-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
(Disclaimer: I'm not a native speaker, and that means I ramble a bit
from lack of skill in making short sentences. Please bear with me.)
Hi module authors,
I'm DOMQ on CPAN, and I'm about to release a new application, NutsPKI.
Problem is, I don't
Hi!
On Wednesday 16 May 2007, Dominique Quatravaux wrote:
(Disclaimer: I'm not a native speaker, and that means I ramble a bit
from lack of skill in making short sentences. Please bear with me.)
Hi module authors,
I'm DOMQ on CPAN, and I'm about to release a new application, NutsPKI.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 16 May 2007, Dominique Quatravaux wrote:
I'm DOMQ on CPAN, and I'm about to release a new application, NutsPKI.
Problem is, I don't know where to put it on the CPAN, if at all.
Shlomi Fish then wrote:
Just put it under the App::
On May 16, 2007, at 5:08 AM, Dominique Quatravaux wrote:
Thanks for the insight; indeed there is precedent here (for the
record: App::SimpleScan, App::Addex, App::GUI::Notepad etc). But there
are even more folks who use the App:: namespace to write modules *for*
applications (App::CLI,
Gabor Szabo wrote:
I would like to create a list of modules that need compilations
as opposed to those that are pure perl
Is checking for a file with .xs .c or .h extension in the distribution
the correct thing to do? Is there a better way to collect this information or is it
already available
# from Andy Lester
# on Wednesday 16 May 2007 09:31 am:
On May 16, 2007, at 11:26 AM, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
Maybe for some value of correct. An equally likely answer is that
they are both wrong. I've asked this question before and it doesn't
seem to have a good answer.
I would like it to be more consistent
though.
Good luck on that. Tell us how it goes.
We should make a magic 8 ball faq generator. When someone
asks a new question about some un-enforced CPAN policy, it makes a
random decision and posts the result somewhere for future reference.
Some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andy Lester wrote:
Are you going to organize the Conference On Namespace Decisions?
Quoting http://pause.perl.org/pause/query?ACTION=pause_04about :
# * Please,* talk to other people (comp.lang.perl.modules,
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] or any mailing list
On May 16, 2007, at 1:02 PM, Dominique Quatravaux wrote:
Overall, far too much time is spent navel-gazing over Namespaces
And How They Should Be.
As a novice CPAN author, I apologize (sincerely? You figure it out!)
for wasting your time trying to do the right thing.
I'm glad you asked, and
Hi,
I would like to improve the coverage of the CPAN distributions available as
binary packages in the various distributions.
If you look at the stats I created recently ActiveState provide 5-7000 modules
depending on platform while FreeBSD has only 2600, Debian only 1000 and
others probably
# from Andy Lester
# on Wednesday 16 May 2007 09:58 am:
I don't see that there's anything confusing in using App:: for both
modules that are apps, and that access other apps,
You forgot modules that get used by applications, which was
Dominique's original concern. In fact, it generated
Gabor Szabo wrote:
Hi,
What do you think?
Gabor
I think that is a good idea whose success, in practical terms, will
depend on whether you can recruit people to the project who are expert
in preparing binary packages for a specific OS. To guide/coach people
to prepare RPMs, for
Gabor Szabo wrote:
Hi,
What do you think?
Gabor
I think that is a good idea whose success, in practical terms, will
depend on whether you can recruit people to the project who are expert
in preparing binary packages for a specific OS. To guide/coach people
to prepare RPMs, for
Text::Aspell is an XS interface to GNU Aspell. The module always has
a large number of cpan-testers failures. They seem to be mostly of two
types. One is:
Aspell.xs:4:20: error: aspell.h: No such file or directory
Yes, aspell needs to be installed.
Second, the module is for spell
14 matches
Mail list logo
