Pretty current 5.1-current/amd64.
This is what happens with the following line in root's crontab
0 * * * * /usr/libexec/spamd-setup -d
On May 29 03:00:02, Cron Daemon wrote:
Getting http://www.openbsd.org/spamd/traplist.gz
spamd-setup: Could not add blacklist uatraps: Illegal seek
Change it to this:
insert non zero number here * * * * /usr/libexec/spamd-setup -d
It will probably fix the problem.
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 08:24:07AM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
Pretty current 5.1-current/amd64.
This is what happens with the following line in root's crontab
0 * * * *
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 08:24:07AM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
When I run the same command from the command line,
everything goes fine. Is the cron job run in a more
restricted environment?
you could be hitting the 'zero minute rush', where world+dog tries to
connect simultaneously. try
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 09:14:29AM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 08:24:07AM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
When I run the same command from the command line,
everything goes fine. Is the cron job run in a more
restricted environment?
you could be hitting the
291936
[IMAGE]
Campamento de Activacisn Profesional para Secretarias Ejecutivas,
Asistentes Auxiliares
Hotel Spa Posada Tlaltenango 6 y 7 Julio Cuernavaca, Morelos.
Un evento diferente, un espacio para renovar las ideas, reflexionar y
actuar con liderazgo.
2 dmas Especiales a un precio
A random sleep between 0 and 3599 prior to running
spamd-setup in cron would not go astray.
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 09:23:43AM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 09:14:29AM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 08:24:07AM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
Please avoid 15 minutes past the hour ;-)
sleep $(($RANDOM % 2048)) /usr/libexec/spamd-setup -d
* Christian Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de [2012-05-28 23:54]:
Zi Loff zel...@zeloff.org wrote:
Is the clock drift just to large for ntpd/adjtime/adjfreq to handle
properly?
I forgot what the maximum is that ntpd can handle, but yes, it looks
like the drift is just too large.
nitpick:
* S. Scott 8f27e...@gmail.com [2012-05-29 01:44]:
After upgrading to 5.1, we de-configured all altq-priq queuing in
favor of the new prio queuing. The re-configuration was
straightforward and it appears to be working.
please be prepared to adjust your config again, prio syntax isn't
final yet.
you could be hitting the 'zero minute rush', where world+dog tries to
connect simultaneously. try shifting to a few minutes past the hour
and
see if that helps.
Please avoid 15 minutes past the hour ;-)
Years ago I've been toying with the idea of having a flag for random-delay
mode
* S. Scott 8f27e...@gmail.com [2012-05-29 10:38]:
On 29 May 2012 03:56, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de wrote:
* S. Scott 8f27e...@gmail.com [2012-05-29 01:44]:
After upgrading to 5.1, we de-configured all altq-priq queuing in
favor of the new prio queuing. The re-configuration was
Hi all,
More bgpd problems last night :( This happened last night on two of our
routers. One running an old version of OpenBSD (4.3) and one running
5.1. Is there anyone out there actually using bpgd in production? How
do you deal with it quitting everytime something unexpected happens on
the
On 2012-05-29, Matt Hamilton ma...@netsight.co.uk wrote:
More bgpd problems last night :( This happened last night on two of our
routers. One running an old version of OpenBSD (4.3) and one running
5.1. Is there anyone out there actually using bpgd in production?
Yes.
How
do you deal with
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 08:57:54AM +, Matt Hamilton wrote:
Hi all,
More bgpd problems last night :( This happened last night on two of our
routers. One running an old version of OpenBSD (4.3) and one running
5.1. Is there anyone out there actually using bpgd in production? How
do you
Andre, as promised;
Here are the outputs you have asked for, but on the Geode 300MHz.
