I downloaded Mozilla 0.9.9 on my NT4.0/SP6 system. I found that the Navigator
components hangs on startup. Mail/News works fine, unless one opens Sidebar and
clicks on Bookmarks. In this case Mail/News will hang also. So I suspect loading
bookmarks is causing the problem. This problem did not
I had an idea for a feature for the tabbed browser: the titles of tabs
whose contents have not yet been viewed (that is, the page just loaded
and the tab is not active) should show up in bold, and those of tabs
whose contents have changed since being last viewed (that is, the tab
was active
Glenn Miller wrote:
On 22 Mar 2002, Jay Garcia was seen to have posted this wee note into
netscape.public.mozilla.general, to which I have responded as follows:
The build date is 03-14-2002 but that doesn't mean that it's using the
0.9.9 Gecko engine.
I didn't know that there was a
My about: page reads Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US;
rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020314 Netscape6/6.5;
I guess the 0.9.4.1 base explains the lack of tabbed browsing.
Wasn't NS 6.2.1 based on Moz 0.9.4?
I just tried it and it says 0.9.4 something ... yeah netscape 6.2.1
was based on
Garth Wallace escribió
Standard date of day/month/year? Huh?
Are you British?
i have understood that in southamerica read and write the date in the same
order.
Morbid as your post may seem, I actually agree with you!
Sounds good to me. But I'd only do one bug - bold for tabs
not-yet-viewed. Because what would you underline? What does partly
read mean when talking about a Navigator tab?
Garth Wallace wrote:
The general rule would be: boldface means totally
new/unread, underline means partly read,
dman84 wrote:
Patrick Gallagher wrote:
With Netscape 4.xx, you could upload a file to an FTP server by going
to that server in a broser window and dragging files onto the window
(not an effective way to upload an entire website, but perfect for a
quick fix) - in mozilla, dragging a file
jim patriarca wrote:
Does anybody know why when setting action=mailto:; in an HTML form
NS6 launches its Email program instead of popping up the the alert box
that says something like you are about to send your email address
over the internet etc..
Mozilla/NS6 doesn't support mailto:;
Mr Ducky wrote:
Also, the window it is opening may already exist. It seems reasonable
to always allow window.open to work if the named window already exists
(it isn't opening a new window, just getting a pointer to an old
window).
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104470
/Jonas
Travis Crump wrote:
Win 2K, build# 2002032003, Ctrl++ does nothing, Ctrl+- makes the text
smaller (zooms out). Ctrl+= makes the text larger (zooms in). Is this a bug?
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54402 (VERIFIED WONTFIX)
The Verified wontfix relates to the fact that Ctrl+=
Garth Wallace wrote:
Glenn Miller wrote:
On 22 Mar 2002, Jay Garcia was seen to have posted this wee note into
netscape.public.mozilla.general, to which I have responded as follows:
The build date is 03-14-2002 but that doesn't mean that it's using the
0.9.9 Gecko engine.
I didn't
Hans-Peter Fischer wrote:
Peter Lairo wrote:
Remember, the wired box people were murderous criminals.
You really make it difficult for people not to call you an idiot. Every
decent source of information - including US media - speak of *suspected*
Al-Quaeda members, and Taliban
Hans-Peter Fischer wrote:
Peter Lairo wrote:
Tortured, who/where? That's new to me. I would certainly not agree
with that.
Read this:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/afghanistan/story/0,1284,665939,00.html
A very interesting article. I will have to investigate that further. I
would not
I am using Netscape Messaging Access SDK (Version3.5). I am having
problem while sending .zip and .rtf files as attachment. The
recipient#8217;s mail program ( we tested only with Microsoft
Outlook, Office97 ) does not recognize the attached file. The
attachment is saved with a decorative name
Ian Davey wrote:
Garth Wallace wrote:
Glenn Miller wrote:
On 22 Mar 2002, Jay Garcia was seen to have posted this wee note into
netscape.public.mozilla.general, to which I have responded as follows:
The build date is 03-14-2002 but that doesn't mean that it's using the
0.9.9 Gecko
Garth Almgren a dit :
Ian Davey wrote:
Garth Wallace wrote:
Glenn Miller wrote:
On 22 Mar 2002, Jay Garcia was seen to have posted this wee note
into netscape.public.mozilla.general, to which I have responded as
follows:
The build date is 03-14-2002 but that doesn't mean that it's
Luke wrote:
dman84 wrote:
it seems to be the case by design. Like if you use Word or something
you drag it to the window to view it.
