Re: [mp2 ANNOUNCE] Apache-ParseFormData-0.06 (new module)

2003-07-30 Thread Henrique Dias
Thank's for yours comments. You are right, is not a replacement for Apache::Request, is a alternative implementation. On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote: > Henrique Dias wrote: > > I'm pleased to announce the release of Apache-ParseFormData-0.06, a > > replace for Apache::Request (libapreq)

Re: [mp2 ANNOUNCE] Apache-ParseFormData-0.06 (new module)

2003-07-29 Thread Stas Bekman
Henrique Dias wrote: I'm pleased to announce the release of Apache-ParseFormData-0.06, a replace for Apache::Request (libapreq). Cool. Though it's implemented in perl (==slower). Did you try to replicate it because of being frustrated of not having Apache::Request? Would be nice if the intereste

[mp2 ANNOUNCE] Apache-ParseFormData-0.06 (new module)

2003-07-29 Thread Henrique Dias
I'm pleased to announce the release of Apache-ParseFormData-0.06, a replace for Apache::Request (libapreq). This module only work with mod_perl-2 and apache 2. http://search.cpan.org/author/HDIAS/Apache-ParseFormData-0.06/ParseFormData.pm Thanks, Henrique Dias -- -

[ANNOUNCE] Apache::App::Mercury (new module)

2003-07-19 Thread Adi Fairbank
This is a new application for mod_perl - just released. Apache::App::Mercury is a customizable, extensible customer to customer, store and forward messaging application for Apache mod_perl (1.x). It uses a relational database (accessed via DBI) to store and retrieve messages, and uses CGI.pm to di

Re: New module : Apache::Session::Manager

2002-11-18 Thread Clinton Gormley
Hi Enrico After posting, I looked at Apache::AuthCookie for the first time - don't why I hadn't looked at it before - to find that I was, indeed, duplicating a lot of work that has been done before. Didn't I feel foolish! It looks like Perrin may have to write a "...why not to write your own

Re: New module : Apache::Session::Manager

2002-11-18 Thread Enrico Sorcinelli
On 16 Nov 2002 13:24:13 +0200 Clinton Gormley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've written a new module as a wrapper around Apache::Session which > provides short term (ie session) tracking (which is something that > Apache::SessionManager and Apache::SessionX provide), but t

New module : Apache::Session::Manager

2002-11-16 Thread Clinton Gormley
I've written a new module as a wrapper around Apache::Session which provides short term (ie session) tracking (which is something that Apache::SessionManager and Apache::SessionX provide), but this adds long term user tracking, and methods to aid login, logout etc. It is meant to be subcl

Re: RFC: new module: Apache::FakeEnv

2001-06-27 Thread Thomas Klausner
Hi! On 26 Jun 2001, at 14:17, Andrew Ho wrote: > That's my script. The caveat is, that it will *never* be possible to > simulate mod_perl entirely--that would be so complex that you might as > well have everybody run a single-child Apache with mod_perl instead. I agree if you are out for debuggin

Re: RFC: new module: Apache::FakeEnv

2001-06-26 Thread Andrew Ho
Hello, GY>there was a more advanced Apache::FakeRequest floating around somewhere... TK>I knew this script (it was posted here, too), and while it is definitly TK>better than Apache::FakeRequest, it still doesn't handle dir_config TK>calls. That's my script. The caveat is, that it will *never*

Re: RFC: new module: Apache::FakeEnv

2001-06-25 Thread Thomas Klausner
Hi! Geoffrey Young: >there was a more advanced Apache::FakeRequest floating around somewhere... > >I think this was it, but I swore it was something on the dev@ list: >http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache- modperl&m=98719810927157&w=2 I knew this script (it was posted here, too), and while it

Re: RFC: new module: Apache::FakeEnv

2001-06-20 Thread darren chamberlain
Thomas Klausner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something to this effect on 06/20/2001: > Hi! > > I am currently working on a module that generates a Fake Apache > Request Object like Apache::FakeRequest does, but that also > parses the Apache Configuration and enables the user to access > values set

RE: new module: Apache::FakeEnv

2001-06-20 Thread Geoffrey Young
> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Klausner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 11:27 AM > To: modperl > Subject: RFC: new module: Apache::FakeEnv > > > Hi! > > I am currently working on a module that generates a Fake Apache

