGP1-iBGP1-iBGP2-iBGP3-eBGP2
iBGP must be fully meshed, a session between iBGP1 and iBGP3 is
missing.
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 08:30:03PM +0300, BSD Kazakhstan wrote:
Thinking of chroot(), I have even tried adding a copy of perl binary to:
# ls -l /var/www/usr/bin/
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root daemon 10725 Jul 9 19:15 perl
your perl is probably not statically linked, see
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 09:18:40PM +0300, ?zg?r Kazan??? wrote:
It's the base' perl,
# perl -v
This is perl 5, version 12, subversion 2 (v5.12.2 (*)) built for
amd64-openbsd
(with 10 registered patches, see perl -V for more detail)
And using nginx with chroot-disabled, (-u) didn't help
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 09:37:06PM +0300, ?zg?r Kazan??? wrote:
And the browser side:
502 Bad Gateway
(Actually the same error occurs when trying with any filenames (no matter
exists or not) ended with .cgi.
... and the log probably says upstream prematurely closed FastCGI
stdout. What
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 10:26:22AM -0400, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
Hi all,
I'm looking for performance measuring and tuning advice for 10 gigabit
Ethernet. I have a pair of Lanner FW-8865 systems that will be used as
firewalls for the local network.
[...]
The initial iperf runs couldn't go
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 12:57:55PM -0400, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Florian Obser flor...@narrans.de wrote:
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 10:26:22AM -0400, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
[...]
Increasing the MTU on both ix0 interfaces to 9000 gives me ~7.2 Gbps:
you expect
On 09/07/13 21:32, Simon Slaytor wrote:
Hi Folks,
I've been trying to wrap my head around a problem for a little while and
I'm getting nowhere fast so thought I'd ask the experts:
Due to a company take over I have two networks, NetA and NetB, that I
need to link together for bi
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 08:17:56PM +, hru...@gmail.com wrote:
Miod Vallat m...@online.fr wrote:
Thanks for the good tips!
I think the bootparams swap file information will be used correctly (I
remember seeing a fix in this area some time ago). It doesn't hurt
anyway to mention it
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 09:15:34AM +0200, InterNetX - Robert Garrett wrote:
I just want to know what a cloud is.
http://xkcd.com/908/
--
I'm not entirely sure you are real.
You want revision 1.30 of if_pflow.c
export the original aka untranslated address in pflow
ok florian@ henning@
~ http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/net/if_pflow.c#rev1.30
(and by that I don't mean you should backport it to 5.2, upgrading to
5.4 will be much easier - alot has
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 06:14:39PM -0300, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
AFAIK, using anything beside proto 5 on pflow interfaces is broken, at
least on OpenBSD 5.4. I know there were some recent work in this area
that solves this issue.
Nope, proto 9 was allways working. proto 10 had the problem
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 06:51:16AM +1000, Darren Tucker wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 04:39:57PM -0400, Darren Tucker wrote:
Indeed. It looks like a bug in the libc resolver rather than sshd, though.
I've been kinda busy recently so I haven't kept up with recent changes so
I'm not sure
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 09:25:45PM +, Florian Obser wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 06:51:16AM +1000, Darren Tucker wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 04:39:57PM -0400, Darren Tucker wrote:
Indeed. It looks like a bug in the libc resolver rather than sshd,
though.
I've been kinda
On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 12:11:18PM +0200, S?bastien Marie wrote:
Hi,
I do some tests with a cgi program that go in infinite loop.
In order to test it with nginx (-current GENERIC.MP#304), I started
slowcgi to run the cgi program (and configured ngnix).
The configuration is ok: the cgi
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 04:05:42PM -0500, Forman, Jeffrey wrote:
Hi Misc,
Long time listener, seldom caller.
My problem statement: I run OpenBSD 5.6-stable on my fw/router. My ISP
(Comcast in the US) provides native IPv6 support for all their customers.
They provide a /128 address for
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 06:08:04PM -0500, Jiri B wrote:
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 01:54:50AM +, Some Developer wrote:
Vultr already support OpenBSD on their servers (you upload the
OpenBSD install ISO and install it yourself) and their servers cost
the same as Digital Ocean.
Hi,
so I want to run smtpd(8) as a backup MX and configure the list of
valid email addresses so that the backup MX rejects invalid
email addresses on accepting the message and not bounce
the mail alter on when it tries to deliver to the primary
mail server.
