Re: [Mjpeg-users] Question about SVCD aspect

2003-01-08 Thread Andrew Stevens
On Tuesday 07 Jan 2003 10:53 pm, you wrote: On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 04:30:11PM +0100, Bernhard Praschinger wrote: Thanks for your help everyone. I've decided that mpeg2 based solutions are too intensive for my intended application. I am now trying DIVX based solutions (using lav2divx), but

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Question about SVCD aspect

2003-01-08 Thread Cameron Kerr
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 10:30:59PM +0100, Andrew Stevens wrote: Oh boy 500kbps for the video! Basically, that just is not doable with current codecs at reasonable display resolutions, it is even worse if you have captured (noisy) material. A realistic minimum is more like 900kbps. Well,

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Question about SVCD aspect

2003-01-07 Thread Cameron Kerr
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 04:30:11PM +0100, Bernhard Praschinger wrote: Thanks for your help everyone. I've decided that mpeg2 based solutions are too intensive for my intended application. I am now trying DIVX based solutions (using lav2divx), but I'm having a lot of trouble getting it working at

[Mjpeg-users] Question about SVCD aspect

2003-01-06 Thread Cameron Kerr
Hi all. I'm creating my first SVCD (30 minutes). After mpeg2enc (I'm following the steps in the HOWTO), I preview it with mplayer, and it shows up as a strange aspect, taller than it ought to be, and and with thick black side borders. Also, the image isn't terribly great on the bottom (colour out

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Question about SVCD aspect

2003-01-06 Thread Selva Nair
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Cameron Kerr wrote: Hi all. I'm creating my first SVCD (30 minutes). After mpeg2enc (I'm following the steps in the HOWTO), I preview it with mplayer, and it shows up as a strange aspect, taller than it ought to be, and and with thick black side borders. Also, the image