Dear Morphometricians
I am new in geometric morphometrics. I have a question perhaps quite simple
with regards to 2D GM. I am comparing the size/shape of human skulls from
different sources using photographs taken in norma lateralis. One part was
obtained through a standardized protocol while the
Dear all
I have an inquiry perhaps trivial!!. I want to know if there exist a
technique/method to date evolutionary divergence using morphometric or
geometric morphometric data in a similar way that the divergence dating
using molecular variants. For example, using evolutionary rates to obtain
Dear morphometricians,
Currently I am performing a study on 3D human craniofacial morphology. I
have data derived from microscribe and from 3D models obtained from CT
scans and procesed in landmark Editor software. My question is if it is
possible to combine both kinds of 3D data within the same
Dear All
I am analyzing 3D coordinates from non-human primate molars. I have in the
same dataset coordinate data for M1, M2 y M3. I performed multivariate
analysis using the size and shape (form) of all teeth together (M1, M2 and
M3). Now I am interested in perform analysis comparing individual
lt;- ProcGPA(a$arr).
>
> The object "a" is a list, the array is an element (arr) of the list.
>
> Let me know if works,
>
> Antonio
>
> 2017-07-13 4:59 GMT+01:00 Pablo Fisichella <fisichellapa...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Dear All
>>
>> I am using the pack
Dear All
I am using the package Morpho in order to make some GM analyses but I
obtained some errors. Now I am trying to use the function read.csv.folder
I ran this command
a<-read.csv.folder("E:/Documents/Zan2", x = 2:44, y = 2:4, rownames = NULL,
header = TRUE, dec = ",", sep = ";", pattern =
hed.specimens <-
> placePatch(atlas=atlas,dat.array=data,path="E:/Documents/hominoid",prefix
> ='', fileext=".ply"))
>
> If the dimnames(data)[[3]] perfectly match the filenames of your ply
> files (without the “.ply”), it should work.
> Best
> Ryan
>
scans to
> landmarks obtained normally. I found the laser scans to be pretty decent,
> but I unfortunately cannot speak to photogrammetry as I've never personally
> tried it.
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 3:29 PM Pablo Fisichella <
> fisichellapa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>&g
tion software have
> improved tremendously (almost to the point of real-time in some cases), but
> I believe process is essentially the same. Perhaps someone with more recent
> knowledge of this technology can chime in.
>
>
>
> M
>
>
>
> *From:* Pablo Fisichel
Dear All
I´m trying to obtain surface scans from human skulls and lithic artifacts
(projectile points). I wonder how can I get the most complete possible
scans, I mean usually is not possibly to obtain a complete scan at once. I
know that several post-scan processing software have functions to
10 matches
Mail list logo