Currently I have this:
accept from any
commited, thanks!
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 07:19:48PM -0330, Michael wrote:
Hi all,
Just noticed a minor spelling mistake in the example httpd.conf.
Regards,
Michael
diff -u /etc/examples/httpd.conf httpd.conf
--- /etc/examples/httpd.confThu Jan 22 19:03:06 2015
+++ httpd.conf Tue
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 07:11:48PM -, Merci Brault wrote:
Does the new httpd support gzip compression?
No.
--
I'm not entirely sure you are real.
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 09:53:10AM -0500, Sly Midnight wrote:
I am replying to this as I too would like some clarification as to the
difference between the two options {eui64|autoconf} for enabling the old
IPv6 behavior.
in ifconfig(8) we have:
-inet6 Disable inet6(4) on the
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 07:13:13PM +, Peter Fraser wrote:
The web sites that are involved make heavy use of Server Side Includes
which the new httpd does not yet have any support.
I wouldn't hold my breath. I'm fairly certain that we won't implement
it.
In particular the web sites use
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 03:41:22PM +0200, Tim Kuijsten wrote:
Had some trouble this morning in configuring inet6 on a new laptop.
What problems did you encounter? inet6 autoconf or rtsol in
hostname.if are supposed to work exactly the same.
Finally figured out that rtsol is dropped and that
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 09:44:45PM -0600, Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know if anyone have web2py running on OpenBSD 5.7 using
new httpd server. I've started web2py with fcgihandler and tried a simple
configuration with no luck (probably wrong, that's why I am
On 01/06/15 18:49, Okupandolared wrote:
Hi,
I have an web form.
I need send of webform to script bash
webform.html -- PHP proces -- create.sh
create.sh
#!/bin/ksh
# Create user
echo hi!! your pass $1
crypted=$(echo -n $1 | smtpctl encrypt )
maildir=$3/$2/
echo -e $2@$3
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 08:27:03PM +0200, Patrik Lundin wrote:
This is where possibly unexpected things start happening. Our first
note is that no default route is appearing for IPv6:
yes, that was an artifact of moving the sending of router
solicitations from rtsol(8) to the kernel. rtsol(8)
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 04:47:25PM +0200, Patrik Lundin wrote:
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 08:59:55AM +, Florian Obser wrote:
yes, that was an artifact of moving the sending of router
solicitations from rtsol(8) to the kernel. rtsol(8) flat out refused
to do anything with forwarding
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 04:27:08PM +0100, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
> I've configured unbound for a small network. What is "maximum
> capacity" of Unbound? Is suitable for big networks?
What was the maximum capacity of bind? Was it suitable for big
networks? How did you find out?
--
I'm not
It is usually not considered polite to forward private mails to
mailing lists.
--
I'm not entirely sure you are real.
I need some help since I'm terrible with hardware...
So my x201 main hacking laptop is getting old and benno@ is always
mocking me for the amount of gaffer and stickers that are holding it
together.
Long story short, I'm in the market for a new thinkpad.
Yes it has to be a thinkpad. I require
[moving to misc, as this thread is missing diffs]
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 09:38:49AM +0300, Mikhail wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 12:11 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >> > this does 2 things:
> >> > [...]
> >>
> >> I may recall what I have sent to you in private email,
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 07:59:44PM +, Joe Holden wrote:
> On 09/03/2017 23:35, Joe Holden wrote:
> >On 09/03/2017 23:02, Joe Holden wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>So - it seems that pledge will deny a change of rtable to 0 when using
> >>level SOL_SOCKET and the current rtable is >0, so eg if you're
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 06:29:12PM -0700, Thomas Smith wrote:
> One question???
>
> What would be necessary to bake this functionality into OpenBSD base? IPv6
> is pretty ubiquitous nowadays???most ISPs support it, most cloud providers
> support it???it seems common enough that much of this
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 09:03:26AM +0200, Thuban wrote:
> Hi
> since we have nsd and unbound included in base, I was wondering what
> tool you use to deal with DNSSEC and sign your zone ?
> I use zkt, but your advices would be nice.
>
> Regards
> --
> thuban
I use powerdns from ports as a
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 01:56:10PM +0200, Christer Solskogen wrote:
> Running the latest snapshot (amd64) I see that slaacd.sock is in /dev,
> while documentation says that is should be in /var/run. What is correct?
