I was informed by an user, that the Freizeitkarte maps are by default in
marine mode. Has someone information which bit is set in this case and what
the default set by mkgmap is?
Cheers Klaus
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/mkgmap-and-marine-mode-tp5795133.html
Here my arguments. Java 7 ...
- isn't the widespread used standard JVM
- isn't available for some OS
- isn't available as ready-to-use installation paket for some OS
@Steve ... you said it yourself: Although it is funny that I only changed
to using 1.7 to run mkgmap in the last week!
Regards
WanMil wrote
Do you have any numbers? What is the most used standard JVM?
Here you will find some interesting facts:
https://community.jboss.org/en/tools/blog/2012/07/30/observations-from-two-year-of-ping-backs-from-jboss-tools-users
WanMil wrote
- isn't available for some OS
Can you be
-1
Regards Klaus
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Commit-r2714-Make-java-1-7-mandatory-and-refuse-to-run-on-earlier-versions-tp5778111p5778195.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
We have a lot of complaints concerning the confuse routing ... no one has an
idea?
Regards Klaus
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Basecamp-4-2-2-Inter-tile-routing-problem-tp5772247p5773856.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at
Today Garmin has updated the Mac version of BaseCamp to release 4.2.2. With
this release I'm able to reproduce the inter-tile routing problem. This
means (imho): Garmin has changed something general. Possible workaround: Do
not set the option Road Type Avoidances - Interstates.
Klaus
--
View
This seems to be an old bug ... I'm able to reproduce it with BaseCamp 4.0.2
(Windows) and a map (Freizeitkarte Deutschland) from February 2013. But it
seems that I'm not able to reproduce the effect with BaseCamp 4.2.1 (Mac)
... peculiar.
Regards Klaus
--
View this message in context:
I have this POI (OSM-Node 1379747163 at N50 20.132 E9 37.533) with a very
long name:
The search (with BaseCamp) for Kunstobjekt leads to nothing ... but the
search for Kunstobjek is successful.
Question: Is there a character limit concering the search index ?
Regards Klaus
--
View this
Steve Ratcliffe wrote
Question: Is there a character limit concering the search index ?
Not to my knowledge.
But Kunstobjekt is not part of that name - so is it added by your
style? Are you sure that it is really in the name.
..Steve
Right ... Kunstobjekt is added by my style and is
===
You are using an old Java runtime environment 1.6.0_26
mkgmap support for JRE 1.6.x will be discontinued
after June 2013.
Please update the JRE to the latest release.
===
What are
I have tested the norway map in both of my devices (Montana, Dakota) and
couldn't find any problem.
Regards Klaus
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Norway-not-buildable-with-the-no-trim-option-tp5741482p5743274.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list
I have tried to follow this discussion ... difficult without a lot of
internal knowlegde. It seems that my norway notrim issue reveals a general
problem. Please let me know if I can help anyway (eg. by building testmap or
providing data) ...
Regards Klaus
--
View this message in context:
Hi Gerd,
does it makes sense to build a norway map with the new splitter ?
Currently I don't think so - right ?
Regards Klaus
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Norway-not-buildable-with-the-no-trim-option-tp5741482p5742552.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development
Hi Gerd,
I have tried to build the norway map (unmodified data) with splitter 275 (on
top of splitter 270) ... but the result was negativ:
There is not enough room in a single garmin map for all the input data
The .osm file should be split into smaller pieces first.
Question: Is r275 the
GerdP wrote
...
Hmm, I did not commit the latest changes to weight the sea nodes with a
factor of two.
The open question is: will we see problems when a tile contains only sea
and land polygons?
Do you want to try that?
I think the more promising approach is to use generate-sea=polygons,
Hi Gerd,
here are the results with splitter r276:
Splitter version unknown compiled 2013-01-03T19:08:35+
cache=
description=
geonames-file=/home/kto/Freizeitkarte-Entwicklung-1212/cities/cities15000.zip
keep-complete=true
mapid=65780001
max-areas=512
max-nodes=80
max-threads=3
GerdP wrote
I assume this problem will disappear when cheap hardware is able to
handle
more details, means, Garmin will sell new hardware with new software and
new map
formats or everything will be done just in time using online data.
