Hi,
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
Personally, I would still
rather make a release of the latest there is, for the sake of making
things simple.
ACK. What were the reasons *not* to take the latest revision? Are those
issues fixable in a reasonable amount of time?
Markus
FYI one of the byproducts of the recent summit is also the creation of
numerous trust paths between most of the present persons:
1
01234567890
.---.
0|\aa0 0 | 0 - 0x4B9C7CED Christof Petig (Wuppertal)
1| \0 0 | 1 - 0x8A89EF39 Christof Petig (work)
2|3
Hi,
If I go to http://venge.net/mtn-wiki/ it shows me an almost empty page
with this text:
PáginaInicial
Mhz, please paste the new content here - don't mess with acl or
try to delete this page!
I assume the problem is that my browser is set to show me spanish
content
Currently, the main monotone manual, 'monotone.texi' in the source
tree, is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL).
Now, it turns out that this is a lousy license, that is probably not
even DFSG-free[1]. It certainly has a whole host of obnoxious
practical problems; in
I'm fine with GPL v2+.
-Ben
--
---
Ben Walton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unanswered questions are far less dangerous than unquestioned answers.
- The Roadside Pulpit
I'm OK with the GPL for the manual.
J.
___
Monotone-devel mailing list
Monotone-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
Nathaniel Smith spake unto us the following wisdom:
PLEASE REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, CC'ING monotone-devel@nongnu.org, AND
SAY THAT YOU ARE FINE WITH YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS TO monotone.texi BEING
RELEASED UNDER THE GPL (v2 or later).
I have no problem with my contributions to the monotone manual,
I give my permission for you to relicense any or all of my
contributions to the Monotone manual (monotone.texi) under the GPL,
v2 or later.
On Feb 18, 2007, at 9:42 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Currently, the main monotone manual, 'monotone.texi' in the source
tree, is licensed under the GNU
I am fine with my contributions to monotone.texi being released under
the GPL (v2 or later).
On Feb 18, 2007, at 9:42 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Currently, the main monotone manual, 'monotone.texi' in the source
tree, is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL).
Now, it turns
I am FINE WITH my CONTRIBUTIONS TO monotone.texi BEING RELEASED UNDER
THE GPL.
joel reed
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Currently, the main monotone manual, 'monotone.texi' in the source
tree, is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL).
Now, it turns out that this is a lousy
I am fine with anything I contributed to the manual being released under
the GPL, v2 or later (although I don't think I have anything
sufficiently substantive to matter).
-Emile Snyder
(And hi to all you monotone developers; long time no see. Hope all is
well with everyone.)
On Sun, 2007-02-18
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 08:27:41AM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
Why has the asciik command reproduced what complete() does, more or
less verbatim? Yeah, I noticed that there's the definition of the
asciik grap(10) smack in the middle, but that definition doesn't have
to be
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 11:02:28PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
There's been lots of talk about making a release. I was actually
planning on doing one just before the summit, but got distracted, and
when I saw all the good stuff that was being committed, I thought a
release
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:17:13 -0800, Nathaniel
Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
njs I was thinking of a release 'round about
njs 19f1659a00d3df5076f768fba98463812a182a36
njs which is where the 'ls unknown in subdir crashes' fix landed --
Yeah, I see what you mean.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 20 Feb 2007 00:00:59 +0100, Lapo Luchini
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
lapo Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
lapo Yeah, I see what you mean. And still, I think I'd prefer to
lapo release what we have now. And since you basically gave me a
lapo blank
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
Considering there seems to be some instability with this new feature,
would find it very horrible if we, for some time, transformed the
feature to be opt-in (with --graph) rather than opt-out (--no-graph)?
Instability as in the known bug I was talking
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 12:30:18AM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote:
In any case if it was for me I'd rather release without the feature than
releasing 0.33 with opt-out and then 0.34 with opt-in, it's not nice to
change the UI when not strictly necessary, isn't it?
It's not so much a change, as just
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 20 Feb 2007 00:30:18 +0100, Lapo Luchini
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
lapo In any case if it was for me I'd rather release without the
lapo feature than releasing 0.33 with opt-out and then 0.34 with
lapo opt-in, it's not nice to change the UI when not strictly
A proposal (at http://venge.net/mtn-wiki/KeystoreFiles ):
I think the keystore, ~/.monotone/keys, could be more usable. (And
this is an area where usability is important for security.)
Problems:
* It is not obvious how to find one's public key
* It is not obvious that ~/.monotone/keys/
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 04:47:15PM -0800, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Proposed solution: stick extra tags on the end of files we write to
the keystore.
[..]
like keyid-EXTRASTUFF, where EXTRASTUFF is either PRIVATE or
PRIVATE,NO-PASSPHRASE, so people are always clear on what exactly
I like the
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 08:44:04PM +1100, William Uther wrote:
A while ago I came across the fact that popen was disabled in the
Lua hooks in monotone for security reasons. Here is a patch that
replaces it with a security conscious version (like spawn() replaces
execute()). The
Hi,
I've just been trying out a recent revision of
n.v.m.cvssync.refactor. (4a94d2a8a0f2daf32daad76900ecb9fb4c5a0f331)
It looks good and passes the tests. Thank you. :)
Questions and comments:
Is this at a user-testable stage?
All the test scripts in tests/common have been
Hi all,
Having started everyone here using monotone, we're now getting
freezes on windows using the ssh transport.
Setup:
A central Unix box has a db. Everyone has a login. Everyone is
using ssh to sync. Everyone (but me) is using 0.32 binaries from the
website (incl. the unix
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 06:42:03PM -0800, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
PLEASE REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, CC'ING monotone-devel@nongnu.org, AND
SAY THAT YOU ARE FINE WITH YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS TO monotone.texi BEING
RELEASED UNDER THE GPL (v2 or later).
(as I already indicated at the summit, but just
Agent Smith wrote:
The code makes me a little uneasy -- lots of pointer arithmetic/
malloc usage. Not clear that's fixable, though.
The formatting could be better -- we tend not to skimp on the space
bar too much
. (char**)malloc((n+1)*sizeof(char*)) is not
particularly easy to read, for
25 matches
Mail list logo
