Apache 1.3.3 + ssl-mod on Win32 NT

Hi, Is it possible that someone give me URL, or file attachment with a complete package of : Apache 1.3.3 + mod-ssl 2.1.0 and other things needed for running on Windows NT4 environement. (I really need a complete package ... !) I'm sorry I haven't any tools for compiling the differents

LDAP support?

Hello, I am trying to get my Mod-SSL'd Apache to do the "Netscape Communicator 4.5 Roam" thing, and it is a royal pain. After setting it up via the instructions at http://www.burlco.lib.nj.us/tutorial/roam/ I found that it still doesn't work well over unreliable (modem, in my case)

Re: ANNOUNCE: mod_ssl 2.1.0 (happy birthday)

On 18-Nov-98 Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: Only for fun and fame, of course ;-) In german there is nice related cookie: ``Im Hause des Schmieds ist der Loeffel aus Holz.'' I hope I translate it correctly to english when I say: ``In the house of the blacksmith the spoon is made from

Re: RedHat 5.x users

On 18-Nov-98 Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: On Wed, Nov 18, 1998, Manuel J. Galan wrote: I've uploaded apache-1.3.3/mod_ssl-2.1.0 to contrib site. Builds and installs flawlessly in an Apollo (RH5.2) system. If you have other addon modules (php3, ...) maybe you will have to recompile

Re: Getting Seg faults on mod_ssl/2.1.0

On Wed, 18 Nov 1998, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: On Thu, Nov 19, 1998, Anthony Rumble wrote: BTW.. Not loading the libssl.so and turning off all the SSL stuff makes no difference.. Makes no difference? You mean when libssl.so is not loaded httpd still segfaults? Yes. Then the

Re: RedHat 5.x users

On Wed, Nov 18, 1998, William X. Walsh wrote: On 18-Nov-98 Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: On Wed, Nov 18, 1998, Manuel J. Galan wrote: I've uploaded apache-1.3.3/mod_ssl-2.1.0 to contrib site. Builds and installs flawlessly in an Apollo (RH5.2) system. If you have other addon

Re: Apache 1.3.3 + ssl-mod on Win32 NT

On Wed, Nov 18, 1998, Hervé Piedvache wrote: Is it possible that someone give me URL, or file attachment with a complete package of : Apache 1.3.3 + mod-ssl 2.1.0 and other things needed for running on Windows NT4 environement. (I really need a complete package ... !) I'm sorry I

Re: Getting Seg faults on mod_ssl/2.1.0

On Thu, Nov 19, 1998, Anthony Rumble wrote: [..] Then the problem cannot be directly inside mod_ssl. Then it's perhaps related to the Extended API or even to a problem between mod_perl and the EAPI? Make sure mod_perl is compiled with -DEAPI, too! Else you get segfaults, of course.

Re: Success was Re: Getting Seg faults on mod_ssl/2.1.0

On Thu, Nov 19, 1998, Anthony Rumble wrote: [...] Makes no difference? You mean when libssl.so is not loaded httpd still segfaults? Then the problem cannot be directly inside mod_ssl. Then it's perhaps related to the Extended API or even to a problem between mod_perl and the EAPI? Make

Re: Apache1.3.3 + Apache-SSL mod + fp-apache mod

On Wed, Nov 18, 1998 at 10:47:13AM +0100, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: Here I forward a message from c.i.w.s.u posted yesterday. The poster talks about Apache+mod_ssl+mod_frontpage and the fact that SSL works fine, FP works fine, but the combination SSL+FP fails because some environment things

Re: Apache1.3.3 + Apache-SSL mod + fp-apache mod

On Wed, Nov 18, 1998 at 10:47:13AM +0100, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: --- FrontPage Error. User: please report details to this site's webmaster. Webmaster: please see the server's system log for more details. --- I thought this was obvious in my previous letter but... The ports are

Re: Success was Re: Getting Seg faults on mod_ssl/2.1.0

Anybody putting this RPM in Contrib? Upgraded to mod_perl 1.16 for starters. Now, the RPM for mod_perl is using DSO and APXS, and of course the origional redhat build of apache doesn't have -DEAPI.. Anyway.. once I put in my apache-mod_ssl-1.3.3-2.1.0 rpm modules in, including the devel

RE: LDAP support?

On 18-Nov-98 John Leveron wrote: So to avoid losing our profiles, I've decided to wade into LDAP. The Netscape doc at http://help.netscape.com/products/client/communicator/manual_roaming 2.html also basically convinces me that LDAP is the way to go. So I guess my question is .

[BugDB] corrigenda to the INSTALL (PR#49)

Full_Name: tpo Version: mod_ssl-2.1.0-1.3.3 OS: Linux 2.0.x Submission from: proxy.spin.ch (194.209.46.26) If I follow your intructions from INSTALL: $ cd mod_ssl-2.1.x-1.3.x ALL $ ./configure

Re: [BugDB] corrigenda to the INSTALL (PR#49)

Estarei em férias no período de 19/11/98 a 08/12/98. Qualquer problema, favor entrar em contato com [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am on vacation from November 19th to December 08th. If your message needs immediate attention, please send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Luiz Cunha

Re: RedHat 5.x users

On Thu, Nov 19, 1998, Albert Etienne wrote: Don't know if this will help you guys, but I got all the goodies to compile AND work on sol2.6 Oh, that's good information. My production boxes are also Sol2.6 boxes. So this means I can expect less hacking on the weekend when I upgrade my own