Gerd
Offtopic: The competitors are already there ...
Hi Gerd,
thanks for looking into it ... yes I add contours to the map data.
In case of Norway the map data are 86 MB and the elevation data are 145 MB
(both in pbf format).
You can find the requested data here:
http://www.freizeitkarte-osm.de/maps/Tmp/Norwegen/Freizeitkarte_Norwegen/
Regards
I see only one reason for using --no-trim with r263: If you want to have
tiles that cover the original bounding box of the input file completely.
Hi Gerd,
yes, that's exactly the reason fr using the --no-trim option.
The results is, that the map looks like a (rectangular) map ...
I think Norway
I'm not able to build the map for Norway with the no-trim option.
- Source:norway extract from geofabrik from 22.12.2012
- Bounds from 18.11.2012, Sea Tiles from 12.12.2012
- mkgmap 2412 / splitter 263
Splitter options:
Splitter version 263 compiled 2012-12-17T19:04:48+
cache=
description=
I also think that a separate tool for bounds and sea tiles is (imho) ok.
Klaus
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Remove-createbounds-option-tp5741270p5741323.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Gerd,
thanks for this essential, invaluable and excellent summary !
Regards Klaus
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/splitter-r254-tp5739717p5739849.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Gerd,
release candidate ... sounds good after all the hard work.
Is it possible for you to write a (short) summery concerning all changes and
enhancements ?
(I have to admit that I got lost in all the splitter threads.)
Regards Klaus
--
View this message in context:
Congratulations and many thanks to
- Steve
- WanMil
- GerdP
- Marko
for writing and maintaining splitter and mkgmap for a very long time.
Six years for an open source project is like 50 years Rolling Stones on
stage.
My wishlist for the future:
@Garmin:
Please open your map format - this is
Sounds like a release candidate ... I will run some tests with it.
Klaus
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/splitter-r232-tp5735799p5735825.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
It is expected that the node ID count reaches this weak 2.000.000.000.
Are there any problems expected when the int max limit (2.147.483.647) will
be reached ?
Regards Klaus
--
View this message in context:
I have got an answer from geofabrik concerning the incomplete relations in
their extracts. The tool geofabrik uses (history splitter) does currently
not makes sure, that a relation is always cut out complete.
Regards Klaus
--
View this message in context:
Hi Gerd,
I have run a first test with sweden (problematic: Vänern sea) ...
*Without --keep-complete:*
java -Xmx6000M -jar
/home/kto/Freizeitkarte-Entwicklung/tools/splitter-r214/splitter.jar
--geonames-file=/home/kto/Freizeitkarte-Entwicklung/cities/cities15000.zip
--mixed --no-trim
Splitting the current geofabrik extract for italy fails with an exception:
java -Xmx6000M -jar
/home/kto/Freizeitkarte-Entwicklung/tools/splitter-r214/splitter.jar
--geonames-file=/home/kto/Freizeitkarte-Entwicklung/cities/cities15000.zip
--mixed --no-trim --overlap=0 --keep-complete
GerdP wrote
Questions:
- Do you save the automatic generated problem list somewhere ?
No, but this could be done. What do you want to do with it?
I currently haven't the demand for such a file ... but in case of problems a
detailed log file could be very helpful.
Regards Klaus
--
View this
GerdP wrote
... maybe I've already fixed that problem. Please try r216:
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/splitter/splitter-problem-list-r216.jar ...
Yes, you are right - with r216 I was able to successfully build the map for
italy:
java -Xmx6000M -jar
I have build further maps for GBR and CHE ... everthing looks good for me.
Great work ...
Regards Klaus
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/splitter-that-generates-problem-list-tp5734014p5734103.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at
GerdP wrote
... I see --mixed in your parameter list. I can't say for sure, but I'd
say that the new algorithm may not work correctly with mixed input. It is
on my todo list to find out.
