to contact with Richard Stallman, just for give us his
opinion and answer us some questions about free software,
How can I contact him?
What's his real email?
You'd be better contacting the FSF rather than Stallman directly - don't you
think that's overkill?
He also may have conducted
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 02:44:35PM +0200, Francesco Vollero wrote:
Il 26/05/10 14.32, Marco Peereboom ha scritto:
That free beer analogy has never made any sense and never will. I
honestly wonder why people keep repeating it.
I hope that in some /parallel/ universe beer is free and bsd is
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 04:28:56PM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 02:44:35PM +0200, Francesco Vollero wrote:
Il 26/05/10 14.32, Marco Peereboom ha scritto:
That free beer analogy has never made any sense and never will. I
honestly wonder why people keep repeating it.
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 04:28:56PM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote:
So the question is - am I living in a parallel universe?
Simple! yes.
Agreed, in a level IV multiverse at least (before you ask, we need a
very good
This thread could be more humorous.
-Girish
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Igor Sobrado sobr...@openbsd.org wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us
wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 04:28:56PM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote:
So the question is - am I living in a
Everyone killed the poor guy with a fork in the eyes!
Yepeee!
This is why misc@openbsd.org is my mentor!
Mess with the Best DIE like the REST so clear!
--
Andris Genovez Tobar / Sistemas
Elastix ECE - Linux LPI-1 - Novell CLA - Apple ACMT
Jabber: bitfr...@asgard.crice.org
On 26 May 2010 23:13, Brad Tilley b...@16systems.com wrote:
Julian Acosta wrote:
Really we need to contact with Richard Stallman, just for give us his
opinion and answer us some questions about free software,
How can I contact him?
What's his real email?
Just talk a lot about open source
Hello!
I'm from the Postgraduate Departmen of the ITCC University from Mexico,
Really we need to contact with Richard Stallman, just for give us his
opinion and answer us some questions about free software,
How can I contact him?
What's his real email?
This help affects up to 19 universities
...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
I'm from the Postgraduate Departmen of the ITCC University from Mexico,
Really we need to contact with Richard Stallman, just for give us his
opinion and answer us some questions about free software,
How can I contact him?
What's his real email?
This help affects up
--- On Wed, 5/26/10, Julian Acosta j.acost...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Julian Acosta j.acost...@gmail.com
Subject: Help contacting Richard Stallman
To: misc@openbsd.org
Date: Wednesday, May 26, 2010, 6:18 AM
Hello!
I'm from the Postgraduate Departmen of the ITCC University from Mexico,
Really we
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Julian Acosta j.acost...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
I'm from the Postgraduate Departmen of the ITCC University from Mexico,
Really we need to contact with Richard Stallman, just for give us his
opinion and answer us some questions about free software,
How can I
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:18:03AM -0600, Julian Acosta wrote:
Hello!
I'm from the Postgraduate Departmen of the ITCC University from Mexico,
Really we need to contact with Richard Stallman, just for give us his
opinion and answer us some questions about free software,
How can I contact
From: Julian Acosta j.acost...@gmail.com
Hello!
I'm from the Postgraduate Departmen of the ITCC University from Mexico,
Really we need to contact with Richard Stallman, just for give us his
opinion and answer us some questions about free software,
How can I contact him?
What's his real email
At 2010-05-26 11:03:50 Gilles Chehade wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:18:03AM -0600, Julian Acosta wrote:
Hello!
I'm from the Postgraduate Departmen of the ITCC University from
Mexico,
Really we need to contact with Richard Stallman, just for give us
his opinion and answer us
from Mexico,
Really we need to contact with Richard Stallman, just for give us his
opinion and answer us some questions about free software,
How can I contact him?
What's his real email?
You'd be better contacting the FSF rather than Stallman directly - don't you
think that's overkill?
He
operating system :)
-Francesco
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:32:56PM +0100, Peter Kay (Syllopsium) wrote:
From: Julian Acostaj.acost...@gmail.com
Hello!
