RE: [MP3 ENCODER] Concatenating wave files

2000-07-16 Thread Osamu Shigematsu
Read the source of get_audio.c. Check every header of every files, sample rate, bits, and so on. Then all are equal, skip wave header and concanate following PCM data into first file. Rewind the frist file, and set up new weve header. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mail

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Concatenating wave files

2000-07-16 Thread Robert Hegemann
Hi Chris! Christopher Wise schrieb am Mon, 17 Jul 2000: > I want to encode a number of wave files into a single mp3 file. > Since lame doesn't appear to be able to do this, the obvious solution > woudl be to concatenate the wave files first. Are there any utilites under > linux or windows (prefer

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparison

2000-07-16 Thread Robert Hegemann
David Bridson schrieb am Mon, 17 Jul 2000: > > In http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~djmrob/mp3decoders/index.html > >there's a comparison of mp3 decoders. Lame is one of the three that > passed > >the test (the other two are Winamp 2.22 and Ultra Player). But mpg123 > is > >not tested. What abo

[MP3 ENCODER] Concatenating wave files

2000-07-16 Thread Christopher Wise
I want to encode a number of wave files into a single mp3 file. Since lame doesn't appear to be able to do this, the obvious solution woudl be to concatenate the wave files first. Are there any utilites under linux or windows (preferrably both) that can do this in batch mode? Chris Wise -- MP3

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparison

2000-07-16 Thread Alberto García
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, David Bridson wrote: > > In http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~djmrob/mp3decoders/index.html > >there's a comparison of mp3 decoders. Lame is one of the three that > >passed the test (the other two are Winamp 2.22 and Ultra Player). > > But mpg123 is not tested. What about i

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparison

2000-07-16 Thread David Bridson
> In http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~djmrob/mp3decoders/index.html >there's a comparison of mp3 decoders. Lame is one of the three that passed >the test (the other two are Winamp 2.22 and Ultra Player). But mpg123 is >not tested. What about it? Does anyone know any decoding problem with it

[MP3 ENCODER] MP3 decoder comparison

2000-07-16 Thread Alberto García
In http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~djmrob/mp3decoders/index.html there's a comparison of mp3 decoders. Lame is one of the three that passed the test (the other two are Winamp 2.22 and Ultra Player). But mpg123 is not tested. What about it? Does anyone know any decoding problem with it?

Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Some observations of vbrtest problem

2000-07-16 Thread Robert Hegemann
Hi Naoki! > I think it is certain that this problem is caused by noises > concentrated on pure tones. > A noise on a single MDCT coefficient increases as it's > amplitude increases. This is because quantized values are > actually values powered by 3/4. > > According to the theory of psychoacous

[MP3 ENCODER] Some observations of vbrtest problem

2000-07-16 Thread Naoki Shibata
I think it is certain that this problem is caused by noises concentrated on pure tones. A noise on a single MDCT coefficient increases as it's amplitude increases. This is because quantized values are actually values powered by 3/4. According to the theory of psychoacoustic, it is a wonder why