Hmmm - I can what you're saying with the Word anaology, but I disagree -
the intuitive drag drop response when looking at an FTP server would
be to
Ian Davey wrote:
Least significant to most significant, or most significant to least
significant does seem to be pretty much a standard. I've never really
understood the logic behind the US format.
At least it is consistent with the way you write the date in American
English.
e.g. March
Pascal Chevrel wrote:
Well, many *American* people ;-)
I do not know any other people using this strange date format :-))
Pascal
Don't forget -- we Americans also insist that the metric system is too
confusing (that whole moving-the-decimal thing, I guess), and only
recently
David Debono [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Out of genuine interest why? I remember the first www type browsers
(they did make using the internet far easier!) but why particularly
Netscape and animated gifs and not the others?
Netscape was the
Christopher Jahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Best asked in:
snews://secnews.netscape.com/netcape.communicator
And also try:
http://ufaq.org
Thanks.
And it came to pass that Glenn Miller wrote:
On 22 Mar 2002, Jay Garcia was seen to have posted this wee
note into netscape.public.mozilla.general, to which I have
responded as follows:
The build date is 03-14-2002 but that doesn't mean that
it's using the 0.9.9 Gecko engine.
I didn't
Garth Almgren wrote:
I see your point and like the idea of least to greatest, but many people
have been trained too well. Whenever I see something like 070101 I
immediately think July 1st, 2001.
That reminds me on a show of Jay Leno. He was asking people on the
street about conversion
George Copeland wrote:
I am looking for the version number of the first release of Netscape
Navigator that would display animated gifs, and the exact date of its
release. If anyone knows or remembers any of the details surrounding the
first use of animated gifs on the web, I would be delighted
Christopher Jahn wrote:
Because that's some weird ass non-standard date format.
This side of the pond uses mmdd.
;-)
What's more weird?
small unit - medium unit - large unit or
medium unit - small unit - large unit?
:-Þ
--
Everyone who sends advertisement to me agrees to pay a fee of
On 3/22/2002 8:48 AM, Glenn Miller apparently wrote exactly the following:
On 22 Mar 2002, Jay Garcia was seen to have posted this wee note into
netscape.public.mozilla.general, to which I have responded as follows:
The build date is 03-14-2002 but that doesn't mean that it's using the
Chris I [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Try: http://sillydog.org/narchive/
Thanks that is very useful.
David Debono [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Yes indeed. it rather took over from Mosaic and at the time IE was a
bit of a no-goer. I suppose I was interested in your line of research
really. Netscape has rather lost the plot recently with
Sounds good to me. But I'd only do one bug - bold for tabs
not-yet-viewed. Because what would you underline? What does partly
read mean when talking about a Navigator tab?
Garth Wallace wrote:
The general rule would be: boldface means totally
new/unread, underline means partly read,
So in the case of 5693, the mozilla1.0+ keyword means that it really
should be in 1.0, but the nsbeta1- keyword means that the netscape.com
people don't have time to fix it, and the target milstone of
mozilla1.2beta is when it will probably end up being fixed if no one
volunteers to do
The only difference is the Gecko.
That is, unfortunately, an illusion. It's the same Gecko. That date
refers to the build date, and not the branch date.
We are currently in the last stages of changing the User Agent standard
to eliminate this problem.
Gerv
I don't know if this is it, but it says in
http://home.netscape.com/eng/mozilla/ns62/relnotes/62.html:
If you have the Crescendo 5.01 plug-in, you must update to the latest
version of Crescendo. Otherwise, Netscape may crash at startup.
Do you have crescendo?
Regards,
Bamm
Date Noorlag [EMAIL
There is no world-wide standard.
That's not quite true - 2002-03-14 is ISO date format (one of the ISO
standards.)
Gerv
Christopher Jahn wrote:
From today's Miami Herald:
http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/business/2887457.htm
Not a bad review. Wait until the author gets to taste whatever Netscape
gets to be based on Moz .99 or later!
