> Free advice from a fellow East European who might better understand
your obnoxious behaviour on this list:
I find behavior of commenters like you much more obnoxious and simply trolling
me and the whole topic of this thread and some interesting facts mentioned here
which might not please peopl
Thanks for your suggestion,
but googling for keys: +openbsd +nitrokey
does not indicate anything interesting except a few of my own questions on the
Nitrokey support forum.
I would like to hear from some real OpenBSD user about he is happy with
Nitrokey on OpenBSD.
Another my point is about
Hey,
since rpki-client has its own home page like other "associated projects",
it makes sense to add a new link.
Cheers,
Alex
Index: index.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/www/index.html,v
retrieving revision 1.740
diff -u -p -r1.740 index.ht
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 12:59:26PM +0200, i...@aulix.com wrote:
> Thanks for your suggestion,
>
> but googling for keys: +openbsd +nitrokey
>
> does not indicate anything interesting except a few of my own questions on
> the Nitrokey support forum.
I had to look up "Nitrokey" to verify that it
Thanks for suggestion, I already have seen it and even contacted SSH developer
Damien Miller regarding FIDO key support a few weeks ago.
What I am looking for right now is something different, it is if
ssh-pkcs11-helper works with SSHD daemon on OpenBSD to store there its server
private key in
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 05:09:16AM +0200, i...@aulix.com wrote:
> Treat it as my secret, I want and that is why I ask because I can, I wish you
> tell me the answer without a knowledge of "why I ask",
> it is a very long discussion of answering by a question to question in your
> Jewish style, is
Btw, thanks for this site link, may be something like:
https://web.archive.org/web/20200513115537/https://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20190302235509
could work.
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 12:59:26PM +0200, i...@aulix.com wrote:
>
>> Thanks for your suggestion,
>>
>> but googling for keys
> This is "testing the waters" racism.
Where did you find an indication of a racism?
On 2020-05-13 11:02, i...@aulix.com wrote:
(all your emails to @misc)
Dear Info,
the best way to get answers to all of your questions regarding OpenBSD
is to try and run OpenBSD for a few years trying to make it help with
your real-world needs, such as personal laptop, home gateway, personal
Hello,
I am currently running OpenBSD 6.5 as firewall with two ix interfaces inside a
trunk interface with LACP protocol. On top of that I have a few vlan interfaces
so it's basically (ix -> trunk -> vlan).
Now I saw that OpenBSD has a new interface specifically for LACP which is
called aggr.
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 11:46:58AM -0300, Fabio Martins wrote:
>
> I believe loongson people are primaly after running some Linux distros for
> their processor (new ones), but maybe if you ask them directly about their
> plans to donate people's effort / hardware to OpenBSD, might be a good
> star
The unveil man page is perfectly correct and it is not hard to test it's
behaviour.
I just wonder if it may aid unveil adoption in languages other than C, if it
explicitly mentioned that exec is not required on a dir to allow reading the
files within, e.g. if the dev is more used to filesystem pe
Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> The unveil man page is perfectly correct and it is not hard to test it's
> behaviour.
>
> I just wonder if it may aid unveil adoption in languages other than C, if it
> explicitly mentioned that exec is not required on a dir to allow reading the
> files within, e.g. if t
Hi,
On 13/05/2020 13:10, mabi wrote:
> I am currently running OpenBSD 6.5 as firewall with two ix interfaces inside
> a trunk interface with LACP protocol. On top of that I have a few vlan
> interfaces so it's basically (ix -> trunk -> vlan).
>
> Now I saw that OpenBSD has a new interface speci
Hi,
Sorry for late reply but I had a problem accessing this device.
I’ve tried both OpenBSD 6.6 and 6.7 (amd64), nothing changed:
I think you’re probably right; transceiver command is only available for
ix(4) driver.
But what about ifconfig em0 media output showing only supporting
SX/multi-mod
The firmwares are packages, and are signed with the
/etc/signify/openbsd-XX-fs.pub key.
There is no risk.
Mogens Jensen wrote:
> I was just trying out the fw_update program on OpenBSD 6.5, deleting/
> installing all the firmware and was wondering if fw_update will verify
> the files before ins
16 matches
Mail list logo
