Hi,
The place where I work has blocked access to doubleclick. Now every
time I go to a site with adverts on it I get a pop-up error telling me
that Mozilla can't find doubleclick. I preferred the adverts!
Clicking block images from this server stops the ads coming up as
broken images, but
Alex Farran wrote:
Hi,
The place where I work has blocked access to doubleclick. Now every
time I go to a site with adverts on it I get a pop-up error telling me
that Mozilla can't find doubleclick. I preferred the adverts!
Find your hosts file, under Windows NT its under:
Ian Davey wrote:
Find your hosts file, under Windows NT its under:
c:\winnt\system32\drivers\etc
and add:
127.0.0.1 doubleclick.net
127.0.0.1 ad.doubleclick.net
(ad.uk.doubleclick.net in my case)
Thanks, that's nearly done it. Now I get the connection was refused
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ian Davey wrote:
Alex Farran wrote:
Hi,
The place where I work has blocked access to doubleclick. Now every
time I go to a site with adverts on it I get a pop-up error telling me
that Mozilla can't find doubleclick. I preferred the adverts!
Find your
michael lefevre wrote:
i guess you could replace 127.0.0.1 in the above with the address of
the corporate web site or something, so mozilla will give 404 errors in
the page instead of the annoying popups. or you could install some kind
of simple web service on your machine.
Thanks,
Recent builds (I'm using 2002030511 for Win32) include new print preview
tools, including a page setup button that allows you to specify whether
background images will appear. It works on preview for me, but I didn't
try printing a page out.
Georg Maaß wrote:
I make heavy use of backgground
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
In every case when evidence is gathered when the person is arrested.
They have vast quantities of of porn of all types and are subscribed to
many porn sites of all types.
So according to your logic every pedophile is a porn addict. Does
that make every porn
Fred Stone wrote:
Peter Lairo wrote:
If I just forward a spam mail, is the header included? (My settings
are: forward *inline*)
If you view all headers, they'll show up in the forwarded email.
I just noticed that (in this NG) the Forward button doesn't do
anything (bug?). I'm using build
Dan Howard wrote:
Recent builds (I'm using 2002030511 for Win32) include new print preview
tools, including a page setup button that allows you to specify whether
background images will appear. It works on preview for me, but I didn't
try printing a page out.
I is enough, when someone
On 3/6/2002 5:07 AM, Bundy apparently wrote exactly the following:
Mozilla looks like is going in the wrong direction. The early builds of
..9.8 were much better. The mail-news focus bug is horrible. 1.0 is
going to be way off in the future
0.9.9 was NOT released yet.
--
Regards,
Sören
On 3/6/2002 7:16 AM, Bundy apparently wrote exactly the following:
Kryptolus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Bundy wrote:
Mozilla looks like is going in the wrong direction. The early builds of
.9.8 were much better. The mail-news focus bug is
On 3/6/2002 7:12 AM, Bundy apparently wrote exactly the following:
Jay Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
On 03/05/2002 10:07 PM, Bundy wrote:
Mozilla looks like is going in the wrong direction. The early builds of
.9.8 were much better. The
Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 06 Mar
2002:
NO NO NO, it was JTK who fixed this. Really.
Of course. Without him, nothing would ever have been fixed, ever.
Every bug in Bugzilla would still be either Assigned or New, right?
--
AIM:
Pratik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
The *real* story
http://www.reuters.com/news_article.jhtml?type=searchStoryID=665144
fyi, it *doesn't* affect NS6 and Mozilla.
Pratik.
FYI, the article mentions *any* email package.
It does not say
DeMoN LaG wrote:
Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 06 Mar
2002:
NO NO NO, it was JTK who fixed this. Really.
Of course. Without him, nothing would ever have been fixed, ever.