RFC: new module: Apache::FakeEnv

2001-06-20 Thread Thomas Klausner
Hi! I am currently working on a module that generates a Fake Apache Request Object like Apache::FakeRequest does, but that also parses the Apache Configuration and enables the user to access values set with PerlSetVar (i.e. fake $r->dir_config). This Request Object can than be used in mod_per

new module: mod_raah (Apache API via Corba)

2000-12-12 Thread Stas Bekman
I've stumbled upon mod_raah while reading http://simplex.ru/news/koi/ (sorry it's in koi charset :). It was referencing to http://www.opencentrix.com/opensource/mod_raah/ This is what is has to say: Mod_Raah exposes a subset of the Apache API via Corba. It allows a programmer to write Apache han

Use Sambe, not NFS [Re: New Module Idea: MLDBM::Sync]

2000-11-22 Thread Joshua Chamas
Paul Lindner wrote: > > Might MLDBM::Sync work over an NFS mounted partition? That's one > reason I've not used the BerkeleyDB stuff yet.. > Paul, For the first time, I benchmarked concurrent linux client write access over a SAMBA network share, and it worked, 0 data loss. This is opposed to

Re: New Module Idea: MLDBM::Sync

2000-11-22 Thread Joshua Chamas
Paul Lindner wrote: > > > I'm puzzled why people wouldn't just use version 3 of Berkeley DB (via > > DB_File.pm or BerkeleyDB.pm) which supports multiple readers and > > writers through a shared memory cache. No open/close/flush required > > per-write and very very much faster. > > > > Is there

Re: New Module Idea: MLDBM::Sync

2000-11-22 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, Paul Lindner wrote: > Might MLDBM::Sync work over an NFS mounted partition? It might, since it's lock-file based. Performance will be poor though. You'd probably be better off using MySQL to share data if you have a cluster of machines. > That's one reason I've not used t

Re: New Module Idea: MLDBM::Sync

2000-11-22 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, Tim Bunce wrote: > I'm puzzled why people wouldn't just use version 3 of Berkeley DB (via > DB_File.pm or BerkeleyDB.pm) which supports multiple readers and > writers through a shared memory cache. No open/close/flush required > per-write and very very much faster. > > Is th

Re: New Module Idea: MLDBM::Sync

2000-11-22 Thread Paul Lindner
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 10:58:43AM +, Tim Bunce wrote: > On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 03:00:01PM -0800, Perrin Harkins wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Joshua Chamas wrote: > > > I'm working on a new module to be used for mod_perl style > > > caching. I'm

Re: New Module Idea: MLDBM::Sync

2000-11-22 Thread Tim Bunce
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 02:17:25PM +0300, Ruslan V. Sulakov wrote: > Hi, Tim! > > I'd like to use BerkeleyDB! But have you test it in mod_perl environment? Not yet, but I will be very soon. I'm sure others are using it. > May be I wrote scripts in wrong fasion. > I open $dbe and $db at startup.

Re: New Module Idea: MLDBM::Sync

2000-11-22 Thread Joshua Chamas
Tim Bunce wrote: > > > I looked through the code and couldn't see how you are doing i/o > > flushing. This is more of an issue with Berkeley DB than SDBM I think, > > since Berkeley DB will cache things in memory. Can you point to me it? > > I'm puzzled why people wouldn't just use version 3 o

Re: New Module Idea: MLDBM::Sync

2000-11-22 Thread Tim Bunce
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 03:00:01PM -0800, Perrin Harkins wrote: > On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Joshua Chamas wrote: > > I'm working on a new module to be used for mod_perl style > > caching. I'm calling it MLDBM::Sync because its a subclass > > of MLDBM that makes sure

Re: New Module Idea: MLDBM::Sync

2000-11-21 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, Joshua Chamas wrote: > On my box, some rough numbers in writes per sec, with doing a > tie/untie for each write, are: > > sync writes/sec with tie/untie > > SDBM_File 1000 > DB_File 30 > GDBM_File 40 > > Note that on a RAM disk in Linux, DB_File goes

Re: New Module Idea: MLDBM::Sync

2000-11-21 Thread Joshua Chamas
Perrin Harkins wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Joshua Chamas wrote: > > I'm working on a new module to be used for mod_perl style > > caching. I'm calling it MLDBM::Sync because its a subclass > > of MLDBM that makes sure concurrent access is serialized with &g