Do you really have a mixed pbf ?
I think so - but I'm not sure ... I add elevation data to the osm data:
Minko-2 wrote
I would like to skip this mp from my germany map; it is probably broken in
de Geofabrik Germany abstract, so it will be flooded in my map:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1685222
Yes, this mp is incomplete. Last week I have asked geofabrik if it's
possible to make
The patch works for my sweden map (vänern):
Before:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/file/n5732113/Bildschirmfoto_2012-10-20_um_21.13.01.png
After:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/file/n5732113/Bildschirmfoto_2012-10-20_um_21.33.49.png
Grand ...
Klaus
--
View this message in context:
Minko-2 wrote
I have tested the patch but the southern half of Lake Geneva is still dry,
...
java -Xmx1400m -jar splitter-r200\splitter_patched.jar
--write-kml=areas.kml --split-file=areas.list --no-trim --output=pbf
--problem-file=problem_polygons.txt alps.osm.pbf
...
Hi Minko,
you
Minko-2 wrote
I did, Klaus: --problem-file=problem_polygons.txt
Oops - sorry - it seems I'm blind today.
Regards Klaus
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Still-problems-with-lakes-tp5725668p5732199.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at
Thanks for providing the patch !
I would like to verify the patch with a map of sweden (vänern sea).
But I'm not familiar with pachtes ... how to apply the patch ?
Or is it possible to provide a ready-to-run patched splitter ?
Regards Klaus
--
View this message in context:
Excellent Henning - thanks for pointing to this ...
Yes you are right - the problem was caused by the avoidance of the
--no-trim parameter in splitter.
In the past I had touble with this paramater. Under special circumstances
the parameter leads to an exception.
The exception occurs on some sea
I'm using the new strategy with predefined sea tiles for building my maps.
Occasional I have a problem with white tiles:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/file/n5729561/Bildschirmfoto_2012-10-09_um_09.46.13.png
Questions:
- Has someone else similar problems ?
- Has someone an idea what the
If a list with the IDs of all huge polygons is helpful, such a list could
perhaps created by
- user (manually)
- mkgmap (automatic)
Regards Klaus
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Still-problems-with-lakes-tp5725668p5726700.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development
@GerdP:
Some ideas concerning the huge polygon problem:
- huge polygons are rare
- a broken polygon leads to an ugly (amateur like) map
- it's hard to find all broken polygons in a map manually
Some questions concerning a solution:
- is it possible to implement a huge polygon parameter ?
- the
First of all thanks to Marko and Henning for providing their (manually
created) areas.list files.
The problem occurs if one lets splitter create its own areas.list file.
That's exactly what I do (and what I currently would not change).
The same problem is discussed here:
Isn't it better to use N.N. (or something like this) instead of a single
blank ?
N.N. makes clear that something is missing - a single blank probably
doesn't.
Regards Klaus
--
View this message in context:
You stated out that name isn't processed twice.
My question: Is it possible to implement that ?
Here's a real life example:
Data:
amenity: restaurant
building: yes
cuisine: regional
name: Gasthof Stern
stars: 3
tourism: hotel
Point style:
tourism = hotel name = * { name '${stars}* ${name}
Hi all,
the address search for Rostock (germany) doesn't works for me.
In BaseCamp I see the correct region Rostock, Rostock, DEU, but no street
can be found there.
In my Garmin GPSr (Dakota-20) no city with the name Rostock exists -
peculiar.
I have build new bounds from scratch, based on the
Hi all,
I get this exception when building a map of france:
java -Xmx7000M -jar E:/Freizeitkarte-Entwicklung/tools/mkgmap/mkgmap.jar
--max-jobs=2 -c Freizeitkarte_Frankreich.cfg
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Illegal Capacity: -545480700
at java.util.ArrayList.init(Unknown Source)
Hi all,
I'm currently working on a map of sweden.
I run into a problem concerning the vänern sea (between Vänersborg and
Karlstad).
