In addition to this week's auctions (with lots of cool stuff), we do have the
new Tarantino teaser for Django Unleashed
http://movieposterexchange.com/buy.php?mode=poster_detailsauction_id=2366
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
_http://www.ebay.com/itm/180903183479?ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT_trksid=p398
4.m1555.l2649_
(http://www.ebay.com/itm/180903183479?ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT_trksid=p3984.m1555.l2649)
David A. Lieberman
_CineMasterpieces.com_ (http://www.cinemasterpieces.com/) | Vintage
Original Movie
Beautiful card!
Kirby
On Jun 11, 2012, at 7:55 AM, David Lieberman wrote:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/180903183479?ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT_trksid=p3984.m1555.l2649
David A. Lieberman
CineMasterpieces.com | Vintage Original Movie Posters
15721 N. Greenway Hayden Loop, Suite 105 |
I'll place $5 on Pink 7 please
From: MoPo List [mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] On Behalf Of Kirby
McDaniel
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 11:26 AM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] DEAD RECKONING - NO RESERVE
Beautiful card!
Kirby
On Jun 11, 2012, at 7:55 AM, David
Thought some might be interested in taking a look...
Rick
_http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-et-classic-hollywood-20120611,
0,7164280.story_
(http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-et-classic-hollywood-20120611,0,7164280
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary=_000_6471032C2E7AEE4AAC7E3E0FDE94CFCE01469D3134C9EXCHANGEMBO_
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 5.6.1.2065439, Antispam-Engine:
Heritage has 555 lots of some of the Best of vintage movie posters closing
Sunday evening, June 17th, at 10pm CT!
www.ha.com/161225http://www.ha.com/161225
Featuring a great selection of affordable posters, lobby cards, photos, press
books, and related Memorabilia!
Heritage has offered over
I have participated a little bit and haven't gotten into any fights that I can
remember. And I try not to make much ado about nothing. But there is one
thing I will make much ado about because to me it is not nothing: that is when
I see four-letter words in a post even with dashes for most
I use to participate considerably more here on the group. A less amount of
available time has limited my posting, but also there were so many times over
the years that the arguing and posturing on MoPo just got out of control, and
not by the women of the group, that I now try to post when
Well said Jill I to tend to lurk more than post and some of these long
threads give my delete button plenty of use.
From: MoPo List [mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] On Behalf Of Susan
Heim
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 12:27 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Why do so
Thought someone might be interested...
Rick
_http://www.ebay.com/itm/LIVE-FAST-DIE-YOUNG-Orig-1958-BAD-GIRL-EXPLOITATION
-US-1-Sheet-ON-LINEN-/180903883270?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0hash=item2a1eb63206
_
I didn't know there was a Jill on MOPO.
JW
From: jimepisale3 jimepisa...@comcast.net
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 1:01 PM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Why do so few women participate on MoPo?
Well said Jill I to tend to lurk more than
Sorry Sue
From: MoPo List [mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] On Behalf Of John
Waldman
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 2:19 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Why do so few women participate on MoPo?
I didn't know there was a Jill on MOPO.
JW
From: jimepisale3
You must have been thinking of a Jill you know when you wrote the post.
Happens to me all the time.
JW
From: jimepisale3 jimepisa...@comcast.net
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 2:24 PM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Why do so few women
There's a good reason there are not that many women on MOPO, there are not that
many women that collect movie posters. If you've ever gone to Cinevent you've
probably noticed that there are just a hand full of ladies in attendance
(buyers). So why would there be a larger percentage of women
What can you mean Geraldine.
-Original Message-
From: John Waldman jhnwald...@yahoo.com
To: MoPo-L MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 19:39
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Why do so few women participate on MoPo?
You must have been thinking of a Jill you know when you
John is pretty much correct.
Movie posters is a predominantly male hobby
At 11:49 AM 6/11/2012, John Waldman wrote:
There's a good reason there are not that many women on MOPO, there
are not that many women that collect movie posters. If you've ever
gone to Cinevent you've probably noticed
I disagree, I have a good few women on my client list...they like films and
movie posters as much as guys...they just dont collect a huge amount women tend
to get a handful of posters they like and thats it.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Halegua Posters + Comic Art
I think what Rich is saying is correct. I've been a movie poster collector for
over 39 years and have been an active member of the hobby also. Now, as the
framer to the hobby, I would say that may for every 500 male collectors of
posters, there is 1 femaile. In fact, we have a running story
I would certainly welcome more posts from female collectors (and particularly
used to enjoy Sue Heim's thoughtful posts and anecdotes).
Over the last few years, I feel MOPO has become more boorish, laddish and more
like a listings service than a poster discussion group.
Scandals (and any
Can't speak for everyone, but in my case, I buy fewer posters since
Cindy died. She was the driving force in our family.
Jay Nemeth-Johannes
On 06/11/12 02:39 PM, Susan Heim wrote:
I think what Rich is saying is correct. I've been a movie poster
collector for over 39 years and have been an
Yup, Rich is right, it is predominantly male. Now. But I do events you guys
have never heard of (mainly because you're almost all over 50) like Cine-Bazar
in Montreal where the gender divide is almost 50/50 and the average age is
mid-20s.
These people don't buy high-end stuff but they do
I feel I must now respond to Ms. Kudaka's bizarre accusations of missing or
stolen posters, and the ongoing discussions about her accusations on MOPO.
Many of your know me personally, and know how hard I work to maintain my
credibility and reputation. I have taken thousands of consignments in
Yeah, Rich, that sure was a good observation. Sheesh.
