Hi,
I'm still fairly new to openbsd and the idea of using ports in general
rather than binary packages.
Is it necessary to keep the ports tree updated if using a release version
of openbsd e.g. pulling the stable tree from CVS before building new
software?
Regards
Ed Fray
and I'm not on the desktop.
I can't confirm at the moment if it is specific to OpenBSD or XFCE in
general.
Does anyone else have this problem?
Regards
Ed Gray
menu (which Robb
at y42 mentioned). I suppose we just have to wait for it to be fixed
upstream. The .xsession-errors file was the right place to look which was
helpful for me so thanks for that Robb.
Regards
Ed Gray
On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 09:07, Dumitru Moldovan wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2
with "AMD
RS880 Host" and "AMD RS780 PCIE". I know it's rather old hardware now and a
bit specialist being ITX but I would expect these NEC chips to be bundled
on quite a few boards.
Regards
Ed Gray
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020, 8:51 am Nils Blomqvist, wrote:
> On 27 Nov 2020, at 17:12
Thanks Stuart,
That was quite a complete answer. I think in my case to be certain any
errors I might find using ports are not due to something outdated on my
system I should follow your instructions and pull the updated CVS first
especially after doing a release upgrade.
Regards
Ed Gray
On Thu
of the ports tree?
The following question is then if I have a problem building a port due to
an outdated dependency on a supported release should I report it as an
issue with the port even if a newer release of openbsd does not have the
issue?
Regards
Ed Gray
On Wed, 28 Oct 2020, 7:07 am Marc Espie
this approach.
In my case I wanted to see the disklabel allocation for comparison.
I suppose I at least didn't run "rm -rf *"...
Regards
Ed Gray
the install
or upgrade programs.
Regards
Ed Gray
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021, 8:33 am Stuart Henderson, wrote:
> On 2021-02-09, Ed Gray wrote:
> > I have backups and will probably not have lost anything important but I
> > just wondered if anyone had any suggestions as to whether
seriously nowadays.
Regards
Ed Gray
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021, 3:52 pm Otto Moerbeek, wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 03:35:06PM +0000, Ed Gray wrote:
>
> > Okay, thanks Stuart.
> >
> > I have left testdisk running a deep scan and will see if it finds my
> /var.
> >
addr 01: 1002:0000 ATI, EHCI root hub
Controller /dev/usb4:
addr 01: 1002: ATI, OHCI root hub
Controller /dev/usb5:
addr 01: 1002: ATI, OHCI root hub
Controller /dev/usb6:
addr 01: 1002: ATI, OHCI root hub
Controller /dev/usb7:
addr 01: 1002: ATI, OHCI root hub
usbdevs -v
Controller /dev/usb0:
addr 01: 1033: NEC, xHCI root hub
super speed, self powered, config 1, rev 1.00
driver: uhub0
Regards
Ed Gray
https://www.linkedin.com/in/ed-gray-55079422
Thanks for the answers. I will make a note of this command. I have now
installed 6.8 and am gradually getting my settings and software back.
Regards
Ed Gray
https://www.linkedin.com/in/ed-gray-55079422
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 19:25, Ian Darwin wrote:
> > The device nodes don't exist
/ CSM boot or UEFI not both but I
don't know how well it is supported on OpenBSD.
Regards
Ed Gray
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021, 1:53 am Sivan !, wrote:
> Thank you. Please see inline:
>
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 at 13:03, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >
> > On 2021-03-08, Sivan ! wrote:
not aware of any
technical reasons why Firefox should be significantly faster with one
rather than another.
You'd still be using gtk either way I imagine.
Regards
Ed Gray
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021, 3:48 pm Mihai Popescu, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Technically speaking, is it possible for a window manage
Hi Sivan,
I think you need to provide more details on your problem if you want some
help at least a log from X and what is in your .xsession file. You also
mentioned errors but don't say what they are.
Did you upgrade the packages each time you upgraded the system?
Regards
Ed Gray
On Wed, 3
might benefit from reading the documentation particularly
the INSTALL file, the FAQs and afterboot man page.
It seems like you don't understand some of the fundamental differences
between Openbsd and other systems. Particularly the disk layout.
Regards
Ed Gray
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021, 7:27 pm Sivan
UNLOAD FEATURE
SMART self-test
SMART error logging
Device has enabled the following command sets/features:
NOP command
READ BUFFER command
WRITE BUFFER command
Host Protected Area feature set
Read look-ahead
Write cache
Power Management feature set
SMART featur
recommend moving
.xsession to .xsession.bak and starting with a fresh configuration.
I would need to understand more about how you are starting gnome like more
details of any changes you made to the standard installation.
Regards
Ed Gray
On Fri, 5 Mar 2021, 12:03 am Sivan !, wrote:
> Dear Stu
the same while loop to run rpcinfo or showmount commands from
the client and server to see if it stops working after the same delay.
Someone with more knowledge of NFS might suggest some better debugging
steps...
Regards
Ed Gray
On Sun, 11 Apr 2021, 10:07 am Родин Максим, wrote:
> Hello
>
download as I
cannot find one from renasas or NEC.
Regards
Ed Gray
https://www.linkedin.com/in/ed-gray-55079422
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 21:43, Ed Gray wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> My main OpenBSD system is a Mini-ITX PC that I built myself using the
> Zotac 880GITX-A-E amd64 AM3 motherboard.
the read-only NTFS
driver or ntfs-3g port successfully and if there are any known bugs
with these.
Regards
Ed Gray
https://www.linkedin.com/in/ed-gray-55079422
various hangs in thunar file manager.
I previously had increased shm variables because of a KDE application
recommending it for lots of file accesses.
I know ntfs-3g is using FUSE rather than a native driver.
Regards
Ed Gray
On Sun, 21 Feb 2021, 6:51 pm Maurice McCarthy, wrote:
> Native read-o
:
Version 2017.3.23 external FUSE 26
Mounted /dev/sd2i (Read-Write, label "SAMSUNG", NTFS 3.1)
Cmdline options: no_detach
Mount options:
allow_other,nonempty,relatime,fsname=/dev/sd2i,blkdev,blksize=4096
Ownership and permissions disabled, configuration type 1
Regards
Ed Gray
https://www.li
22 matches
Mail list logo