In Moz for the Mac, the Help menu is on the far right, to the
right of Debug and QA.
In Moz for Window, the Help menu is between Tasks and
Debug.
Why the difference?
And it came to pass that Martin Fritsche wrote:
Christopher Jahn wrote:
Because that's some weird ass non-standard date format.
This side of the pond uses mmdd.
;-)
What's more weird?
small unit - medium unit - large unit or
medium unit - small unit - large unit?
:-Þ
When we
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002 12:53:40 GMT, George Copeland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
David Debono [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Yes indeed. it rather took over from Mosaic and at the time IE was a
bit of a no-goer. I suppose I was interested in your
Christopher Jahn wrote:
A fur trapper may walk into a saloon after months in the woods,
and ask the date.
It's September, stranger. The 23rd, to be exact he might be
told. A Saturday.
LOL
--
Everyone who sends advertisement to me agrees to pay a fee of 10 Euro.
David Debono [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Far enough. Are you going back to the internet pre-html days as well?
It always makes me smile when people say the internet was created in
1991 (or whatever). Not many people remember BIX, CIX, early
I downloaded version 0.9.9 20020320 and it came with download manager,
then I decided to download today latest build and it came with out the
manager.
Is this a stand alone feature, if so were can I downloaded?
If not, is there a way to keep the manager and upgrade to the latest build?
Thank
dman84 wrote:
What platform are you on? try taking the plugins from mozilla/plugins
directory and copy them to your profile application/data/mozilla/plugins
directory you can put there also..
what urls have you seen this on? and have you tried to delete all your
(if win32)
On 3/22/2002 2:11 PM, Gervase Markham apparently wrote exactly the
following:
There is no world-wide standard.
That's not quite true - 2002-03-14 is ISO date format (one of the ISO
standards.)
Hmm... I seem to recall that I read a recommendation for that format in
a DIN (Deutsche
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
jim patriarca wrote:
Does anybody know why when setting action=mailto:; in an HTML form
NS6 launches its Email program instead of popping up the the alert box
that says something like you are about to send your email address
over the
Mario Martinez wrote:
Hi:
I downloaded version 0.9.9 20020320 and it came with download manager,
then I decided to download today latest build and it came with out the
manager.
Is this a stand alone feature, if so were can I downloaded?
If not, is there a way to keep the manager and
Most Plugin folks have gone on to other projects and there is very
little interest in changing.
I have yet to get Quicktime 5.02 on the mac platform to work. Even with
just the quicktime plugin installe along with the Java plugin and the
default plugin.
whereever there is supposed to be a sound
On 3/22/2002 3:26 PM, Mario Martinez apparently wrote exactly the following:
Hi:
I downloaded version 0.9.9 20020320 and it came with download manager,
then I decided to download today latest build and it came with out the
manager.
Go to Tasks | Tools and make sure Download Mgr is there.
I wanted to be able to run Quicktime animations through Mozilla. I
moved the plugin to the Mozilla plugin directory. The animations work
fine but the accompanying sounds are all 'garbled' or staticy sounding.
Any suggestions on how to correct this? The sounds on Flash
animations work
dman84 wrote:
What platform are you on? try taking the plugins from mozilla/plugins
directory and copy them to your profile application/data/mozilla/plugins
directory you can put there also..
what urls have you seen this on? and have you tried to delete all your
(if win32)
On 3/22/2002 3:44 PM, Johnny Cage apparently wrote exactly the following:
check in your browser preferences then in navigator you should see a
option call downloads
That panel apparently got backed out for now. I no longer have it in
2002-03-22-03 which I just installed.
--
Regards,
Sören
I've already post this message to the layout forum but i didn't get
any answer so I hope I'll have more luck here.
The message :
HI!
If we look at the plan at http://www.mozilla.org/docs/url_load.html,
we can see that a nsCSSFrameConstructor is used in order to create a
Frame Hierarchy.
Hi
I am having problems after installing Mozilla ( 0.99) in a win2k machine
I was using Netscape 6.2.1 and just installed Mozilla 0.99 and Mozilla settings
went for Netscape 4.76
How can I tell mozilla to go to another directory to read/save mail/news ?
