Hi!

JTK wrote:

> > Now,
> > if we're talking SECONDS that may be a different matter. Who gives a
> > ratsazz if one is 2 ms faster than the other ??? And besides, in order
> > to post a true value you have to run these so-called speed tests in a
> > sterile medium without the benefit of congestion/connection anomalies.
> > What's 'faster' in one venue can be slower in another but we're still
> > talking milliseconds. BAH !! Nothing but marketing hype.
> >
> 
> Hmm.  I must be getting old.  Back in my day, if we wanted to compete
> with a competitor, instead of a litiniy of excuses, we simply produced a
> better product.  Or at least one with equal performance.

Well, that's sooo yesterday. Today, you just bundle it with the OS...

Christian

Reply via email to