Brian Heinrich typed:
Christian Biesinger wrote:
Bundy wrote:
[java under windows]
1 file under windows? Name it.
NPOJI610.DLL
And you've found that file just using the JRE? I tried on several
occasions, with several JREs, and was only ever to find it using the
J2SDK 1.4.0,
Bundy wrote:
Someone brought up a point, why doesn't Mozilla simply put the latest
version of the java file in the plugin directory during installation?
Well, this might be due to licensing issues...
And, of course, Mozilla is not meant for end users. It's a vendor's job
to package plugins
Bundy wrote:
Fault and fact don't always equal. The fact is, installing plug-ins for
Mozilla takes a little bit of work.
Well. Mozilla can't do anything against it.
Note that Mozilla _is_ meant to be an easy to use product.
[...]
Mozilla is not meant to be an end-user product
I didn't say
Brian Heinrich wrote:
Christian Biesinger wrote:
[java plugin for windows]
NPOJI610.DLL
And you've found that file just using the JRE?
$ ls /mnt/c/Programme/JavaSoft/jre/1.4/bin/NPOJI*
/mnt/c/Programme/JavaSoft/jre/1.4/bin/NPOJI610.dll
As you can clearly see, this is a JRE, version 1.4.
Christian Biesinger wrote:
Brian Heinrich wrote:
Christian Biesinger wrote:
[java plugin for windows]
NPOJI610.DLL
And you've found that file just using the JRE?
$ ls /mnt/c/Programme/JavaSoft/jre/1.4/bin/NPOJI*
/mnt/c/Programme/JavaSoft/jre/1.4/bin/NPOJI610.dll
As you can
Someone brought up a point, why doesn't Mozilla simply put the latest
version of the java file in the plugin directory during installation?
Well, this might be due to licensing issues...
And, of course, Mozilla is not meant for end users. It's a vendor's job
to package plugins with the
We won't discuss the other plug-ins. To Mozilla's defense, it's not
meant to be an easy to use end user product.
Are you saying it's Mozilla's fault if the plugin's installation program
doesn't install correctly in Mozilla?
Note that Mozilla _is_ meant to be an easy to use product.
I
Till typed:
nf wrote in message ...
Question:
I've been considering upgrading from my Netscape 6.2.1 to Mozilla .99
for the speed improvements that I have been hearing about.
1) Is it as stable / problem free as my current Netscape installation?
2) Can I still access my Netscape WebMail
Bundy wrote:
[Mozilla vs Netscape 6.x]
1) It is more problem free... kind of... To get Java and plug-ins to
work takes a little bit of effort. (moving files, and a few .js file
tweaks)
I never needed to change a .js file to install Java, I only had to copy
(Windows) or symlink (linux) 1
Garth Wallace wrote:
nf wrote:
Question:
I've been considering upgrading from my Netscape 6.2.1 to Mozilla .99
for the speed improvements that I have been hearing about.
1) Is it as stable / problem free as my current Netscape installation?
Yes.
2) Can I still access my
Christian Biesinger typed:
Bundy wrote:
[Mozilla vs Netscape 6.x]
1) It is more problem free... kind of... To get Java and plug-ins to
work takes a little bit of effort. (moving files, and a few .js file
tweaks)
I never needed to change a .js file to install Java, I only had to copy
Bundy wrote:
[java under windows]
1 file under windows? Name it.
NPOJI610.DLL
Netscape 6.2.1 requires zero file
transfers to get Java working.
That's because it's installed using the installer. Note that the XPI
file for installing Java has also always worked when I tried, though the
hi kyle, or should i call you Netscape Basher, or Bundy? Man, you go
by many names
You've got to know exactly what files in what directory and
transfer to them to the current directory under Mozilla
same thing for IE, i once did a clean install of XP Pro, and for some
reason only
We won't discuss the other plug-ins. To Mozilla's defense, it's not
meant to be an easy to use end user product.
Are you saying it's Mozilla's fault if the plugin's installation program
doesn't install correctly in Mozilla?
Note that Mozilla _is_ meant to be an easy to use product.
I
Bamm Gabriana wrote:
We won't discuss the other plug-ins. To Mozilla's defense, it's not
meant to be an easy to use end user product.
Are you saying it's Mozilla's fault if the plugin's installation program
doesn't install correctly in Mozilla?
Note that Mozilla _is_ meant to be an easy to use
Bamm Gabriana typed:
We won't discuss the other plug-ins. To Mozilla's defense, it's not
meant to be an easy to use end user product.
Are you saying it's Mozilla's fault if the plugin's installation program
doesn't install correctly in Mozilla?
Fault and fact don't always equal. The fact is,
Christian Biesinger wrote:
Bundy wrote:
[java under windows]
1 file under windows? Name it.
NPOJI610.DLL
And you've found that file just using the JRE? I tried on several
occasions, with several JREs, and was only ever to find it using the
J2SDK 1.4.0, much to my annoyance. If
I've been considering upgrading from my Netscape 6.2.1 to Mozilla .99
for the speed improvements that I have been hearing about.
1) Is it as stable / problem free as my current Netscape installation?
2) Can I still access my Netscape WebMail account with it? (Important)
3) Is jumping from
nf wrote in message ...
Question:
I've been considering upgrading from my Netscape 6.2.1 to Mozilla .99
for the speed improvements that I have been hearing about.
1) Is it as stable / problem free as my current Netscape installation?
2) Can I still access my Netscape WebMail account with
nf wrote:
Question:
I've been considering upgrading from my Netscape 6.2.1 to Mozilla .99
for the speed improvements that I have been hearing about.
1) Is it as stable / problem free as my current Netscape installation?
Yes.
2) Can I still access my Netscape WebMail account with it?
20 matches
Mail list logo