Is it possible for Mozilla to share the
Hi Johnny,
Not sure why I couldn't see this message in my Mozilla mail.
Answering your question, no BrowserG! install will not overwrite the
latest milestone as it saves the Mozilla 0.9.2 in a sub directory
under the BrowserG directory, it also doesn't change any registry
entries. I run it all
[This followup was posted to netscape.public.mozilla.general and a copy
was sent to the cited author.]
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
On 03/21/2002 12:28 PM, alpha wrote:
Sometime ago there was a url to a mozilla project that would let you add
search engines to
On 3/22/2002 4:26 PM, Martin Fritsche apparently wrote exactly the
following:
Sören Kuklau wrote:
Hmm... I seem to recall that I read a recommendation for that format
in a DIN (Deutsche Industrie-Norm / German industry standard)
Arg! DIN means Deutsches Institut für Normung / German
Sören Kuklau wrote:
See http://www.raumausstattung.de/999/533.html . Both applies. And no
need to get angry.
Go to http://www.din.de/
They know how they are called :-)
--
Everyone who sends advertisement to me agrees to pay a fee of 10 Euro.
On 3/22/2002 5:12 PM, Martin Fritsche apparently wrote exactly the
following:
Sören Kuklau wrote:
See http://www.raumausstattung.de/999/533.html . Both applies. And no
need to get angry.
Go to http://www.din.de/
They know how they are called :-)
Yes, I went there, and it is pretty clear
David Debono [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I think that the relevance was that these dissonent systems of
interconnectivity. email and such like, were brought together,
struggling, and unified in a disjointed manner.
Before TCP/IP, such
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002 16:25:05 GMT, George Copeland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
David Debono [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I think that the relevance was that these dissonent systems of
interconnectivity. email and such like, were brought together,
Glenn Miller wrote:
Why not use the standard date of day/month/year - instead of some cockeyed
arrangement with the day after the month but before the year.
Actually, the ISO standard (I'm told is)
YEAR-MONTH-DAY
which is actually the Japneese way of doing things. It's also the usual
way
Gervase Markham wrote:
We hope that Mozilla coders, from all areas of the community, will
concentrate on 1.0+ bugs (this means you, dear reader), but we can't
easily force them to do so.
Where do we sign up? :o)
Search Bugzilla for 1.0+ bugs and see if there's any you are able to
Patrick Gallagher wrote:
With Netscape 4.xx, you could upload a file to an FTP server by going to
that server in a broser window and dragging files onto the window (not
an effective way to upload an entire website, but perfect for a quick
fix) - in mozilla, dragging a file into the window
I have made yet again new startup page for Mail News. Now it fits
better to Modern theme and also classic. Now it has also some Moz gfx
:-P. http://www26.brinkster.com/archonon/mozillamail/mailnews.html
Anyway, I noticed that Mozilla have some problems rendering .PNG images
(check
On 3/22/2002 4:53 PM Alvaro Garriga wrote:
How can I tell mozilla to go to another directory to read/save mail/news ?
Give the path to your directories here:
Edit / Mail Newsgroup Account Settings / Server Settings / Local
direrctory
Max
I posted this previously in n.p.m.prefs, but there isn't much activity
there, so I thought I'd try over here
I'm hoping someone might be able to help with this.
A while back, I installed a test build containing a bug fix patch. It
didn't work right so I uninstalled it and went back to
Is not there, they took it out, it was working fine.
Sören Kuklau wrote:
On 3/22/2002 3:26 PM, Mario Martinez apparently wrote exactly the
following:
Hi:
I downloaded version 0.9.9 20020320 and it came with download manager,
then I decided to download today latest build and it came with
On Friday 22 March 2002 3:13 am, Christopher Jahn wrote:
Is it actually an Islamic Democracy, or is it a democracy with
a large Islamic population?
Who cares?
Anyway its got nothing to do with U.S. Export Restrictions of
cryptography. For Pete's sake, KILL THIS THREAD!
--
Graham
I found it, is under tools.
Mario Martinez wrote:
Hi:
I downloaded version 0.9.9 20020320 and it came with download manager,
then I decided to download today latest build and it came with out the
manager.
Is this a stand alone feature, if so were can I downloaded?
If not, is there a way
BAHAHHAHAHAHHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAH!!!
