On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 6:20 AM, Fernando Quintero
fernando.a.quint...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Im trying to install amavisd-new on release 4.6 / 386, and i got an
error with the freeze-2.5p0 package.
Im looking for it in the packages list on the openbsd's mirrors and
can't find it.
Its
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 01:30:00PM +1000, Philip Higgins wrote:
I noticed while doing some debugging on an ipv6 connection that the
included version of tcpdump uses an old draft version of dhcp6 for
its output.
src/usr.sbin/tcpdump/dhcp6.h was last edited almost 10 years, and
is based on
Thank you Dmitry for your great work in supporting E17 on OpenBSD!
2009/11/11 sda dmitry.serpok...@gmail.com:
hello,
http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/OpenBSD
welcome to correct, improve, advise, etc...
regards,
sda
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 02:15:30PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
as an old time screen user i was perplexed to see that when i
attached to an already attached tmux session, both clients were
updated real time and accepted input as well. the ascii art with
the differing terminal window sizes
On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 12:21:12AM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
thanks everyone on/off-list for pointing out
that screen can do this as well.
it was not the point of my mail though.
it was not a pissing contest what screen and tmux
can/can't do.
How about you go off this list for a while,
Hi guys
I use pppoe on my openbsd based router some time now, but always using
user space ppp. I read on several posts / blogs / etc. that kernel-level
pppoe (pppoe(4)) would have better performance and I decided to bring up
a test device.
My config (OpenBSD 4.6):
/etc/hostname.pppoe0
inet
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 12:09:05PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
No really, what is the right way to recursively list the
dependencies of a given package? pkg_info doesn't seem to
do that natively (and the above attempt only works for
installed packages indeed). Is that a design decision,
say
Hi,
I have performance problems on the above platform. After some time the
proxy runs very slowly, and console becomes slow to respond. No
observable difference between bsd.sp or bsd.mp
See tweaks applied below. Since I've tried without them first, but
e.g. squid exhausted
Hi,
i had a similar problem with our configuration, and i resolved this by
setting this in /etc/squid/squid.conf
max_filedescriptors 4096
Very good performances now ;)
Pete Vickers a icrit :
Hi,
I have performance problems on the above platform. After some time the
proxy runs very
On 2009-11-12, David Taveras d3taveras3...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Jason Dixon ja...@dixongroup.net wrote:
There are plenty of L7 tools in OpenBSD base and ports/packages to help
you reach your goals. It's up to you to deploy and configure them
properly for
On 2009-11-11, Tom Smith ts8807...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Nick Guenther kou...@gmail.com wrote:
Well if you were using monitor mode on some other card I would say
it's because as a 'security measure' the firmware is blocking it, but
it's a Ralink and they're the
On 2009-11-12, sonjaya sonj...@gmail.com wrote:
i try implementions mailgraphs in obsd 4.6 , we know basic chroot mode
and i have copy all file need to /var/www
you missed some libraries.
ldd /usr/local/libdata/perl5/site_perl/i386-openbsd/auto/RRDs/RRDs.so
will show you what to copy.
Hi,
Well earlier I got the filedescriptor shortage squid warning, so I
progressively increased it the max_filedescriptors to 2048, and the
warning no longer occurs, also I can see in the squid diagnostics that
it's not using more than 1700. So I'm pretty sure it's not that.
However I
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:17:25 +0900, msf wrote
removal of large cromulent bags of dead code is always a good thing
doowit
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. :)
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/cromulent
Hi,
Part 1:
How can I tell if casting a off_t (e.g, sb.st_size) to size_t risks
an overflow?
What about casting ptrdiff_to to a uint64_t or a long?
The full table of all such possible integer type casts must be large
(and full of dragons?). How do you all keep it straight?
Part 2:
Can
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Mark Bucciarelli mkb...@gmail.com wrote:
How can I tell if casting a off_t (e.g, sb.st_size) to size_t risks
an overflow?
What about casting ptrdiff_to to a uint64_t or a long?
The full table of all such possible integer type casts must be large
(and full
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Ted Unangst ted.unan...@gmail.com wrote:
The harder way: Why are you casting an off_t to a size_t?
