Try removing "rcpt-to " from the 2nd match line and see
what happens.
I put it there because, in my setup, that is the only thing which
prevents accepting mail for a valid virtual domain but invalid name.
But your setup has a subsequent mapping lookup in the action line which
may (or may not) a
With some help from Andrew off-list, he provided a config that works for what
I'm trying to do. It's attached below. Hopefully all you'd need to do to
duplicate my success is search-and-replace example.com for your own primary
(FQDN) mail server domain name (as long as it's called mail.youdoma
> your match rule is not correct, I'm not sure what you want to do:
I want to accept mail for any of my virtual domains, for eMail addresses
described in the vusers table (which contains a full eMail address
(us...@example2.com) followed by whitespace, and the local user whose mailbox
tionality by including the ability to send and receive mail
>> for my list of domains, and for eMail addresses which forward to locally
>> defined users -- but I can't seem to get it working, and I think the issue
>> is my (mis-)understanding of how the match parameter works...
e lines to the config:
>
>> table vusers file:/etc/mail/vusers
>> action "vusers" maildir junk virtual
>> match from any for domain rcpt-to virtual action "vusers"
> I was able to get mail delivered for local users to my virtual domains
> previously
if it's even needed here
- virtual can't be in the match rule, it must be in your action, which
is already the case
> I was able to get mail delivered for local users to my virtual domains
> previously without issue.
> But I can't get virtual addresses working...
>
cpt-to virtual action "vusers"
I was able to get mail delivered for local users to my virtual domains
previously without issue. But I can't get virtual addresses working...
I've tried a half a dozen varieties of the match command, and I keep getting
'syntax error'
On 18 Nov 2019, at 16:24, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
>
> November 18, 2019 4:14 PM, "Charles Collicutt"
> wrote:
>> Can virtual users be used with sub-addresses, e.g user+...@virtualdomain.org
>> ?
>>
>> When I tried that (some time ago) it failed saying that the user did not
>> exist.
>
> It
November 18, 2019 4:14 PM, "Charles Collicutt" wrote:
> On 18 Nov 2019, at 13:07, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
>
>> With a virtual domain, OpenSMTPD assumes that domain.org == the content of
>> the virtual table.
>> The virtual mechanism is not optional, the recipient MUST exist in the table
>> to
On Nov 18, 2019 9:14 AM, Charles Collicutt wrote:
>
> On 18 Nov 2019, at 13:07, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
> >
> > With a virtual domain, OpenSMTPD assumes that domain.org == the content of
> > the virtual table.
> > The virtual mechanism is not optional, the recipient MUST exist in the
> > table
On 18 Nov 2019, at 13:07, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
>
> With a virtual domain, OpenSMTPD assumes that domain.org == the content of
> the virtual table.
> The virtual mechanism is not optional, the recipient MUST exist in the table
> to be valid.
Can virtual users be used with sub-addresses, e.g u
November 17, 2019 5:19 PM, "Implausibility" wrote:
> I'm reading the man pages for makemap, and there are two types of database
> maps described, as per
> $subject.
>
> What are the functional / operational differences between Primary & Virtual
> Domai
I'm reading the man pages for makemap, and there are two types of database maps
described, as per $subject.
What are the functional / operational differences between Primary & Virtual
Domains? When when I choose one over the other? Can I get examples of when
I'd choose a ta
Look at userbase if you want to bypass having system users at all.
--
Jason Barbier
jab...@serversave.us
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015, at 03:05 PM, Gonzalo wrote:
> I mean, I don't want to create a system user per email account.
> El mar 12, 2015 6:55 PM, "Edgar Pettijohn III"
> escribió:
Yes, sorry the delay.
The problem was a permission in users files.
Now is working.
Thank you so much.
El mar 12, 2015 9:42 PM, "Edgar Pettijohn"
escribió:
>
> On 03/12/15 18:37, Gonzalo wrote:
>
> Ok, but now I have no email:
>
> debug: mda: all done for user ":vmail"
> debug: scheduler: evp
On 03/12/15 18:37, Gonzalo wrote:
Ok, but now I have no email:
debug: mda: all done for user ":vmail"
debug: scheduler: evp:4bb1b8d779458d6b scheduled (mda)
mda: new user 1f4c8dcc1b038c63 for ":vmail"
debug: lka: userinfo :vmail
lookup: lookup "vmail" as USERINFO in table getpwnam: ->
"vmail:5
Ok, but now I have no email:
debug: mda: all done for user ":vmail"
debug: scheduler: evp:4bb1b8d779458d6b scheduled (mda)
mda: new user 1f4c8dcc1b038c63 for ":vmail"
debug: lka: userinfo :vmail
lookup: lookup "vmail" as USERINFO in table getpwnam: ->
"vmail:5001:5001:/home/vmail"
debug: mda: new
one system user will take care of it all. you could do:
@domain.tld user
and map all to one user.
On Mar 12, 2015, at 5:05 PM, Gonzalo wrote:
> I mean, I don't want to create a system user per email account.
> El mar 12, 2015 6:55 PM, "Edgar Pettijohn III"
> escribió:
> smtpd.conf
I mean, I don't want to create a system user per email account.