I'm from the Postgraduate Departmen of the ITCC University from Mexico,
Really we need to contact with Richard Stallman, just for give us his
Julian Acosta wrote:
Really we need to contact with Richard Stallman, just for give us his
opinion and answer us some questions about free software,
How can I contact him?
What's his real email?
Just talk a lot about open source and the Linux operating system. He'll
show up.
2010/5/26 Brad Tilley b...@16systems.com:
Julian Acosta wrote:
Really we need to contact with Richard Stallman, just for give us his
opinion and answer us some questions about free software,
How can I contact him?
What's his real email?
Just talk a lot about open source and the Linux
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Vadim Jukov persg...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/5/26 Brad Tilley b...@16systems.com:
Julian Acosta wrote:
Really we need to contact with Richard Stallman, just for give us his
opinion and answer us some questions about free software,
How can I contact him?
What's
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Vadim Jukov persg...@gmail.com wrote:
Now he'll definitely come here, because you wrote Linux instead of
religiously correct GNU/Linux.
Do you mean Apache/BSD/GNU/IPL/MIT/SGI/X11/Linux, right?
Igor Sobrado wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Vadim Jukov persg...@gmail.com wrote:
Now he'll definitely come here, because you wrote Linux instead of
religiously correct GNU/Linux.
Do you mean Apache/BSD/GNU/IPL/MIT/SGI/X11/Linux, right?
Wasn't that SCO/Linux?
: Help contacting Richard Stallman
From: j.acost...@gmail.com
To: misc@openbsd.org
Hello!
I'm from the Postgraduate Departmen of the ITCC University from Mexico,
Really we need to contact with Richard Stallman, just for give us his
opinion and answer us some questions about free software,
How
I thought that RMS is GNU guy and this is BSD mailing list so maybe
you mistyped address? Anyway what's the status of reading and
searching ability on universities in Mexico as email of RMS is on his
own page http://stallman.org/ ? ;-)
At first I tought it was spam. It's quite weird for
Vadim Jukov persg...@gmail.com writes:
Now he'll definitely come here, because you wrote Linux instead of
religiously correct GNU/Linux.
Actually it's the other way around - in my experience he's
significantly more reluctant to visit if the organizers show a
fondness for open source rather
I thought that RMS is GNU guy and this is BSD mailing list so maybe
you mistyped address? Anyway what's the status of reading and
searching ability on universities in Mexico as email of RMS is on his
own page http://stallman.org/ ? ;-)
At first I tought it was spam. It's quite weird
It's clearly spam.
We really need to reason whether he is trolling or not,
Even if he is completely clueless about OSS at all, why the hell would
he come to an openbsd list ? We all know openbsd isn't the most
popular OS in the planet, it's the best, but far from being the most
popular.
Having that in mind, why
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Christiano F. Haesbaert
haesba...@haesbaert.org wrote:
Having that in mind, why didn't he came across a Linux mailing list or
a FreeBSD or a my-ass-is-on-fire list ?
My point is, what are the odds of an individual asking the completely
wrong question on the
Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
We all know openbsd isn't the most popular OS in the planet, it's the best, but
far from being the most popular.
Great words.
+rep for this.
Subject: Re: Help contacting Richard Stallman
Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
We all know openbsd isn't the most popular OS in the planet, it's the
best, but far from being the most popular.
Great words.
+rep for this.
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 13:40 -0400, Kenneth Gober wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Christiano F. Haesbaert
haesba...@haesbaert.org wrote:
Having that in mind, why didn't he came across a Linux mailing list or
a FreeBSD or a my-ass-is-on-fire list ?
My point is, what are the odds
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 02:52:50PM -0500, Vanessa Kraus wrote:
For what it's worth, I am on a good number of oss lists (including
Linux), and there are no other mentions of RMS anywhere.