I want to verify a file's size before mmap'ing it.
The file holds a number of structs each of size size_t. I stat
the file, compute records_n, then make sure
i386/amd64. Nothing else is realistic these days.
Sparc64 is wonderful but is basically legacy - it's great for finding
bugs and I use it for hacking but is not something I run in
production.
All my production gear is i386 or amd64 - with a few exceptions. Yes,
the hardware sucks and the biosen
Bob Beck wrote:
There might have been if Sun
hadn't been so determined to turn itself from a good hardware company
into a company trying to compete in Microsoft's product space
Ah! The benefits of hiring employees 'away' from Microsoft and putting
them in your own company. Funny how the
2009/11/12 Lars Nooden lars.cura...@gmail.com:
Stupid business decisions aside, you can get if you try Sparc from Sun
or Fujitsu for server work
Kind of, but I don't really think it's got a future. It's kind of like
advocating necrophila with a fresh corpse.. or maybe just doing it
with a
2009/11/12 Bob Beck b...@ualberta.ca:
Kind of, but I don't really think it's got a future. It's kind of like
advocating necrophila with a fresh corpse.. or maybe just doing it
with a really hot coma patient. It might be really good for a short
time but you know there isn't much potential
We have people like that..
Take an ice bath and lie real still...
I resent that webcam you installed in my bathroom. Please remove it, I
like to be alone in my ice baths.
Miod
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:41:35AM -0700, Bob Beck wrote:
2009/11/12 Bob Beck b...@ualberta.ca:
Kind of, but I don't really think it's got a future. It's kind of like
advocating necrophila with a fresh corpse.. or maybe just doing it
with a really hot coma patient. It might be really
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:41:35AM -0700, Bob Beck wrote:
2009/11/12 Bob Beck b...@ualberta.ca:
Kind of, but I don't really think it's got a future. It's kind of like
advocating necrophila with a fresh corpse.. or maybe just doing it
with a really hot coma patient. It might be really
Hi,
I used to call programs not supporting libreadline with the rlfe
wrapper which added history and commandline editing.
Is there such a thing for OpenBSD?
Christopher
Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
I used to call programs not supporting libreadline with the rlfe
wrapper which added history and commandline editing.
Is there such a thing for OpenBSD?
Try rlwrap in ports.
--
Simon Nicolussi, simon.nicolu...@student.uibk.ac.at
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 08:10:31PM +0100, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
I used to call programs not supporting libreadline with the rlfe
wrapper which added history and commandline editing.
Is there such a thing for OpenBSD?
Information for inst:rlwrap-0.28
Comment:
generic readline wrapper
I'm new to OpenBSD and so far so good.
One thing I am floundering around on is that I cannot get my 3Com
card working.
cbb1 at pci1 dev 4 function 0 TI PCI1620 CardBus rev 0x01: apic 2 int 16
(irq 11), CardBus support disabled
cbb2 at pci1 dev 4 function 1 TI PCI1620 CardBus rev 0x01: apic 2
On Thursday 12 November 2009 12:11:35 Bob Beck wrote:
i386/amd64. Nothing else is realistic these days.
Sparc64 is wonderful but is basically legacy - it's great for finding
bugs and I use it for hacking but is not something I run in
production.
All my production gear is i386 or amd64 -
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Bob Beck b...@ualberta.ca wrote:
2009/11/12 Lars Nooden lars.cura...@gmail.com:
Stupid business decisions aside, you can get if you try Sparc from Sun
or Fujitsu for server work
Kind of, but I don't really think it's got a future. It's kind of like
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:45:24 -0800 rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com
wrote:
I'm new to OpenBSD and so far so good.
One thing I am floundering around on is that I cannot get my 3Com
card working.
