Quoting Clint M. Sand [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 07:09:12PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
People keep yammering this bullshit about Security is a process.
Bullshit! Lies! It's about paying attention to the frigging details
when they are right in front of your face.
On 2005-09-23 00:05:14 -0700, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
appreciable added risk. The only loose end is that sshd doesn't
currently log the RSA/DSA key that is used to gain access. Ideally it
Hu? Try
LogLevel VERBOSE
Best
Martin
--
http://www.tm.oneiros.de
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Security is everything you've ever said, plus a process.
If it is secure, it doesn't need a process. So why would security be a
process again? Because of the vendors making mistakes and fix it later?
Jimmy Scott
It is a process in the same way that making toast is
Making is a process.
Toast is not a process.
- --- Original Message --- -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 02:30:10
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Security is everything you've ever said, plus a
process.
If it is secure, it doesn't need a
Martin SchrC6der [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 2005-09-23 00:05:14 -0700, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
appreciable added risk. The only loose end is that sshd doesn't
currently log the RSA/DSA key that is used to gain access. Ideally it
Hu? Try
LogLevel VERBOSE
Your eloquent reply aside,
I'm receiving the following messages from portmap when starting Legato
Networker's nsrexecd. The nsrexecd I'm running is the Linux version under
emulation:
portmap[16083]: non-local unset attempt (might be from 127.0.0.1)
portmap[16083]: non-local set attempt (might be from 127.0.0.1)
: Thursday, September 22, 2005 1:02 PM
To: Michael Favinsky
Cc: 'misc@openbsd.org'
Subject: Re: Portmap non-local set / unset attempt
I'm receiving the following messages from portmap when starting Legato
Networker's nsrexecd. The nsrexecd I'm running is the Linux version
under
emulation
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 02:02:13PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
snip
People keep yammering this bullshit about Security is a process.
Bullshit! Lies! It's about paying attention to the frigging details
when they are right in front of your face. And it is very clear other
vendors do not pay
People keep yammering this bullshit about Security is a process.
Bullshit! Lies! It's about paying attention to the frigging details
when they are right in front of your face. And it is very clear other
vendors do not pay attention to the details, considering the work I
did here was
Which is why I now know MORE about air-conditioners than most of the
technicians who come here.
The phrase, and everything you said, is all excuses for the vendors.
I bet that the air-conditoner technicians believe that
Air-conditioner maintainance is a process.
Which is why they can never
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 07:09:12PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
People keep yammering this bullshit about Security is a process.
Bullshit! Lies! It's about paying attention to the frigging details
when they are right in front of your face. And it is very clear other
vendors do not
Security is everything you've ever said, plus a
process.
No. security does not require the process.
Attempted security (that doesn't quite work) requires a process.
Like the difference between does work and should work.
12 matches
Mail list logo
