On Sat, Apr 4, 2015, at 01:17 PM, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Kevin Chadwick
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 3 Apr 2015 08:24:36 + (UTC)
> > Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >
> > > I'm not
> > > sure whether the in-browser renderers are based on these or something
> > > else,
> >
On Sat, 4 Apr 2015 19:17:37 +0200
Landry Breuil wrote:
> developped my mozilla
> itself, and it's as "secure" as any pdf viewer.
Well, I disagree and I am sure history will tell.
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Apr 2015 08:24:36 + (UTC)
> Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> > I'm not
> > sure whether the in-browser renderers are based on these or something
> > else,
>
> Firefox uses jspdf (javascript pdf)
>
> I think but am not sure if this i
On Fri, 3 Apr 2015 08:24:36 + (UTC)
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I'm not
> sure whether the in-browser renderers are based on these or something
> else,
Firefox uses jspdf (javascript pdf)
I think but am not sure if this is the right link
https://github.com/MrRio/jsPDF
I don't trust it myself
On 2015-04-02, Eric Furman wrote:
> I sometimes have to deal with PDF files (ugh) and all
> I need is the ability to view and print them, nothing
> fancy. With security in mind I would like to get opinions
> on the best one to use.
So outside of Adobe's software there are a couple of different co
On Thu, 02 Apr 2015 23:11:57 -0400 Eric Furman wrote:
> Thanks for the info and I expected someone to suggest this,
> but I didn't really want to go all crazy. :)
> I wanted to know if there was a secure one so I wouldn't have
> to jump through all these kind of hoops.
> Thanks anyway.
>
doing t
Thanks for the info and I expected someone to suggest this,
but I didn't really want to go all crazy. :)
I wanted to know if there was a secure one so I wouldn't have
to jump through all these kind of hoops.
Thanks anyway.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015, at 04:17 PM, dan mclaughlin wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Apr 201
On Thu, 2 Apr 2015 11:47:04 -0400 Jiri B wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 12:33:25AM -0400, Eric Furman wrote:
> > I sometimes have to deal with PDF files (ugh) and all
> > I need is the ability to view and print them, nothing
> > fancy. With security in mind I would like to get opinions
> > on th
Hi,
John D. Verne wrote on Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 09:33:25AM -0400:
> Somebody wrote:
>> I sometimes have to deal with PDF files (ugh) and all
>> I need is the ability to view and print them, nothing
>> fancy. With security in mind I would like to get opinions
>> on the best one to use.
> There ar
Hi,
Eric Furman wrote:
I sometimes have to deal with PDF files (ugh) and all
I need is the ability to view and print them, nothing
fancy. With security in mind I would like to get opinions
on the best one to use.
Thanks.
I use GSPdf, which just calls ghostscript, you could ghostscript itself.
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 12:33:25AM -0400, Eric Furman wrote:
> I sometimes have to deal with PDF files (ugh) and all
> I need is the ability to view and print them, nothing
> fancy. With security in mind I would like to get opinions
> on the best one to use.
> Thanks.
Run it chrooted under non-def
>I sometimes have to deal with PDF files (ugh) and all
>I need is the ability to view and print them, nothing
>fancy. With security in mind I would like to get opinions
>on the best one to use.
>Thanks.
There are PDF-to-mandoc converters out there. Assuming the conversion
tool is sound, I imagine
I sometimes have to deal with PDF files (ugh) and all
I need is the ability to view and print them, nothing
fancy. With security in mind I would like to get opinions
on the best one to use.
Thanks.
13 matches
Mail list logo
