> Yes could be, he has a "social engineering" approach to people. He places
> people and
> himself on the same level of machines. Then he searches vulnerability on
> persons.
> He makes extensive use of corruption to take advantage on his personal war.
> From this
> point of view also a vpn
> > change target. Then a victim that describe a situation outside of this
> > schema most
> > probably will be classified as a paranoid or a troll.
>
> Do you have reason to believe, that this evil person has control over your
> hardware
> deliveries? Do you have some procurement process in
> yes exactly, I know who is the attacker and he has really great of resources
> and power.
> Most probably he is responsible of the death of a guy in my country.
> Many people have preconceived ideas about security and about the attackers.
> Many people think that an hacker is pushed by money or
> "Cord" claims, that people with great resources are out there to get his boxes
> hacked. Obviously I can not verify his claim.
>
yes exactly, I know who is the attacker and he has really great of resources
and power.
Most probably he is responsible of the death of a guy in my country.
Many
> security, like OpenBSD works on. Anyone that says anything can be hacked
> without
> qualification, loses any respect from me, atleast for that moment. Even
> browsers
"qualification" is very relative word... there are perfect unknown around
internet
that are high qualified guys.
>
> To the
On 2020-04-08 18:02, Rudolf Leitgeb wrote:
> A public facing server with ftp, http, smtp and sshd would have had to be
> patched
> in regular intervals to remain reasonably secure.
False, even though you have lowered the bar from "anything/everything is
hackable".
httpd and libressl have done
> OpenSMTPD does not listen to the internet, by default and even if you do set
> it
> to, it only affected certain configurations.
A server, which does not listen to the outside is pretty useless, don't
you think? I did not bring up opensmtp, because it is particularly bad,
quite to the
On 2020-04-08 12:08, Rudolf Leitgeb wrote:
>> I believe that is false too.
> You're kidding, yes? Did you somehow miss the opensmtp hole?
>
> https://poolp.org/posts/2020-01-30/opensmtpd-advisory-dissected/
OpenSMTPD does not listen to the internet, by default and even if you do set it
to, it
> True if you consider physical attacks and for most hardware, otherwise mostly
> false. Anything can be hacked is also one of my biggest annoyances as a mantra
> from "infosec", that gets more money than it deserves in comparison to real
> security, like OpenBSD works on.
We know from Snowden,
On 2020-04-07 18:21, Rudolf Leitgeb wrote:
> You have no chance defending your desktop against each and every attacker, no
> matter
> which operating system you have running.
True if you consider physical attacks and for most hardware, otherwise mostly
false. Anything can be hacked is also one
> I understand you perfectly but there are some points I want highlight:
> Then there is a huge number of hacked site and hackaed desktop out there.
> Many people
> didn't know that their pc or phone is not under their control anymore.
> The new frontier of hacking is espionage. None want be
>
> "Theo de Raadt" dera...@openbsd.org wrote:
>
> > Cord openbs...@protonmail.com wrote:
> >
> > > You are free to believe or not to believe, but you are not free to insult
> > > me.
> > > Is that clear ?
> >
> > Or what.. you'll throw your tinfoil hat at them?
>
> Haven't you yet been
> Cord openbs...@protonmail.com wrote:
>
> > You are free to believe or not to believe, but you are not free to insult
> > me.
> > Is that clear ?
>
> Or what.. you'll throw your tinfoil hat at them?
of course, my hat is deadly!
> > I found something that in my opinion are nearly evidences.
>
> What exactly are trying to prove here?
>
> > For those who doesn't know my story please read past messages:
> > https://marc.info/?a=15535526152=1=2
>
> I think I know you from before. You're the guy claiming to be hacked
>
On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 10:26:36PM +0200, Kristjan Komlosi wrote:
> The thing I find funny is that you insist on being spied on or somehow
> hacked, you act tin-foil paranoid to the point of changing your laptop
> because of some unexplained behavior, yet you use Speedtest.net and
> CloudFlare
On 4/1/20 10:25 PM, Cord wrote:
> Hi,
> I found something that in my opinion are nearly evidences.
What exactly are trying to prove here?
> For those who doesn't know my story please read past messages:
> https://marc.info/?a=15535526152=1=2
I think I know you from before. You're the guy
Haai,
"Theo de Raadt" wrote:
> Cord wrote:
>
>> You are free to believe or not to believe, but you are not free to insult me.
>> Is that clear ?
>
> Or what.. you'll throw your tinfoil hat at them?
Haven't you yet been diagnosed w/ ODD? :)
Cord: you're prolly being overly paranoid, and your
You are free to believe or not to believe, but you are not free to insult me.
Is that clear ?
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday 2 April 2020 03:01, Anders Andersson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 10:29 PM Cord openbs...@protonmail.com wrote:
>
>
Cord wrote:
> You are free to believe or not to believe, but you are not free to insult me.
> Is that clear ?
Or what.. you'll throw your tinfoil hat at them?
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 10:29 PM Cord wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I found something that in my opinion are nearly evidences.
> For those who doesn't know my story please read past messages:
> https://marc.info/?a=15535526152=1=2
> Well, as I said previously my laptop was been hacked then I bought a new
20 matches
Mail list logo