This is an very huge polygon / sea - 10 times larger than the german/swiss
Bodensee.
Only a small part of the sea will be displayed on the as water:
I have a similar problem with portugal (unmodified geofabrik extract,
coastlines).
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/file/n5519589/Screenshot_20120227_180429.png
Klaus
splitter:
--mixed --overlap=1 --max-nodes=60
mkgmap:
Hi all,
I'm at the point where it seems that my map overcharges the GPSr (probably
too much details).
mkgmap offers some optimization options:
--reduce-point-density=NUM
Simplifies the ways with the Douglas Peucker algorithm.
NUM is the maximal allowed error distance, by which the resulting
way
This looks (very) interesting: http://www.synesys.com/Downloads/ppp.html
Concerning the style files it allows something like this: *perl ppp.pl
polygons-master polygons -DGPSR*
...
#include indexsearch
...
#ifndef GPSR
building = * [0x13 resolution 20]
#endif
...
Klaus
--
View this
If you are on OS X or linux you can use curl - example:
curl --location --url
http://download.geofabrik.de/osm/europe/germany/nordrhein-westfalen/muenster.osm.pbf;
--output
/Volumes/OneTouch4/Freizeitkarte-Entwicklung/source/Kartendaten_Freizeitkarte_Muenster.osm.pbf
Klaus
--
View this message
I have experimented with polygons in the past but this was unsuccessful.
May be due to the problem you have found yet.
Could you explain the basic difference between multipolygon and polygons
?
And what is the advantage of polygons ?
Thanks - Klaus
--
View this message in context:
BaseCamp 3.3 offers some new features concerning routing:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/file/n5474741/Routing-BC33-1.png
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/file/n5474741/Routing-BC33-2.png
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/file/n5474741/Routing-BC33-3.png
How is it possible to take advantage from
Why not only one (compressed) file ?
Klaus
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/PATCH-V1-boundary-preparer-with-quadtree-tp5454571p5459756.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Hi list,
I have a node with two POIs inside (amenity=restaurant and
tourism=alpine_hut):
addr:city: Axams
addr:country: AT
addr:postcode: 6094
addr:street: Köhlgasse
amenity: restaurant
ele: 1927
name: Coburger Hütte
operator: DAV Sektion Coburg
operator:tenant: Friedrich Schranz
smoking: no
Splitting is a bit misleading - it's more a doubling.
And here is an example where continue doesn't do the job or leads to a
complex logic:
tourism = alpine_hut name = * ele = * {name '${name} (${ele})
(Berghütte)'} [0x4803 resolution 23]
tourism = alpine_hut name = * {name '${name}
Hi all,
for a few tiles I have the problem that the tile is filled with unwanted
data:
The problem:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/file/n5444194/Screenshot_20120131_112548.png
On a larger map it's ok:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/file/n5444194/Screenshot_20120131_112622.png
Any ideas ?
Hi Marko,
thanks for the hint - the option --overlap=1 solves my problem.
The usage help says:
--overlap
Nodes/ways/rels that fall outside an area will still be included if they are
within this many map units. Default is 2000.
Could someone explain more detailed the influence of the
Friedrichstrasse search on OS X (BaseCamp 3.3.0.2 Beta):
Search for: Friedrichstrasse
near: Berlin, Berlin, DEU
Result: 1x Friedrichstrasse
Klaus
PS: Nevertheless r2174 seems to be a good candidate for a stable version.
--
View this message in context:
In germany we have done some optimication concerning the index search.
We have changed a lot of the admin_level names.
In order to benefit from this changes I have tried to create the europe
bounds.
But this wasn't successful - I have tried it with mkgmap r2164
First try (Windows 7):
java
OK - this workflow was successful:
Step 1:
osmconvert europe.osm.pbf --out-o5m europe.o5m
Step 2:
osmfilter europe.o5m --keep-nodes=
--keep-ways-relations=boundary=administrative europe-boundaries.osm
Step 3:
java -Xmx2500M -jar mkgmap.jar --createboundsfile=europe-boundaries.osm
My style file are becoming more and more complex.