Throughputs, http downloading src.tar.gz from my ISP mirror in a loop:
Tue May 29 16:33:45 EST 2012 1.84 MB/s
Tue May 29 16:35:01 EST 2012 1.86 MB/s
Tue May 29 16:36:17 EST 2012 1.87 MB/s
The same test when I
Greetings to all,
here is a followup of an older thread [1] regading the use of OpenBSD in
a large scale DNS anycast setup. To make the long story short, OpenBSD
fails to meet our resolving perfomance needs for the time being. The
main issue (from my understanding) is the lack of kernel-level
Hi Misc!
We have some older HP Dl360, Dl380 G4 machines with Smart Array 6i
controllores w/o battery backed cache.
The disk performance in this case is really poor, for examle the
disklabel operation on a 72GB disk lasted for about 5 mins.
I found a commit in a NetBSD ciss driver (which is a
Hi,
I have a moosefs cluster (http://www.moosefs.org/) running on linux servers
and one more linux server mounting the distributed filesystem and exporting
it using NFS (since OpenBSD does not have FUSE support).
Now here comes my problem, if I mount the nfs share on a linux host
everything is
Stuart Henderson stu at spacehopper.org writes:
cron job to restart it, with a random delay to avoid two machines
coming back up at the same time when all the routers at a site
fail together...
So you just check it every minute to see if it is alive?
It seems to me to be a pretty fundamental
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Kostas Zorbadelos kzo...@otenet.gr wrote:
Greetings to all,
here is a followup of an older thread [1] regading the use of OpenBSD in
a large scale DNS anycast setup. To make the long story short, OpenBSD
fails to meet our resolving perfomance needs for the
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Schmurfy schmu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a moosefs cluster (http://www.moosefs.org/) running on linux servers
and one more linux server mounting the distributed filesystem and exporting
it using NFS (since OpenBSD does not have FUSE support).
Now here
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Mitja MuEeniD
mi...@muzenic.net wrote:
Years ago I've been toying with the idea of having a flag for random-delay
mode in spamd-setup. So the default cronjob is still set at zero minute,
but
spamd-setup then waits for random amount of minutes before hitting the
Otto Moerbeek otto at drijf.net writes:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 08:57:54AM +, Matt Hamilton wrote:
Hi all,
More bgpd problems last night :( This happened last night on two of our
routers. One running an old version of OpenBSD (4.3) and one running
5.1. Is there anyone out
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:00:53AM +, Matt Hamilton wrote:
Stuart Henderson stu at spacehopper.org writes:
cron job to restart it, with a random delay to avoid two machines
coming back up at the same time when all the routers at a site
fail together...
So you just check it every
* Matt Hamilton ma...@netsight.co.uk [2012-05-29 10:59]:
OpenBSD 4.3/amd64:
May 29 05:53:43 firewall1 bgpd[5090]: imsg_create: buf_open: Cannot
allocate memory
out of memory.
others have said enuff about running 4.3.
OpenBSD 5.1/amd64:
May 29 05:55:09 fw1 bgpd[21316]: Lost child: route
* Kostas Zorbadelos kzo...@otenet.gr [2012-05-29 11:27]:
here is a followup of an older thread [1] regading the use of OpenBSD in
a large scale DNS anycast setup. To make the long story short, OpenBSD
fails to meet our resolving perfomance needs for the time being. The
main issue (from my
I don't think that commit will fix the problem.
HP shouldn't sell machines without the battery, but they do.
From memory the firmware on the raid controller has no way
of turning on caching without the battery being present.
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:30:34AM +0200, csszep wrote:
Hi Misc!
We
* Matt Hamilton ma...@netsight.co.uk [2012-05-29 12:02]:
Stuart Henderson stu at spacehopper.org writes:
cron job to restart it, with a random delay to avoid two machines
coming back up at the same time when all the routers at a site
fail together...
So you just check it every minute to
Is suspend/resume working well?
On 28 May 2012 07:04, Robert Connolly robertconnolly1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello again. This is the dmesg from an Acer 5552-7858. Webcam, wifi,
microphone, video, dvd-rw, etc, are all supported and I confirm working
with OpenBSD 5.1 without any trouble.
