If I might butt inI have to agree. I have tried everything from
changing this preference to that preference and still can't get DUN to
work properly. It will only dial for Microsft products only. There is
an after-taste in my mouth and it's bitter.
There could be 2 seperate issues
I'm looking into using Mozilla as our default mail/web package, and I'm
wondering if it's possible to do the following:
- store user profiles in a user's home directory on a network, and have
Mozilla look there by default (mapped network drive)
- automate the process of creating an account.
Just a short question. Isn't it possible to disable the two dashes (--)
which are automatically added in top of every signature (Mozilla 0.9.6)?
Best Regards,
Thomas
Am 20.12.2001 09:34 schrieb TJH folgendes:
Just a short question. Isn't it possible to disable the two dashes (--)
which are automatically added in top of every signature (Mozilla 0.9.6)?
No. And it's -- , not just --.
This is the standard signature delimeter according to son-of-rfc-1036:
I demand that flacco may or may not have written...
- home page set to our intranet employee home page;
You can set the default home page and many other preferences by editing
the .js files in bin/defaults/pref
But should it be this way? Should focus automatically go into the URL
bar?
Yes. I _love_ this.
Or should Ctrl-W function the same there as in the rest of
display panes?
Yes. This should also work.
Gerv
Pratik wrote:
[snip]
Is there anyone else seeing this bug? I go to cnn.com all the time and I
haven't seen it.
Do you have the same cache setting? Same OS (Why2K)?
The HTTP headers from cnn.com say
HTTP/1.1 200 OKCRLF
Server: Netscape-Enterprise/4.1CRLF
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ra
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
But should it be this way? Should focus automatically go into the URL
bar? Or should Ctrl-W function the same there as in the rest of
display panes?
Focus should certainly go into the URL bar as most people open a new
window in order to
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001 03:58:07 -0600,
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Go to CNN one day, go to it a few days later and you'll see the exact
:same page until you hit the reload button. Few days being say over the
:weekend. Nothing more to it.
Are you going through a proxy? If not, are you sure,
Holger,
I Keep learning everyday! In my private E-mail I use a HTML sig file
with a table to make it look a bit better. With what you just discribed,
does this mean that my private signature (not displayed here) is actualy
not done ?
On 20-12-2001 10:10, Holger Metzger made an attempt to
Am 20.12.2001 12:16 schrieb Arthur folgendes:
Holger,
I Keep learning everyday! In my private E-mail I use a HTML sig file
with a table to make it look a bit better. With what you just discribed,
does this mean that my private signature (not displayed here) is actualy
not done ?
Wat you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (lambliu) wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
when I try to sign in after typed name and password ,
the browser report :
login.yahoo.com could not be found, please check the name and try again
but I can sign in use IE, what's the matter?
I'm having the same problem,
Christopher Jahn wrote:
Mmmm...I did not describe it clearly.
Please try to save files from WebPage or save attachment in
Netscape Mail, and rename files except ext. filename. After
that you will see that the files lost ext. filename. :-(
I see what you're doing - instead of only
Hello,
is there a hidden preference to switch of background images? I don't
want to change the color of the page, but I use mozilla over the network
and pages with brackground images are damn slow.
Regards,
Helge
Peter Trudelle wrote:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
Post in text/plain only, please?
/Jonas
Johnny Yen wrote:
One benefit is that users can tell, at a glance, the current site, and
which site such bookmarks came from, much faster than they could ever
read the URL. They can thus browse faster and with fewer errors.
Absolutely. Site/page icons is a great feature. But automatically
shevek wrote:
Someone please implement this:
I would like to be able to elect to have PRE formatted text wrapped
to fit in the window.
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16909
I worked a little on this, but need some help to finish off the feature.
Also please put TEXT
JTK wrote:
Pratik wrote:
The HTTP headers from cnn.com say
HTTP/1.1 200 OKCRLF
Server: Netscape-Enterprise/4.1CRLF
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 23:28:30 GMTCRLF
Last-modified: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 23:28:31 GMTCRLF
Expires: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 23:29:31 GMTCRLF
Cache-control: private,max-age=60CRLF
Hi there.
In my code, I do:
...
main.document.open(), main is a frame
...
main.document.write(input type=text name=t
main.document.close();
After this I call a funcion that does:
main.document.t.value=hello;
...
But it doesn't work on Mozilla.
It works on IE, and Netscape.
Thanks
On 12/20/01 04:58 AM, JTK wrote:
Pratik wrote:
[snip]
Is there anyone else seeing this bug? I go to cnn.com all the time and I
haven't seen it.