IMHO a (simple) preprocessor would be very helpful.
Important features (analogue C preprocessor):
- ##include (includes a text file)
- ##define (defines a preprocessor var; also as command line option)
- ##ifdef (checks if a preprocessor var is
My first impression is 2.5 hours is a very long time but it depends on ...
- What do you build ?
- What do you use (world bounds, world coastlines) ?
- What are your hardware resources (number of cores, ram, ...) ?
- Which OS are you using ?
- ...
A finding from yesterday: Using the world
My first impression is 2.5 hours is a very long time but it depends on ...
- What do you build ?
- What do you use (world bounds, world coastlines) ?
- What are your hardware resources (number of cores, ram, ...) ?
- Which OS are you using ?
- ...
A finding from yesterday: Using the world
Just a hint:
The option --license-file=file only works as command line option.
It doesn't work if it's part of a configuration file.
Klaus
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/License-text-tp6092865p7141781.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive
Here some stats:
Germany, admin_level 8, name prefix:
Gemeinde = 658x (!)
Stadt = 67
Austria, admin_level 8, name prefix:
Gemeinde = 1925x (!)
My recommendation:
- Gemeinde should be removed by default for germany and austria
- Stadt should be corrected by the mappers
Klaus
--
View this
In the same map I have sometimes the unwanted effect that a stream (river)
overlays a way.
That's what I want:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/file/n7078255/Bridge-OK.png
But often I get this:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/file/n7078255/Bridge-NOK.png
The streams are defined after the ways
OK - and how to interpret this comment from the mkgmap default lines file?
...
# The following boundary styles are after the highway rules because ways
# are frequently tagged with both and we want the highway to take priority.
boundary=administrative { name '${mkgmap:boundary_name}' }
...
--
How is it possible to substitute more than one word ?
I have something like this as names in admin_level=8:
Gemeinde Spalt
Gemeinde Maxdorf
Stadt Linz am Rhein
Stadt Rodgau
I want to replace Gemeinde and Stadt with nothing.
How is it possible to combine:
mkgmap:country=DEU mkgmap:city!=*
I'm also interested in an option to control the copyright text.
Reason: I want to create an osm map with integrated srtm data.
Concerning the (correct) srtm copyright message you will find more infos
here:
http://www.cgiar-csi.org/data/elevation/item/45-srtm-90m-digital-elevation-database-v41
I use carpool lanes to avoid cars from cycleways - and it works fine.
highway = radweg {add mkgmap:carpool=1}
highway = radweg {add access = no; add bicycle = yes; add foot = yes}
Regards Klaus
--
View this message in context:
Hi GerdP,
I'm a little bit confused about the changes of the changes.
The default is now to assume a highest node id of 2^31 and resize when
needed.
Does this mean that the 'old' limit is back ?
Regards Klaus
--
View this message in context:
GerdP wrote:
... Still not solved by this patch:
- Memory usage depends on the highest node id in the data.
- Node id Integer.MAX_VALUE do not work (not a problem at this moment)
If this small patch is okay for you, I can provide a bigger one that also
fixes these issues, but touches many
Just for my understanding - What's your intention ?
As map creator it's possible to create BaseCamp map as well as GPSr maps.
Klaus
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/gmapsupp-visible-in-Basecamp-tp6917545p6919623.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list
Just for clarification:
All bus_stops have the point number 0x2f08.
That means that they also must be available as categorized POIs.
But what I see in the category is the same result as above - peculiar.
Regards Klaus
--
View this message in context:
It seems that the index search doesn't work correct for POIs which occur very
often.
Remarks:
- Haltestelle (german) = bus stop
- Compiler = r2049
Screenshot (BaseCamp OS X) - result OK (many bus_stops available):
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/file/n6892353/Haltestellen-OSX.png
Screenshot
Question:
Is it possible to achieve for a point, generated by add-pois-to-areas, the
same processing as for an identical point?
point:
name: Junge
shop: bakery
Rule: shop = bakery name = * {name '${name} (Bäckerei)'} [0x2a0d
resolution 24]
Result: Junge (Bäckerei)
closedway:
building: yes
name:
Perfect and just-in-time - thanks for implementing this.
