On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 12:25:17AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 21:23, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
The following diff fixes the problem and the program works in current.
The program is bahamut ircd and I managed to make it work up to 5.3
without this.
In current
Alexander Hall alexan...@beard.se wrote:
Leaving the internals of rsync aside (of which I assume much but *know*
little), if I consider two 4TB blobs to be equal just because they have
the same SHA1 hash, I can easily see myself ending up in one of these
conditions (but not both):
This
Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 08:16:50PM +, hru...@gmail.com wrote:
Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
From a checksum I expect two things: (1) the pre-images of elements
in the range have all similar sizes,
Why ? This makes no sense, and is in
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 06:15:50PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 03:18:28PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013-09-16, Stefan Sperling s...@openbsd.org wrote:
You can use hotplugd(8) to simulate an auto-mounter for known USB disks.
hotplug-diskmount (in packages)
On 2013 Sep 16 (Mon) at 16:42:26 +0100 (+0100), Andy wrote:
:I know that OpenBSD runs on any CPU which is based on the AMD64
:architecture, however someone has worried me and said that this CPU and
:chipset is different somehow and might not boot with BSD!?
Does Windows work with it? Does it
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
On 2013-09-16, Stefan Sperling s...@openbsd.org wrote:
You can use hotplugd(8) to simulate an auto-mounter for known USB disks.
hotplug-diskmount (in packages) saves a bit of time writing a script for this.
And
On Tue 17 Sep 2013 08:58:12 BST, Peter Hessler wrote:
On 2013 Sep 16 (Mon) at 16:42:26 +0100 (+0100), Andy wrote:
:I know that OpenBSD runs on any CPU which is based on the AMD64
:architecture, however someone has worried me and said that this CPU and
:chipset is different somehow and might not
Try E17: lightning fast, meek on requirements, user friendly.
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:18 PM, James Griffin j...@kontrol.kode5.netwrote:
I need to install a Dektop Environment for my partner.
I thought about KDE or xfce, i've tried neither on OpenBSD before. Which
of the 3 main main DE's
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Paolo Aglialoro paol...@gmail.com wrote:
Try E17: lightning fast, meek on requirements, user friendly.
yes, it's nice. A bit buggy, but nice...
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 07:23:07AM +, hru...@gmail.com wrote:
Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 08:16:50PM +, hru...@gmail.com wrote:
Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
From a checksum I expect two things: (1) the pre-images of elements
in the
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 07:23:07AM +, hru...@gmail.com wrote:
In the case of rsync the hash is applied to strings of a fixed lenth.
In this case the input is finite and we can argue with cardinality.
Just imagine the set finite strings mapped to a single element in the
range. If all these
On 16/09/13 23:49, Stuart Henderson wrote:
the ISC resolver is available in ports/net/libbind, this is used in some
ports which fiddle with resolver internals in _res (e.g. net/mtr).
Thanks for the tip.
Indeed linking with libbind also fixed the problem with the program's
resolver.
The
This part:
VOP_FSYNC() at VOP_FSYNC+0x2f
ffs_sync_vnode() at ffs_sync_vnode+0x77
vfs_mount_foreach_vnode() at vfs_mount_foreach_vnode+0x38
ffs_sync() at ffs_sync+0x83
sys_sync() at sys_sync+0xa1
vfs_syncwait() at vfs_syncwait+0x50
vfs_shutdown() at vfs_shutdown+0x32
boot() at boot+0x17f
On 17/09/13 10:13, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 12:25:17AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
I think this will give unexpected results if ipv6 resolvers are
configured. You'll notice the asr code is allocating possibly varying
amounts of memory. I think you're going to want to memcpy
Alexander Hall alexan...@beard.se wrote:
Leaving the internals of rsync aside (of which I assume much but *know*
little), if I consider two 4TB blobs to be equal just because they have
the same SHA1 hash, I can easily see myself ending up in one of these
conditions (but not both):
This was
as it seems like this is a legit regression,
could this backed out please?
-f
--
between two evils, always pick the one you never tried before.
Regarding samba... there's no need to automount samba folders because you
always can browse them via file browser (konqueror, thunar or nautilus),
but if you want you can mount them in /etc/fstab. Simply read the
documentation about permissions and syntax. It's very easy.
For NFS the best way is
I am having trouble accessing anything which uses SSL behind my NAT,
though I can access the same services from the firewall itself. There
is nothing unusual in /var/log/messages, dmesg, etc. I don't know why
this is happening. The system has been running fine for months, and
nothing I am aware of
On 2013-09-17, David Coppa dco...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
wrote:
On 2013-09-16, Stefan Sperling s...@openbsd.org wrote:
You can use hotplugd(8) to simulate an auto-mounter for known USB disks.
hotplug-diskmount (in packages)
On 2013-09-16, Andy a...@brandwatch.com wrote:
Planning to test Hennings new ALTQ subsystem diff on OpenBSD 5.4 with
this hardware :D
pardon the pedantry, but it's not altq..