Do you have the same cache setting? Same OS (Why2K)?
Same cache setting on Linux.
The HTTP headers from cnn.com say
HTTP/1.1
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
This sentence:
That is just as nice for people who visit than auto-requesting them.
Should have been:
That is just as nice for people who visit as auto-requesting them is.
is there a hidden preference to switch of background images?
Put:
* { background-image: none !important}
in the userContent.css file in the chrome/ directory in your profile
Boris
-
617-864-9910
-
Why can one call the time component of the preceding 4-vector
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Christian Biesinger wrote:
JTK wrote:
Pratik wrote:
The HTTP headers from cnn.com say
HTTP/1.1 200 OKCRLF
Server: Netscape-Enterprise/4.1CRLF
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 23:28:30 GMTCRLF
Last-modified: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 23:28:31 GMTCRLF
Expires: Wed, 19 Dec 2001
DeMoN LaG wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 19 Dec 2001:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Okay grin. Here's another. Light Blue background, Letter is Black
with Grey
David Gerard wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001 03:58:07 -0600,
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Go to CNN one day, go to it a few days later and you'll see the exact
:same page until you hit the reload button. Few days being say over the
:weekend. Nothing more to it.
Are you going through
Pratik wrote:
Do you have the same cache setting? Same OS (Why2K)?
Same cache setting on Linux.
A, that's bolstering my CR/LF WAG.
Let me make a WAG: it's the CR/LF line ends.
Nope. Thats just the way websniffer displays it
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], JTK wrote:
Pratik wrote:
Nope. Thats just the way websniffer displays it
(http://webtools.mozilla.org/web-sniffer/). Thats not the fault.
Is the cache and specifically the headers written thereto plaintext? If
so, I upgrade my WAG to a WAH (wild-ass
Fred Figueiredo wrote:
After this I call a funcion that does:
main.document.t.value=hello;
...
Is t an element (ie using document.all)? If so, you should be doing
main.document.getElementById('t').value=hello;
Ian
Fred Figueiredo wrote:
After this I call a funcion that does:
main.document.t.value=hello;
...
Is t an element (ie using document.all)? If so, you should be doing
main.document.getElementById('t').value=hello;
Ian
Ian Thomas wrote:
Fred Figueiredo wrote:
After this I call a funcion that does:
main.document.t.value=hello;
...
Is t an element (ie using document.all)? If so, you should be doing
main.document.getElementById('t').value=hello;
Ian
He didn't give the input tag an id. He
Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
As most Mozilla users you'll never use this shortcut, but Mozilla won't
care about that someday when you press back thinking that you are in
the textarea, but loosing all your carefuly thought Slashdot message,
because you weren't in the textarea.
Huh?!? If
Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
Wrong. The point is that this is a convienient way for IE users to
get a feel for our product. Just because IE does it doesn't make it
bad. I myself will never use it, as I've grown up on alt left/right
arrow.
As most Mozilla users you'll never use this
Sören Kuklau wrote:
Thanks, the shot looks neat. I partly still prefer the old Modern chrome -
sorry - to the new one... it was a bit _more_ different. Maybe not
convenient enough or so though...
The way you arranged the menu bar is interesting. So we have both IE _and_
Mozilla menus,
Peter Mutsaers wrote:
As most Mozilla users you'll never use this shortcut, but Mozilla
won't care about that someday when you press back thinking that you
are in the textarea, but loosing all your carefuly thought Slashdot
message, because you weren't in the textarea.
Huh?!? If I do
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 20 Dec 2001:
Let me ask a really Dumb question it hasn't stopped me before.
Please explain why a person that is using a strictly text only
reader such as Newswatcher (for mac) is posting in a
I've turned off Show Web Site Icons, so I no longer get favicon.ico,
or whatever, showing when I navigate to a site - BUT the icon for
whatever search engine I'm using appears in the URL section of the
navigation toolbar whenever I start to type in an address. Is there
any way of turning this
Holger Metzger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 20 Dec 2001:
it to mangling and makes it rather less conspicuous. A standard
delimiter line makes it possible for reading agents to handle
signatures specially if desired. (This is unfortunately hampered
Peter Mutsaers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on
20 Dec 2001:
Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
As most Mozilla users you'll never use this shortcut, but Mozilla
won't care about that someday when you press back thinking that
you are in the textarea, but
Has anyone downloaded todays build? If so, how does it look? Anything
major changed? How's the stability looking? I've been using Build ID:
2001121508 and loving it.
