Re: Download manager

Hi! Pratik wrote: > Its part of the MachV spec so I gues it should be in. But I can't > believe they used the tree widget for the Download Manager. Why didn't > they use outliner? There's a bug for converting all tree widgets to > outliner and they go ahead and write up new code that uses the tre

Re: Repeat after me....(another tirade on Mozilla cookie handling)

Hi! psmith wrote: > > Christian Mattar wrote: > > >Hi! > > > >psmith wrote: > > > >(psmith's ranbling snipped) > > > >I just checked, Mozilla's and Communicator cookie-files look exactly the > >same, the< use the same

Re: Repeat after me....(another tirade on Mozilla cookie handling)

Hi! psmith wrote: (psmith's ranbling snipped) I just checked, Mozilla's and Communicator cookie-files look exactly the same, the< use the same spec from . I suggest you inform yourself properly next time before throwing around any invalid cl

Re: Collapsible Tree Menu: IE only?

Hi! Yatsu wrote: > > > > > so.. > > > > if(document.getElementByID("foldheader")) > > I'm afraid the javascript console complains at this line. > "document.getElementByID is not a function." It's 'getElementById', not 'getElementByID'. Christian

Re: P.S. (was: Re: IE6.0 Released)

Hi! JTK wrote: > > Now, > > if we're talking SECONDS that may be a different matter. Who gives a > > ratsazz if one is 2 ms faster than the other ??? And besides, in order > > to post a true value you have to run these so-called speed tests in a > > sterile medium without the benefit of congesti

Re: DIV handling in netscape

Hi! Steve Bowen wrote: > > Hi > I can't help, but just ran across a simular problem. > http://www.virtualmechanics.com/ > Thing is this page looks okay in IE 5.5 and Opera 5.12. > And you know how picky Opera can be. > In Mozilla 0.9.2 and NS 6.01 this page looks terrible. Everything > is out of

Re: Mozilla and Ultra DMA

Hi! DeMoN_LaG wrote: > Since UDMA does nothing to hurt performance or stability in any way, > there is really no reason to NOT install busmastering drivers that > support it anyhow. This is not strictly true. There were/are some problems with VIA chipsets and SB-Live and some general bugs in

Re: poor HTML on mozilla.org

Hi! Mama Cass Elliot wrote: > > In netscape.public.mozilla.general the people heard Henno Buschmann say > these wise words: > > > Hallo, > > > > Gervase Markham wrote: > > > >>>It doesn't matter how many browser you checked. You will never have > >>>chacked it on all. > * Please k

Re: Netscape 6.1 instead of 6.5?

Hi! jesus X wrote: > > > but Netscape is the primary contributor to Mozilla. > > Pretty much the only contributor. It'd be interesting to see some > > numbers. > > IBM is doing the whole BiDi section. Intel contributed the cache code a while > ago. RedHat has a full time employee doing NOTHING

Re: Netscape has pulled secnews.netscape.com service

Hi! Jay Garcia wrote: > > Christian Mattar wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > It seems secnews is back on its feet, even on the secure port. > > > > Christian > > And not only that, we're still in the Browser business .. fancy that !! > :o) It

Re: Netscape has pulled secnews.netscape.com service

Hi! It seems secnews is back on its feet, even on the secure port. Christian

Re: CSS Support in composer

Hi! Chris Howells wrote: > > I don't see a more specific group, so I'll post here... > > Does Mozilla Composer (0.9) have any support for CSS? AFAIK the composer does interpret CSS in the same way as the browser does, but does not produce CSS (or only if you specify it manually) in most cases.

Re: What does "Resolving host" mean?

Hi! Mama Cass Elliot wrote: > > In netscape.public.mozilla.general the people heard DeMoN_LaG say these > wise words: > > > Resolving host means looking up the address. > > Then why don't we simply call the process of looking up the IP number > "Searching DNS for IP number" instead of "resolvi

Re: Anyone checked out that tab feature on galeon?

Hi! "Ian S. Nelson" wrote: > > I think it is pretty cool. Is there XUL code for making tabs and what > have you? How hard do you think it would be to implement if I was to > try my hand at it? > > Ian I think there's some project on Mozdev for this. If you look for another example, ActiveSta

Re: AOL to buy Opera?

Hi! Bart Meerdink wrote: > > Maybe this is flamebait in this newsgroup, but that's not my intention. > > People who have tried Opera on Linux migtht ask themselves if Opera > isn't a lot closer to what Mozilla should be than Mozilla itself (wrt > functionality, I'm not speaking about the open s

Re: Info on Nighlies

Hi! Roger Martensson wrote: > > Hi! > > Is there a way quick get a glance on what has happened between nightlies? > (Maybe a quick-link from the nightly-download on the mainpage?) There's a link to the latest checkins into the tree on mozilla.org's mainpage. However, these changes will usually

Re: Can my computer handle Mozilla?

Hi! JTK wrote: > > Gervase Markham wrote: > > > > > > Browse a chosen 20 > > > > sites in the two browsers (of equal HTML and CSS functionality), then > > > > check the memory usage. > > > > > > Ah, Mr. Markham, do you *really* want me to do that, and report back > > > with the results? > > > >

Re: Looking good - but hope for lower resources/memory?

Hi! Fabian Guisset wrote: > > Christian Mattar wrote: > > > The XPConnectifying of the DOM will reduce memory size about 10%. That's > > not too bad, IMO... > > > > Christian > Where do you have this info from? I think I saw it on one of the branch/

Re: Looking good - but hope for lower resources/memory?