OpenBSD
Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de writes:
if it is really thread related and not sth small stupid - try it.
http://your.favorite.mirror/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/$arch/
Will do.
also, you'd do yourself much of a favor by using real hardware and not
some crappy emulation of garbage.
This
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 08:57:54AM +, Matt Hamilton wrote:
Hi all,
More bgpd problems last night :( This happened last night on two of our
routers. One running an old version of OpenBSD (4.3) and one running
5.1. Is there anyone out there actually using bpgd in production? How
Yes. For
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:06:37AM +, Matt Hamilton wrote:
Otto Moerbeek otto at drijf.net writes:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 08:57:54AM +, Matt Hamilton wrote:
Hi all,
More bgpd problems last night :( This happened last night on two of our
routers. One running an old
On 29/05/2012, at 6:08 PM, Matt Hamilton ma...@netsight.co.uk wrote:
Stuart Henderson stu at spacehopper.org writes:
cron job to restart it, with a random delay to avoid two machines
coming back up at the same time when all the routers at a site
fail together...
So you just check it every
Okay, I can reproduce the problem.
In the nearly 80 % (by guess value) of cases the relayd stops forwarding
packets in the given situation:
- first the services of the master host goes down.
- relayd switches to the backup pool. requests are redirected to the
backup host.
- master host
On May 29 09:14:29, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 08:24:07AM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
When I run the same command from the command line,
everything goes fine. Is the cron job run in a more
restricted environment?
you could be hitting the 'zero minute rush', where
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 08:31:06PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote:
From memory the firmware on the raid controller has no way
of turning on caching without the battery being present.
I run some ciss, like the HP P212 and P410 and I can override
the cache setting, that is I can turn it on even
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 08:22:07PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
According to the spamd(8) manpage, the '-v' option makes
message detail including subject and recipient information
logged with LOG_INFO; but the subject doesn't seem to be logged
(not that I miss it):
May 28 20:05:23 www
Otto Moerbeek otto at drijf.net writes:
According to you previous message, you are getting a different
behaviour on the 5.1 box. A segfault is not the same as running out of mem.
I agree. It seems strangely co-incidental though that bgpd on both version
of OpenBSD died within minutes of each
Here are the results with a dd if=/dev/zero of=/storage/20M bs=1m
count=20 running
$mount
/dev/wd0a on / type ffs (local)
/dev/wd0e on /home type ffs (local, nodev, nosuid)
/dev/wd0d on /usr type ffs (local, nodev)
nfs_server_address:/mnt/mfs_volume on /storage type nfs (v3, udp,
timeo=100,
Ok, but i installed Linux (Debian 6) and there is no performance degradation.
I will install NetBSD too, and i will do a test.
The commit does not turn on the cache, it enable tagged queing if i
understand it well.
thx
csszep
2012/5/29 Jonathan Gray j...@jsg.id.au:
I don't think that commit
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 17:30 +0400, Pavel Shvagirev wrote:
2. Doesn't work EAP mode - Windows stops on Checking username and
password error. Then #13803, 1931...
Hi,
Just to mention it for those not following source-changes@
that there was a bug in the message ID handling that prevented
EAP
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:25:51PM +0100, Rodolfo Gouveia wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 08:31:06PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote:
From memory the firmware on the raid controller has no way
of turning on caching without the battery being present.
I run some ciss, like the HP P212 and P410 and
749859
[IMAGE]
Taller de Identificacisn de Procesos y Desarrollo de Manuales de
Polmticas
4 de Junio, Cd. de Mixico.
Un taller totalmente practico guiado por un experto.
Analice y Optimice sus procesos, Desarrolle manuales efectivos para su
empresa y su personal.
!Reciba la informacisn completa,
Thanks for all the replies.
I'm giving clockspeed a try. So far so good, but I'll only have definite
results in a day or two. I'll post my findings.
Anyway, I'll start looking for newer hardware and arrange a proper burial
for this crappy and brave machine...