--
Wayne Alligood/Amelia Island, Florida
Compaq Computer running Windows XP/ Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Words rightly spoken
I didn't fully today's build, but it seems that there may be a crash problem
when switching theme on some sites. Yesterday's build is wonderful hovever,
with a big performance increase.
WDA wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
Subject:
Today's Build
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
DeMoN LaG n@a wrote:
Holger Metzger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
it to mangling and makes it rather less conspicuous. A standard
delimiter line makes it possible for reading agents to handle
signatures specially if desired. (This is unfortunately hampered by
I'm running builds of 0.9.6 on Win98. I can't get Flash player to work.
It appears in the list from about:plugins (npswf32.dll), and the same
plugin works fine on NS6.2.1 on the same system. Right-clicking on a
Flash animation gives a context menu with About Macromedia flash Player
5 plus
Dan Howard wrote:
I'm running builds of 0.9.6 on Win98. I can't get Flash player to work.
It appears in the list from about:plugins (npswf32.dll), and the same
plugin works fine on NS6.2.1 on the same system. Right-clicking on a
Flash animation gives a context menu with About
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
DeMoN LaG wrote:
Kill the HTML. It looks horrible in text only readers. Don't post
binaries to non binary newsgroups, it's rude
Let me ask a really Dumb question it hasn't stopped me before. Please
explain why a person that is using a strictly text only
DeMoN LaG n@a wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Andrea Monni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 19 Dec 2001:
We should go for a Mozilla version without symbols... like text
only...
Text could be offensive too, how about
I tryed it and it still doesn't work.
I think the problem, is after da instruction:
main.document.close();
When I trie to access main.document.getElementById('t').value, it doesnt
exists yet.
I've put an alert before this last instuction.
On IE, Netscape and Opera all the HTML is written (and
Johnny Yen wrote:
Here again, it's a helluva lot easier to throw a favicon into the root
rather than ad link rel=icon to hundreds and hundreds of pages just to
get the same effect.
So how do you add the same background to all of your pages? favbg.ico?
--
Mike Gratton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 21 Dec 2001 00:20:41 GMT,
Magnus W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:DeMoN LaG n@a wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
: Andrea Monni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 19 Dec 2001:
: We should go for a Mozilla version without symbols... like
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 18:28:01 +0100, Sören Kuklau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1st it's December 17th, not 14th.
2nd I have no clue what you're talking about, probably because I'm not from
the U.S.
I _AM_ from the US, and I think that posted has obviously lost his mind. :-)
Erik Harris
Chris Hoess wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], JTK wrote:
Pratik wrote:
Nope. Thats just the way websniffer displays it
(http://webtools.mozilla.org/web-sniffer/). Thats not the fault.
Is the cache and specifically the headers written thereto plaintext? If
so, I upgrade my
On 12/20/2001 11:47 PM, JTK wrote:
snipping all the crap
Well again, I run IE through the same exact Proxomitron, and view the
exact same CNN, and get two different behaviors. Either two programs
are broken in such a way that the errors cancel each other out, or one
program has a broken cache.
Pratik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 21 Dec 2001:
The question still stands. Did you try out what the bug suggests?
Yes or No? And did that solve your problem? Yes or No?
My guesses:
No
N/A
--
ICQ: N/A (temporarily)
AIM: FlyersR1 9
email: [EMAIL
0.8, I think.
Ian Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Sören Kuklau wrote:
Thanks, the shot looks neat. I partly still prefer the old Modern
chrome -
sorry - to the new one... it was a bit _more_ different. Maybe not
convenient
Daniel Veditz wrote:
Sören Kuklau wrote:
Well makes me wonder what's about all those MachV new features though then.
Will they be in Mozilla?! Doesn't this disagree to the Mozilla 1.0 Manifest?
Yes, it does.
Well, nothing like airing dirty laundry, eh Dan? ;-)
In fact, when you guys get
Gervase Markham wrote:
But should it be this way? Should focus automatically go into the URL
bar?
Yes. I _love_ this.
This has been discussed in the UI newsgroup. You may love it, but it is
almost always a defect. When a new window has content loaded, the
content should be focused so
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], JTK wrote:
Chris Hoess wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], JTK wrote:
Pratik wrote:
Nope. Thats just the way websniffer displays it
(http://webtools.mozilla.org/web-sniffer/). Thats not the fault.
Is the cache and specifically the headers written
56 matches
Mail list logo