Friend Computer is of course right. Just fixed the man page. Thanks!
--
I'm not
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 08:06:08PM +0200, Christer Solskogen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Florian Obser <flor...@openbsd.org> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 01:56:10PM +0200, Christer Solskogen wrote:
> > > Running the latest snapshot (amd64) I see
On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 06:31:06PM +, lists+m...@ggp2.com wrote:
> Hello all -
>
> I don't feel this warrants a bug report, but nevertheless feel that this
> behavior is inconsistent with the way dhclient works. I have a vultr
there is a school of thought that says dhclient should not delay
On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 07:18:55PM -0500, Kris Katterjohn wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 09:04:33AM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 04:20:31PM -0500, Kris Katterjohn wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 09:24:33AM -0700, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> > > > This looks correct.
reply-to: misc
could you all please fix your email client to not strip diffs when
posting to tech@? thanks
zfs is already there: https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs=136482823110105=2
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 05:39:11PM +0200, Philipp Buehler wrote:
> Am 25.08.2017 17:35 schrieb Daniil Berendeev:
>
On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 08:15:57AM +, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
> I know well that article, because it is several years old with no updates.
>
> Those working on ffs should do what they are supposed to do. Lack of money?
> Setup a stickers sale or a kickstarter, get the money and just fucking
Be careful not to break dhcpv6-pd.
I suspect the problem is actually in make_prefix() in config.c which
unconditionally sets
onlink and autoconf.
I stared at this for some time but can't figure out how to fix this.
RFC 4861 has this which I don't think rtadvd is implementing correctly:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 08:09:40AM +1000, Stuart Longland wrote:
> On 15/06/18 06:50, Steve Fairhead wrote:
> > I gather Amazon are not quite there yet re OpenBSD virtual machines. Can
> > anyone here provide a cluebat as to prospects or alternatives? I don't
> > want to move away from OpenBSD -
On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 09:14:35AM -0700, Scott Vanderbilt wrote:
> On 5/26/2018 4:54 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> > aeneas.datagenic.com doesn't respond on port 80. (And if I can't
> > fetch it, letsencrypt's checkers are also unlikely to be able to).
> >
> > Firewall issue?
>
> Oh, FFS.
>
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 09:03:09PM -0800, Chris Bennett wrote:
> OpenBSD 6.2 (GENERIC.MP) #2: Sun Dec 10 21:14:42 CET 2017
>
> r...@syspatch-62-amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
> real mem = 3774021632 (3599MB)
> avail mem = 3652612096 (3483MB)
the ram will
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 11:33:14PM +, Dinesh Thirumurthy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If you wanted your personal git mirrors of OpenBSD, then you can do it with:
>
> https://github.com/hakrtech/repogen/repogen.sh
>
> This will generate git repos of OpenBSD's source, xenocara, ports and www.
>
> You
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 09:20:16PM +, Maxim Bourmistrov wrote:
>
> I had to bypass relayd to roll prod stable.
> Down to apache. Taking care of http and https.
> By redirect.
> Now this setup (if I can call it) is stable.
>
> .
>
> P.S.
> Looks like we have to move forward from here.
Buy
During g2k18 I commited rad(8).
The latest amd64 and i386 snapshots should contain it with enough
features to replace rtadvd(8). If you are using rtadvd(8) I'd
appreciate if you could switch to rad(8) and report back if any
features are missing.
The plan is to unhook rtadvd(8) from the build
On Sun, Jul 08, 2018 at 07:53:41AM -0500, Edgar Pettijohn III wrote:
> I am playing around with cgi written in c. I am getting what seems like a
> weird error though. I'm starting off with a very basic program:
>
> #include
>
> int
> main(void)
> {
> fprintf(stdout,
>
On Sun, Jul 08, 2018 at 08:30:29AM -0500, Edgar Pettijohn III wrote:
>
>
> On 07/08/18 08:09, Florian Obser wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 08, 2018 at 07:53:41AM -0500, Edgar Pettijohn III wrote:
> > > I am playing around with cgi written in c. I am getting what seems like a
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 04:12:48PM +0200, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wasn't going to ask, but the book I have (alternative dns servers - jpm) is
> somewhat outdated on nsd.