--
Hi!
Thank you very much for quick answer! Tried it on 5.1 stable in the
spirit on applying bind patch i.e. saying
# cd /usr/src
# patch -p0 /usr/src/nsd.patch
# cd usr.sbin/nsd
# make -f Makefile.bsd-wrapper obj
# make -f Makefile.bsd-wrapper depend
# make -f Makefile.bsd-wrapper
# make -f
Hi
it seems to me the Myricom 10GB Ethernet devices should be supported by
OpenBSD, according to myx(4) and the What's new page of 5.0
http://www.openbsd.org/50.html#new and actually also 4.2
http://www.openbsd.org/plus42.html
However there are no mention of those cards in the Supported hardware
Hi!
So i tested the ciss performance with Openbsd 5.1 and Netbsd 5.1.2 and
the numbers are the same. :(
approx 13Mbyte/s write with dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rsd1c bs=1m count=500
But why Linux is four times faster (approx 40Mbyte/s)?
thx csszep
2012/5/29 csszep css...@gmail.com:
Ok, but i
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 4:01 AM, Tomas Bodzar tomas.bod...@gmail.com wrote:
Probably you are aware that OpenBSD doesn't have VMware tools from
VMware available (they have impact)...
While I don't think it'd help here, you might want to see vmt(4) and vic(4)...
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 03:48:02PM +0200, csszep wrote:
Hi!
So i tested the ciss performance with Openbsd 5.1 and Netbsd 5.1.2 and
the numbers are the same. :(
approx 13Mbyte/s write with dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rsd1c bs=1m count=500
But why Linux is four times faster (approx
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Daniel Melameth dan...@melameth.com wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 4:01 AM, Tomas Bodzar tomas.bod...@gmail.com wrote:
Probably you are aware that OpenBSD doesn't have VMware tools from
VMware available (they have impact)...
While I don't think it'd help here,
Henning Brauer lists-openbsd at bsws.de writes:
OpenBSD 5.1/amd64:
May 29 05:55:09 fw1 bgpd[21316]: Lost child: route decision engine
terminated; signal 11
now that is bad. sig11 = segfault, Must Not Happen (tm).
can you get us a backtrace? stuart, can we document the steps to do so
314034
[IMAGE]
Taller de Manejo Sptimo de la Ventanilla Znica de Comercio Exterior
18 de Junio, Cd. de Mixico.
Un taller totalmente practico guiado por un experto.
Optimice sus procesos y ahorre dinero con esta practica herramienta!
!Reciba la informacisn completa, Inscrmbase y Capacmtese!
Por
Hello,
On 05/29/12 17:28, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 03:48:02PM +0200, csszep wrote:
Hi!
So i tested the ciss performance with Openbsd 5.1 and Netbsd 5.1.2 and
the numbers are the same. :(
approx 13Mbyte/s write with dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rsd1c bs=1m count=500
But
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 04:21:12PM +, Matt Hamilton wrote:
I will happily supply what I can. Just let me know how.
Hello, I've never used BGPd personally but perhaps I can help you get a
backtrace. There is quite possibly two ways to get a backtrace.
1. Make BGPD dump core
Recompile the
* Peter J. Philipp p...@centroid.eu [2012-05-29 21:26]:
1. Make BGPD dump core
it doesn't work that way due to bgpd dropping privs and chrooting.
the way involves setting kern.nosuidcoredump to 2, but since we have
all that already written down in an email to a non-public list, it'll
be easiest
Yeah they are actually tested/supported in 5.1 and maybe 5.0 too.
Pierre Berthier [pierre.berth...@ini.phys.ethz.ch] wrote:
Hi
it seems to me the Myricom 10GB Ethernet devices should be supported by
OpenBSD, according to myx(4) and the What's new page of 5.0
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de wrote:
* Peter J. Philipp p...@centroid.eu [2012-05-29 21:26]:
1. Make BGPD dump core
it doesn't work that way due to bgpd dropping privs and chrooting.
the way involves setting kern.nosuidcoredump to 2, but since we have
It seems that during the SMTP dialogue, spamd says things like
250 Hello spammer, this is gonna hurt you and similar
- but it also happens for hosts that are GREY at the time.
