If the team does not want to let mono go worse. Then I would suggest to add
more test cases, and a peer reviews.
But if mono team is just simply ignoring pull requests out of core business,
and trying to make mono close for other developers. Then just let other
volunteers know, we properly can
-list@lists.ximian.com
Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] System.Json string handling
On 21/09/14 17:12, 何子杰Hzj_jie wrote:
If the team does not want to let mono go worse. Then I would suggest to
add more test cases, and a peer reviews.
But if mono team is just simply ignoring pull requests out of core
And how to define practices and skills? If you guys do not have time to review
the changes from contributors out of mono group, then how to find out new
people to join the group? And, I continually see an incorrect design pattern in
mono source code, which may cause unexpected behavior in
+1
We are volunteers, we would like to make mono better. So if your guys do not
have enough time to review changes, why not add more people in the developer
group?
.Hzj_jie
From: Steffen Kießmailto:steffen.ki...@ipvs.uni-stuttgart.de
Sent: 19/9/2014 17:58
To:
fix to issue 5 has been pulled together with issue 3.
besides the fix to the Encoding.GetEncoding itself, the change also contains
several fixes to avoid race-condition in multithreading environment, and some
performance improvements of I18N.
https://github.com/mono/mono/pull/1272/files
it will
2014 12:31:37 -0400
CC: mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
To: hzj_...@hotmail.com
On Sep 16, 2014, at 6:10 AM, 何子杰Hzj_jie hzj_...@hotmail.com wrote:
1. GC
thought GC.Collect() does not guarantee all the inaccessible objects are
finalized and reclaimed, .Net implementation usually be able
hi, all,i am trying to move my code mainly vb.net from .net to mono, there
are ~300 test cases, which can help to find out the difference between .Net and
Mono implementation.if you are interesting, you can enlist the code from
codeplex,
Yes, in the scenario to start a URL or an xls file, the behavior is correct.
But think about a different scenario, the logic extract a set of files from a
gzip package to the hard disk, start the executable file in the package, the
Process.Start will fail. And except for some tricks, dev cannot
Thank you Marek,
1. GC
It's do tricky, briefly WeakReference an object, and call GC.Collect() and
GC.WaitForPendingFinalizers() for several times 3 in my case , in .Net, the
WeakReference will be invalid. in Mono, I did not see the same behavior. I
agree your point, there should be no
Hi, guys, I really want to be helpful.
.Hzj_jie
From: 何子杰
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 10:33 PM
To: Mono Develop Mailing List
thank you for Robert's comment,
Internals calls must not return structs. This is not supported across all
platforms.
Hzj_jie: but i see
thank you for Robert's comment,
Internals calls must not return structs. This is not supported across
all platforms.
Hzj_jie: but i see GetName_internal and SetName_internal are all
using string and InternalThread, do you mean ThreadPriority enum?
but i really cannot
hi, all,can anyone from the collaborators help to look at the change
https://github.com/mono/mono/pull/1272? it's an implementation of
System.Threading.Thread.Priority property.
thank you.
.Hzj_jie ___
12 matches
Mail list logo