>
> If I'm correct, in order to pull the zones to disk on a slave nsd setup, one
> has to manually or crontab
this works for me:
server "tlakh.xyz" {
listen on 0.0.0.0 tls port 443
listen on :: tls port 443
tls certificate "/etc/ssl/tlakh.xyz.crt"
tls key "/etc/ssl/private/tlakh.xyz.key"
hsts
location "/shop.6.html" {
block return 402
On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 04:05:44PM +0200, Leo Unglaub wrote:
> Hey,
>
> > see "IPv6 broken on Hetzner.de vServer OpenBSD 6.3 / amd64" on bugs@
> >
> > I'm pretty sure hetzner sets a static route to your link local address for
> > the /64 they assign to you.
> >
> > Since the the link local
On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 03:43:07PM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 03:23:19PM +0200, Miles wrote:
> |
> | Am 03.04.2018 um 14:56 schrieb Leo Unglaub:
> | > Hello,
> | > i have a IPv6 problem since i upgraded to 6.3. I cannot reach other
> | >
> | /etc/hostname.vio0
> | >>
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 10:52:11AM +0200, Dumitru Moldovan wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 09:03:51 +0100, Stefan Wollny wrote:
> >
> > I changed the 'exec' command in /usr/local/bin/iridium like so:
> > - LANG=${_l} exec "/usr/local/iridium/iridium" "${@}"
> > + LANG=${_l} exec
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 09:45:38AM +0100, Stefan Wollny wrote:
> Am 08.11.18 um 09:03 schrieb Stefan Wollny:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > just a little nit with the iridium-browser unveiled:
> >
> > I changed the 'exec' command in /usr/local/bin/iridium like so:
> > - LANG=${_l} exec
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 12:21:58PM +0100, Solene Rapenne wrote:
> Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to pull my munin node over IPv6, but the process is only
> > listening on IPv4.
> >
> > guinch# grep '^host' /etc/munin/munin-node.conf
> > host *
> > guinch# netstat -af inet |
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 07:38:04PM +0100, Thuban wrote:
> Hi,
> I use dovecot and smtpd on my personal mail server.
> They both share the same password file.
>
> I works very well, but I'm concerned about permissions on this file :
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel passwd
>
> It's world
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 09:25:25AM +0100, Kollar Arpad wrote:
> Any creative hints to defend against these kind of threats?
Your system has been compromised. The attacker is able to replace
binaries, you have lost. If your package manager can still tell you
that the sshd binary has been replaced
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 10:02:45AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 09:50:31AM +0100, Florian Obser wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 09:25:25AM +0100, Kollar Arpad wrote:
> > > Any creative hints to defend against these kind of threats?
> >
One possible workaround is putting
-inet as the first line in /etc/hostname.vio4
It will nuke all v4 addresses and re-add them.
Depending on your usecase this might work for you or it might melt
down your whole network ;)
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 10:49:01PM +, Tom Smyth wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 03:43:20PM +, Chris Narkiewicz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to configure Nextcloud on a subdomain. My config has 2
> vhosts and connection max request body is not respected for my subdomain.
this has been fixed in current. Wild guess, you are on 6.4?
This diff should
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 10:47:49PM +0200, mathijs wrote:
> this makes misc@ so much more amusing
It really doesn't. We are not here to have manure tossed at us for the
audience's amusement.
Everytime something like this happens it takes time away from hacking
on OpenBSD. It doesn't matter that
imsg));
> >memcpy(, imsg.data, sizeof(verbose));
> >log_setverbose(verbose);
> >break;
> > @@ -754,6 +754,7 @@ config_new_empty(void)
> >xconf->ra_options.cur_hl = 0;
> >xconf->ra_options.m_flag = 0;
> >x
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 09:39:40AM +0300, Consus wrote:
> On 19:59 Wed 28 Aug, Steven Shockley wrote:
> > So, many thanks to everyone who put together the new -stable updates for
> > packages. Is there a command I can put in the crontab that will only
> > output if there are updates? Similar to
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 07:36:55PM +0200, list wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The output of slaacctl show interface vio0 ist the following:
>
> # slaacctl show interface vio0
>
> slaacctl: connect: /dev/slaacd.sock: Connection refused
>
> This is not how it is supposed to be i guess.
it would be
This will only work if you stop upgrading snapshots long before 6.6 is
announced.
