Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
That won't
happen with individual bug pages.
Are you sure?
For example, the bugzilla front page has a link to Bugs Filed Today.
Mozilla.org has links to mostfrequent bugs and I think also a list to
bugs with most votes.
-- there are not so little bugs which would be
Nicolás Lichtmaier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
Because Google will index the full page, comments included. This is very
useful.
Because Google will be able to return Mozilla bug pages when you search
for other things not only bugs, when it finds that the bug is relevant
to the
Chris Hoess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
More to the point, this is solving a problem that doesn't exist. It's
already quite possible to do a full-text search on Bugzilla comments. The
problem is that one tends to get either no results, or far too many.
Well if there are only seconds and no objections I think it should be
done. Somebody could just rm robotx.txt...
This is not a good idea. Google's index of a bug would rapidly go out of
date.
You are solving the wrong problem. If Bugzilla's querying system makes
it hard for you to find the
Gervase Markham wrote:
Well if there are only seconds and no objections I think it should be
done. Somebody could just rm robotx.txt...
This is not a good idea. Google's index of a bug would rapidly go out of
date.
Yes and no. You're right that it'd go out of date /rapidly/ but sooner
Well if there are only seconds and no objections I think it should be
done. Somebody could just rm robotx.txt...
This is not a good idea. Google's index of a bug would rapidly go out of
date.
That's not a problem, because all Google needs to provide a search
result is to have some
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
Well if there are only seconds and no objections I think it should be
done. Somebody could just rm robotx.txt...
This is not a good idea. Google's index of a bug would rapidly go out of
date.
That's not a problem, because all Google
Yes and no. You're right that it'd go out of date /rapidly/ but sooner
or later it'll be indexed becoming avaiable and, IMO, the utility of the
Google (or your favorite search engine) indexing is more the ability to
able to search quickly in all the Bugzilla database and, once you had
Yes and no. You're right that it'd go out of date /rapidly/ but sooner
or later it'll be indexed becoming avaiable and, IMO, the utility of
the Google (or your favorite search engine) indexing is more the
ability to able to search quickly in all the Bugzilla database and,
once you had
that itself may be an issue. google will detect the frequent changes to
bugzilla's dynamic pages, and revisit them often. having googling
sucking down pretty much the entire contents of the bugzilla database at
frequent intervals could well be a significant burden on the bugzilla
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
having googling
sucking down pretty much the entire contents of the bugzilla database at
frequent intervals could well be a significant burden on the bugzilla
server(s)...
You are talking about how you think Google works. Google
In article a5e5kr$6nlkc$[EMAIL PROTECTED], michael lefevre wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
having googling
sucking down pretty much the entire contents of the bugzilla database at
frequent intervals could well be a significant burden on the bugzilla
something? The point is if there is a valid reson for *blocking* Google.
This hasn't been pointed out so I thought I'd mention it. Do we really
want a search for Mozilla by someone who doesn't understand what
bugzilla is to pull up results where a majority of them are bugs?
And why would
The 'normal pages' ? Bugzilla is already in the top ten results of a
search for 'mozilla'. What exactly are the pages that are going to be
more relevant?
Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
something? The point is if there is a valid reson for *blocking* Google.
This hasn't been pointed out so I
something? The point is if there is a valid reson for *blocking*
Google.
This hasn't been pointed out so I thought I'd mention it. Do we
really want a search for Mozilla by someone who doesn't understand
what bugzilla is to pull up results where a majority of them are bugs?
And why
Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
So I propose to change robots.txt to only disallow entries which causes
searchs in bugzilla, and allow http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi
at least.
I second the proposal, very often I thougt that using Google for my
queries on mozilla would have been
So I propose to change robots.txt to only disallow entries which
causes searchs in bugzilla, and allow
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi at least.
I second the proposal, very often I thougt that using Google for my
queries on mozilla would have been easier than using the query
Having the bug pages indexed by Google is of course a good thing:
* Google could be used to search if a bug has already been reported, and
it will probably make a better job than the current search system.
* If someone searchs about a company Google will probably shown an
evangelism bug
Currently bugzilla.mozilla.org disallow indexing by search engines. The
robots.txt file has:
User-agent: *
Allow: /index.html
Disallow: /
Having the bug pages indexed by Google is of course a good thing:
* Google could be used to search if a bug has already been reported, and
it will
Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
So I propose to change robots.txt to only disallow entries which causes
searchs in bugzilla, and allow http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi
at least.
I'm not sure that would work: many (most?) search engines disallow
searching anything with a ? in the URL. The
So I propose to change robots.txt to only disallow entries which causes
searchs in bugzilla, and allow http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi
at least.
I'm not sure that would work: many (most?) search engines disallow
searching anything with a ? in the URL. The only way to make this
Stuart Ballard wrote:
Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
So I propose to change robots.txt to only disallow entries which causes
searchs in bugzilla, and allow http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi
at least.
I'm not sure that would work: many (most?) search engines disallow
searching anything
22 matches
Mail list logo
