hi there
i am having big trouble using dynamic html in netscape 62 to dynamically
append table-cells with input fields and checkbox-controls
everything works fine in IE5 but in netscape the dynamically generated
checkboxes (and radios) are not selectable they even don't provide any
onclick /
We will help you
get
the mortgage loan you want!
Only takes 2 minutes to fill out our form.
Whether a new
home loan is what you seek orto refinance your current home loan at a
lower interest rate and payment, we can
help!Mortgage rates
haven't been this low in the last 12 months, take
i found the answer: the bug is in the clone-method if i generate checks /
radios on my own and replace the cloned ones by them, it works :)
fabi
Andrea Monni wrote:
Peter Lairo wrote:
excellent suggestions I'm following the bug, and I signed up for
SpamCop - thank you very much :) :) :)
No problem I am really sick and tired of all the spam I'm receiving so
I decided to take some actions Reporting the spam to SpamCop is the
Hiya,
Mozilla is absolutely superb. Anyone think that having a feature
where you can select multiple home pages would be a good idea ? I'd
like Mozilla to rotate on a new browser through a list of home pages,
eg. news.com, oreillynet.com, mozilla.org, java.sun.com etc. etc.
rather than just
Chris Newman wrote:
Hiya,
Mozilla is absolutely superb Anyone think that having a feature
where you can select multiple home pages would be a good idea ? I'd
like Mozilla to rotate on a new browser through a list of home pages,
eg newscom, oreillynetcom, mozillaorg, javasuncom etc etc
Another possible solution that would work in most browsers is to write
yourself a little HTML page and save it locally In the page have some
javascript that selects the 'home page' you want either randomly or
based on the date/time
If you wanted to be really fancy you could save the page
Mark Slater wrote:
There's been a bug filed on this already Couldn't find it tho :)
http://bugzillamozillaorg/show_bugcgi?id=126224
Peemm wrote:
It might be that I missed your point; I merely skimmed through the
postings in this long thread, and probably I didn't get all the nuances
Nevertheless I've got the impression that you have a very positive view
on porn
I wasn't talking about my own personal opinion on porn,
ARE YOU TIRED OF PAYING TOO MUCH FOR XXX
VIDEOS, DVDS TOYS?
**
CLEARANCE DVD's, TOYS and VHS **
Great Adult Video and Toy Store with
over 7000 + Products online
Are you looking for Vibrators,
Penis Extensions, Lingerie, Love Dolls,
Vivid Video Super Sale!
Just wondering if anyone knows about the plan to implement the
keyaccess field in a link According to the HTML 401 docs, the
following should work:
a href=indexhtml keyaccess=nhome page/a
and then I hit n and it should take me to the page It doesn't work
and I can't find a bug on it
Any
Your boss is an asshole
Your girlfriend is lame
Your friends keep asking you to help them bury bodies
The 15-year-old dickhead at the drive-through forgot your fries, again
http://www.freeandkinky.com/erup
Put down the high-powered rifle, and look at some
FREE HARDCORE PORN!!
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Craig Jones wrote:
Just wondering if anyone knows about the plan to implement the
keyaccess field in a link.
accesskey, surely?
--
Chris Hoess
Sorry that should have been accesskey
a href=indexhtml accesskey=nhome page/a
The above still does not work
Craig
Craig Jones wrote:
Just wondering if anyone knows about the plan to implement the
keyaccess field in a link According to the HTML 401 docs, the
following should work:
a
Use alt-accesskey, so alt-n in your example
Craig Jones wrote:
Sorry that should have been accesskey
a href=indexhtml accesskey=nhome page/a
The above still does not work
Craig
Peter Lairo wrote:
Andrea Monni wrote:
Peter Lairo wrote:
excellent suggestions I'm following the bug, and I signed up for
SpamCop - thank you very much :) :) :)
No problem I am really sick and tired of all the spam I'm receiving
so I decided to take some actions Reporting the spam
Fred Stone wrote:
BTW, spamcop sent me an e-mail address to which i should *forward* spam
that i receive. I also thought that they need to receive the spam's
*header*.