Re: New Module Idea: MLDBM::Sync

2000-11-21 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Joshua Chamas wrote: > I'm working on a new module to be used for mod_perl style > caching. I'm calling it MLDBM::Sync because its a subclass > of MLDBM that makes sure concurrent access is serialized with > flock() and i/o flushing between reads

New Module Idea: MLDBM::Sync

2000-11-17 Thread Joshua Chamas
Hey, I'm working on a new module to be used for mod_perl style caching. I'm calling it MLDBM::Sync because its a subclass of MLDBM that makes sure concurrent access is serialized with flock() and i/o flushing between reads and writes. Below is the code for the module. I believ

new module

2000-11-13 Thread Thomas Klausner
Hi! I am currently developing a perl module that is somewhat simmilar to CGI::PathInfo, and somewhat not. (IMO more not). The module would be used in a CGI- or mod_perl-environment. It takes the path-info (or the whole URL) and performs some regular expressions (defined via some configuration

Re: [ RFC ] New Module Apache::SessionManager

2000-10-30 Thread Gerald Richter
> >Hence is it worth a CPAN entry ? (I've not got an account ) > > Imho, a perl module that could be of use to the community should be placed on > CPAN. Yes!! Gerald

Re: [ RFC ] New Module Apache::SessionManager

2000-10-30 Thread James G Smith
Greg Cope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hence is it worth a CPAN entry ? (I've not got an account ) Imho, a perl module that could be of use to the community should be placed on CPAN. It is easy to get an account -- email the perl module list with the idea for your module and an account will

Re: [ RFC ] New Module Apache::SessionManager

2000-10-29 Thread Greg Cope
Gunther Birznieks wrote: > > How long have you been a member of sourceforge and when was the project > created? 7 days ago I am the admin - its called - wait for the great supprise - Session Manager > > Sometimes it takes changes (eg giving you access to the project directory > with write pe

Re: [ RFC ] New Module Apache::SessionManager

2000-10-29 Thread Greg Cope
darren chamberlain wrote: > > Greg Cope ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something to this effect: > > > $r->header_out(Location => 'http://' . $r -> server -> server_hostname . > > > $r->uri()); > > > > Seems easy - will add it in. > > It's not that simple, of course -- you need to maintain port number

Re: [ RFC ] New Module Apache::SessionManager

2000-10-29 Thread Gunther Birznieks
How long have you been a member of sourceforge and when was the project created? Sometimes it takes changes (eg giving you access to the project directory with write permissions) the famous 6 hour wait for their cluster of machines to get up to date. You know that you are the default project

Re: [ RFC ] New Module Apache::SessionManager

2000-10-29 Thread Greg Cope
Matt Sergeant wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Gerald Richter wrote: > > > I have three anonations: > > > > 1.) > > > > $r->header_out(Location => $r->uri()); > > > > Also this code works with most browsers it doesn't conform to the HTTP > > specs. A location header must include a host part. Shou

Re: [ RFC ] New Module Apache::SessionManager

2000-10-27 Thread darren chamberlain
Greg Cope ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something to this effect: > > $r->header_out(Location => 'http://' . $r -> server -> server_hostname . > > $r->uri()); > > Seems easy - will add it in. It's not that simple, of course -- you need to maintain port numbers and all that. I recommend using Apache:

Re: [ RFC ] New Module Apache::SessionManager

2000-10-27 Thread Greg Cope
Gerald Richter wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > > I also hot heard anything back from the poeple I sent a copy to, I can > > hence only assume that its so good that it's made them speachless ;-) > > > > That's more a matter of time, then a matter of speach... I am up against a deadline and hence wi

Re: [ RFC ] New Module Apache::SessionManager

2000-10-26 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Gerald Richter wrote: > I have three anonations: > > 1.) > > $r->header_out(Location => $r->uri()); > > Also this code works with most browsers it doesn't conform to the HTTP > specs. A location header must include a host part. Shouldn't be to hard add > something like >

Re: [ RFC ] New Module Apache::SessionManager

2000-10-24 Thread Gerald Richter
Hi Greg, > > I also hot heard anything back from the poeple I sent a copy to, I can > hence only assume that its so good that it's made them speachless ;-) > That's more a matter of time, then a matter of speach... Greg, I have taken a look at your module and the code and I think it is really