Regards Klaus
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/add-pois-to-areas-processing-vs-point-processing-tp6885984p6886385.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks for providing the coastline data.
Regards Klaus
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Coastline-issues-analysis-and-possible-solution-tp6735954p6848795.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks for the answers. My intention is / was to avoid something like this:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/file/n6772670/graveyard-footways.png
The mappers are very diligent ...
Maybe a feature request for the future.
Klaus
--
View this message in context:
Question: Is it possible to avoid the drawing of lines on a specific polygon?
E.g.: I would like to suppress the drawing of footways on graveyards.
Regards Klaus
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/No-line-drawing-on-specific-polygons-tp6765345p6765345.html
Sent
I have tested the routing behavior on my Dakota-20 with firmware 4.70.
The behavior is as expected and totally different from BaseCamp (Windows, OS
X).
Maybe a bug in BaseCamp ...
--
View this message in context:
Sounds terrible - devaluates *all* OSM garmin maps.
Next week I will do further test on my Dakota-20 with Firm 4.30.
Klaus
PS:
My workaround is to use the toll and ferry bits (toll for footways and
ferry for cycleways).
Yes I agree, it's a dirty workaround.
And I hope that someone finds the
Minko-2 wrote:
I just noticed that even cars are routed on cycleways on OSM maps...
Yes you are right.
BTW: This was the reason why I have started this thread.
I have always tested my maps with BaseCamp (3.2.1 / 3.2.2, Windows, OS X)
and on my Dakota-20 with the new Firmware 4.30.
I though
Further investigation has shown a significant difference (concerning routing)
between MapSource (Windows, 6.16.3) and BaseCamp (Windows, OS X, 3.2.2).
It seems that the access bits (e.g. access=no; bicycle=yes; ...) in BaseCamp
are not working as expected.
Could someone verify my observation?
You can do something like this in your lines style file:
highway = primary {set name = '${name}' | '${ref}' | ''} [0x03 road_class=3
road_speed=5 resolution 24 continue with_actions]
highway = primary {set name = '${name}' | '${ref}' | ''} [0x01040e
resolution 23 continue with_actions]
highway =
Could someone describe the unwanted side effects of the avoid carpool
roads setting ?
Thanks - Klaus
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Routing-Documentation-and-Best-Practice-tp6710634p6715703.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at
Currently I'm working on the routing feature of my garmin maps and run into
some problems. I was looking for detailed information concerning routing
(incl. best pratice) but couldn't find such a document.
Question: Could someone point me to such a documentation or describe the
best practice?
Currently I'm working on the routing feature of my garmin maps and run into
some problems.
I was looking for detailed information concerning routing (incl. best
pratice) but couldn't find such a document.
Question: Could someone point me to such a documentation or describe the
best practice?
Thanks for the response - I have something like this:
highway = path foot = designated {set highway = fussweg}
highway = footway foot = designated {set highway = fussweg}
...
# Routing (nur Fussgaenger zulassen)
highway = fussweg {add access = no; add foot = yes}
highway = fussweg [0x16
The effect on BaseCamp OS X (3.2.1)
Map with routing (red line = foot only; blue line = foot + bicycle):
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/file/n6710993/Map.png
Map with unexpected motorcar routing:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/file/n6710993/Unexpected_Routing.png
Map with expected
It seems that the avoid features (toll, carpool, ferry, unpaved, ...) are
still working as expected.
Maybe a workaround ...
Klaus
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Routing-Documentation-and-Best-Practice-tp6710634p6711106.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development
Toll roads and ferries seems to have the highest priority.
Both have something to do with money - sounds reasonable.
Klaus
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Routing-Documentation-and-Best-Practice-tp6710634p6711963.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing
94 matches
Mail list logo