Otherwise you will be on 6.6-current by November 1st and -r will wait for 6.7.
On September 2, 2019 1:15:26 PM GMT+02:00, Ian Darwin
wrote:
>> The sysupgrade tool is a nice way to install the newest snapshot,
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 12:42:58PM +0200, Henry Jensen wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> A tweet[0]from @romanzolotarev confused some people, including me.
>
> Basically he says, that if you wish co continue to use acme-client you
> have to upgrade to -current, because of the switch to ACME v02 API and
>
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 09:43:20AM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> I'm a bit surprised nobody looked at instrumenting what sets are actually
> installed on a machine during install/manual upgrade and cloning that
> into sysupgrade to avoid this kind of surprise...
>
Yeah, I think sysupgrade was a
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 11:17:04PM +0200, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> Caleb(enlightened.des...@gmail.com) on 2019.08.06 08:05:48 -0700:
> > How do I publish default router preferences as defined in RFC 4191
> > (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4191) using rad in OpenBSD 6.5?
> > I've read the
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 09:56:57AM +0100, Daniel Winters wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> > Today acme-client renewed all but 2 of my domains; the two that have
> > "alternative names" in the certificates. I cannot get it to renew
> > those two. This is on amd64 on 6.6-current, updated today.
>
> I
The ifconfig option parser is... special.
You must set flowdst as well as pflowproto.
On 4 March 2020 14:02:18 CET, Kapetanakis Giannis
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Is IPFIX removed from pflow in 6.6?
>
># ifconfig pflow0 pflowproto 10
>ifconfig: SIOCSETPFLOW: Can't assign requested address
>
>pflow(4)
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 10:06:41AM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
> It seems it's the SD card that is slow (the machine
> is a BeagleBone Black) - will try with a faster one.
>
> It seems I am missing out on
>
On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 04:59:40PM +, go...@disroot.org wrote:
> I never read
Please stop wasting our time then.
Thanks,
Florian
--
I'm not entirely sure you are real.
On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 05:35:13PM +0300, Hamd wrote:
> It's 2020 and it's -still- sad to see OpenBSD -still- has the
> lowest/poorest (general/overall) performance ever:
Thank you for your kind and encouraging words.
I will get right on fixing these issues for you.
--
I'm not entirely sure you
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 06:52:21AM +, Roderick wrote:
> Is that not a little too primitive?
I thought so, too. No context, no explanation just a one-liner.
--
I'm not entirely sure you are real.
Please leave, optionally seek professional help and never come back.
--
I'm not entirely sure you are real.
A common problem. :(
I finally got around to improve acme-client's error reporting, it should be
better in -current and 6.8
On 23 May 2020 21:28:23 CEST, Teno Deuter wrote:
>On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 8:22 PM Stuart Henderson
>wrote:
>>
>> On 2020-05-23, Teno Deuter wrote:
>> > acme-client:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 09:48:04AM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> Guesses can be made, but a quick email might get a more accurate
> answer :) "Hi, I see you are padding your announcements at $IX and we
> are seeing you from other peers with the same path length, would you
> prefer we send to
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 04:08:16PM +0200, Why 42? The lists account. wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 07:12:47AM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > Sounds like they are trapping sigbus themselves but the handler isn't
> > giving useful information.
> >
> > Try just running it under gdb:
> >
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 12:26:43PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
> While OpenBSD itself is great about using duids, those are defined in
> the 'a' partition of the boot disk..which is usually the first disk. But
> in your case, the "first disk" doesn't include the 'a' partitionand the
> /etc/fstab
On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 01:19:17AM -0400, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
>
> Hi Misc,
>
> For number of years I had a very simple scheme to backup my OpenBSD
> infrastructure servers running critical network services for our small
> university lab. Namely, I would put a low profile usb flash drive and
On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 07:19:29AM +0200, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Aug 5 07:09:55 beta unwind[1703]: startup
> Aug 5 07:09:59 beta unwind[62921]: validation failure
> . A IN>: no DNSSEC records from 192.168.177.1 for DS internal.centroid.eu.
> while
> building chain of trust
>
>
Wild guess, /home is an nfs mount or mounted read-only? That's not going to
work unfortunately.