Re: [ RFC ] New Module Apache::SessionManager

2000-10-22 Thread Greg Cope
Gunther Birznieks wrote: > > I believe Greg is familiar with Apache::Session. There have been > discussions about this before. A session manager manages the workflow > around sessions. A session stores information. They are two different things. > > In addition, I believe the name session manage

Re: [ RFC ] New Module Apache::SessionManager

2000-10-21 Thread Gunther Birznieks
I believe Greg is familiar with Apache::Session. There have been discussions about this before. A session manager manages the workflow around sessions. A session stores information. They are two different things. In addition, I believe the name session manager has come up on this list before w

Re: [ RFC ] New Module Apache::SessionManager

2000-10-21 Thread James G Smith
Check out Apache::Session, available on CPAN and see if your code could be moulded to fit it's way of thinking. If they are too much different, then you might want to consider contacting the module list to see if what you have is a good name (it probably is) before going all out with distribution

Re: [ RFC ] New Module Apache::SessionManager

2000-10-21 Thread Greg Cope
Greg Cope wrote: > > Dear ALL > > I've writen a module that does transparent session management via either > Cookies, Munged URI or Query Args. > > It has quite a few options to change the behavour, and appears stable in > my developement environment. > > What I suggest is that unless there is

Re: [ RFC ] New Module Apache::SessionManager

2000-10-18 Thread Gerald Richter
25152 - - Original Message - From: "Greg Cope" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Gunther Birznieks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Modperl list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 10:55 AM Subject: Re:

Re: [ RFC ] New Module Apache::SessionManager

2000-10-18 Thread Greg Cope
Gunther Birznieks wrote: > > I like the name as it works well with our naming (SessionManager, Session > hierarchy) so I can probably write a wrapper that assumes your > SessionManager is embedded in Apache and it's not confusing for our users > who want to configure our apps to use your session

Re: [ RFC ] New Module Apache::SessionManager

2000-10-17 Thread Gunther Birznieks
I like the name as it works well with our naming (SessionManager, Session hierarchy) so I can probably write a wrapper that assumes your SessionManager is embedded in Apache and it's not confusing for our users who want to configure our apps to use your session manager. Thanks, Gunther A

[ RFC ] New Module Apache::SessionManager

2000-10-17 Thread Greg Cope
Dear ALL I've writen a module that does transparent session management via either Cookies, Munged URI or Query Args. It has quite a few options to change the behavour, and appears stable in my developement environment. What I suggest is that unless there is a major objection I call it Apache::S

[ANNOUNCE] new module HTTPD::Bench::ApacheBench

2000-09-26 Thread Adi
Stas Bekman wrote: > > > Before I upload it to CPAN, are there any objections to calling it > > "ApacheBench"? Other names I considered are "Bench", "ab", "ABuse"... but > > ApacheBench I thought was the best because an m/Apache/ search on CPAN will find > > it. > > That's the proper name, sinc

Re: [ANNOUNCE] new module ApacheBench

2000-09-25 Thread Stas Bekman
On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, Adi wrote: > It took a little longer than planned, but here it is. It is a Perl API to > the Apache ab tool. It took so long because we added a number of useful > features, mainly the ability to benchmark sequences of URLs instead of just > one. Very nice Adi! > Before I

[ANNOUNCE] new module ApacheBench

2000-09-21 Thread Adi
It took a little longer than planned, but here it is. It is a Perl API to the Apache ab tool. It took so long because we added a number of useful features, mainly the ability to benchmark sequences of URLs instead of just one. Before I upload it to CPAN, are there any objections to calling it "

New module cadidate Apache::AddHostPath

2000-08-23 Thread Robert Jenks
I have written a new PerlTransHandler module which I currently calling Apache::AddHostPath. It was written to solve a problem I am having in an application I am writing, however if others think it might be usefull and there isn't already something out there that does it, I'd be more than happy to

ANNOUNCE: Apache::Compress 1.002 (new module)

2000-08-21 Thread Ken Williams
Hi all, The URL http://forum.swarthmore.edu/~ken/modules/archive/Apache-Compress-1.002.tar.gz has entered CPAN as file: $CPAN/authors/id/K/KW/KWILLIAMS/Apache-Compress-1.002.tar.gz size: 10708 bytes md5: 7fef7de82d46083a1b0f2ea1492d2faf Here's the documentation. I'd appreci