If I just forward a spam mail, is the header included? (My settings are:
forward *inline*
If you view all headers,
, Mr Blumenthal said
---
BTW: here's the link to the story (yeah, it's ugly):
http://rtnewsglobetechnologycom/servlet/RTGAMArticleHTMLTemplate/D,B/20020305/gtmsms?tf=tgam%252Frealtime%252Ffullstory_Techhtmlcf=globetechnology/tech-config-neutralslug=gtmsmsdate=20020305archive=RTGAMsite=Technology
Title: kuchi
If you can not see this page please
click: http://www.kuchi.co.il/design1.html
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Peemm wrote:
It might be that I missed your point; I merely skimmed through the
postings in this long thread, and probably I didn't get all the
nuances. Nevertheless I've got the impression that you have a very
positive view on porn
I wasn't talking about my
Is there a way to associate a helper application with a mime type in
Netscape 62+ through a script or some other programatic means? I haven't
seen a way short of directly modifying each profile's mimetypesrdf file
DanG
You'll notice that my bitching finally got AOL to add the two-line
percent complete in the download progress box title fix that I posted
a while back
Peemm wrote:
I wouldn't call it a positive view on women that females are weaker and
more naive than males and therefore it is a mans job to protect women
from all the evilness on this planet -- I would call it an EXTREMELY
SEXIST view on women!!!
But he never wrote that! You are
JTK wrote:
You'll notice that my bitching finally got AOL to add the two-line
percent complete in the download progress box title fix that I posted
a while back
Well, I'm grateful but if I said, Thanks JTK, you'd only accuse me of
taking the piss, so I won't bother ;-)
(Seriously, it's a
JTK wrote:
You'll notice that my bitching finally got AOL to add the two-line
percent complete in the download progress box title fix that I posted
a while back
Die
Neil M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in news:3C8509F5.6070809
@sympatico.ca:
Chris Newman wrote:
Hiya,
Mozilla is absolutely superb. Anyone think that having a feature
where you can select multiple home pages would be a good idea ? I'd
like Mozilla to rotate on a new browser through a list
Michael A. Koenecke wrote:
Neil M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in news:3C8509F5.6070809
@sympatico.ca:
javascript:a = Math.round(Math.random() * 3);if (a == 1) {
document.location=http://www.mozillanews.org;} else if (a == 2) {
document.location=http://mozilla.org;} else {
JTK wrote:
You'll notice that my bitching finally got AOL to add the two-line
percent complete in the download progress box title fix that I posted
a while back
For those who want to know who really deserves the credit, three cheers
for Bill Law, who appears to have had some assistance
Christian Biesinger wrote:
Michael A. Koenecke wrote:
Neil M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in news:3C8509F5.6070809
@sympatico.ca:
javascript:a = Math.round(Math.random() * 3);if (a == 1) {
document.location=http://www.mozillanews.org;} else if (a == 2) {
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Only subjectively can you say the same about
pornography.
/Jonas
There are many people that are addicted to porn as well. And many are
closet pedephiles.
There is a Sheriff's office that has a website and chat line that they
use to find and arrest Pediphiles.
In
On 3/5/2002 11:24 PM, cep apparently wrote exactly the following:
Loaded as a first-timer 09.08 and got so happy with it, that after
discovering news.xul etcetera, I soon enough locked myself in some XUL
test control element screen, showing the build of the browser screen in
red and blue
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], KCOM wrote:
[snip]
And you got this idea that editing a Reuters press release would be a
plausible troll...why?
--
Chris Hoess
[posted and mailed]
And it came to pass that margaret Andrews wrote:
What is the easiest way to transfer Netscape emails from one
PC to another ? For a NON TECHNICAL person
I have a new PC with N 6.2
My old pc has N 6.1
Is a CD Burner is the easiest way to tansfer ?
If so pls.
Ok here's the deal I downloaded a cool DHTML animation but can't
remember where, it may even be a testase for mozilla DHTML performance,
I don't remember Anyways, I uploaded it on my site here :
http://pagesinfinitnet/wcg/dhtml/duplexhtml
Other files that came with the package are all also
Phillip M Jones, CET wrote:
There is a Sheriff's office that has a website and chat line that they
use to find and arrest Pediphiles
In every case when evidence is gathered when the person is arrested
They have vast quantities of of porn of all types and are subscribed to
many porn sites of
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Computer security companies on Tuesday
warned that a dangerous new Internet worm that is spreading will try
to delete and overwrite files on infected computers beginning on
Wednesday that run Mozilla and Netscape 6 builds.
The worm, dubbed Klez.E, is programmed to
And it came to pass that KCOM, the bald-faced lying scum, wrote:
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Computer security companies on
Tuesday warned that a dangerous new Internet worm that is
spreading will try to delete and overwrite files on infected
computers beginning on Wednesday that run Mozilla
Would you look at that!
I'm running 2002030511 on Win98 I thought I'd give print preview
another try, expecting the usual problems Somebody snuck in a new
toolbar with useful options, including (hang on) a Close button!