Every bug in Bugzilla would still be either Assigned or New,
Laubrino wrote:
And what about long long pages? Quite hard to scroll this way...
i guess this is a possible solution, the eagle eye will illustrate the
canvas with a grid, when the page is more long than the eagle eye can
illustrate, moving the red frame to the direccion where the page
michael lefevre wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ian Davey wrote:
Alex Farran wrote:
Hi,
The place where I work has blocked access to doubleclick. Now every
time I go to a site with adverts on it I get a pop-up error telling me
that Mozilla can't find doubleclick. I preferred the
On Wed, 06 Mar 2002 09:35:48 -0500, Gazwad cried into the void:
Pratik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
The *real* story
http://www.reuters.com/news_article.jhtml?type=searchStoryID=665144
fyi, it *doesn't* affect NS6 and Mozilla.
Pratik.
gavin long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
Yeah. I've had one or two others sneak by, too. This kind of thing is
always going to be an arms race...
But rather a stupid one for the advertisers surely? - they're trying to force
adverts on people who have gone to the trouble to
I have the same problem today, using NS 6.2.1 -- site comes in OK with
IE6, but just spins its wheels on a blank page with NS, eventually
coming back with connection refused. I ran the page through the W3C
HTML validation service (using IE), and after an inordinately long time,
it responded
The *real* story
http://www.reuters.com/news_article.jhtml?type=searchStoryID=665144
fyi, it *doesn't* affect NS6 and Mozilla.
Pratik.
FYI, the article mentions *any* email package.
It does not say that NS6 and Mozilla are excluded.
Get your facts right before you flame anyone
The original poster is *obviously* a troll(1). Unless you *know* that
Mozilla / Netscape 6 is vulnerable to automatically(2) running or
spreading the virus and you have a testcase, please stop responding /
posting to this thread.
Thanks.
(1) somebody who knowingly posts wrong information and
Peter Lairo wrote:
It is high time an effective law is passed prohibiting spam. This seems
to be a no-bariner to me.
I would vote a politician into office on this issue alone, as long as
he/she isn't a real jerk.
We in norway have an anti-spam law now :) if one breaks it, one is
just to put it simple :
a few months ago i was beta testing windows XP.
Just because i was using something that said Windows XP, it did't mean
that this was the *actual* windows XP that people are using nowadays.
It just means that i had windows XP beta or XP release candidate.
It's not the
Can someone tell me why my banking site produce an empty page with
mozilla build 20020228.
Thanks
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN
html
head
titleDAB Post Manager/title
/head
script language=JavaScript1.2
var ns4 = (document.layers) ? 1 : 0;
var ie4 =
Just wondering what people on this forum think about Mozilla's usability in
a business environment.
I have no doubts that the browser, even in it's current form can be
deployed. My concern however is the Mail application.
Has anyone deployed Mozilla on a large scale? What shortcomings did
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Guenter Huerkamp wrote:
Can someone tell me why my banking site produce an empty page with
mozilla build 20020228.
Thanks
[snip]
script language=JavaScript1.2
var ns4 = (document.layers) ? 1 : 0;
var ie4 = (document.all) ? 1 : 0;
gavin long wrote:
JTK wrote:
You'll notice that my bitching finally got AOL to add the two-line
percent complete in the download progress box title fix that I
posted a while back.
For those who want to know who really deserves the credit, three cheers
for Bill Law, who appears to
You appear to be deluded. Get a life.
--
Gazwad
Freelance scientist and people tester.
Ben Bucksch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
The original poster is *obviously* a troll(1). Unless you *know* that
Mozilla / Netscape 6 is vulnerable to
Gazwad Dont Be So Far King Wee Tar Did wrote in news:3c868b06$1
@news1.homechoice.co.uk, on 06 Mar 2002:
You appear to be deluded. Get a life.
You are a troll, sir. Good bye! *plonk*
--
AIM: FlyersR1 9
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_ = m
Bundy,
I think you have misunderstood how Mozilla releases work, or rather
how they are named.
To begin, a release signifies a publicly available piece of software
called Mozilla, which has achieved certain stability milestones. A
milestone release is made available publicly every six weeks, or
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
I wouldn't call it a positive view on women that females are weaker
and more naive than males and therefore it is a mans job to protect
women from all the evilness on this planet -- I would call it an
EXTREMELY SEXIST view on women!!!