Re: [new module] Apache::PageKit

2000-08-16 Thread T.J. Mather
> > Here is a brief description of the module: > > PageKit is a set of Perl modules that provides an application > > framework based on mod_perl and HTML::Template. It is based on the > > Model/View/Controller approach to design, with complete seperation > > of Perl from HTML. It includes sess

Re: [new module] Apache::PageKit

2000-08-16 Thread T.J. Mather
I got a couple of e-mails asking where this module could be found. I plan to release the module in a few days on CPAN. I will make an announcement on this list when I do. -TJ Mather

Re: [new module] Apache::PageKit

2000-08-16 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, T.J. Mather wrote: > I have an addition for the Apache/Perl Module List, under PerlHandler's > > PageKit cmpOApplication framework w/ HTML::Template TJMATHER > > Here is a brief description of the module: > PageKit is a set of Perl modules that provi

[new module] Apache::PageKit

2000-08-16 Thread T.J. Mather
I have an addition for the Apache/Perl Module List, under PerlHandler's PageKit cmpOApplication framework w/ HTML::Template TJMATHER Here is a brief description of the module: PageKit is a set of Perl modules that provides an application framework based on mod_perl and HTML::

[New Module] Apache::Motd

2000-07-12 Thread Carlos Ramirez
I wrote an Apache Perl Module that I think can be of use to others who maintain webservers and once in a while have to notify web users with an urgent message. This module is currently being on the servers I maintain. The proposed module name is Apache::Motd (Message of the Day). It basically mim

[new module] Apache::Regex

2000-06-28 Thread Geoffrey Young
Hi all... I posted to the list a little while ago a simple regular expression PerlHandler implementation. I've cleaned it up since then and thought I might post it to CPAN if there is any interest. I was thinking of Apache::Regex as the release name. I know it's a basic module, and peo

RE: [new module] Apache::Dispatch

2000-06-05 Thread Geoffrey Young
> -Original Message- > From: Matt Sergeant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 12:25 PM > To: Stas Bekman > Cc: Geoffrey Young; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; 'Vivek Khera' > Subject: Re: [new module] Apache::Dispatch > > > O

RE: [new module] Apache::Dispatch

2000-06-05 Thread Geoffrey Young
> -Original Message- > From: Stas Bekman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 12:19 PM > To: Geoffrey Young > Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; 'Vivek Khera'; 'Matt Sergeant' > Subject: Re: [new module] Apache::Dispatch

Re: [new module] Apache::Dispatch

2000-06-05 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Stas Bekman wrote: > On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Geoffrey Young wrote: > > > hi all... > > > > I'm not sure if some you remember the idea Vivek and Matt had about creating > > a handler that mapped, say, http://localhost/Foo/doit to Foo->doit() > > > > anyway, the relevant part of

Re: [new module] Apache::Dispatch

2000-06-05 Thread Stas Bekman
On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Geoffrey Young wrote: > hi all... > > I'm not sure if some you remember the idea Vivek and Matt had about creating > a handler that mapped, say, http://localhost/Foo/doit to Foo->doit() > > anyway, the relevant part of the thread, including some code, can be seen > here: > h

[new module] Apache::Dispatch

2000-06-05 Thread Geoffrey Young
hi all... I'm not sure if some you remember the idea Vivek and Matt had about creating a handler that mapped, say, http://localhost/Foo/doit to Foo->doit() anyway, the relevant part of the thread, including some code, can be seen here: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-modperl&m=95598609306

New Module (was Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Forms (or something similar))

2000-05-19 Thread Francesc Guasch
I have my own module for doing this job, sorry I missed many posts of this thread but here is what I do: - The target is automatically : add , update, select data from a table reading data typed by the user. - I didn't want to use the Apache api, so it even can be used out of apache, so I ca

[new module development] Apache::Ping

2000-04-27 Thread Geoffrey Young
hi all... well, this isn't a new module quite yet... I've been toying with the idea of a module that does automatic server monitoring. I know there must be programs out there that do this, and the guide has some examples, but I was interested in creating a module add-in that

RE: [new module] proposal Apache::DebugHeaders

2000-03-31 Thread Geoffrey Young
> -Original Message- > From: Graham Barr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, March 31, 2000 3:12 AM > To: Geoffrey Young > Cc: 'Ask Bjoern Hansen'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; 'Stas Bekman'; 'darren > chamberlain'; '