YOU AOL EMPLOYEES KNOW WHAT I'M LAUGHING MY KIESTER OFF ABOUT!!!
For those of you who don't, read these HILARIOUS articles:
AOL mail: OK for others, not itself
http://www.msnbc.com/news/727898.asp?cp1=1
Return to sender: AOL nixes
David Debono [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I think that is a bit simplistic. When TCP/IP was shoehorned on-top of
these other systems a type of interconnectivity was achieved getting
progressively better as the old systems gradually died out.
Roope Lehmuslehto wrote:
I have made yet again new startup page for Mail News. Now it fits
better to Modern theme and also classic. Now it has also some Moz gfx
:-P. http://www26.brinkster.com/archonon/mozillamail/mailnews.html
Anyway, I noticed that Mozilla have some problems rendering
Nigel L wrote:
Nigel L responds:
Brian Heinrich wrote:
Nigel L wrote:
www.xulplanet.com added GreyModern and Pinball themes for Mozilla
0.9.9 on March 17. Latter adds pleasing splashes of color atop
Navigator (only). I'd welcome word of which build will break them
since I usually
Can someone on a fast machine count up how many lines of C, C++, XUL,
JavaScript, etc Mozilla is now?
Ed wrote:
I posted this previously in n.p.m.prefs, but there isn't much activity
there, so I thought I'd try over here
I'm hoping someone might be able to help with this.
A while back, I installed a test build containing a bug fix patch. It
didn't work right so I uninstalled it
dman84 [EMAIL PROTECTED] had written:
| Mark Roberts wrote:
| On my Red Hat 7.2 system, Mozilla 0.9.9 is printing italic fonts as
| Helvetica normal, rather than Times Roman italic.
[...]
| I cannot seem to find *any* location where the fonts for printing
| are determined. I hope they're
Hi,
I'm in the early stages of embedding gecko in my own MFC test application.
So far, I am only calling NS_InitEmbedding( nsnull, provider );
My provider class is currently identical to winEmbedFileLocProvider.
I'm getting a curious failure inside NS_InitEmbedding.
Internally this function
Garth Almgren wrote:
Luke wrote:
dman84 wrote:
it seems to be the case by design. Like if you use Word or something
you drag it to the window to view it.
Hmmm - I can what you're saying with the Word anaology, but I disagree
- the intuitive drag drop response when looking at an
Luke wrote:
I don't know what this would take programming-wise, but I'd expect it to
be targetted Future...
I like this feature. Go ahead and file the bug, it shouldn't be
difficult, you just trigger on the same event as the annoying rotating
arrow:
*when it starts loading, change the
Colin Blake wrote:
Can someone on a fast machine count up how many lines of C, C++, XUL,
JavaScript, etc Mozilla is now?
a lot :]
grayrest
grayrest wrote:
Garth Almgren wrote:
Luke wrote:
dman84 wrote:
it seems to be the case by design. Like if you use Word or
something you drag it to the window to view it.
Hmmm - I can what you're saying with the Word anaology, but I
disagree - the intuitive drag drop response
Colin Blake wrote:
Can someone on a fast machine count up how many lines of C, C++, XUL,
JavaScript, etc Mozilla is now?
devo:mozilla 262: find mozilla \( -name \*.xul -o -name \*.js -o -name
\*.cpp -o -name \*.h \) | xargs -n 50 wc -l | fgrep total | awk '{print
$1}' | add
2824938
Does anybody know why Netscape would not save settings (window sizes, etc.)
from session to session? It is very annoying to have to reset them every
time I start up!
Please help!
dan
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002 19:39:33 GMT, George Copeland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
David Debono [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I think that is a bit simplistic. When TCP/IP was shoehorned on-top of
these other systems a type of interconnectivity was
Hi,
Please point me to the correct newsgroup if this is incorrect.
In my web application I want to browser cache to load pages quickly.
But I also want to ping my backend to determine if any data is updated
before the browser displays the page. The page is dynamically generated.
If yes, then
Colin Blake wrote:
Can someone on a fast machine count up how many lines of C, C++, XUL,
JavaScript, etc Mozilla is now?
http://kryptolus.com/report.txt
[Warning: might be very inaccurate]
David Debono [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
They still exist and are being used, although not as much as before.