Hi! JTK wrote: > > > The footprint will probably not be reduced *much* lower, although > > it does get better with every release. > > No, it doesn't. Since I've been squealing about Mozilla's use of 20MB+ > to display a blank page, do you know where we sit today? Yep: 20MB+ to > display a bl

Re: no scrollbar when document.write frame content!

Hi! Anthony Evans wrote: > > Hello Christian > > I just downloaded Mozilla 0.8.1 and the bug still occurs. > > Do you have a bug number I can update at bugzilla? > > Thanks > Tony The bug is 55334 I think. I just saw that only a workaround got checked in. You gotta try if it works for you. 0

Re: no scrollbar when document.write frame content!

Hi! Anthony Evans wrote: > > Thank you, Christian. > > Since I'm writing a commercial application, I need to stick with the lastest > release of Netscape. Do you know when the next release of Netscape will be > that encompasses all the bug fixes or alternatively, how to make this work > in NN

Re: no scrollbar when document.write frame content!

Hi! Anthony Evans wrote: > > Greetings all > > If you document.close(), document.open(), then document.write() the > *contents* of a frame, and those contents are long enough to warrant a > scroll bar, Netscape 6.01 won't give you one. > > If you try to fool it by loading a SPAN or DIV in to t

Re: Mozilla at a GLANCE

Hi! JTK wrote: > > Well now, I'll admit that the old peepers ain't what they used to be, > but I ain't exactly ready for one of them Braille mice yet! Sheesh, > check out this screenshot of the latest nightly. And no, I didn't do > anything but install it. Yeah, I know what you mean. Just adj

Re: Happy 3rd Birthday Mozilla :-)

Hi! JTK wrote: > > jesus X wrote: > > > > JTK wrote: > > > > Because, as someone else explained, the API for a file dialog is "Get > > > > me a filename, please". That for a tree control is somewhat more > > > > complex, > > > Not much more. "Display this tree of items, please". "Tell me the >

Re: Happy 3rd Birthday Mozilla :-)

Hi! JTK wrote: > > Gervase Markham wrote: > > > > > > The open/save dialog is skinnable on Linux because several window > > > > managers support themes. So the dialog is skinnable, but not through > > > > Mozilla's skins. That's why he added the winking smiley. > > > > > > Ah, ok. > > > > Perhap

Re: Happy 3rd Birthday Mozilla :-)

Hi! JTK wrote: > > Garth Wallace wrote: > > > > JTK wrote: > > > > > Gervase Markham wrote: > > >> JTK wrote: > > >>> > > > > >>> and attempting to explain why people are reinventing every UI > > >>> wheel in sight. > > >> > > >> Blame the W3C and CSS 2 :-) > > > > > > For making the Mozilla pr

Re: need to crash mozilla?

Hi! Scott Tran wrote: > > Torgeir Veimo wrote: > > >Go to http://geek.com/pdageek/pdamain.htm and move the pointer over the > >menus (eg. "JobGeek") . > > > I hope you reported a bug on that I files bug 75590 Christian

Re: All new! - The Ultimate Internet Tool to Investigate Anyone or Anything!

Hi! > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Internet Investigator™ > > New for 2001 > Internet Software Program for Online Investigations > >- Find Out Anything about Anyone Online - Exactly this message spams the mozilla

Re: Start-Up behavior

Hi! JTK wrote: > > Christopher Jahn wrote: > > [snip] > > > I see no evidence that XP will be any better than any other MS > > peice of bloatware. > > > > Memory required for Mozilla to display a blank page: ~20MB. > > Don't cry to Redmond or anybody else about 'bloatware' until you remove >

Re: [Why not?] Mozilla without Java: faster, smaller, no crashes...

Hi! Carcarlo wrote: > > I think many people would appreciate a lot a Mozilla version without > Java, as Opera has done. > Many people (like me) disable Java so it's totally unnecessary for us. > It would be nice also to have a "browser only" version. > > Many many people use Eudora, Forte Agent

Re: why upgrade to netscape6?

Hi! Christopher Jahn wrote: > > And it came to pass that Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote: > > > > > > >Christopher Jahn wrote: > >> > >> And it came to pass that Richard Blair wrote: > >> > >> >So far I have seen very little reasoned arguments in > >> >favour of actually downloading 24Mb, to try

Re: CSS "color" and TABLE

Hi! Fredrik Larsson wrote: > > Hi, > > Is there some one that knows how CSS color attribute shulde work? > What I want to do is to specify the text color for a table row, > this works fine in IE but Mozilla0.8 won't add the specifyed color. > > Is this a known bug for Mozilla or is this wrong

Re: W3C: Common User Agent Problems...

Hi! Gervase Markham wrote: > > > After reading W3C's "Common User Agent Problems" > > (http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-cuap-20010206) - which of these "issues" > > are (still) present in your Zilla ? > > There is now a bug filed on each recommendation in this document. The > meta-bug is http://b

Re: W3C: Common User Agent Problems...

Hi! > After reading W3C's "Common User Agent Problems" > (http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-cuap-20010206) - which of these "issues" > are (still) present in your Zilla ? I took the liberty to convert the HTML-file into plaintext, so we can comment on this in the newsgroup. If you know any bug numb

Re: Bug in NS6 can anyone confirm?

Hi! madmax wrote: > > http://www.ncdesign.org/html/s050pos.htm#overflow > > Follow the above link and move the scroll bar in the third box up or down. > In my version of NS6 all the surrounding boxes started to shift left and > right. Can anyone confirm this? I was trying the CSS supporting abi

Re: mac NS6 & NS4.76 probs w/ frames and css

Hi! Ayende Rahien wrote: > That is also because netscape was the only widely used browser that > completely ignored standards. > You could usually write according to standards, and it would pretty much > work in all browsers except on Netscape. > That was why you had to implement layers for ne