Re: [new module] proposal Apache::DebugHeaders

2000-03-31 Thread Graham Barr
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 04:07:38PM -0500, Geoffrey Young wrote: > Hey, I'm not trying to redo anyone's work or step on toes... I am sure your not, but on the other hand when two modules are so close in functionality it can help to merge them. There are several reasons why this can be benificial,

RE: [new module] proposal Apache::DebugHeaders

2000-03-30 Thread Geoffrey Young
# otherwise, just print the pid #--------- print STDERR "Debug PID for $uri during " . $r->notes('PERL_CUR_HOOK') . "\n\t$$\n"; #-

Re: [new module] proposal Apache::DebugHeaders

2000-03-30 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Geoffrey Young wrote: > Hi all... > > I finished an alpha of DebugHeaders (now potentially called DebugInfo) - > here's the description. I still think it would fit much better as patches to Apache::DumpHeaders. :) They are doing pretty much the same thing. - ask --

Re: [new module] proposal Apache::DebugHeaders

2000-03-30 Thread Geoffrey Young
Hi all... I finished an alpha of DebugHeaders (now potentially called DebugInfo) - here's the description. As I've said in the past, I'm terrible with names - barring any adverse feedback, I'll upload it to CPAN under Apache-DebugInfo_0.01 sometime today or tomorrow... --Geoff =head1 NAME

RE: [new module] proposal Apache::DebugHeaders

2000-03-29 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Geoffrey Young wrote: > actually, http://perl.apache.org/src/apache-modlist.html recommends > > h2xs -AX -n Apache::YourPackageName > > what's the -C option - it isn't in my perldoc h2xs? It was supposed to be -c, shoot the typist :) Not really relevant with -X, but I alw

RE: [new module] proposal Apache::DebugHeaders

2000-03-29 Thread Geoffrey Young
> -Original Message- > From: Stas Bekman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2000 5:11 PM > To: Geoffrey Young > Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Re: [new module] proposal Apache::DebugHeaders > > > > Hi, Geoff > > &g

RE: [new module] proposal Apache::DebugHeaders

2000-03-29 Thread Geoffrey Young
> -Original Message- > From: Ask Bjoern Hansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 6:30 AM > To: Geoffrey Young > Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Re: [new module] proposal Apache::DebugHeaders > > > On Tue, 28 Mar 2000,

RE: [new module] proposal Apache::DebugHeaders

2000-03-29 Thread Geoffrey Young
, 2000 4:40 AM > To: Francesc Guasch > Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Re: [new module] proposal Apache::DebugHeaders > > > On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Francesc Guasch wrote: > > A very easy way of create Makefile.PL and module files > > and directories is typing thi

Re: [new module] proposal Apache::DebugHeaders

2000-03-29 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, Geoffrey Young wrote: > ok, this isn't all that clever, but recently I got tired of writing loops of > warnings to debug headers_in and headers_out over and over again... Then you should look at the Apache::DumpHeaders module. :) Major feature is that it can be configured

Re: [new module] proposal Apache::DebugHeaders

2000-03-29 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Francesc Guasch wrote: > A very easy way of create Makefile.PL and module files > and directories is typing this: > > h2xs -X -n My::Object Please don't do that for mod_perl. You get autoloading that way, which means mod_perl can't load the methods at start time, which means

Re: [new module] proposal Apache::DebugHeaders

2000-03-28 Thread Francesc Guasch
Stas Bekman wrote: > > Did you know that CPAN tolerates even the packages with no Makefile.PL? I > don't try to disencourage you to write Makefile.PL (feel free to "steal" > one from your favorite module), but if you really cannot build yours > release it as it is. It still might save one of us d

Re: [new module] proposal Apache::DebugHeaders

2000-03-28 Thread Stas Bekman
Hi, Geoff > ok, this isn't all that clever, but recently I got tired of writing > loops of warnings to debug headers_in and headers_out over and over > again... > > all this one does is spit out headers_in in the init phase and headers_out > in the cleanup phase. Not terribly extensible, but

[new module] proposal Apache::DebugHeaders

2000-03-28 Thread Geoffrey Young
ok, this isn't all that clever, but recently I got tired of writing loops of warnings to debug headers_in and headers_out over and over again... all this one does is spit out headers_in in the init phase and headers_out in the cleanup phase. Not terribly extensible, but perhaps practical if any