On Wed, 19 Oct 2005, Roman Rodyakin wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 08:44:49AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005, Roman Rodyakin wrote:
I have been recently thinking about trade-offs involved in running
servers at the securelevel 2. In securelevel 2, it is possible to
On 10/19/05, Roger Neth Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, I put OpenBSD 3.8 snapshot on an old DEC 500pws with pf.conf
and it was okay on response. Then I redid my pf.conf with the tutorial
by Jeff Hansteen posted a couple of days ago.
I assume you meant the one posted by Peter N. M.
Edy Purnomo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i suggested to my friend to replace his linux box to openbsd.
he uses mailnly for internet gateway : pf + squid proxy after 2
weeks later he switched it back linux and said : linux much
faster to respond the http requests (he had a same
configuration on
Hi,
Problem:
Running (OpenBSD 3.7 (GENERIC)) kfmclient, open a file in
my home directory via right mouse - menu open with
- other... - in the selections menu I type vim (Open with).
Then the complete kde session/xsession shuts down without warning.
If I activate the run in terminal vim opens
I actually was reading a good document on PF tonight and I came across
this quote that I think would answer your question as to the difference
between iptables and pf.
OK, may be it's more poetic, but still I really liked it.
Hope it make you think as well! (:
And I think it describe it very
Hi list,
We just wanna let you know that OpenCON final program is out.
Check it on website http://www.opencon.org.
I hope a lot of you will join us.
kind regards,
OpenCON Staff
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 07:36:23PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 10:16:40AM -0700, Steve B wrote:
I'm trying to find what wireless PCI cards or chipsets support hostap
mode.
The Prism 2/2.5/3 is referenced everywhere. Is that that the only one or
do
any of the others
Theo, I'm sorry you feel that way. When I wrote the email, i wasn't even
upset or angry. I still don't know what offended you but nothing of what
i wrote was meant to offend you or anybody else. I haven't once sworn at
you, I haven't been rude to you. I never said anything offensive (that i
was
On 20/10/05, Oliver Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[?1h=[1;25r[34l[34h[?25h[23m[24m[m[H[JIn file
kernel/qpixmap_x11.cpp, line 630: Out of memory
Can't say for sure what the root cause of this is, but I don't like
the look of this error.
Does this happen if you turn up your memory
Hello All,
I am linux administrator and use iptables for firewall. I use
shorewall, which you
need to be setting up only policy based on your box is having one
interface or
two interfaces or three. Policy, zone, interfaces, rules these are all
I need to edit.
Is there any such tool for
On 10/20/05, Sophie L [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still don't know what offended you...
I can't speak for Theo but this may have been it.
Also, USB works under NetBSD 2.0/Linux (FC3-4, SuSe - I've tried
it).
How did they get it working?
How come OpenBSD developers can't?
That would
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 09:59:10 +0200, Jan Johansson wrote:
And knowing thoose Linux dudes, maybe his Linux squid is a
loadable kernel module so it will be uber fast, I mean crashing
the machine instead of just squid is not really a problem now is
it?
Yes, we know the Linux kernel is bloated.
That's some sad shit Theo. She apologized.. Sheesh.
Flame me for it .. But someone had to say it. Come on
Guys.
What's your specific issue, Sophie? Maybe someone else
can help?
D.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Sophie L
Sent:
terry tyson wrote:
On 10/20/05, Sophie L [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still don't know what offended you...
I can't speak for Theo but this may have been it.
Also, USB works under NetBSD 2.0/Linux (FC3-4, SuSe - I've tried
it).
How did they get it working?
How come OpenBSD developers
On Oct 20, 2005, at 10:31 AM, Wolfpaw - Dale Corse wrote:
That's some sad shit Theo. She apologized.. Sheesh.
Flame me for it .. But someone had to say it. Come on
Guys.
Is this suddenly The O.C. [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
misc@ is not your LiveJournal. misc@ is not going to give you a
fucking
On 10/19/05, Budhi Setiawan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 20:43:38 -0700
Roger Neth Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, I put OpenBSD 3.8 snapshot on an old DEC 500pws with pf.conf
and it was okay on response. Then I redid my pf.conf with the tutorial
by Jeff Hansteen posted
On 10/20/05, Marc Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi roger,
i searched in the archives at marc.theaimsgroup.com but didn't find the
thread you mention. du you have a link for me?
TIA,
marc
Roger Neth Jr schrieb:
Hello, I put OpenBSD 3.8 snapshot on an old DEC 500pws with pf.conf
For the record, these systems run 3.7/i386 rock solid. Just forget
entirely about using the Software Assist RAID support on the motherboard
and use RAIDFrame instead.
In the BIOS, you can toggle it between RAID and NON-RAID mode, but it
makes no difference. The kernel probes it just the
re
everybody who experienced problems w/ the mention chipsets
on the mobos such as audio not interrupting properly and stuff.
please try the changes i just put into sys/arch/i386/pci/.