El mar 12, 2015 6:55 PM, "Edgar Pettijohn III"
escribió:
> smtpd.conf(5)
> *for* [*!*] *domain* *domain* *virtual* <*users*>This rule applies to
> mail destined for the specified virtual*domain*. This parameter supports
> the ‘*’ wi
smtpd.conf(5)
for [!] domain domain virtual
This rule applies to mail destined for the specified virtualdomain. This
parameter supports the ‘*’ wildcard, so that a single rule for all sub-domains
can be used, for example:
accept for domain "*.example.com" \
virtual deliver to mbox
The t
I dont want systems users
El mar 12, 2015 6:43 PM, "Edgar Pettijohn III"
escribió:
>
> On Mar 11, 2015, at 8:09 PM, Seth wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:11:16 -0700, Gonzalo
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Guys,
> >>
> >> I have this conf on OpenBSD 5.6
> >>
> >> table dominios
On Mar 11, 2015, at 8:09 PM, Seth wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:11:16 -0700, Gonzalo wrote:
>
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> I have this conf on OpenBSD 5.6
>>
>> table dominios file:/etc/mail/dominios
>> table usuarios file:/etc/dovecot/users
>> table a
debug: pony: rsae_bn_mod_exp
smtp-in: Started TLS on session cdb6415f5a23579f: version=TLSv1/SSLv3,
cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, bits=128
smtp-in: Client certificate verification succeeded on session
cdb6415f5a23579f
debug: smtp: SIZE in MAIL FROM command
lookup: check "209.85.217.171" as NE
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 07:14:11 -0700, Gonzalo wrote:
Mmm I have the same output..
El mar 11, 2015 11:31 PM, "Seth" escribió:
Offhand I would say this is probably more of Dovecot delivery
configuration issue moreso than an OpenSMTPD one. I don't have much
experience using or troubleshooting
You might need to include a '${dest}' bit at the end of this smptd.conf
accept statement:
accept from any for domain virtual deliver to mda
"/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda -f %{sender} -d %{dest}"
Found a related LDA accept statement example here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/mis
first of all the auth on imap I need to check out the dovecot conf, but
still can recive mails from other domains, so the debug is:
smtpd -dv
debug: init ssl-tree
info: loading pki information for foobar.com.ar
info: OpenSMTPD 5.4.3 starting
debug: bounce warning after 4h
debug: using "fs" queue b
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:11:16 -0700, Gonzalo wrote:
Hi Guys,
I have this conf on OpenBSD 5.6
table dominios file:/etc/mail/dominios
table usuarios file:/etc/dovecot/users
table aliases db:/etc/mail/aliases.db
table spa
Hi Guys,
I have this conf on OpenBSD 5.6
table dominios file:/etc/mail/dominios
table usuarios file:/etc/dovecot/users
table aliases db:/etc/mail/aliases.db
table spam file:/etc/mail/spam
exp
I have an issue in a relay configuration.
I have an OpenSMTPD server which authenticate distant users and relaying
their mails to an other SMTP server who is in charge to local delivery or
external relaying.
Below is its configuration :
listen on 127.0.0.1 port submission tls-require auth pki
Am 2014-01-13 17:58, schrieb Martin Kropfinger:
Am 2014-01-13 17:52, schrieb Martin Kropfinger:
[...]
### Virtual Domains Table ###
example.com
funnydomain.net
sillydomain.org
### EOF ###
### Virtual Users ###
vuser localuser
sissi localuser
k
Am 2014-01-13 17:52, schrieb Martin Kropfinger:
[...]
### Virtual Domains Table ###
example.com
funnydomain.net
sillydomain.org
### EOF ###
### Virtual Users ###
vuser localuser
sissi localuser
k...@sillydomain.orglocaluser
### EOF ###
[...]
PS:
Funny
Hi there,
my smtpd is listening for a handful of domainnames. Those are inside a
table-file.
Also there are some users, that are virtual, I want to accept mail for.
As an example, let's say my FQDN is domain.com and here are my tables:
### Virtual Domains Table ###
example.com
funnydomai
ver, when I create a .forward in ~maurice/ , mail is still delivered
to the maildir instead of forwarded to the address in the .forward file.
For primary domains, the .forward is used as expected, but not for
virtual domains. Is this considered a bug or by design? It's not a big
problem for me
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 03:10:03PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > Sorry, now I'm confused. Do you mean 'foo => foo' is valid even if there
> > is no local user 'foo'? (and I really apologise for all the newbie
> > questions).
> >
>
> Nope, I meant that you can define an alternate "user base" th
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:23:51PM +0100, Z? Loff wrote:
> >
> > I don't really understand what you mean, because if you map your virtual
> > boxes to the 'vmail' user on Postfix, you essentially do:
> >
> >table users { foo => vmail, goo => vmail }
> >
> > unless I didn't understand what yo
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:48:32PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:30:28AM +0100, Z? Loff wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > OK, mapping to a local user worked. I was trying to mimic my postfix
> > setup, with a few virtual users/domains (and a few aliases) each with
> > its own
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:30:28AM +0100, Z? Loff wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> OK, mapping to a local user worked. I was trying to mimic my postfix
> setup, with a few virtual users/domains (and a few aliases) each with
> its own maildir. I managed to do this with:
>
> table users { foo => zeloff, goo =
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 09:36:50AM +0200, Eric Faurot wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:04:20PM +0100, Zi Loff wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > I'm running version 5.3.3 on -current OpenBSD and smtpd shutdowns upon
> > receiving a mail for a virtual domain recipient (which doesn't get
> > delivered). D
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:04:20PM +0100, Zé Loff wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I'm running version 5.3.3 on -current OpenBSD and smtpd shutdowns upon
> receiving a mail for a virtual domain recipient (which doesn't get
> delivered). Delivery for local users works as it should.
>
> $ egrep -v "^#|^$" /etc/
Hi all
I'm running version 5.3.3 on -current OpenBSD and smtpd shutdowns upon
receiving a mail for a virtual domain recipient (which doesn't get
delivered). Delivery for local users works as it should.
$ egrep -v "^#|^$" /etc/smtpd.conf
listen on lo0
table aliases db:/etc/mail/aliases.db
table us
40 matches
Mail list logo