Also FWIW, saw a lot of OpenBSD + RMS chatter on the Twitter in the
last 24 hours.
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
it's likely that he found
multiple mailing lists that all had some tenuous relationship to
open-source software, and spammed all of them. but I haven't looked
in the archives of any other lists to find out.
Cursory googling
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 01:05:01PM -0700, Andrew Fresh wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 02:52:50PM -0500, Vanessa Kraus wrote:
BLABLABLABLABLABLABLA
BLABLABLA
So much junk here. Bye bye misc.
https://twitter.com/marco_peereboom
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 01:05:01PM -0700, Andrew Fresh wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 02:52:50PM -0500, Vanessa Kraus wrote:
For what it's worth, I am on a good number of oss lists (including
Linux), and there are no other mentions of RMS anywhere.
Also
Gregg Reynolds wrote:
On 1/7/08, Steve Shockley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nicodache wrote:
I cannot anything but to appreciate and look how you are able to stay
calm and polite when I read some people on this ML talking about crap,
fucking duck with tape, shutting up things.
I have never seen
On 1/7/08, Steve Shockley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nicodache wrote:
I cannot anything but to appreciate and look how you are able to stay
calm and polite when I read some people on this ML talking about crap,
fucking duck with tape, shutting up things.
If if walks like a duck and talks
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 20:46:43 -0700
L [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard Stallman wrote:
I hope that the other OpenBSD developers
will repudiate such conduct.
You said the other openbsd developers.
In this context, it implies that I am an OpenBSD developer. The
other means that I am
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 16:58:48 +0800, Koh Choon Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Is the FSF preparing to treat OBSD as one of the free OS they recommend?
Who cares. OpenBSD just doesn't like misinformation spread about it.
I have no connection to the OBSD project, but I hope it never has
anything to do
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 06:30:58 -0500, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Except, sir, at some point, someone made a mistake. And this mistake
has blown up in to this thread with this ongoing argument. Their
report was either not as accurate as you seem to think, or you're
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 09:31:10AM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
is possible I said something about it at some point. Could you tell
me where that statement appears? If I need to correct it, I need to
know where it is.
Time to back track again, eh Moron.
What is the URL
On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 05:46:49 -0500
Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I doubt I would have looked at the AROS web site myself. To find out
the status of the BSD systems, recently, I asked the FSF staff to
check for me.
Wait, you have someone else do the research
Except, sir, at some point, someone made a mistake. And this mistake
has blown up in to this thread with this ongoing argument. Their
report was either not as accurate as you seem to think, or you're very
badly expressing the contents of the report (which has not been made
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 11:18:17PM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
Can you tell the FSF web programmers to do more checking for HTML/SQL
injection vulnerabilities?
I know nothing about that issue, but I will forward your message.
Teaching the public about this issue is a good thing
2) using more free software is better than not running it at all
3) incentivating usage of non-free software on free software operating
systems doesn't incentivate the creation of free software
replacements
this is a word play. I know people who used OpenBSD for a while
There are also quite a few free programs that run only on Windows.
(Being able to redistribute a program and its source and modify and
redistribute the source doesn't somehow cause it to be instantly
ported to other platforms by the grace of God.) These programs can be
run on other
No, Richard. No. This is really getting tired.
Their report was that OpenBSD contains ports for non-free programs,
and that is what I tried to say in the interview.
No, you didnt't.
I made a mistake in the way I said it: I used words which were subject
to misunderstanding.
No, you used
I wrote:
I hope that you have not arranged in effect to cause our web site
to be attacked.
You responded:
It was a recommendation of OpenBSD rather than an attack.
It was neither a recommendation of OpenBSD nor an attack.
Your message did not talk about OpenBSD, but if it had,
Richard,
I don't want not make any comment on all this FUD, instead I'll just
tell you this.
I cannot anything but to appreciate and look how you are able to stay
calm and polite when I read some people on this ML talking about crap,
fucking duck with tape, shutting up things.