(suppose bias according to your local mirror update).
10x
cu
--
paranoic mickey (my employers have
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-10-19 13:08]:
Quoting Diana Eichert [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Perhaps I should post a URL for a plot of whiny posts vs. worthwhile
posts over time.
A Signal to Noise Ratio of sorts? We could measure it in decitrolls!
Just make sure if it's
Thank you all, for all the help/advice.
If that is what has offended people, i didn't mean the developers were
not capable of writing a usb driver. I respect them and know that what
they do requres an extremely clever mind (I can program a bit in C but
nothing like the developers so i can
Hi
This is my first post to openbsd-misc so forgive me if this has been
raised before. That said, I've just read through the 1200 messages in
the archives this month and can't find the same issue.
I am trying to configure a redundant firewall pair. So far almost
everything is fine and it
Hi,
Edy Purnomo wrote:
i suggested to my friend to replace his linux box to openbsd.
he uses mailnly for internet gateway : pf + squid proxy
after 2 weeks later he switched it back linux and said : linux much
faster to respond the http requests (he had a same configuration on
openbsd, pf +
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Chris Kuethe wrote:
On 20/10/05, Oliver Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[?1h=[1;25r[34l[34h[?25h[23m[24m[m[H[JIn file
kernel/qpixmap_x11.cpp, line 630: Out of memory
Can't say for sure what the root cause of this is, but I don't like
the look of this
http://dryfish.org.uk/~john/openbsd38/
Hope I'm not spoiling the sticker art for anyone.
I have been moving a single Linux FW to a pair of OBSD machines, lured by carp
and pfsync. This has been working well in my test environment. This also lead
me to vpns running with ISAKMPD, replaceing a Freeswan box, and forestalling
purchasing proprietary products for site to site partner
Ashley Moran wrote:
fw1# cat /etc/hostname.carp0
inet 192.168.67.3 255.255.255.0 192.168.67.255 carpdev rl0 vhid 1 pass
mycarp
fw2# cat /etc/hostname.carp0
inet 192.168.67.3 255.255.255.0 192.168.67.255 carpdev rl0 vhid 1
advskew 10 pass mycarpstudio
Could it be your inconsistent 'pass'?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have been moving a single Linux FW to a pair of OBSD
machines, lured by carp and pfsync. This has been working
well in my test environment. This also lead me to vpns
running with ISAKMPD, replaceing a Freeswan box, and
forestalling
Congrats on the cool OpenBSD SAN installation. I was
wondering how you are dealing with the relatively
large filesystem. By default, if you lose power to
the server, OpenBSD will do a rather long fsck when
coming back up. To alleviate this, there are numerous
suggestions running around that
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Oliver Fuchs wrote:
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Chris Kuethe wrote:
On 20/10/05, Oliver Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[?1h=[1;25r[34l[34h[?25h[23m[24m[m[H[JIn file
kernel/qpixmap_x11.cpp, line 630: Out of memory
Can't say for sure what the root cause of
Sophie L [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please accept my appology and help me. As I said, I'm not a rude lady
and I'm sorry I may have come accross like that.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.asp?Submit=GORange=1InnerCata=421bop=andRange=1description=pcmciasrchInDesc=usb
[
Hi,
I'm having trouble booting an i386 box - it seems to hang at
detecting the
fxp NICs (2 present, on motherboard, not possible to disable in BIOS).
If I enable verbose booting in UKC it hangs at:
...
probing for pcic*
pcic probe returned 0
fxp probe won
fxp0 at pci0 dev 16 function 0
You have just received a virtual postcard from a family member!
.
You can pick up your postcard at the following web address:
.
http://www2.postcards.org/?a91-valets-cloud-31337
.
If you can't click on the web address above, you can also
visit 1001 Postcards at
On Oct 20, 2005, at 1:49 PM, Joe Advisor wrote:
Congrats on the cool OpenBSD SAN installation. I was
wondering how you are dealing with the relatively
large filesystem. By default, if you lose power to
the server, OpenBSD will do a rather long fsck when
coming back up. To alleviate this,
Hello,
Just a little note to tell that the just-released OpenOffice.org 2.0
perfectly works on OpenBSD with the Linux emulation (tested with
OpenBSD-current).
Basic instructions:
http://www.00f.net/php/show-article.php/openoffice_on_openbsd
Best regards,
--
Frank - my stupid blog:
Hi,
For everyone interested in the matter of software-patents. Here is
your chance to vote against them, yes, even if you are not from
Europe. And even if you don't live in Europe this is a very impor-
tant frontier, a good chance to stop them in their tracks and to
make sure software stay free
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 23:26:44 +0159
Han Boetes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
For everyone interested in the matter of software-patents. Here is
your chance to vote against them, yes, even if you are not from
Europe. And even if you don't live in Europe this is a very impor-
tant frontier, a
Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
You also received an e-mail from Norbert Bollow, right? :-)
Indeed I did. And I want everybody to get involved and to start
thinking about it!
