One important use case for me, which is not covered is a "Loudness" EQ, the
thing, found on most living room amplifiers. This is very useful if you
play silent music at dinner time.
For me a perfect EQ would be a steep two band ISO for Mixing + a Loudness
effect on the Mid knob.
2017-01-18 13:5
Yes, we should not follow Traktor to model N Type of hardware mixers. We
may let us inspire from the solutions out there and build a well suited set
of Mixxx EQs, that covers the most important use cases for Mixxx.
Providing a generic EQ builder sounds cool but it is ambiguous, since we
are facing
I'm afraid we will end up with lots of EQs: generic EQs that only differ on
slope or number of bands + eqs that mimic a specific hardware mixer. Thats
confusing.
AFAIK there's two kinds of EQ we are talking about:
1-EQs based on a crossover
2-EQs that are a combination of filters low/hi pass, bel
In addition to emulating the Xone:92, it would be fun to have an EQ
emulating the PLAYdifferently Model 1, which also uses 4 knobs:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mixxx/+bug/1581721
On 01/16/2017 06:47 AM, Ferran Pujol Camins wrote:
> Following discussion in https://github.com/mixxxdj/mixxx/pull/1007
Sure, I expect to find time in a week or so.
On 16 Jan 2017 11:03 p.m., "Daniel Schürmann" wrote:
>
>
> Am 16.01.2017 um 18:13 schrieb Ferran Pujol Camins:
> > By the way, do you have access to a xone:92 to revers engineer the
> > behavior, or should be just made our own 4 band EQ as a c
Am 16.01.2017 um 18:13 schrieb Ferran Pujol Camins:
> By the way, do you have access to a xone:92 to revers engineer the
> behavior, or should be just made our own 4 band EQ as a combination
> of 2 isolators knobs and two EQ knobs?
>
>
> No, just to Traktor's emulation.
Great, would
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:01 AM Be wrote:
I'm generally in agreement. However, I'm not sure if mapping should
automatically detect if a 4 band EQ is loaded and react accordingly.
Users may get confused if they pick a 4 band EQ and then their filter
knob isn't filtering. I think mappings should m
I'm generally in agreement. However, I'm not sure if mapping should
automatically detect if a 4 band EQ is loaded and react accordingly.
Users may get confused if they pick a 4 band EQ and then their filter
knob isn't filtering. I think mappings should make it an explicit option
that the user m
I'm still strongly against this idea (we discussed it pre-2.0). It won't
work if we ever decide to move the quick effect unit somewhere other than
below the EQs (including user designed skins that don't follow this
convention). (worse, it will restrict us to position quick effects below
and gain ab
>
> IMO we're already doing the right thing here. The controller preset
> author is best situated to decide what makes sense per controller (usually,
> that corresponds to going with whatever the letters printed on the plastic
> say), and the user is best situated to decide what makes sense for
>
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 9:15 AM Ferran Pujol Camins <
ferranpujolcam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What about this:
>
>1.
>
>Let mappings declare how many knobs per mixer channel they offer
>(typically 5: 3-band eq, gain and quick effect)
>2.
>
>Decide what to show and how to map base
What about this:
1.
Let mappings declare how many knobs per mixer channel they offer
(typically 5: 3-band eq, gain and quick effect)
2.
Decide what to show and how to map based on number of declared knobs /
number of bands of the selected EQ:
3 declared knobs:
Number of Eq ba
Maybe we shouldn't add any hacks to the EQ preferences and leave it to
controller mappings considering that this will only affect controllers.
This will be more user friendly when we have a better way for users to
edit mapping options without opening a JavaScript file in a text editor.
On 01/16
Setting the gain knob to the 4th EQ knob would be odd because the gain
knob is typically above EQs. So, to use a 4 band EQ by repurposing a
gain knob, it would make more sense to remap the gain + EQ knobs so they
go in order down the controller. I don't think an option should be added
to the EQ
As said, you can already build a sink with a dynamic amount of knobs. But
you cannot do this on a controller.
I personally would use the gain knob. (My controller has no filter knob)
Using a four band EQ on a controller with only 3 knobs does not really
makes sense. So the user needs to "solve" t
Following discussion in https://github.com/mixxxdj/mixxx/pull/1007
>
> Reusing the Qick effect knob for the fourth EQ band, Is IMO very handy
> because it works for the Controller and for the GUI. The GUI still matches
> 1:1 to the controller.
>
> We have also discussed to use the gain knob as four
16 matches
Mail list logo