On 2013-09-17, Kapetanakis Giannis bil...@edu.physics.uoc.gr wrote:
On 16/09/13 23:49, Stuart Henderson wrote:
the ISC resolver is available in ports/net/libbind, this is used in some
ports which fiddle with resolver internals in _res (e.g. net/mtr).
Thanks for the tip.
Indeed linking with
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 02:36:25PM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
as it seems like this is a legit regression,
could this backed out please?
Which commit exactly needs to be backed out?
hmm, on Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 02:56:30PM +0200, Stefan Sperling said that
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 02:36:25PM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
as it seems like this is a legit regression,
could this backed out please?
Which commit exactly needs to be backed out?
my guess would be the ones done
Raimo Niskanen raimo+open...@erix.ericsson.se wrote:
When you have two different real world contents the collision probability
is just that; 2^-160 for SHA-1. It is when you deliberately craft a
second content to match a known hash value there may be weaknesses
in cryptographic hash
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:42:55PM +1000, John Tate wrote:
I am having trouble accessing anything which uses SSL behind my NAT,
though I can access the same services from the firewall itself. There
is nothing unusual in /var/log/messages, dmesg, etc. I don't know why
this is happening. The
Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 07:23:07AM +, hru...@gmail.com wrote:
In the case of rsync the hash is applied to strings of a fixed lenth.
In this case the input is finite and we can argue with cardinality.
Just imagine the set finite strings mapped to a
On Tue 17 Sep 2013 13:48:45 BST, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013-09-16, Andy a...@brandwatch.com wrote:
Planning to test Hennings new ALTQ subsystem diff on OpenBSD 5.4 with
this hardware :D
pardon the pedantry, but it's not altq..
Lol, yes sorry ;)
*ALTQ's replacement..
Does it have a
# sysctl -a
kern.ostype=OpenBSD
kern.osrelease=5.3
kern.osrevision=201305
kern.version=OpenBSD 5.3 (GENERIC) #50: Tue Mar 12 18:35:23 MDT 2013
dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
kern.maxvnodes=5926
kern.maxproc=1310
kern.maxfiles=7030
kern.argmax=262144
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 02:35:48PM +0100, Andy wrote:
On Tue 17 Sep 2013 13:48:45 BST, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013-09-16, Andy a...@brandwatch.com wrote:
Planning to test Hennings new ALTQ subsystem diff on OpenBSD 5.4 with
this hardware :D
pardon the pedantry, but it's not altq..
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 01:21:04PM +, hru...@gmail.com wrote:
Raimo Niskanen raimo+open...@erix.ericsson.se wrote:
When you have two different real world contents the collision probability
is just that; 2^-160 for SHA-1. It is when you deliberately craft a
second content to match a
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 02:59:19PM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 02:56:30PM +0200, Stefan Sperling said that
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 02:36:25PM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
as it seems like this is a legit regression,
could this backed out please?
Which
On 17/09/13(Tue) 14:59, frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 02:56:30PM +0200, Stefan Sperling said that
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 02:36:25PM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
as it seems like this is a legit regression,
could this backed out please?
Which commit exactly
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 01:21:04PM +, hru...@gmail.com wrote:
Raimo Niskanen raimo+open...@erix.ericsson.se wrote:
When you have two different real world contents the collision probability
is just that; 2^-160 for SHA-1. It is when you deliberately craft a
second content to match a
Oh yea, just look at the slides.. Dohh ;)
On Tue 17 Sep 2013 14:54:12 BST, Jiri B wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 02:35:48PM +0100, Andy wrote:
On Tue 17 Sep 2013 13:48:45 BST, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013-09-16, Andy a...@brandwatch.com wrote:
Planning to test Hennings new ALTQ subsystem
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 01:27:06PM +, hru...@gmail.com wrote:
Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 07:23:07AM +, hru...@gmail.com wrote:
In the case of rsync the hash is applied to strings of a fixed lenth.
In this case the input is finite and we can argue
I wrote to the list. If you have something to say about the thema,
then please to the list. Your impolite mails are not welcome in
my mailbox.
Rodrigo.
Jan Stary h...@stare.cz wrote:
On Sep 17 13:21:04, hru...@gmail.com wrote:
Raimo Niskanen raimo+open...@erix.ericsson.se wrote:
When
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 03:28:11PM +, hru...@gmail.com wrote:
Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
You have strings A and B, and you know only that hash(A)=hash(B): what
is the probability that A=B? 2^-160?