That beeing said,
nicodache wrote:
I cannot anything but to appreciate and look how you are able to stay
calm and polite when I read some people on this ML talking about crap,
fucking duck with tape, shutting up things.
I have never seen anyone on this list fuck a duck with a tape. Ever.
Richard Stallman wrote:
I would not call your message an attack, because encouraging attacks
is not the same thing as making an attack. It is not the same, but it
goes in the same direction. I hope that the other OpenBSD developers
will repudiate such conduct. Surely we can disagree without
Richard Stallman wrote:
I hope that the other OpenBSD developers
will repudiate such conduct.
You said the other openbsd developers.
In this context, it implies that I am an OpenBSD developer. The other
means that I am one myself and relative to me, they are the other
developers with me
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 12:15:37PM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
I wrote:
I hope that you have not arranged in effect to cause our web site
to be attacked.
You responded:
It was a recommendation of OpenBSD rather than an attack.
It was neither a recommendation of OpenBSD nor
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 12:15:37PM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
I wrote:
I hope that you have not arranged in effect to cause our web site
to be attacked.
You responded:
It was a recommendation of OpenBSD rather than an attack.
It was neither a recommendation
On 1/7/08, Steve Shockley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nicodache wrote:
I cannot anything but to appreciate and look how you are able to stay
calm and polite when I read some people on this ML talking about crap,
fucking duck with tape, shutting up things.
I have never seen anyone on this
Is the FSF preparing to treat OBSD as one of the free OS they recommend?
--
Regards
Koh Choon Lin
a href=http://profiles.friendster.com/42928535;Best Teacher in
Singapore/a
Dude... it is on the endorsement list on gnu.org you talked about in
the beginning how you cannot include OpenBSD in it...
http://gnu.org/links/links.html
Thank you. Now I know where to remove the link if it comes to that.
I have a feeling that list is maintained by your 'FSF
I doubt I would have looked at the AROS web site myself. To find out
the status of the BSD systems, recently, I asked the FSF staff to
check for me.
Wait, you have someone else do the research, and this persons opinions
get reflected in what you say?
Absolutely. FSF
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 12:56:08AM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 12:34:45PM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
According to YOU, it is okay to have emacs and gcc run on a proprietary
system as it allows more people to run free software. How is it that it
is
So the FSF told you OpenBSD contains non-free software and you said
EXACTLY what they told you on the talk?
So the FSF are hypocrites and liars!
On Jan 6, 2008 12:46 PM, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I doubt I would have looked at the AROS web site myself. To find out
Richard Stallman wrote:
I don't personally do most of our web site maintenance, of course.
But I take responsibility for removing this link if it should not be
there.
Can you tell the FSF web programmers to do more checking for HTML/SQL
injection vulnerabilities?
I have found
On Jan 6, 2008, at 2:46 AM, Richard Stallman wrote:
Absolutely. FSF staff checked the BSD versions and told me what
found. I do not redo their work after they do it; I trust that they
did it well.
Their report about OpenBSD was accurate.
Except, sir, at some point, someone made a mistake
Deanna Phillips wrote:
Marco Peereboom writes:
Blah blah blah my feelers are hurt. Do I need to mail you
some maxi pads?
Do I need to point out that you've attempted to insult someone
by comparing him to some bullshit stereotype about women?
Well said. Flinging mud is all well
To bring in half the human population into this flame
fest is at best grossly overeager and at worst extremely and unfairly
prejudicial.
Indeed. IMO the most depressing thing about this entire exchange (with
the possible exception of the amount of top-posting) is the offhand
way in which
Can you tell the FSF web programmers to do more checking for HTML/SQL
injection vulnerabilities?
I know nothing about that issue, but I will forward your message.
Teaching the public about this issue is a good thing to.
However, the way you did it was predictably bad.