Is that right, and is that expected?
Jan
On 05/29/2012 05:41 AM, Garry Dolley wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 08:57:54AM +, Matt Hamilton wrote:
Hi all,
More bgpd problems last night :( This happened last night on two of our
routers. One running an old version of OpenBSD (4.3) and one running
5.1. Is there anyone out there
I was just reading the April's issue of the Communications of the ACM (the
flagship magazine of the Association for Computing Machinery), and noticed
that OpenBSD and its developers were mentioned in one article, in a rather
negative way:
Unfortunately, there is a segment of the open source
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 09:25:16PM +0200, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
Recompile the bgpd with debugging symbols (CFLAGS+=-g, LDFLAGS+=-g). And
install that.
I have thought -current is compiled with debug, isn't it?
jirib
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 09:53:40PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
It seems that during the SMTP dialogue, spamd says things like
250 Hello spammer, this is gonna hurt you and similar
- but it also happens for hosts that are GREY at the time.
Is that right, and is that expected?
Jan
Yes.
Philip Guenther guenther at gmail.com writes:
Roger. To paraphrase: in order for such a process to be able to dump
core, do the following:
Create /var/empty/var/crash/ and chown it to the user that the
[chroot'ed priv-sep'ed process] runs
as, then set the kern.nosuidcoredump sysctl to
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 09:06:37PM +0100, Wilhelm Brandt wrote:
I was just reading the April's issue of the Communications of the ACM (the
flagship magazine of the Association for Computing Machinery), and noticed
that OpenBSD and its developers were mentioned in one article, in a rather
I was just reading the April's issue of the Communications of the ACM (the
flagship magazine of the Association for Computing Machinery), and noticed
that OpenBSD and its developers were mentioned in one article, in a rather
negative way:
Unfortunately, there is a segment of the open source
Just an FYI for OpenBSD 5.1
If someone else runs into this...
I just did cvs for stable 5.1 on a i386 that was updated on May 29,2012
...and...
I could not find the port p5-Net-SSLeay
nor could some of the dependencies for spamasssassin...
I did find
/usr/ports/p5-Net_SSLeay
to which I did the
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
wrote:
I was just reading the April's issue of the Communications of the ACM (the
flagship magazine of the Association for Computing Machinery), and noticed
that OpenBSD and its developers were mentioned in one article, in a
Rafael Zalamena [rzalam...@gmail.com] wrote:
ifconfig mpe0 192.168.1.130/32 -mplslabel 12345 up
ifconfig mpe0 192.168.10.132/32 -mplslabel 54321 up
What am I missing??
I think you want option mplslabel, not -mplslabel which should _remove_
existing labels from the interface rather than add
I upgraded from 5.0 to 5.1 yesterday; everything looks good except that tap
of touchpad is ignored. It used to act the same as left click. dmesg
follows...
Are there any suggestions what files I should be looking at?
OpenBSD 5.1 (GENERIC.MP) #207: Sun Feb 12 09:42:14 MST 2012
I let my membership expire years ago and haven't seen a reason to
rejoin...ever.
If you are not a member of the ACM, you can read it in ACM
Queue, in which it
was published in January:
http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=2090149
I somehow feel this is a very
distorted view of what really
F Bax writes:
I upgraded from 5.0 to 5.1 yesterday; everything looks good except that tap
of touchpad is ignored. It used to act the same as left click. dmesg
follows...
Are there any suggestions what files I should be looking at?
The synclient(1) or synaptics(4) manpages might be what you're
It's the wonderful new synaptics support in the pms driver.
It also causes a bunch of other odd behavior and is really fucking annoying if
you aren't used to it.