That's why I took the liberty of write a message about this
seemingly off-topic subject.
# Han
indeed!
btw nice blog there :)
Is there any documentation outlining the preferred process for patch
submission from members of the community? I've got something small I'd
like to send up, but I'm not entirely sure about where to send it
(misc@, bugs@/sendbug, or tech@) as it's not a bug, per se, and I'm also
not sure if
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 11:26:44PM +0159, Han Boetes wrote:
Hi,
For everyone interested in the matter of software-patents. Here is
your chance to vote against them, yes, even if you are not from
Europe. And even if you don't live in Europe this is a very impor-
tant frontier, a good chance
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 23:05:05 +0100
Jason McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 11:26:44PM +0159, Han Boetes wrote:
Hi,
For everyone interested in the matter of software-patents. Here is
your chance to vote against them, yes, even if you are not from
Europe. And
I'm in a similar situation, 3ghz single cpu on a supermicro board with
two syskonnect cards, previously running around 50,000 packets the cpu
would bounce between 20 - 80 cpu utilized. Switched to the mp kernel,
I'm now topping out at 215,000 showing basically no utilization.
mike blodgett
Did you make any other configuration changes?
Right now my box is doing ~28,000pps per direction per interface (out
public, in public, out internal, in internal), totalling around
112kpps. It doesn't seem to want to go any higher than that. I've just
tried moving the internal connection off of
JD Harrington wrote:
Is there any documentation outlining the preferred process for patch
submission from members of the community? I've got something small I'd
like to send up, but I'm not entirely sure about where to send it
(misc@, bugs@/sendbug, or tech@) as it's not a bug, per se, and I'm
Dear Sophie
I think you have misunderstood the main point of OpenBSD. OpenBSD isn't
developed for you! The developers develope for themselves!
If you need anything - write the stuff yourself, if you can't then just
ask nicely, otherwise buy hardware that is supported or run something
that
Hi,
Reading the last couple of days of sftp/scp's posts and reading up on
the achives I just wanted to ask..
Would it be a bad idea to extend OpenSSH with some extra feaures like:
1. In sshd_config - making it possible to provide a sftp/scp only
connection. Like AllowUsers having a
Frank Denis (Jedi/Sector One) wrote:
Hello,
Just a little note to tell that the just-released OpenOffice.org 2.0
perfectly works on OpenBSD with the Linux emulation (tested with
OpenBSD-current).
Basic instructions:
http://www.00f.net/php/show-article.php/openoffice_on_openbsd
Best regards,
From: Rico [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reading the last couple of days of sftp/scp's posts and reading up on
the achives I just wanted to ask..
Would it be a bad idea to extend OpenSSH with some extra feaures like:
1. In sshd_config - making it possible to provide a sftp/scp only
Jason Dixon wrote:
On Oct 20, 2005, at 1:49 PM, Joe Advisor wrote:
Congrats on the cool OpenBSD SAN installation. I was
wondering how you are dealing with the relatively
large filesystem. By default, if you lose power to
the server, OpenBSD will do a rather long fsck when
coming back up.
How about a two-track vote? We should press hard to
prevent software patents AND the GPL. The GPL is
pushing a lot of the rush to further patents, as more
of more GPL advocates openly copy software and then
place it into a licensing scheme that is even WORSE
than patents. Patented software can
Rico wrote:
If you need anything - write the stuff yourself, if you can't then just
ask nicely, otherwise buy hardware that is supported or run something
that works on your hardware - it's your choise!
[...]
Many of us experience the same as you! I too have experienced hardware
that isn't
Szechuan Death wrote:
Speaking of which: Which driver supports the Adaptec 1205SA? Anybody?
Bueller? Manpages are not forthcoming.
Don't know if any of them do, especially now that Adaptec SCSI has been
removed from the kernel. However, if any dev wants it, I just removed
one from my
Chris Zakelj wrote:
Szechuan Death wrote:
Speaking of which: Which driver supports the Adaptec 1205SA? Anybody?
Bueller? Manpages are not forthcoming.
Don't know if any of them do, especially now that Adaptec SCSI has been
removed from the kernel. However, if any dev wants it, I just
Nick Holland wrote:
Were I a betting man, I'd bet the 1205SA is supported by the pciide(4)
driver. It appears to be a very basic SATA controller. If it's not
supported by pciide, it probably could be. Probably isn't even an
Adaptec chip on it.
You're right... pulling back the sticker, it's
55 matches
Mail list logo
