Hallo
Christian Ebert wrote:
> * Trent Piepho on Friday, October 15, 2010 at 11:33:01 -0700
>> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Christian Ebertwrote:
>>> Index: yuvdenoise/main.c
>>> ===
>>> RCS file: /cvsroot/mjpeg/mjpeg_play/yuvden
* Trent Piepho on Friday, October 15, 2010 at 11:33:01 -0700
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Christian Ebert wrote:
>> Index: yuvdenoise/main.c
>> ===
>> RCS file: /cvsroot/mjpeg/mjpeg_play/yuvdenoise/main.c,v
>> retrieving revisio
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Christian Ebert wrote:
> No! Trent nudged me in the right direction I believe. By applying
> the same fix to the other asm volatile line I was able to build
> it here as well. This change makes it build, but of course I've
> no idea what I was doing:
>
> Index: yu
* Christian Ebert on Friday, October 15, 2010 at 19:49:02 +0200
> With this change, yuvdenoise builds again, but someone in the
> know should check whether I've broken other stuff:
And I did break it, but this seems to work:
Index: yuvdenoise/main.c
===
* Christian Ebert on Friday, October 15, 2010 at 19:58:28 +0200
> * Bernhard Praschinger on Friday, October 15, 2010 at 19:17:13 +0200
>> I have at home a OSX 10.4.11 (PowerPC) and 10.6.4 (Intel) with gcc 4.2.1
>> and it compiles without problems on both computers.
>>
>> I did a "make clean" in t
* Bernhard Praschinger on Friday, October 15, 2010 at 19:17:13 +0200
>>> I tested your better version. And it compiles here on my linux and Intel
>>> osx box. I did also a quick test with the new version on the linux box.
>>> And it works well.
>>>
>>> So I would appreciate a feedback if it works
* Trent Piepho on Friday, October 15, 2010 at 10:19:20 -0700
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:40 AM, Christian Ebert wrote:
>
>> * Trent Piepho on Thursday, October 14, 2010 at 17:38:39 -0700
>>> Looks like you didn't actually change the needed lines.
>>
>> No, I didn't but Bernhard did:
>> +
>> #if
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:40 AM, Christian Ebert wrote:
> * Trent Piepho on Thursday, October 14, 2010 at 17:38:39 -0700
> > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Christian Ebert
> wrote:
>
> Easy fix would just be the change the sse detection asm to save and
> restore ebx.
>
> >>
Hallo
>> I tested your better version. And it compiles here on my linux and Intel
>> osx box. I did also a quick test with the new version on the linux box.
>> And it works well.
>>
>> So I would appreciate a feedback if it works on a mac.
>
> Thanks for looking into this, but I get:
>
> gcc -DHA
* Trent Piepho on Thursday, October 14, 2010 at 17:38:39 -0700
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Christian Ebert wrote:
>
>> * Bernhard Praschinger on Thursday, October 14, 2010 at 19:06:33 +0200
Oh yeah, this isn't on Linux. OSX probably has some kind of API for
checking if sse2 is a
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Christian Ebert wrote:
> * Bernhard Praschinger on Thursday, October 14, 2010 at 19:06:33 +0200
> >> Oh yeah, this isn't on Linux. OSX probably has some kind of API for
> >> checking if sse2 is available. Using CPUID isn't enough, because sse
> >> requires OS su
* Christian Ebert on Thursday, October 14, 2010 at 23:43:20 +0200
> * Bernhard Praschinger on Thursday, October 14, 2010 at 19:06:33 +0200
>>> Oh yeah, this isn't on Linux. OSX probably has some kind of API for
>>> checking if sse2 is available. Using CPUID isn't enough, because sse
>>> requires
* Bernhard Praschinger on Thursday, October 14, 2010 at 19:06:33 +0200
>> Oh yeah, this isn't on Linux. OSX probably has some kind of API for
>> checking if sse2 is available. Using CPUID isn't enough, because sse
>> requires OS support that might not be there. I.e., the cpu supports
>> sse2 but
Hallo
> Oh yeah, this isn't on Linux. OSX probably has some kind of API for
> checking if sse2 is available. Using CPUID isn't enough, because sse
> requires OS support that might not be there. I.e., the cpu supports
> sse2 but you're not actually able to use it. Probably not much of issue
> o
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Christian Ebert wrote:
> * Trent Piepho on Tuesday, October 12, 2010 at 12:06:45 -0700
> > It looks like the only use of ebx is in the code to detect CPU features
> > using cpuid. A better way to do it would be to read the /proc/cpuinfo
> file
> > and look for th
* sfrase6 on Tuesday, October 12, 2010 at 18:06:17 +
>> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I.. -I../utils -O3 -funroll-all-loops
>> -ffast-math -march=nocona -mtune=nocona -g -O2 -I/sw/include -no-cpp-precomp
>> -D_THREAD_SAFE -Wall -Wunused -MT main.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/main.Tpo -c -o
>> main.
* Trent Piepho on Tuesday, October 12, 2010 at 12:06:45 -0700
> It looks like the only use of ebx is in the code to detect CPU features
> using cpuid. A better way to do it would be to read the /proc/cpuinfo file
> and look for the sse2 or whatever flag.
There is no /proc/ directory on MacOS X.
hristian Ebert"
> To: mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 6:17:56 AM
> Subject: Re: [Mjpeg-users] [Mjpeg-developer] yuvdenoise performance patch
>
> > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I.. -I../utils -O3 -funroll-all-loops
> -ffast-math
- Original Message -
From: "Christian Ebert"
To: mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 6:17:56 AM
Subject: Re: [Mjpeg-users] [Mjpeg-developer] yuvdenoise performance patch
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I.. -I../utils -O3 -funroll-all-loops
* Christian Ebert on Sunday, October 10, 2010 at 14:51:22 +0100
> * Bernhard Praschinger on Sunday, October 10, 2010 at 15:14:35 +0200
>> I have tested your patch and sent it to CVS. So it will appear in the
>> next version.
>
> However, it breaks building on MacOS 10.5.8:
>
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_
* Bernhard Praschinger on Sunday, October 10, 2010 at 15:14:35 +0200
> I have tested your patch and sent it to CVS. So it will appear in the
> next version.
However, it breaks building on MacOS 10.5.8:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I.. -I../utils -O3 -funroll-all-loops
-ffast-math -march=noco
Hallo
> On Sat, 02 Oct 2010 07:12:39 +0200 Bernhard Praschinger
>> There are still people that monitor the list :)
>> My main problem is finding time to answer mails and do tests.
> I see, same here. I didn't know whether the project was still alive,
> since there's quite little traffic on this li
22 matches
Mail list logo