F Bax [fbax...@gmail.com] wrote:
I upgraded from 5.0 to 5.1 yesterday; everything looks good except that tap
of touchpad is
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 01:07:57PM +0100, Zi Loff wrote:
I'm giving clockspeed a try. So far so good, but I'll only have definite
results in a day or two. I'll post my findings.
Strike that. Clockspeed didn't work (terminates immediately without
giving feedback) and honestly I didn't bother to
Zi Loff zel...@zeloff.org wrote:
I'm running rdate every minute via cron as a temporary fix, until the
new HP N40L I got for under 200 euros (no HD nor DVD) arrives. :)
So you jump the clock every minute?
For the archives: That's about the worst possible thing to do.
--
Christian naddy
For the archives: That's about the worst possible thing to do.
It's actually worse than it sounds. It jumps *backwards* every minute...
I really don't know what else to do, actually... Let it drift? (not a
rethorical question)... As for now the only visible problem seems to be
future dates on
!Muy Importante!
Si no puede visualizar correctamente este correo, le pedimos que lo arrastre a
su Bandeja de Entrada
Apreciable Ejecutivo:
TIEM de Mixico
Empresa Lmder en Capacitacisn y Actualizacisn de Capital Humano
Pone nuevamente a su disposicisn este exitoso curso denominado:
Comunicacisn
I let my membership expire years ago and haven't seen a reason to
rejoin...ever.
If you are not a member of the ACM, you can read it in ACM
Queue, in which it
was published in January:
http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=2090149
Yes, and people can even comment there, too. Looks like a
Wow, and look at this:
http://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2011-10-2011-12.html#The-New-CARP
Look at that last entry about talking to IANA!
Yet we -- who wrote the protocol -- never received a mail from any
of them.
So it is OK for him to accuse of us not going through the proper
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 05:20:19PM -0400, F Bax wrote:
Are there any suggestions what files I should be looking at?
Same thing happened to me with 5.1-current on my ThinkPad T500 and
Fujitsu Esprimo U9210. Try removing
Option Protocol wsmouse
and set
Option Device /dev/wsmouse
On 5/29/12 4:35 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
However, I myself will not send them a letter. If an organization with
the size and reputation of ACM cannot self-police their own authors
before publishing, then they do not have a high reputation after all,
and it is not worth my time writing a
yes, they work well.
dlg
On 29/05/2012, at 11:38 PM, Pierre Berthier wrote:
Hi
it seems to me the Myricom 10GB Ethernet devices should be supported by
OpenBSD, according to myx(4) and the What's new page of 5.0
http://www.openbsd.org/50.html#new and actually also 4.2
I haven't tried suspend yet. I read the apm man page, and the zzz pdf, but
I don't yet understand how it works in OpenBSD. Is system memory moved to
swap while the system is suspended? or am I thinking of hibernation?
I did try 'apm -C', and CPU stepping is sortof working. apm steps the CPU
clock
Escuela Sistimica Argentina
Institucisn dedicada a la formacisn, asistencia e investigacisn
psicolsgica.
Hoy nos acercamos a Uds. para invitarlos a la realizacisn del VIII Ateneo
2012
ATENEO
EL PODER DEL AHORA O EL ARTE
So... I just had my trusty Thinkpad W500 repaired, getting a new system
board. Things seemed fine, till the machine shut down on me. It was
graceful so the filesystems wern't dirty, but still wrong.
Today, trying to compile the latest i386-current, it shut down on me
three times. Here is
And they came across so well themselves.
Ad hominem attacks on people they obviously know nothing about
except what they've been told. Real mature.
I thought it was pretty funny, actually.
Ya wanna know what really happened?
Big Corp came up with a good idea, but then implemented it
Badly and in
My favorite part is above. This shit cracks me up.
Now imagine if there were proprietary tcp protocols.
All sorts of different devices running there own version.
Yes it would be a nightmare.
I think you are mixing up things. TCP? No, that was another time, a
little later:
86 matches
Mail list logo