By publishing it,
On Jan 6, 2008, at 8:18 PM, Richard Stallman wrote:
By publishing it, and telling only me--not anyone who could fix
it--you made sure a day would go by when others know about the problem
but our sysadmins did not. It would have been better practice to tell
our sysadmins privately first
Eric Furman wrote:
Yea, it was the artwork that attracted me to OpenBSD,
not all the hard work that was put in creating good,
clean, secure code. :-) (no offense Ken).
Thanks again Theo and all the other devs.
None taken. The quality of the OpenBSD effort goes without saying,
although
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 05:49:42PM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
Why didn't you answer my mail Rui ?
You are a troll.
Either I did and you missed it, or it wasn't the answer you'd expect or
I found it so irrelevant it didn't even raise any bell.
Anyways, most of your emails have been so rude
I note that Richard also says that AROS is a free operating system.
I don't recognize the name AROS, but if it is an operating system, it
is possible I said something about it at some point. Could you tell
me where that statement appears? If I need to correct it, I need to
know where it is.
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 11:53:30AM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 05:49:42PM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
Why didn't you answer my mail Rui ?
You are a troll.
Either I did and you missed it, or it wasn't the answer you'd expect or
I found it so irrelevant it
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 09:31:10AM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
I note that Richard also says that AROS is a free operating system.
I don't recognize the name AROS, but if it is an operating system, it
is possible I said something about it at some point. Could you tell
me where
2008/1/6, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I note that Richard also says that AROS is a free operating system.
I don't recognize the name AROS, but if it is an operating system, it
is possible I said something about it at some point. Could you tell
me where that statement appears
On Jan 5, 2008 11:31 AM, Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't recognize the name AROS, but if it is an operating system, it
is possible I said something about it at some point. Could you tell
me where that statement appears? If I need to correct it, I need to
know where
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 08:47:16AM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 11:53:30AM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 05:49:42PM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
Why didn't you answer my mail Rui ?
You are a troll.
Either I did and you missed
On Jan 5, 2008, at 6:31 AM, Richard Stallman wrote:
I doubt I would have looked at the AROS web site myself. To find out
the status of the BSD systems, recently, I asked the FSF staff to
check for me.
Wait, you have someone else do the research, and this persons opinions
get reflected
That's clearly a rhetorical question.
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 07:30:36AM -0800, johan beisser wrote:
On Jan 5, 2008, at 6:31 AM, Richard Stallman wrote:
I doubt I would have looked at the AROS web site myself. To find out
the status of the BSD systems, recently, I asked the FSF staff
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 08:47:16AM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 11:53:30AM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 05:49:42PM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
Why didn't you answer my mail Rui ?
You are a
[slight legibility edit]
On Jan 5, 2008, at 9:39 AM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 07:30:36AM -0800, johan beisser wrote:
On Jan 5, 2008, at 6:31 AM, Richard Stallman wrote:
I doubt I would have looked at the AROS web site myself. To find
out
the status of the BSD systems
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 05:53:40PM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 08:47:16AM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 11:53:30AM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 05:49:42PM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
Why didn't you
On Jan 5, 2008, at 9:53, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 08:47:16AM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 11:53:30AM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 05:49:42PM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
Why didn't you
Hello mini-RMS,
Happy New Year greetings from gnu.misc.discuss! :-)
On Jan 5, 2008 6:53 PM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I'm not from the FSF.
Yeah, yeah. You're a kind of Richard Bruce Dick Cheney of National
Association for Free Software, aren't you? A kind of fsf
On Jan 5, 2008 12:53 PM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
4) FYI I think the wine project is counter-productive as it enables
running non-free software on free software operating systems, and as
such de-incentivates the creation of replacements.
4.1) but it's free software and its authors
Oh, the real troll just arrived (one more list where he get's to the
kill file).
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 07:52:34PM +0100, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
On Jan 5, 2008 6:53 PM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I'm not from the FSF.
Yeah, yeah. You're a kind of Richard
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 05:53:40PM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
... you distribute non-free software.