No, that's never the problem.
You have a *given* string A, and another
Intentionally I left the problem generic. Is the probability near to 1?
You can suppose that A is 500 bytes long, that the server knows the hash
value of A (but not A), that it searchs only strings of this
length with the same hash value, that it found such a string
B, that the hash function is
Resurrecting this thread, since I also got a total freeze in
Qemu/KVM after sending ACPI shutdown using OpenBSD 5.3.
Testing, I also tried 5.3 in VirtualBox and VMWare, both gave clean
shutdown. This makes me suspect KVM is at fault...
QEMU/KVM (echo system_powerdown | nc -U
Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
You have strings A and B, and you know only that hash(A)=hash(B): what
is the probability that A=B? 2^-160?
No, that's never the problem.
You have a *given* string A, and another string B.
O.K. You have string A in the client with hash(A)=n. You find
I'm considering bidding on this 48-core box:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Supermicro-A-Server-1042G-TF-1U-H8QG6-4-CPUS-48-cores-2-2Ghz-128GB-RAM-/151119828428?pt=COMP_EN_Servershash=item232f7195cc
Does anyone have experience with it and can I use all the cores?
Thanks!
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 04:16:47PM +, hru...@gmail.com wrote:
Intentionally I left the problem generic. Is the probability near to 1?
YES it is near to 1.
Your way to phrase mathematical problems is BOGUS. You can't do probability
without formulating a set of complete hypothesis.
Your way
Dear All,
I am still working on OpenVPN gateway for my Lab. As of now I have
everything fully functional and I am trying now to tide up PF rules.
My network topology roughly looks like this
Internet (128.xxx) OpenVPN clients (VPN network 10.8.0.xxx)
| Also
INSUFFICIENT DATA
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of
hru...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 10:28 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: cvsync, rsync
Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
You have strings A and B, and
Kenneth R Westerback kwesterb...@rogers.com wrote:
And your endless meanderings around the pointless questions you pose
are not welcome on the list. They certainly have NOTHING to do with
OpenBSD.
What you say in the last sentence is exactly what I hope. One
of my questions was:
This is a
But in general, in case of foul play, you have ways ways more
to worry about than whether your hash is going to match!
(and the attacks we know about for md5 and sha1 are of the choose preimage
variety, so it's for files A and B that *the attacker* can choose, not your
own A file, and a B
* Andy a...@brandwatch.com [2013-09-10 11:38]:
PS; Thanks for your great work Henning (and others of course).
Hoping and keeping fingers crossed the new subsystem will make it
into 5.4 :)
queueing? no, looks like 5.5
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services GmbH,
* Matt Hamilton ma...@netsight.co.uk [2013-09-10 12:30]:
sven falempin sven.falempin at gmail.com writes:
[nonsense deleted]
The problem is that (I believe) that the pflow packet is not generated until
the state expires from pf. In the case of the scp transfer I saw that was not
for several
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 03:22:16PM +, hru...@gmail.com wrote:
I wrote to the list. If you have something to say about the thema,
then please to the list. Your impolite mails are not welcome in
my mailbox.
Rodrigo.
And your endless meanderings around the pointless questions you pose
are
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 06:18:48PM +, hru...@gmail.com wrote:
Kenneth R Westerback kwesterb...@rogers.com wrote:
And your endless meanderings around the pointless questions you pose
are not welcome on the list. They certainly have NOTHING to do with
OpenBSD.
What you say in the
On Tue 17 Sep 2013 18:09:15 BST, Michael Chen wrote:
I'm considering bidding on this 48-core box:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Supermicro-A-Server-1042G-TF-1U-H8QG6-4-CPUS-48-cores-2-2Ghz-128GB-RAM-/151119828428?pt=COMP_EN_Servershash=item232f7195cc
Does anyone have experience with it and can I
On 17/09/13 2:12 PM, Nick Holland wrote:
On 09/17/2013 01:41 PM, Andy wrote:
On Tue 17 Sep 2013 18:09:15 BST, Michael Chen wrote:
I'm considering bidding on this 48-core box:
Hi,
I'm trying to do some configuration backups from a piece of equipment over
tftp (only option for this equipment) to a new-ish OBSD 5.3 file server
running tftpd.
Historically, this equipment has done its backups to a tftpd server running on
OpenBSD 4.4 and its been working fine for several
On 17 September 2013 20:37, Jes jjje...@gmail.com wrote:
but if you want you can mount them in /etc/fstab. Simply read the
documentation about permissions and syntax. It's very easy.
For NFS the best way is mount them in /etc/fstab too.
/Why/ is it the best way, though?
Unlike
54 matches
Mail list logo