Just call me Jill.
JW
From: Posteropolis posteropo...@bell.net
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 3:59 PM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Why do so few women participate on MoPo?
Yup,
This is a very fine summary, Grey, which clears up a lot of the unexplained
issues. Thanks for posting it. I hope this will put the topic to rest. Richard
Richard Del Belso
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:01:47 -0500
From: gre...@ha.com
Subject: [MOPO] Kudaka and Lippincott
To:
There are always two sides to every story, and it's good to hear Heritage's
side of this issue.
JW
From: Richard Del Belso rdel...@msn.com
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 4:13 PM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Kudaka and Lippincott
This is a
Well said, Grey.
Regards
John
- Original Message -
From: Smith, Grey - 1367
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 6:01 AM
Subject: [MOPO] Kudaka and Lippincott
I feel I must now respond to Ms. Kudaka's bizarre accusations of missing or
stolen
Since I posted my last question about why *WOMEN *don't participate on
MoPo, I received a bunch of private e-mails from non-posting female members
(perhaps every one) and they gave wonderfully valid reasons why they don't
post here.
So now I have a different question. Why do so many of the
Please let me know what posters you have for this title. No lobby cards
please.
Thanks,
David A. Lieberman
_CineMasterpieces.com_ (http://www.cinemasterpieces.com/) | Vintage
Original Movie Posters
15721 N. Greenway Hayden Loop, Suite 105 | Scottsdale, Az 85260
602 309 0500 | _Our
Bruce: I am an infrequent poster for several reasons:
1. As i get older i talk less and listen more..or i read more and comment less.
2. I get 500 + emails at work every day. You just run out of steam replying to
stuff.
3. I often find that on MOPO, there are a good number of people with a lot
Grey -
* As one of the few who defended Geraldine's right to post - and who knew the
tactical reasons why you/Heritage remained silent - and who also wrote and
spoke to you personally about this train wreck - I'm glad you finally felt
unleashed to strongly defend yourself here. Your
I learned a lesson about the internet from this group and that is people
will say things in a post they would never say to someone's face.
This rings ABSOLUTELY TRUE to me, Sue. It's like the old saying, It's hard to
hate up close. When face-to-face with a detractor, (excluding thieves,
Grey
That was a great detailed reply. I just have one question (and forgive me
if this has been addressed in some way, because there has been so much
posted about this that I can't wrap my head around it all.
My question is, were you personally there when either or both packages were
opened? If
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a
I can't believe Bruce that you're actually doing one more pass on this. You
have a great operation. I've bought many things from you over the years and
I was always very happy with your service. But so does Grey. Constantly
criticizing his operation, doesn't make yours any better. It just makes
Was this addressed? Is there no chance the person who opened the package
did not enter all the contents?
If it was, then that really completely closes the matter, down to an
unsolvable puzzle.
If it was addressed, I certainly apologize.
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Franc fdav...@verizon.net
Bruce
I think I've had enough of this silliness
in the last hour, you accused me of smearing you on APF.
You may be my friend, but at some point, I just can't take it anymore.
I want your assurance, before I post a Bruce isn't perfect story I
do know, that you will not get angry at my post.
I can't promise how I will feel. I have never posted against you in any way
until now, and even now it was solely because of your relentless attacks on
me.
I don't see why you feel anything here is your battle. I am weary of the
entire endless bickering, but will not allow attacks to go
Bruce
I am not attacking you and why you have that perception I just don't
understand. You are not my enemy. you are my friend, but that doesn't
mean I can't have disagreements with you over something, which is all
I have. disagreements
I only post facts. no conjecture.
I will be as gentle
Howdy Rich et al,
I know this may not be the best time ... but I just gotta ...
It's an old, old line ...
I thought that I didn't make any mistakes in my life, but I was wrong
(Sorry 'bout that , y'all)
ad
From: Richard Halegua Comic Art sa...@comic-art.com
Changing the subject line to get off of the old thread...
Rich - you're making me laugh! You sound like the self-appointed Tony
Soprano of MoPo! Quit prefacing your treatises by saying you're Bruce's
friend or Sean's friend or Grey's friend or my friend or anybody's friend -
before
Okay Folks.. here goes.
Before I put this down, I want everyone here to know some simple
things, including Bruce.
Bruce is my friend and has been for a very long time. I first met
Bruce at the 1968 Comic Art con in NYC when I was just 11 years old.
We never really hung out much then for
From: Robert C. Mannheim [mailto:robert.mannh...@midsystems.com]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 8:32 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: RE: [MOPO] Kudaka and Lippincott
For my two cents, I believe that all concerned should consider what they are
publishing on a public forum. You are
Just in case you missed my post to the prior thread now, you are
taking potshots at another industry leader. Do you guys eat your young, as
well
For my two cents, I believe that all concerned should consider what they are
publishing on a public forum. You are all talking about
very well said Robert
At 08:41 PM 6/11/2012, Robert C. Mannheim wrote:
From: Robert C. Mannheim [mailto:robert.mannh...@midsystems.com]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 8:32 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: RE: [MOPO] Kudaka and Lippincott
For my two cents, I believe that all
Marc Antony at your service
;-)
At 08:04 PM 6/11/2012, David Kusumoto wrote:
Changing the subject line to get off of the old thread...
Rich - you're making me laugh! You sound like the self-appointed
Tony Soprano of MoPo! Quit prefacing your treatises by saying
you're Bruce's friend or
46 matches
Mail list logo