It has been pointed out on numerous occasions that
this is a false statement.
No, I am a victim
Only because you elect to remain uninformed.
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 01:51:22PM -0500, Eliah Kagan wrote:
On Jan 5, 2008 12:53 PM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
4) FYI I think the wine project is counter-productive as it enables
running non-free software on free software operating systems, and as
such de-incentivates the
I wrote:
discouraging development of free replacements to software? What would
you need to know to actually know that Wine was ultimately
counterproductive, or ultimately productive? When it comes right down
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
The world is not made of such extremes,
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 10:28:19AM -0800, Ray Percival wrote:
don't like you. You think we rank up there with baby killers. I will NEVER
understand how that works so just FOAD and we can all be happy.
I think that ranking you mention is 100% your interpretation. :)
Rui
--
Or is it?
Today is
Blah blah blah my feelers are hurt. Do I need to mail you some maxi
pads?
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 12:56:08AM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 12:34:45PM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
According to YOU, it is okay to have emacs and gcc run on a proprietary
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 06:34:49PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
Blah blah blah my feelers are hurt. Do I need to mail you some maxi
pads?
Now that you mention it, shortly after this idiotic flame I started
receiving tons of spam.
I wonder if they're related...
Rui
--
Or is it?
Today is
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 12:34:45PM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
According to YOU, it is okay to have emacs and gcc run on a proprietary
system as it allows more people to run free software. How is it that it
is wrong to allow more people to run a free system by giving them links
to
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 11:31:00AM -0700, L wrote:
Hypocrite thoughts are constructed in your mind the way you want to see
it.. the same way CULTS want you to see that their cult is right about
EVERYTHING and every other religion and church is wrong.
You seem to abuse the word hypocrisy.
On Jan 5, 2008, at 4:56 PM, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
Yes. But even if it's legally redistributable, the question remains
wether it's free software or not.
Fortunately OpenBSD is Free Software. Unfortunately it recommends and
distributes proprietary software on it's servers (and it wasn't
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 11:31:00AM -0700, L wrote:
Hypocrite thoughts are constructed in your mind the way you want to see
it.. the same way CULTS want you to see that their cult is right about
EVERYTHING and every other religion and church is wrong.
You
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 07:46:08PM -0500, Eliah Kagan wrote:
When you say the world is not made of such extremes, do you mean you
think the long-term effects of something are always unquantifiable?
The long term effects of anything are always something left to optimism
or pessimism, according
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 06:18:34PM -0700, L wrote:
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 11:31:00AM -0700, L wrote:
Hypocrite thoughts are constructed in your mind the way you want to see
it.. the same way CULTS want you to see that their cult is right about
EVERYTHING
Marco Peereboom writes:
Blah blah blah my feelers are hurt. Do I need to mail you
some maxi pads?
Do I need to point out that you've attempted to insult someone
by comparing him to some bullshit stereotype about women?
L wrote:
...
The first time I heard cult mentioned was when people were complaining
about open bsd being a cult of open bsd followers, or mean rude cult
members...
I assume you are talking about this dreadful thread.
Outside this thread the first time I heard cults mentioned was back in
the
Let me make a sincere apology to all who read that and thought I was
drawing a parallel. It obviously was poor choice of words and I am
sorry for saying it. I won't even try to explain what my actual
intention was since it'll sound hollow.
Bad marco.
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 08:47:10PM -0500,
Lars NoodC)n wrote:
L wrote:
...
The first time I heard cult mentioned was when people were complaining
about open bsd being a cult of open bsd followers, or mean rude cult
members...
I assume you are talking about this dreadful thread.
...
Outside this thread the first time I
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
BTW, one would say that the accusations of cult did not start from me
(or Richard), so I'd say you accusers fall straight on the above all
that's included in that link:
We are not a cult -- all of those other groups are. We work very hard
to make sure that our
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