You're new, so you might want to read the following:
http://www.openbsd.org/mail.html
[quote]
Andre Keller ak () ak ! cx scrivere:
My config (OpenBSD 4.6):
/etc/hostname.pppoe0
inet 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 NONE \
pppoedev vr0 authproto chap \
authname 'user' authkey 'pass' up
dest 0.0.0.1
/sbin/route add default 0.0.0.1
Totally unrelated to your issue but I have
It seems the 'relayctl' command returns an error code when used on
several systems of mine (all i386 4.6)
# relayctl reload
command failed
Found this bug files in January with similar issue with relayctl:
http://cvs.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-wrapper?full=yesnumbers=6046
If I can provide any
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
wrote:
I noticea tool called parfait is being used by some OpenBSD developers
to check code for problems. Is parfait available to average people?
Can't find a download for it.
http://research.sun.com/projects/parfait
We
I'm converting a pf ruleset to work with the new nat/rdr changes in 4.6
-current and I came across an issue that seems like a problem in the way
tagged rules are handled. It's breaking ftp-proxy with tagging when I
try to apply additional rules to the tagged packets. The result is that I
can
I noticea tool called parfait is being used by some OpenBSD developers
to check code for problems. Is parfait available to average people?
Can't find a download for it.
http://research.sun.com/projects/parfait
I noticea tool called parfait is being used by some OpenBSD developers
to check code for problems. Is parfait available to average people?
Can't find a download for it.
http://research.sun.com/projects/parfait
We aren't using it. The people who work there ran it against our
entire codebase
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:15:37 -0700 Bob Beck b...@ualberta.ca wrote:
this was absolutely disturbing to read.
misc@ is always disturbing. most of the time it's just disturbing in
the i-want-a-belt-fed-weapon-to-make-the-stupid-stop-burning kind of
way...
You can either be a disturber or
Alpha was the best. Which, of course, is why it's dead now.
RIP DEC :(
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:31 +0100, Daniel Gracia Garallar
danie...@electronicagracia.com wrote:
Hi there!
Now that I have to change my little server farm and I'm able to choose a
new platform, I would like to choose
Why choose? If you're not going both ways you're missing half the action.
Bob Beck wrote:
this was absolutely disturbing to read.
misc@ is always disturbing. most of the time it's just disturbing in
the i-want-a-belt-fed-weapon-to-make-the-stupid-stop-burning kind of
way...
You can either
Theo de Raadt wrote:
This is the second time they have sent us a log. For me, it is a game
to see how quickly we can go through the entire dump of errors they
give us, fixing all of them. Almost done.
Very nice for you to play the game Theo!
And I for one, wants to thank you and all the
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:52:48 -0800
J.C. Roberts wrote:
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:45:24 -0800 rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com
wrote:
I'm new to OpenBSD and so far so good.
One thing I am floundering around on is that I cannot get my 3Com
card working.
You're new, so you might want to read
Hi,
at www.uniqueBidWin.com. auction prices go down. lowest unique bid
wins..not like at ebay ...
get free credits to win nice stuff http://iphonesale.yolasite.com/
Walter
Brynet wrote:
I know this is unrelated, Matthieu.. but are you and Owain working on
getting DRI/DRM working on other supported architectures? and fixing
the other drivers (..ragedrm/mgadrm/machdrm/etc have been broken since
4.5).
Matthieu Herrb wrote:
It's on the TODO list, but no one is
--- On Thu, 11/12/09, Brent Jones br...@servuhome.net wrote:
From: Brent Jones br...@servuhome.net
Subject: Relayd relayctl reload error on 4.6
To: misc@openbsd.org
Received: Thursday, November 12, 2009, 6:55 PM
It seems the 'relayctl' command
returns an error code when used on
several
I upgraded an OpenBSD firewall from 4.4 - 4.5 - 4.6 in one go, and am
noticing that the ftp-proxy is only working sporadically. I keep getting
Can't build data connection: illegal port number errors when attempting to
ftp from a machine inside a NAT to a machine outside the NAT. I thought this
certificado energC)tico online
http://www.lojaurbana.pt
orC'amento automC!tico
pedido e marcaC'C#o emediata
os melhores preC'os em todo o paC-s
se precisa de certificado energC)tico, simplifique!
http://lojaurbana.pt/certificacao.asp
http://www.lojaurbana.pt/certificacao.asp
--
47 matches
Mail list logo