What is interesting about TCP/IP as a way of communicating is that
there are now many differing systems with a shared connectivity
JTK wrote:
BAHAHHAHAHAHHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAH!!!
YOU AOL EMPLOYEES KNOW WHAT I'M LAUGHING MY KIESTER OFF ABOUT!!!
For those of you who don't, read these HILARIOUS articles:
AOL mail: OK for others, not itself
http://www.msnbc.com/news/727898.asp?cp1=1
Return
RV wrote:
JTK wrote:
BAHAHHAHAHAHHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAH!!!
YOU AOL EMPLOYEES KNOW WHAT I'M LAUGHING MY KIESTER OFF ABOUT!!!
For those of you who don't, read these HILARIOUS articles:
AOL mail: OK for others, not itself
http://www.msnbc.com/news/727898.asp?cp1=1
RV wrote:
And here is a URL so that you can ROTFL (roll on the floor laughing) ...
as AOLers say.
ooops, I was LMHO and forgot to include the link
http://www.osopinion.com/perl/story/15295.html
Try: http://sillydog.org/narchive/
Thanks that is very useful.
Are you going to publish a paper on this? It's interesting, especially
to one who has used Netscape since v.1 and is still a member of the
loyal and faithful.
ML
how can i disable the file:// access to machine in linux??
any idea ??
thanks
--
\\|//
(o o)
oOOo-(_)-oOOo
Uxio Faria Giraldez
-
SISTEMAS PRISACOM
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TLF: 91 353 7812
-
Luke wrote:
Sounds good to me. But I'd only do one bug - bold for tabs
not-yet-viewed. Because what would you underline? What does partly
read mean when talking about a Navigator tab?
Hmm...I'm having a hard time explaining what I mean. A tab would be
partly read if it was viewed when
Patrick Gallagher wrote:
grayrest wrote:
I remember bits and pieces of Basic, Fortran,
Pascal, and Prolog (there's a (NOT) useful programming language) but I
haven't touched anything like that in 12 years.
10 PRINT HELP!
20 GOSUB 10
30 END (I know... with the GOSUB it isn't
Garth Wallace wrote:
Patrick Gallagher wrote:
grayrest wrote:
I remember bits and pieces of Basic, Fortran, Pascal, and Prolog
(there's a (NOT) useful programming language) but I haven't touched
anything like that in 12 years.
10 PRINT HELP!
20 GOSUB 10
30 END (I know... with the
Garth Wallace wrote:
Patrick Gallagher wrote:
10 PRINT HELP!
20 GOSUB 10
30 END (I know... with the GOSUB it isn't necessary, but shortcuts
aren't cool ;)
Shouldn't that be GOTO? I still remember bits of BASIC...
GOSUB is also possible but not very good here.
GOSUB is like a procedure
Patrick Gallagher wrote:
Garth Wallace wrote:
Patrick Gallagher wrote:
grayrest wrote:
I remember bits and pieces of Basic, Fortran, Pascal, and Prolog
(there's a (NOT) useful programming language) but I haven't touched
anything like that in 12 years.
10 PRINT HELP!
20 GOSUB 10
30
you probably have a user.js UA override.. that gives you the same problem..
-dman84
Thanks for the suggestion. I checked, and I have no user.js anywhere,
so it must be something else.
I decided not to screw with it anymore and just made a new profile. I'm
slowly copying all my
I've just tested the newest nightly build for Linux. There seems to be
an error in the internet search function. I've configured Mozilla to use
Google for searching. When I use the search item in the URL-bar nothing
happens. When I press the 'Search' button it opens the Netscape-search.
Anyone
I like this feature. Go ahead and file the bug, it shouldn't be
difficult, you just trigger on the same event as the annoying rotating
arrow:
*when it starts loading, change the style to underline,
*when load complete and window is not focused, change to bold, set a flag,
*on focus, clear
10 PRINT HELP!
20 GOSUB 10
30 END (I know... with the GOSUB it isn't necessary, but shortcuts
aren't cool ;)
Help!
Help!
HeC^
Patrick
Shouldn't that be ^C?
QuickBasic translation:
PrintHelp:
PRINT Help!
Goto PrintHelp
:)
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