But he never wrote that!
http://www.mozilla.org.uk/docs/personae/
This is my contribution to the Who is Mozilla's target user? debate.
Comments welcome :-)
Gerv
DeMaN LoG n@a wrote in message news:204.29.187.156...
You are a troll, sir. Good bye! *plonk*
Victim
--
Gazwad
Freelance scientist and people tester.
Using Mozilla 0.9.8, can someone tell me how to turn on favaicons?
Thanks
--
Wayne Alligood/Amelia Island, Florida
Compaq Computer running Windows XP/ Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Words rightly spoken are like apples of gold in pictures of silver.
You've never seen anything quite like this before! BLOW combines wrestling, beautiful women, and so much lesbian sex! Not just a wrestling site though, BLOW adds 300,000+ pics to the mix. Trust your friends from 4PlayMail to find you the hottest entertainment to literally blow you
People love to hear themselves. How many time people have to post the
same information that other have posted before? Enough with this thread.
Time to kill it
WDA wrote:
Using Mozilla 0.9.8, can someone tell me how to turn on favaicons?
Thanks
read 0.9.8 release notes for starters.
Peemm wrote:
Spam is easily ignored. With a little experience you can always tell
from the subject or the sender line whether it's spam or not. Just
scroll past it. It's not a big deal. (Am I wrong to believe that it is
you that cannot keep yourself from opening these posts..?)
Yes, you
Peemm wrote:
I don't believe in calling for the police every time someone does
something bad.
I agree with you.
No, in practice you don't.
Why do you think so?
/Jonas
Jiri Znamenacek wrote:
Is there a way of changing account email to another one?
The option to change it through your Bugzilla preferences is being
worked on, but for now you'll have to email [EMAIL PROTECTED] and ask him
to change it for you.
/Jonas
On 03/06/2002 12:18 AM, Bundy wrote:
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/latest-0.9.9
Not even Garcia knew about this, which shocks me.
Guess not but maybe my header info User_Agent string may save me !!!
It's a peice of shit though.
You're entitled to your foul opinion.
On 03/06/2002 12:25 AM, Jason Fleshman wrote:
Bundy wrote:
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/latest-0.9.9
Not even Garica knew about this, which shocks me.
It's a peice of shit though.
You have an incomplete understanding of how the Mozilla builds work.
Anything in the latest
dman84 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
WDA wrote:
Using Mozilla 0.9.8, can someone tell me how to turn on favaicons?
Thanks
read 0.9.8 release notes for starters.
Specifically, the relevant portion says:
# Mozilla no longer reads /favicon.ico
Thank you very much ^_^
Jirka
RV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 06 Mar 2002:
Gosh:
People love to hear themselves. How many time people have to post
the same information that other have posted before? Enough with
this thread. Time to kill it
The easiest thing to do is just
High all,
Using the win32 version of 0.9.8 for a couple days now. I have just
noticed some odd behavior though. When I click the minimiz button, Moz
doesn't minimize. It's strange. If I have multiple programs running
with their windows displayed, then clicking on the minimize button will
Mark wrote:
High all,
Using the win32 version of 0.9.8 for a couple days now. I have just
noticed some odd behavior though. When I click the minimiz button, Moz
doesn't minimize. It's strange. If I have multiple programs running
with their windows displayed, then clicking on the
Guenter Huerkamp wrote:
Can someone tell me why my banking site produce an empty page with
mozilla build 20020228.
Thanks
script language=JavaScript1.2
var ns4 = (document.layers) ? 1 : 0;
var ie4 = (document.all) ? 1 : 0;
if(ie4){document.write('frameset border=0
Kryptolus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Mark wrote:
High all,
Using the win32 version of 0.9.8 for a couple days now. I have just
noticed some odd behavior though. When I click the minimiz button, Moz
doesn't minimize. It's strange. If
DeMoN LaG wrote:
The easiest thing to do is just plonk, killfile, or pass over anything
by that little troll who started the thread
People using Mozilla don't have a killfile or newsfilter. You lucky
Xnews-User you. :-))
--
Five exclamation marks, the sure sign of an insane mind.
(Terry
51 matches
Mail list logo
