Copperhead's linux-hardened can be a suitable replacement for grsec in
due time. However, AFAIK that is not the intent. Fot those unfamiliar
with Copperhead, they did (and do) an awesome job on hardening Android.
They have forked AOSP, hardened it. The fork is called CopperheadOS.
This is also
Thanks, Kevin. Exactly this. Even though I think OpenBSD is awesome, it
isn't fit for every situation/use case. Thus, I hardly meant that it is
viable for anything and everything.
To give some examples: OpenBSD doesn't support ZFS (nor should it, lots
of kernel changes required for that, some are
Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 13:41:20 -0800
>
>
> > I am considering a move to OpenBSD, since I subscribed to this
> > mailing list some time ago (~few months). I want to take advantage
> > of security.
>
> I would use OpenBSD if you can but if you do
On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 13:41:20 -0800
> I am considering a move to OpenBSD, since I subscribed to this
> mailing list some time ago (~few months). I want to take advantage of
> security.
I would use OpenBSD if you can but if you do decide on Linux and care
about security there are only really a
On Thu 08 Feb 2018 6:21 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 13:41:20 -0800
> Charlie Eddy wrote:
>
> > hello misc,
> >
> > I am considering a move to OpenBSD, since I subscribed to this
> > mailing list some time ago (~few months). I want to take advantage of
On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 15:09:25 +0300
> > - You shouldn't assume we know Linux. So refering to a Linux
> > specific command often does not help a lot. Try to explain what you
> > want to achieve.
>
> I was just making a point. OpenBSD has a lot of downsides in some
> areas so blindly calling it
On 13:02 Fri 09 Feb, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 12:27:47PM +0300, Consus wrote:
>
> > On 23:12 Thu 08 Feb, Jeroen wrote:
> > > I can talk hours and hours why OpenBSD is superior to Linux
> >
> > It is possible to list all block devices (with type and size) with one
> >
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 12:27:47PM +0300, Consus wrote:
> On 23:12 Thu 08 Feb, Jeroen wrote:
> > I can talk hours and hours why OpenBSD is superior to Linux
>
> It is possible to list all block devices (with type and size) with one
> command? You now, like lsblk(8) in Linux.
I don't think
On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 13:14:05 +0300
> # lsblk
> NAMEMAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
> nvme0n1 259:00 238.5G 0 disk
> ├─nvme0n1p1 259:10 256M 0 part /boot/efi
> ├─nvme0n1p2 259:20 256M 0 part /boot
> └─nvme0n1p3 259:30 238G 0 part
>
On 10:40 Fri 09 Feb, Philipp Buehler wrote:
> Am 09.02.2018 10:27 schrieb Consus:
> > It is possible to list all block devices (with type and size) with one
> > command? You now, like lsblk(8) in Linux.
>
> You're implying..
>
> # lsblk
> bash: lsblk: command not found
>
> And just that is
Another perspective. Not to do with embedded systems, but the quality
of OpenBSD documentation.
My job is as a technical editor. I write documentation for email
encryption software based on a Debian platform (but mainly administered
in the browser, to be fair). I know exactly how documentation
Am 09.02.2018 10:27 schrieb Consus:
It is possible to list all block devices (with type and size) with one
command? You now, like lsblk(8) in Linux.
You're implying..
# lsblk
bash: lsblk: command not found
And just that is already a reason, I do not like "Linux" very much.
--
pb
On 23:12 Thu 08 Feb, Jeroen wrote:
> I can talk hours and hours why OpenBSD is superior to Linux
It is possible to list all block devices (with type and size) with one
command? You now, like lsblk(8) in Linux.
On 02/08/18 19:28, mazocomp wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 01:41:20PM -0800, Charlie Eddy wrote:
hello misc,
Hi!
I am considering a move to OpenBSD, since I subscribed to this mailing list
some time ago (~few months). I want to take advantage of security.
Good, go ahead, all doors are
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 01:41:20PM -0800, Charlie Eddy wrote:
> hello misc,
>
Hi!
> I am considering a move to OpenBSD, since I subscribed to this mailing list
> some time ago (~few months). I want to take advantage of security.
>
Good, go ahead, all doors are open.
> However, a programmer
On 8 Feb 2018 23:23, "Steve Litt" wrote:
On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 13:41:20 -0800
Charlie Eddy wrote:
> hello misc,
>
> I am considering a move to OpenBSD, since I subscribed to this
> mailing list some time ago (~few months). I want to take
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 09:41:20PM +, Charlie Eddy wrote:
> hello misc,
>
> I am considering a move to OpenBSD, since I subscribed to this mailing list
> some time ago (~few months). I want to take advantage of security.
>
> However, a programmer who I know personally and respect considers
Thanks Daniel. Definitely the correct answer.
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 4:07 PM, Daniel Bolgheroni
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 09:41:20PM +, Charlie Eddy wrote:
> > hello misc,
> >
> > I am considering a move to OpenBSD, since I subscribed to this mailing
> list
> >
On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 13:41:20 -0800
Charlie Eddy wrote:
> hello misc,
>
> I am considering a move to OpenBSD, since I subscribed to this
> mailing list some time ago (~few months). I want to take advantage of
> security.
>
> However, a programmer who I know personally
Hi Charlie,
https://sivers.org/openbsd is another good site to view :)
@Joren that is commitment the Tat :)
Thanks
Tom Smyth
On 8 February 2018 at 22:12, Jeroen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> OpenBSD has a clear and proactive stance when it comes to security,
> while Arch does not. If
On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 13:41:20 -0800
> Does the difference boil down to one's
> definition of free software, and then compliance with that definition?
There is a huge difference. Arch is at the whim of Linux which is far
behind even the Windows kernel in mitigations (which is far
behind OpenBSD)
On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 13:41:20 -0800
Charlie Eddy wrote:
> hello misc,
>
> I am considering a move to OpenBSD
Where from?
>
> However, a programmer who I know personally and respect considers
> OpenBSD to be old-school, in a negative sense. He recommends Arch
> Linux
If your programmer friend has any source code patches he would like to
submit then I am sure the project would love to have them.
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 4:58 PM Charlie Eddy
wrote:
> hello misc,
>
> I am considering a move to OpenBSD, since I subscribed to this
Hi,
OpenBSD has a clear and proactive stance when it comes to security,
while Arch does not. If you want to stay atop of new developments, feel
free to try -current. If you need a very stable environment, go with
-stable. Don't expect to find that latter one in Arch, as it works with
a rolling
24 matches
Mail list logo