In all seriousness, thanks to those who have been working so hard on
this
This bug was discovered on a nightly build of mozilla just after 0.9.8
(im at school, i dont have the exact number with me) it has been
verified to work for me:
the bug involves the target frame link not appearing on the correct
window when multiple windows are open that have the same frame
Bundy wrote:
Mozilla looks like is going in the wrong direction The early builds of
98 were much better The mail-news focus bug is horrible 10 is going
to be way off in the future
--Kyle
What are you talking about?
Mozilla 099 has not been released yet
This is what mozilla need, a little more of atractive basic simplicity
http://wwwgeocitiescom/charadew/exsertus/cableriahtml
Kryptolus wrote:
Bundy wrote:
Mozilla looks like is going in the wrong direction The early builds
of 98 were much better The mail-news focus bug is horrible 10 is
On 03/05/2002 10:07 PM, Bundy wrote:
Mozilla looks like is going in the wrong direction The early builds of
98 were much better The mail-news focus bug is horrible 10 is going
to be way off in the future
--Kyle
The 099 Milestone has NOT been released, we're only in the nightly
build
MOST RECOMMENDED ADULT ENTERTAINMENT
GET LAID, NO STRINGSOver 100,000 horny women have signed up to get fucked at Sex2go. Want to have sex with one of them? Just make contact! You can see their photos, check out their spread open pussies, email them,
Jay Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED];
On 03/05/2002 10:07 PM, Bundy wrote:
Mozilla looks like is going in the wrong direction. The early builds of
.9.8 were much better. The mail-news focus bug is horrible. 1.0 is going
to be way off in the future
Wrong Jay
Kryptolus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Bundy wrote:
Mozilla looks like is going in the wrong direction. The early builds of
.9.8 were much better. The mail-news focus bug is horrible. 1.0 is going
to be way off in the future
--Kyle
Not even Garica knew about this, which shocks me.
It's a peice of shit though.
Bundy wrote:
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/latest-0.9.9
Not even Garica knew about this, which shocks me.
It's a peice of shit though.
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/latest-0.9.9/mozilla-win32-installer.exe
It's still a peice of shit.
Bundy wrote:
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/latest-0.9.9
Not even Garica knew about this, which shocks me.
It's a peice of shit though.
You have an incomplete understanding of how the Mozilla builds work.
Anything in the latest directory is /not/ a milestone release. The
In article vwih8.19602$[EMAIL PROTECTED], Bundy wrote:
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/latest-0.9.9
Not even Garica knew about this, which shocks me.
It's a peice of shit though.
...which is interesting and all, but
URL:ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/releases/mozilla0.9.9
And it came to pass that Bundy wrote:
Jay Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
On 03/05/2002 10:07 PM, Bundy wrote:
Mozilla looks like is going in the wrong direction. The
early builds of .9.8 were much better. The mail-news
focus bug is
Bundy wrote:
Jay Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
On 03/05/2002 10:07 PM, Bundy wrote:
Mozilla looks like is going in the wrong direction. The early builds of
.9.8 were much better. The mail-news focus bug is horrible. 1.0 is going
to be
Bundy wrote:
Yes it has. I got it from the ftp server.
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/latest-0.9.9
You seem to be new to the Mozilla release cycle. Mozilla makes nightly
branch builds available for testers and developers. That is what you
downloaded at the URL above. Those
ahem. sorry but your understanding of mozilla development cycle is
totaly wrong. there at te and of the linh you have given it says
latest-0.99. Means the development on 0.9.9 is continuing. When it is
ready, you will find it in
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/releases/
directory.
it is
And it came to pass that Bundy wrote:
Kryptolus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Bundy wrote:
Mozilla looks like is going in the wrong direction. The
early builds of .9.8 were much better. The mail-news
focus bug is horrible. 1.0 is going
[posted and mailed]
And it came to pass that Bundy wrote:
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/latest-0.9.9
Not even Garica knew about this, which shocks me.
Hey, Einstein, that's the NIGHTLY directory, not the RELEASE
directory.
Peabrain.
--
}:-) Christopher Jahn
{:-(
Bundy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in news:irih8.19579$0S4.10803726
@typhoon.southeast.rr.com, on 06 Mar 2002:
Wrong Jay
Download from Mozilla
Welcome to Mozilla Setup. You are about to install Mozilla version
0.9.9.2002030514
Check got it from the FTP server.
Someone with such a cocky
Bundy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 06 Mar 2002:
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/latest-0.9.9/mozilla-win32
-installer.exe
It's still a peice of shit.
The 1.0 trunk is doing quite nicely, if you ask me. I don't know how
good the
57 matches
Mail list logo