On 17 June 2020 22:23:13 CEST, "Raymond, David" wrote:
>I am trying to upgrade a bunch of machines from 6.6 to 6.7 using
>sysupgrade and I get the message
>
>/usr/sbin/sysupgrade[136]: cannot create
I think the only way is to repeat the location statement for each extension :/
You can leave out the socket since that's the default
On 10 December 2020 18:24:20 CET, Alexey Vatchenko
wrote:
>Hello!
>
>I’m migrating from ancient server with OpenBSD’s apache1 to 6.8
>OpenBSD’s httpd.
>In my
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 11:58:41AM +0100, Martin Schröder wrote:
> Am Fr., 30. Okt. 2020 um 11:54 Uhr schrieb Denis Fondras
> :
> > Please, fix your tweet. The default install answer for IPv6 is 'none'.
>
> This borders on "switch off v6 for security reasons", which would be just
> wrong.
On 3 January 2021 15:25:13 CET, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Daniel Jakots wrote on Sat, Jan 02, 2021 at 11:19:07PM -0500:
>> On Sat, 2 Jan 2021 22:57:06 -0500, wrote:
>
>>> I came across a broken link during some pre-install research.
>>>
>>> While browsing URL
On 2021-05-30 19:55 +02, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 01:43:54PM -0400, Daniel Jakots wrote:
>> On Sun, 30 May 2021 17:45:22 +0200, Theo Buehler
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Unsure. If people really think this is useful and necessary, I can be
>> > convinced. It's easy enough to do. And
https://xkcd.com/979/
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 05:43:36PM +0200, open...@crw.name wrote:
> Self solved.
>
> Am 02.04.2021 14:02, schrieb open...@crw.name:
> > Hello, I need some help to configure my acme-client the right way.
> >
> > Obtain certificates itself works using OpenBSD -current #434
What are the permissions on the bsd.upgrade that's left behind?
If they are still +x then your issue is with the boot loader, maybe that
boot.conf otto suggested. If they are -x then the boot loader started the
install kernel but something went wrong.
On 14 February 2021 18:02:07 CET, Judah
On 2021-08-18 12:48 UTC, Olivier Cherrier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a DHCP setup using dhcp-client-identifier option.
>
> On the DHCP server side, i use something similar to this:
> ---8< /etc/dhcpd.conf
> host rex {
> option dhcp-client-identifier "rex";
>
mkdir ~/.cache should get you get going again until xterm is fixed.
On 6 September 2021 08:41:38 CEST, henkjan gersen wrote:
>That indeed gives much more output, but not sure it gives more clarity
>as it ends with this:
>
>--
>69930 xterm CALL mprotect(0xf4aab8c6000,0x1000,0x3)
>69930 xterm RET
On 2021-10-20 07:55 +02, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 07:47:30AM +0200, Mischa wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately our joy was short lived. This morning I noticed a lot of
>> Oct 20 07:44:15 name1 nsd[80814]: server 76410 died unexpectedly with status
>> 11, restarting
>>
>> It looks
On 2021-10-18 14:38 UTC, tetrahe...@danwin1210.me wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 10:14:56PM +, tetrahe...@danwin1210.me wrote:
>>My setup is a little bit unusual, and I'm trying to understand why
>>`uname -a` is still reporting 6.9 after I successfully booted
>>bsd.upgrade and saw the
On 2021-12-06 13:49 +03, Maksim Rodin wrote:
> Hello
> I have the following unwind.conf:
> ```
> cat /etc/unwind.conf
> fwd1=192.168.1.150
> fwd2=192.168.1.1
> forwarder { $fwd1 $fwd2 }
> preference forwarder
> ```
> and an automatically generated resolv.conf:
> ```
> cat /etc/resolv.conf
>
On 2021-12-26 19:43 UTC, mgra...@brainfat.net wrote:
> So my question is, is this expected behavior? When the router advertisement
> does not have a router and
> thus sets the router lifetime to 0 (as it should), should slaacd ignore
> advertisement? Or should
> it still configure an IP
Here we go again...
On 23 November 2021 21:00:18 CET, "pas...@pascallen.nl"
wrote:
>I'm trying to upgrade to 7.0 but it fails.
>The upgrade quide shows:
> Check available disk space in /usr. Verify that the /usr partition
> has a size of at least 1.1G. With less space the upgrade may fail
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo